The Parramatta Eels have today commenced legal proceedings against Zac Lomax. The purpose of the proceedings is to enforce the release agreed in November 2025.
We have endeavoured to resolve this by negotiations. This has included a formal independent mediation process with Zac Lomax and his legal team and representatives of the Melbourne Storm. However, no deal has been reached.
Zac’s legal team have informed us in writing that he does not agree that the terms of the release can be enforced against him. Regrettably, we have been left with no alternative, but to approach the NSW Supreme Court to resolve this issue.
In late July / early August, Zac requested a release from his playing contract with the Parramatta Eels to pursue opportunities outside the NRL. After a period of negotiation with Zac and his lawyers, the Parramatta Eels agreed to the terms of a release for Zac to pursue opportunities outside of the NRL. As part of the release granted on 16 November 2025, the Parramatta Eels included conditions to safeguard the Club.
One of those conditions was that Zac could not join another NRL Club before 31 October 2028 without our express written consent.
This protected the Parramatta Eels (and its Members and fans) from a football perspective heading into the 2026 season. It ensured the Club would not lose a representative player to another NRL club without receiving adequate compensation/benefit during the period of Zac’s original contract. Zac agreed to that condition after receiving legal advice.
Parramatta Eels Chairman Matthew Beach made the following comments:
“It is disappointing that we have reached this position, but we have an obligation to the Club’s stakeholders to protect the contractual rights of our Club and the expectation of our Members, players and supporters that contracts will be honoured.
“Back in November 2025, we granted Zac Lomax’s request for a release to pursue opportunities outside the NRL on the condition that he would not return to the NRL during the period of his original playing contract with our Club, without our written consent.”
”Zac had legal representation during the negotiations of his release. Zac accepted those conditions on the basis that he told us that his interests were focused on pursuing opportunities with rugby union, particularly R360. The release documentation was registered with the NRL. The NRL are aware of the conditions associated with the release.
“Our Club believes in the importance of observing contractual obligations. Contracts allow Clubs and players to operate with certainty and within a framework of rules. Contracts are the very stuff that any member of the community and companies have to honour in order to ensure that there is fair dealing. The same applies to the NRL, Clubs and players.
“Late last year, when we were approached by Melbourne Storm, we engaged with them in good faith however we have not been able to come to an agreement that would represent sufficient value for our Club, particularly in relation to our football program. The guiding position of our Club has been to ensure a fair exchange of value for our football program in circumstances where the Storm are attempting to obtain the benefit.”
“Zac and his agent still have an opportunity to work with us to explore options with the other 16 NRL clubs. Notwithstanding this action, we remain open to discussions with any Club who may be willing to offer the appropriate value for our football program.”
“Our coaching staff, players, Members and fans would not expect us to consent to the release based on what has been offered, and therefore we have no alternative but to pursue legal action to enforce the terms of the release and protect the rights of our Club.”
Arthur Moses SC has been retained by the Parramatta Eels to represent its interests in court,” added Beach.
Replies
How's the knitting going?
Melbourne took my best wool
yeah the court is only ruling on the validity of owning Zac's NrL playing rights. It would be up to the clubs to offer the right player for the Eels during negotiations to fully release Zac to them.
In two days, this blog has currently rocketed up the charts to 15th most popular blog in 1EE history, and second most popular posted in January. Well done to all the contributors!
May I ask for what no.1 is?
Probably 2009 Melbourne Under Bellamy Saga
LB, Here's the 1EE top 20 most viewed
Brett Finch on Matty Johns podcast (Fish, 2019)
Signing news (PouPou, 2019)
The Parramatta GOAT (Super, 2020)
Some big rumours circulating (Chief, 2025)
Dylan Brown open to offers (Super, 2025)
Dylan Brown Charged with 5 Counts of Sexual Touching (Johnny B Good, 2023)
Another Eels star on the radar of rival club (Analyst, 2021)
Does Nathan Cleary Have the biggest jaw in the NRL? (Andrew, 2020)
Dogs sign Mahoney (Analyst, 2021)
Bailey Simmonson requests release (Chiefy, 2025)
Reed backflips announces he will stay a Eel (Fandango, 2021)
Moses to stay at Eels (Driza, 2023)
Lachlan Galvin immediate release (Chief, 2025)
Eels right to question Moses loyalty (Analyst, 2022)
Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings...(Lurker, 2026)
Boom!! 4yr deal Eels Silva (Analyst, 2025)
Breaking - Parramatta Eels confirm current player is at centre of s...(Chiefy, 2021)
Eels expected to win the race- Pezet (Chiefy, 2025)
NQ Cowboys and Mackay Cutters junior coming to Parramatta (LB, 2024)
Eels new recruits for 2020 (Robert Maxwell, 2019)
Note: There are almost 45,000 blogs in total. Most of the top 100 (say 95%) are footy-player related narratives or signings.
Just playing devil's advocate here, but wasn't Galvin still under contract with the tigers when Parra was trying to recruit him?
We are arguing that there is one rule for the storm and one rule us, but really we do it too
Will. Yes you are corect in that Galvin was under contract when the Eels approached him. However the circumstances were different and the Eels approach was totally legal. At that time Richardson-Tigers CEO- had offered Galvin a large increse in salary and a long term deal. Galvin and his manager, Isaac Moses said no to the offer and also advised the Tigers that they did not respect Marshall as a coach as Galvin felt that he could not improve under Marshall's coaching. As a consequence of this occurence and the fact that the Tigers did not want any disruptions they allowed Galvin to negoitate with other teams immediately.
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
of 29 Next