Blogs

Eels Blogs

Add a blog

1Eyed Eel is all about participation. Don't be shy, have your say!

Social blogs are for members only. 
CLICK HERE TO JOIN!

Joel K replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"Pretty fair ranking regarding the Eels, although we have more depth then other clubs which isn't included in the rating
Putting Roosters at first is laughable, Broncos have the best pack in the comp "
3 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"We have more depth than most other clubs. The fact that they didn't even mention Moretti,  Guymer or Doorey shows our advantage "
8 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"I think its the case. Parra had to take it court as Lomax notified them he intended to ignore the conditions of his contract and sign with Melbourne."
1 hour ago
Bob Smith replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"The 'experts' always big note the Roosters. Expect them to fight hard for bottom half of the 8."
1 hour ago
Johnny Suede replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"The full 17
1. Roosters
2. Storm
3. Broncos
4. Dolphins
5. NZ
6. Sharks
7. Riff
8. Canberra
9. Parra
10. Tigers
11. Manly
12. Dogs
13. Rabbits
14. Cowboys
15. Dragons
16. Titans
17. Knights"
1 hour ago
Johnny Suede posted a discussion
The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/fear-factor-rotation-at... the engine room in all 17 NRL teams, but some forward packs…
See More
1 hour ago
The Captain replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"In Lomaxs mins he has little to lose and a lot to gain by trying his luck.
R360 didn't happen, rugby has offered him a fraction of what he was on in the NRL. The dude is shellshocked by how quickly his life has gone from on top of the world to…"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"He's done but if some team dumb enough is out there think they can get something out of him good luck.I'd hold the door open for him to leave if we got something in return red carpet roll the club would have fleeced whomever made this deal."
2 hours ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"If it involves a chance to get more money could be surprised."
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"I have seen no evidence that Matto CAN still perform, for any reason...it's in the past"
3 hours ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Though Hannay might like the experience of Matto. Move Tino to Prop and Matto at Lock. Plus Matto is off-contract, bloke will perform to get one more deal."
3 hours ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"As is always the case. Human nature. There is a chance that Melbourne just drop off."
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Poppa's discussion Shark Attack..... Moses told to be wary of the surf!
""
3 hours ago
Parraborn1 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"I'd argue that nobody wants Lomax except for Melbourne who are desperate for short-term acquisitions. "
4 hours ago
iamnot replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"that's on Lomax, his agent and his legal team, not Parramatta. If R360 made promises to him they couldn't fulfil, its on Lomax to take R360 to court. "
4 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"If you lost Joliffe would you replace him with Matto?....it's like replacing your car with a banana"
4 hours ago
More…