2nd Test vs India

Anyone following?

I can't believe we're in a winning position!!!

Our bowling unit is great. We though dearly miss both Smith and Warner.

I reckon we're going to win this one and keep the series interesting.

India 2/15 chasing 287.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Love your passion mate albeit posting a blog at the start of the 4th innings!

    Anyway, that pitch is doing a LOT. I'm just glad I'm not out there facing a new ball. How many injuries have we seen to hands, fingers, elbows and the like? The Aussies are in a good position atm, we need to get the world's biggest cricketing hurdle out of the way in Kholi who found form 1st innings. If we get him for less than 50, it's safe to say we have the 2nd test wrapped up.

    Go Aussies!

    • Mate, I (and I assume all the Aussie public and fans) became disillusioned after the sandpaper scandal in S.A. That's not the Aussie way. He play hard but fair. That was the biggest disgrace since the under arm incident with the Chappell brothers. 

      I still think we are really weak when it comes to batting. I don't like Paine as captain in the team because he can't score a century to save his life. I'd rather have Wade who's killing it in the shield and I'd make Nathan Lyon captain. He's at the peak of his game and has the respect of his team mates and fans. I'd drop Marsh and bring in Tom Cooper who is also raking in the runs in the SS.

      • Sandpaper gate was the best thing to happen to Aussie cricket in a strange way.

        That Aussie team was very difficult to back over the previous 2 or so years and I blame Lehman. He watched over the over the top and ridiculous sledging for a couple of years and the buck stops with him. Nothing was done and it became progressively worse to a point I was almost hoping the Aussies would lose just to pull the heads in of blokes like Warner.

        Anyway, it's a new era and quite enjoyable to watch.

      • But the question is, do you pick a keeper-batsman on their keeping or batting? Because Paine is miles ahead of Wade as a keeper. And funnily enough, Paine has a better Test average than him.
  • It all comes down to Kohli
    • I agree. If we can get him for less than 50 then we should be good to win.

  • It would also be good if Starc bowled at the stumps
  • and the G.O.A.T reels in Kohli!!!

    Put the champers on ice I say!!!

    Αποτέλεσμα εικόνας για champagne on ice

    • We did that once and Allan Border ended up destroying a dressing room.
  • We couldnt settle on a spinner for a long time there after Warne.. Lyon really cementing himself as a household name these days. Shouldn’t lose from here...
This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Why can't we have our cake and eat it to.
Taste better than the stuff fans have been eating the last 40 years.
Why shouldn't fans expect more from those that continually let you down.
Maybe that's the clubs real problem there ambition to be the best…"
1 hour ago
Hugh replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"thats a pretty fair point - Paul Stringer, Craig Stapleton are really good examples of that.
then just have to wait for a Glenn Morrison , David Solomona or Dean Widders like talent to pop up and look to come on board."
3 hours ago
Wizardssleeves official receipts replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Brian Smith always recruited experienced players to complete the picture.  One old bloke who was without a contract isn't the Brian Smith blueprint. 
He'd also add 2 or 3 players in an offseason that could change the whole trans dynamics overnight.…"
4 hours ago
iamnot replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Fitzy had no idea how to build ongoing success, or build sucess at all. He was politically strong and connected, that was it. He ensured the club constitution was setup in a way that made it very hard to boot him out of office.
He got extremely…"
6 hours ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"That's the entire purpose of our junior development now. The entire focus is on those juniors. We have now got the largest junior investment in the competition. And that's what is partially frustrating about these discussions saying "where's our big…"
6 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"They were when the club was a development first that's the difference what we were then is what we are trying to get back to I suspect.
Those 09 and 22 appearances tells you all you need to no about the club they aren't consistent and until we get…"
7 hours ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"2001? A squad built over a 5 year period culminating in one of the best NRL era teams of all time that fell at the final hurdle. The team that beat the defending premiers in the preliminary final.
2005. Again, a squad rebuilt following 2001 and a…"
7 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"This is it if you want sustained success it's the club across every level that is strong not just a coach or a particular administrator that's the key for success here we have to be top of class in the key categories and have the people that are the…"
8 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"101, take your meds or hand the phone to the other person who posts on your account.....I like them better"
8 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"How can you say we 'should have' made a grand final in a given year? When have we ever had the best or second best squad in the comp? Not since 1986. Any year we've made the grand final since then, we've overachieved."
8 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"BA had enough support, if not all were convinced. Not many clubs sack a coach immediately after a GF. But after it, there was a nuanced change in strategy up-top, which may have affected BA & seems to align with his emotional flatlining — when his…"
9 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"LB, do you get the feeling JR is ultimately aiming for a reasonably high footy IQ six? Not just your archetypical "running" six who can defend and has some ball skills.
Think his connection with Pezet. Walker. Iongi. He chose Junior over RCG. Foxxy…"
10 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Thats the bit that upsets me, we should have sacked BA after that GF for not taking it seriously. That 2020 squad should have also made the GF, same the 17 squad as well. "
10 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Well i can say we are going in the right direction, not rushing in to buy or sign anyone. Just annoyed over the 22 GF and that BA era. It really did upset me on how we handle the GF week and day and i just blame those at top that we should have been…"
10 hours ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"I do not know much on Fletcher either but i wonder if he is in the awkward spot of Moses still has another 4 years left and Fletcher could be looking at FG in 2 years. Does he wait? Or can he be a 5/8?
Overall of course you pick the best player out…"
10 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Defensively fragile and in free-fall post 2020, it's an illusory narrative, self-trickery, that we should have built on the 22' GF. It was an inevitable fall under the Jeckyl-Hyde defence and unadaptive coaching systems of the previous era."
10 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>