Earlier this morning, Jim Sarantinos was on SEN with Matt White. Here are the key highlights of the interview:

* Mitchell Moses is an outside chance of returning before round nine, potentially for the R7 clash with the Tigers at Commbank pending medical assessment. But, the Eels would take precautionary approach of there were any risks suggesting perhaps less likelihood of an early return.

* When asked about Cherry Evans, Sarantinos reiterated that Moses is our on feild leader, and we're not interested in DCE we're looking at other players. 

* On the the 5/8 position Jim noted there was a short term, middle and long term perspective to weigh up saying, "we're looking at players in the short term, and when others come off contract in 26 we're looking at players who'll provide a long term deal with the club looking at players who'll give us the best opportunity to win a premiership" (Galvin perhaps?)

* Eels will be hitting the external market with some cash 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Good news if true. It will be a timely boost to get our season back on track. I just hope he is fully fit.

  • New Signings i am more excited about. Maybe King-Togia is one. But if new signings are being talked about does that mean an announcement in coming days?

  • Fox interviewed Moses before Dragons game and Lara Pitt asked him if he'd  ever back for Magic Round and he responded along the lines of hopefully before, which lines up with SEN

    • I think, if you ask Moses he would be back for Wests. He loves playing Wests and Easter Monday as well. Plus it is a long turnaround from Darwin too. 

      Ryles will listen to medical as he should. So let's see. At least if he does play Wests Tigers he has 11 days to recover for Cronulla.

  • All that was said was

    * Moses is a chance of coming back in r7 dependent on the medical staff 

    * When asked about Cherry Evans, Sarantinos reiterated that Moses is our on feild leader, and we're not interested in DCE we're looking at other players. 

    * the 5/8 position we're looking at players in the short term, and when others come off contract in 26 we're looking at players who'll provide a long term deal with the club looking at players who'll give us the best opportunity to win a premiership  (ie. Galvin perhaps?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Longfin Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"The trouble with Melbourne is that they have been in the competition now for about 27 years. I'm yet to see any local players that have come through the ranks to play NRL. Compare that to Sydney Swans, who by 2009 (27 years) had many local players.…"
32 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"V'lanys' position is becoming untenable. What poor leadership he has shown through this matter. The only thing on his mind is a big dollar sign, with the clubs and fans nowhere to be seen."
39 minutes ago
Acme replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"V'Landy's sincerely cares about Lomax's mental health. He (rightfully) sees it as his responsibilty to give regular, personal updates to the public on Zac's mental well being, as he does for all players. Thank goodness we have a genuinely thoughtful…"
45 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"That won't stand up in court, and everyone know's it's just a PR exercise, so they can play that game if they want to. No one is buying it."
1 hour ago
Mallee57 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"The mental health issues which Lomax might be going through are basically due to his own decisions and the advice and support of his legal advisors and player manager."
1 hour ago
Mallee57 replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Lots of people including lots of elderly visit the sick in hospitals and do it quietly without looking for praise or applause. Highlighting what Lomax did maybe once orca few times has absolutely nothing to do with his error in judgement and the…"
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Ryles 2.0: 2026 gets off to a bright start in Eels trial
"I get the succession plan and why Tago played, my point is based on the fact that we've struggled in the wing position for the last few years, so why are we investing in small guys that don't make the metres and don't offer much speed?
Shouldn't we…"
2 hours ago
SuperEel 22 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Ryles 2.0: 2026 gets off to a bright start in Eels trial
"Neither Kelly or JAC were playing yesterday. That's why Tago started. I didn't mind Alameddine. He did good ruck work and when given some room he seemed fast enough to take advantage of it."
2 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Its not surprising this is unfolding this way, the NRL is desperate for a competitive team in AFL heartland. Its not an anti Parramatta conspiracy, its bias and annoying but this is getting blown out of proportion. Take a player that makes us better…"
2 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"$300K could help pay for an elite junior to be developed by the Eels over a number of years to be NRL ready and then immediatley poached to another club. mmmmmmmm"
3 hours ago
Axel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Yeah, but one of the women is paying for his divorce LOL"
3 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Zach will eventually get back into the nrl, no one hates him it's just a bigger issue in the game. These contracts are useless and storm trying to benefit from it. Eels need to get proper value in return."
3 hours ago
macybrown replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Yes Nitram, Nrl do think all fans are stupid suckers...think they showed this couldn't care less attitude to fans,back when they changed NRL GF time slot.
and obviously in their blatantly shown attitude towards this issue re support what is clearly…"
3 hours ago
The Badger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"The answer to your last question is, yes they do & they don't give a toss about the intelligence or viewpoint of fans. 
Thus this pathetic open for all Origin change.  If it ain't broke don't fix it!"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Great point Nitram. Like i used this anology with my mates, like saying a bloke got caught having an affair on his wife with two women. His wife took the kids and left him. Then have his mates come out and say "He's a great bloke and did all these…"
4 hours ago
macybrown replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Im not surprised that mental health issues were raised in relation to Lomax, but Im very much astounded that it was raised not by zacs manager or by some alias on line reporter, but V’landys (whom supposedly should be a neutral party in this).…"
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2075

 

V'Landys on Hello Sport

Happy Monday, if anyone wants a good laugh to start their week, skip to 32:50 mark and listen to this f***wit talk. It is laughable seriously. Claiming the offer of $300k was a great deal and we can put that into our junior system. But said we can…

Read more…
8 Replies · Reply by Mallee57 1 hour ago
Views: 800

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>