All Discussions (44416)

Sort by

Clinton Schifcofske

First off, let me start by saying I couldn't really care less about Zac leaving. There's enough red flags about decsions he's made off field and on it to show he might not be the full package.  Being 1 year into a 4 year deal and letting this crap to

Read more…
41 Replies · Reply by CarloEEL2 Nov 19, 2025
Views: 2459

More stuff to read

BringBackSemi replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion Can someone please tell me
"From what I read, neither party is wanting a reunion. Lets face it, we tried him at centre and he had some issues defensively there so was moved back to the wing. Flannagan was right. Ryles doesn't want to pay a winger centre money, and someone who…"
1 minute ago
SuperEel 22’s discussion was featured
When Zac Lomax approached the Eels hierarchy in 2025 that he would like to depart the club only one year into a four year deal, it was clear the representative winger was going his own way.
Parramatta, while not exactly keen to release a marquee…
17 minutes ago
Mannah-Brow replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"As per comment above, "It also opens up a roster spot and cap space so we can go to market." 
Have you also not seen him play recently?"
25 minutes ago
will replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Ryles is wanting speed.
He wants fast mobile forwards and speedy backs
Howarth does tick a box for the 6 man interchange. 
A 2nd rower who can play centre could be valuable "
1 hour ago
More…