ABCNEWS

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens

There's a reason Prime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia's households may have to self-isolate for another six months.

It's the maths.

There's a mathematical law driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which makes health experts so fearful.

Frustratingly, some of Australia's highest-paid commentators can't wrap their heads around it, which is why they're telling their listeners and readers the Government is overreacting by shuttering parts of the economy and enforcing strict social distancing measures for the winter.

The human brain wasn't built to think naturally about complicated mathematical phenomena. It's fine with basic maths, like simple percentages.

After a certain level of education, the brain intuitively understands that if you put $100 in a savings account with a 1 per cent interest rate, you'll have $101 after a specific period.

But the brain can turn to mush when faced with more complicated problems, if it hasn't been taught how to think them through.

 
 
A famous example is rice and chessboard problem.
 

If someone gave you a chessboard (which has 64 squares on it) and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?

It sounds like an easy question — it's simply asking you to double the number of rice grains from one square to the next, from 1 grain to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 to 32 to 64, and so on, until the 64th square.

 

 What's the answer? You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.

That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.

And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board — from squares 1 to 64 — would be 18.4 quintillion grains.

That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.

The educational joy of that problem comes from the lesson that when something tiny begins expanding at a constant rate it can become mindbogglingly large within a surprisingly short amount of time.

It also reveals how the human brain struggles with the concept of exponential growth — it can't fathom how something growing slowly can suddenly explode in size.

That's the phenomenon driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which is why the virus is so dangerous.

Fears for the US well-founded

It's also why people can look foolish when they complain that authorities in Australia are overreacting.

The total number of new cases of the virus is currently doubling every six to seven days in Australia. It's encouraging news, because last month the number of new cases was doubling every three to four days (according to the Grattan Institute).

It means our extreme efforts to slow the rate of contagion may be working.

But in the United States the situation is horrifying.

 

 

The total number of new cases there is doubling at a scary pace. According to the New York Times on Friday, the US death toll had grown six-fold in the previous eight days.

The healthcare system in some of its major cities is already at breaking point. New York is currently the country's ground zero, and the city's governor, Andrew Cuomo, says the city will run out of ventilators by the middle of this week.

They've built a field hospital in Central Park to cope with the overflow of critical patients.

A few weeks ago, President Donald Trump was still saying Democrats were overhyping the situation, claiming "this is their new hoax".

But now, a few weeks later, his administration admits 100,000 to 240,000 Americans will probably die from the virus — and that's its best-case scenario.

It demonstrates why an intuitive understanding of the maths of contagion is so important.

If you don't want a deadly virus to spread through a population to the point where it overwhelms your healthcare system and other institutions, it pays to try to slow the rate of growth in new cases as early as possible.

If you don't want your chessboard to start billowing grains of rice, you need to reduce the rate at which the rice is doubling.

Beware the 'second half of the chessboard'

In the late 1990s, the US inventor Ray Kurzweil wrote about the importance of the "second half of the chessboard", saying exponential growth is still crucial in the first half, but it's in the second half when growth appears to move into hyper-speed and the human mind gets overwhelmed.

Australia does not want to get anywhere near the second half of that board. 

Our healthcare system has finite resources — a small number of hospitals, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and equipment — which is a deliberate policy choice.

If we had 50,000 more hospitals, millions more medical staff, and all the equipment we needed, we wouldn't have to worry. But we can only work with the system we've built.

For Mr Morrison, if things go well in Australia and we "flatten the curve" of transmission to the point where our healthcare system isn't overwhelmed and we can crawl through the pandemic until a vaccine is discovered, he'll have to live with the fact that millions of Australians will believe he's wasted all that money — $213 billion in stimulus — and pushed the country into recession for nothing.

He's already acknowledged that.

It's similar to the problem former prime minister Kevin Rudd faced after he spent $67 billion to prevent Australia falling into recession during the global financial crisis.
 

But when it comes to financial markets, investors shrugged last week when a record 6.6 million Americans applied for unemployment benefits, with large parts of the US economy finally shutting down to impede the transmission of COVID-19.

It was the largest number of initial jobless claims in a single week in America's history, by a gigantic margin, but markets were more interested in Mr Trump's claim that Saudi Arabia and Russia would soon be cutting oil production by 10 million barrels a day in a bid to stabilise oil prices.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I get exponential growth. What I have been saying is that with the restrictions in place it is only going to go exponential for about 3 chess squares before it reaches a dead end. At least while the number of cases is easily manageable by testing and identifying contacts. There is also the concept of critical mass to allow the virus to get past local dead ends - especially with the restrictions.

    The bad news for Australia is not the exponential growth because we got inearly enough to keep the number of chess squares of exponential growth to a minimum and only several hundred cases getting in in the first place.

    The bad news is that it appears that the decline in new cases may level off so that there will be a low level remaining virus that restrictions will not eradicate. That means the powder keg of exponential growth will remain with a low level of new cases to motivate bankrupting everybody. If the restrictions are lifted then we become like Italy.So that makes for difficult decisions. In this case politicians usually partially lift restrictions until the threat increases to enough new cases to get everyone frightened enough to accept reinstatement of crippling restrictions.

     

  • Should we all go to the Gap at Watsons Bay and jump?

    • Not all at once, we would overwhelm the Gaps ability to do its job.

      • This reply was deleted.
      • This reply was deleted.
        • Mate, all we need to do is pick 64 even money winners, go all up, and we're quintillionaires - where the hell is my form guide?  :)

        • Go ploppa 4120437740?profile=RESIZE_710x

        • Poppa, your argument is a red herring. If a contagion has an expondential growth rate and continues unconstraind, it will take over the population. That is the only issue. Just because the population itself might be finite and constrained is the red herring. Your argument is like saying if you have a bucket of clear water, and everyone prefers clear to muddy water, and the bucket is finite in volume,and you introduce some mud into the bucket, at an exponential rate, the issue is not the end-point of muddy water but the start-point of the finite volume of the bucket. 

          Just playing the ball not the man!

        • gotchya, lol

      • Hahaha

      • LOL Maggie, gold right there.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Avon Barksdale replied to Angry Eel's discussion Something Wrong with NRL
"Most other teams have adapted but we havent at all. Unfortunately it's not going anywhere with that clown PVL in charge "
27 seconds ago
Michael W. replied to Poppa's discussion Defending the Undefendable... this game should not have been a surprise....Look what we had!
"Simon LB, to reference something Poppa said 12mths ago is a bit over the top. Anyone with half a brain could see what was going to happen today. On top of the players out injured, we had Penisini come back 2wks early to help them out, JAC and Moses…"
2 minutes ago
ParramAddict replied to Poppa's discussion Defending the Undefendable... this game should not have been a surprise....Look what we had!
"I'm not reading all that, but I don't care who we had missing, getting 52 points against us is never acceptable, especially to a club like the Titans "
2 minutes ago
RV replied to Poppa's discussion Defending the Undefendable... this game should not have been a surprise....Look what we had!
"Well said. "
2 minutes ago
RV replied to Poppa's discussion Defending the Undefendable... this game should not have been a surprise....Look what we had!
"Poppa the pontificator, pontificating for years and where has it got anyone ? "
4 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Poppa's discussion Defending the Undefendable... this game should not have been a surprise....Look what we had!
"With how badly injured this team is, they need to play near perfect footy just to be in games. Defensively they have to be great and passes have to stick. Today everything went wrong and they got belted basically. Lot of fringe nrl players on the…"
7 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Will Penisni
"Penisini career has mirrored that of the team in his initial years as you mention there was plenty of promise but he hasn't kicked on much like the team id suggest that's the real problem here because we have no depth or development there's no one…"
10 minutes ago
Trent replied to Angry Eel's discussion Something Wrong with NRL
"People won't it faster unfortunately one side will cop it"
10 minutes ago
steveeel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R6 v Titans: Call House
"Three players in tackles and they still can't stop the offloads. Not one of them was committed to strong first contact. And poor or zero communication."
10 minutes ago
Archie replied to Poppa's discussion Defending the Undefendable... this game should not have been a surprise....Look what we had!
"I'm a big fan of yours Poppa, but that performance cannot be defended. I've been to three games this year and I'm sure others that have been to the same or more will echo my thoughts.. we simply cannot compete in the middle of the field or don't…"
10 minutes ago
ParraTime replied to Poppa's discussion Defending the Undefendable... this game should not have been a surprise....Look what we had!
"I don't post on here often, but to call supporters dumb, is probably the dumbest thing I have seen in a while. We criticise and complain cause we actually want our team to succeed, and to succeed you need to own your shortcomings. 
A couple points…"
11 minutes ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Blue Eel's discussion Eels Break a 79 year old Record.
"Can anyone recollect if both Eels FG and Cup teams have had 50 both put on them in the same round?
12 nil down in Cup after 8 minutes..."
12 minutes ago
LB replied to Poppa's discussion Defending the Undefendable... this game should not have been a surprise....Look what we had!
"I agree the Pezet move was dreadful. I admitted that we had him so had to support him and what Ryles sees. No defending it now, it was an awful move. A move that was touted as brilliant and never 100% got on board with the idea. Ryles agreed to it…"
13 minutes ago
Will 5150 replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Will Penisni
"He's shit.
Slow as and terrible hands... add zero ability to step or swerve plus bog average defence and this list is enough to NOT be an NRL centre... but all good at Parra!"
13 minutes ago
Seraph replied to Poppa's discussion Defending the Undefendable... this game should not have been a surprise....Look what we had!
"Using your own words dipstick
but I do know that you only need one or two key defensive players out
Another great nothing response of yours for the ages"
15 minutes ago
Eels1 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's Sack !'s discussion Sarantinos and Mark O'neill must be shown the door now
"Ben Rogers can't put a oztag side together let alone a NRL side "
17 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2303

 

Something Wrong with NRL

There is something wrong with the NRL product atm. The overage points scored this weekend was 58 points per game. This is out of control and boring as hell. I find myself struggling to watch a game atm unless Parra are involved and that's not going…

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by Avon Barksdale 28 seconds ago
Views: 53

Will Penisni

Does any one know his contract status ? I know he seemed to think he had re-signed but it was never announced . Let's bloody well hope it never happened. He is the worst starting centre in the comp . I don't care if he's a local junior , what high…

Read more…
24 Replies · Reply by Coryn Hughes 10 minutes ago
Views: 344

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>