ABCNEWS

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens

There's a reason Prime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia's households may have to self-isolate for another six months.

It's the maths.

There's a mathematical law driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which makes health experts so fearful.

Frustratingly, some of Australia's highest-paid commentators can't wrap their heads around it, which is why they're telling their listeners and readers the Government is overreacting by shuttering parts of the economy and enforcing strict social distancing measures for the winter.

The human brain wasn't built to think naturally about complicated mathematical phenomena. It's fine with basic maths, like simple percentages.

After a certain level of education, the brain intuitively understands that if you put $100 in a savings account with a 1 per cent interest rate, you'll have $101 after a specific period.

But the brain can turn to mush when faced with more complicated problems, if it hasn't been taught how to think them through.

 
 
A famous example is rice and chessboard problem.
 

If someone gave you a chessboard (which has 64 squares on it) and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?

It sounds like an easy question — it's simply asking you to double the number of rice grains from one square to the next, from 1 grain to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 to 32 to 64, and so on, until the 64th square.

 

 What's the answer? You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.

That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.

And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board — from squares 1 to 64 — would be 18.4 quintillion grains.

That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.

The educational joy of that problem comes from the lesson that when something tiny begins expanding at a constant rate it can become mindbogglingly large within a surprisingly short amount of time.

It also reveals how the human brain struggles with the concept of exponential growth — it can't fathom how something growing slowly can suddenly explode in size.

That's the phenomenon driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which is why the virus is so dangerous.

Fears for the US well-founded

It's also why people can look foolish when they complain that authorities in Australia are overreacting.

The total number of new cases of the virus is currently doubling every six to seven days in Australia. It's encouraging news, because last month the number of new cases was doubling every three to four days (according to the Grattan Institute).

It means our extreme efforts to slow the rate of contagion may be working.

But in the United States the situation is horrifying.

 

 

The total number of new cases there is doubling at a scary pace. According to the New York Times on Friday, the US death toll had grown six-fold in the previous eight days.

The healthcare system in some of its major cities is already at breaking point. New York is currently the country's ground zero, and the city's governor, Andrew Cuomo, says the city will run out of ventilators by the middle of this week.

They've built a field hospital in Central Park to cope with the overflow of critical patients.

A few weeks ago, President Donald Trump was still saying Democrats were overhyping the situation, claiming "this is their new hoax".

But now, a few weeks later, his administration admits 100,000 to 240,000 Americans will probably die from the virus — and that's its best-case scenario.

It demonstrates why an intuitive understanding of the maths of contagion is so important.

If you don't want a deadly virus to spread through a population to the point where it overwhelms your healthcare system and other institutions, it pays to try to slow the rate of growth in new cases as early as possible.

If you don't want your chessboard to start billowing grains of rice, you need to reduce the rate at which the rice is doubling.

Beware the 'second half of the chessboard'

In the late 1990s, the US inventor Ray Kurzweil wrote about the importance of the "second half of the chessboard", saying exponential growth is still crucial in the first half, but it's in the second half when growth appears to move into hyper-speed and the human mind gets overwhelmed.

Australia does not want to get anywhere near the second half of that board. 

Our healthcare system has finite resources — a small number of hospitals, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and equipment — which is a deliberate policy choice.

If we had 50,000 more hospitals, millions more medical staff, and all the equipment we needed, we wouldn't have to worry. But we can only work with the system we've built.

For Mr Morrison, if things go well in Australia and we "flatten the curve" of transmission to the point where our healthcare system isn't overwhelmed and we can crawl through the pandemic until a vaccine is discovered, he'll have to live with the fact that millions of Australians will believe he's wasted all that money — $213 billion in stimulus — and pushed the country into recession for nothing.

He's already acknowledged that.

It's similar to the problem former prime minister Kevin Rudd faced after he spent $67 billion to prevent Australia falling into recession during the global financial crisis.
 

But when it comes to financial markets, investors shrugged last week when a record 6.6 million Americans applied for unemployment benefits, with large parts of the US economy finally shutting down to impede the transmission of COVID-19.

It was the largest number of initial jobless claims in a single week in America's history, by a gigantic margin, but markets were more interested in Mr Trump's claim that Saudi Arabia and Russia would soon be cutting oil production by 10 million barrels a day in a bid to stabilise oil prices.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I get exponential growth. What I have been saying is that with the restrictions in place it is only going to go exponential for about 3 chess squares before it reaches a dead end. At least while the number of cases is easily manageable by testing and identifying contacts. There is also the concept of critical mass to allow the virus to get past local dead ends - especially with the restrictions.

    The bad news for Australia is not the exponential growth because we got inearly enough to keep the number of chess squares of exponential growth to a minimum and only several hundred cases getting in in the first place.

    The bad news is that it appears that the decline in new cases may level off so that there will be a low level remaining virus that restrictions will not eradicate. That means the powder keg of exponential growth will remain with a low level of new cases to motivate bankrupting everybody. If the restrictions are lifted then we become like Italy.So that makes for difficult decisions. In this case politicians usually partially lift restrictions until the threat increases to enough new cases to get everyone frightened enough to accept reinstatement of crippling restrictions.

     

  • Should we all go to the Gap at Watsons Bay and jump?

    • Not all at once, we would overwhelm the Gaps ability to do its job.

      • This reply was deleted.
      • This reply was deleted.
        • Mate, all we need to do is pick 64 even money winners, go all up, and we're quintillionaires - where the hell is my form guide?  :)

        • Go ploppa 4120437740?profile=RESIZE_710x

        • Poppa, your argument is a red herring. If a contagion has an expondential growth rate and continues unconstraind, it will take over the population. That is the only issue. Just because the population itself might be finite and constrained is the red herring. Your argument is like saying if you have a bucket of clear water, and everyone prefers clear to muddy water, and the bucket is finite in volume,and you introduce some mud into the bucket, at an exponential rate, the issue is not the end-point of muddy water but the start-point of the finite volume of the bucket. 

          Just playing the ball not the man!

        • gotchya, lol

      • Hahaha

      • LOL Maggie, gold right there.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner ; "We are no worse than anyone else" "yes we are" and our goals need to be higher and better...FULL STOP
"Yeah agreed."
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner ; "We are no worse than anyone else" "yes we are" and our goals need to be higher and better...FULL STOP
"Nice story LB, but I cannot help seeing the game change so much, it maybe that last season's winning ploy's no longer exist, I have  always said benevolent dictatorship is the best form of management.....two teams fit that image, the Cleary's at…"
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner ; "We are no worse than anyone else" "yes we are" and our goals need to be higher and better...FULL STOP
"Yes you make your point well and those names you mention are exactly what we need .....the likes of anyway."
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner ; "We are no worse than anyone else" "yes we are" and our goals need to be higher and better...FULL STOP
"Yes I figured it out, its just that my memory makes me forget the most obvious things, you should see how I mix my grandkids up LOL.... not them, just their names.
Thanks for that Mallee"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Desieels's discussion This Isn’t a Bad Game — This Is Who We Are
"Yep good way of looking at it in that our attack matches everybody.
Quick stat on Easter Monday games. Every odd year we win, every even year Tigers win. Our record at CommBank with Easter Monday 1-2. Win loss win loss is how it goes. We won last…"
4 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Timoko told to look elsewhere
"All 3 better then our current centres but, so I think you just have to grab 1/2 of them "
4 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Timoko told to look elsewhere
"Need to look at guys like Xerri tago Timoko who are stuck in nsw cup but better then most of our outside backs lol. Pretty simple logic 🤣"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Timoko told to look elsewhere
"Out of them Xerri is the one that I feel is exception since I believe he is a victim of them trying to get Woods in with Burton at Centre. Also, cap space.
Unlike Tago and Timoko who seemed they are not wanted due to performance."
4 hours ago
EA replied to Aj's discussion Thoughts on Api Pewhairangi to play at fullback
"Yep he could have been if his defence was good. I just feel it's a mindset and technique thing. He doesn't put his body in the right positions to make tackles "
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner ; "We are no worse than anyone else" "yes we are" and our goals need to be higher and better...FULL STOP
"This is the problem Cappy, we continually go off at tangents and we do not understand the heirachy......it would be nice to see a list of duties, responsibilities and reporting lines.
My experience is that if they are not known/understood....no when…"
4 hours ago
Parraboy replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Timoko told to look elsewhere
" I hear Xerri will be at the club. "
4 hours ago
sloth replied to Desieels's discussion This Isn’t a Bad Game — This Is Who We Are
"Exactly this! The team still has A LOT of work to do, especially with defense, but no one in their right mind would have expected us to go anything but 0-3 against the broncos, storm and panthers (top 3 teams of last year).
Seems like too many…"
4 hours ago
sloth replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Timoko told to look elsewhere
"Definitely a much better strike player than what we have. Timoko struggles with defense at times though, which is our problem at the moment, but nothing to lose I guess. Would be a good pick up if we don't over pay."
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner ; "We are no worse than anyone else" "yes we are" and our goals need to be higher and better...FULL STOP
"Well explained Coryn."
4 hours ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Timoko told to look elsewhere
"I think if anything..we maybe late in starting talks. Galvin was already decided to go to Dogs and just met up with JR to show he was talking to the market. KK went for the money. We didnt want to offer and extra season like the Dragons did but then…"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Timoko told to look elsewhere
"Thing I'll say about Timoko, there is a reason a team like Canberra who are struggling are getting rid of him. Is that a player we want? Now not much is out there so our hands might be tied to get one of the rejected Centres and hope they work out…"
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2254

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>