ABCNEWS

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens

There's a reason Prime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia's households may have to self-isolate for another six months.

It's the maths.

There's a mathematical law driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which makes health experts so fearful.

Frustratingly, some of Australia's highest-paid commentators can't wrap their heads around it, which is why they're telling their listeners and readers the Government is overreacting by shuttering parts of the economy and enforcing strict social distancing measures for the winter.

The human brain wasn't built to think naturally about complicated mathematical phenomena. It's fine with basic maths, like simple percentages.

After a certain level of education, the brain intuitively understands that if you put $100 in a savings account with a 1 per cent interest rate, you'll have $101 after a specific period.

But the brain can turn to mush when faced with more complicated problems, if it hasn't been taught how to think them through.

 
 
A famous example is rice and chessboard problem.
 

If someone gave you a chessboard (which has 64 squares on it) and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?

It sounds like an easy question — it's simply asking you to double the number of rice grains from one square to the next, from 1 grain to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 to 32 to 64, and so on, until the 64th square.

 

 What's the answer? You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.

That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.

And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board — from squares 1 to 64 — would be 18.4 quintillion grains.

That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.

The educational joy of that problem comes from the lesson that when something tiny begins expanding at a constant rate it can become mindbogglingly large within a surprisingly short amount of time.

It also reveals how the human brain struggles with the concept of exponential growth — it can't fathom how something growing slowly can suddenly explode in size.

That's the phenomenon driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which is why the virus is so dangerous.

Fears for the US well-founded

It's also why people can look foolish when they complain that authorities in Australia are overreacting.

The total number of new cases of the virus is currently doubling every six to seven days in Australia. It's encouraging news, because last month the number of new cases was doubling every three to four days (according to the Grattan Institute).

It means our extreme efforts to slow the rate of contagion may be working.

But in the United States the situation is horrifying.

 

 

The total number of new cases there is doubling at a scary pace. According to the New York Times on Friday, the US death toll had grown six-fold in the previous eight days.

The healthcare system in some of its major cities is already at breaking point. New York is currently the country's ground zero, and the city's governor, Andrew Cuomo, says the city will run out of ventilators by the middle of this week.

They've built a field hospital in Central Park to cope with the overflow of critical patients.

A few weeks ago, President Donald Trump was still saying Democrats were overhyping the situation, claiming "this is their new hoax".

But now, a few weeks later, his administration admits 100,000 to 240,000 Americans will probably die from the virus — and that's its best-case scenario.

It demonstrates why an intuitive understanding of the maths of contagion is so important.

If you don't want a deadly virus to spread through a population to the point where it overwhelms your healthcare system and other institutions, it pays to try to slow the rate of growth in new cases as early as possible.

If you don't want your chessboard to start billowing grains of rice, you need to reduce the rate at which the rice is doubling.

Beware the 'second half of the chessboard'

In the late 1990s, the US inventor Ray Kurzweil wrote about the importance of the "second half of the chessboard", saying exponential growth is still crucial in the first half, but it's in the second half when growth appears to move into hyper-speed and the human mind gets overwhelmed.

Australia does not want to get anywhere near the second half of that board. 

Our healthcare system has finite resources — a small number of hospitals, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and equipment — which is a deliberate policy choice.

If we had 50,000 more hospitals, millions more medical staff, and all the equipment we needed, we wouldn't have to worry. But we can only work with the system we've built.

For Mr Morrison, if things go well in Australia and we "flatten the curve" of transmission to the point where our healthcare system isn't overwhelmed and we can crawl through the pandemic until a vaccine is discovered, he'll have to live with the fact that millions of Australians will believe he's wasted all that money — $213 billion in stimulus — and pushed the country into recession for nothing.

He's already acknowledged that.

It's similar to the problem former prime minister Kevin Rudd faced after he spent $67 billion to prevent Australia falling into recession during the global financial crisis.
 

But when it comes to financial markets, investors shrugged last week when a record 6.6 million Americans applied for unemployment benefits, with large parts of the US economy finally shutting down to impede the transmission of COVID-19.

It was the largest number of initial jobless claims in a single week in America's history, by a gigantic margin, but markets were more interested in Mr Trump's claim that Saudi Arabia and Russia would soon be cutting oil production by 10 million barrels a day in a bid to stabilise oil prices.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I get exponential growth. What I have been saying is that with the restrictions in place it is only going to go exponential for about 3 chess squares before it reaches a dead end. At least while the number of cases is easily manageable by testing and identifying contacts. There is also the concept of critical mass to allow the virus to get past local dead ends - especially with the restrictions.

    The bad news for Australia is not the exponential growth because we got inearly enough to keep the number of chess squares of exponential growth to a minimum and only several hundred cases getting in in the first place.

    The bad news is that it appears that the decline in new cases may level off so that there will be a low level remaining virus that restrictions will not eradicate. That means the powder keg of exponential growth will remain with a low level of new cases to motivate bankrupting everybody. If the restrictions are lifted then we become like Italy.So that makes for difficult decisions. In this case politicians usually partially lift restrictions until the threat increases to enough new cases to get everyone frightened enough to accept reinstatement of crippling restrictions.

     

  • Should we all go to the Gap at Watsons Bay and jump?

    • Not all at once, we would overwhelm the Gaps ability to do its job.

      • This reply was deleted.
      • This reply was deleted.
        • Mate, all we need to do is pick 64 even money winners, go all up, and we're quintillionaires - where the hell is my form guide?  :)

        • Go ploppa 4120437740?profile=RESIZE_710x

        • Poppa, your argument is a red herring. If a contagion has an expondential growth rate and continues unconstraind, it will take over the population. That is the only issue. Just because the population itself might be finite and constrained is the red herring. Your argument is like saying if you have a bucket of clear water, and everyone prefers clear to muddy water, and the bucket is finite in volume,and you introduce some mud into the bucket, at an exponential rate, the issue is not the end-point of muddy water but the start-point of the finite volume of the bucket. 

          Just playing the ball not the man!

        • gotchya, lol

      • Hahaha

      • LOL Maggie, gold right there.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Poppa replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Agree all you like LB, its inexcusable but then again Parraboy is so biased that he has no credability. 
he shows his hand early "just everyone in general in his life".....he obviously is doing it tough so he may have my empathy, but not respect!…"
8 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"This was my take before this game boy oh boy.
We are going to have to be pretty much faultless tonight there's a reason Melbourne have won 23 in a row they just don't beat themselves and they'll be betting favourites without a doubt.
We have to win…"
14 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Tell who we do miss DB."
18 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Yep that was poor and the raiders game that same year torn apart that game too."
19 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Why would Barnett come here ?
Barnett has a 2 year window Parra aren't winning a premiership in that time so again why is Parra a good option for him when in Brisbane he basically walks into a side ready to contend now.
I'd be shocked to see Barnett…"
19 minutes ago
Poppa replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Forget the birth pains, we are into adolesence and its too late for the "clearasol""
23 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"I'll say this with regards to the officiating when you lose 52-4 you don't complain about officiating you just don't and I'm glad to see JR in the presser said nothing about the mentioned.You just can't complain about it when you get drilled like we…"
33 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Our 9s need to be better so as our halves."
41 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Also was anyone actually expecting us to win the comp? We can still meet our goals of being a good top 8 team by the end of the year despite this performance. Well that was my expectations at least."
44 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"I thought De Belin started the game strong. The moment he went off our ruck was even worse. "
45 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Agree NOS. Its a hard balance between questioning the teams performance and also the refs performance. But no doubt the refs performance contributed big time to the eels performance. Even Simmo sin bin. Rewatch it. Stefano forearm was smashing his…"
46 minutes ago
EA replied to Roy tannous's discussion My personal takeaways
"Agreed. That says something aboout how shit how service and defence was at 9 yesterday."
51 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Eels2025's discussion Done with this team.
"Interesting how our play-the-ball speed (average) was slower than Melbourne, yet we were gettimg smashed with the set restarts, particularly at the end of sets. When it was looking too obvious, we were thrown a couple of six again bones on tackle 1…"
56 minutes ago
LB replied to Eels2025's discussion Done with this team.
"A true fan knocks the club to accept better, not put their head in the sand and say everything is fine."
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Basically mate, that 6 more Bs rule has taken any reward away from winning a tackle or getting some control in the ruck. You will see in big games they will just let the players decide it but if they start calling 6 more every set for one team you…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Did I say he's too old?"
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2162

 

My personal takeaways

Tayln d-Seriously what are we playin this cunt for.Every time he comes on he does the dumbest shit I've ever fucken seen seriously man.Fcken pissed me of.penis and Kelly-Two of the most attroucious defensive centres I've ever seen in my 15 plus…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by EA 51 minutes ago
Views: 445

1eE Modern day Eels team: Prop

So anyone want to have a guess of the Halfback chosen? Well surprisingly it was Moses, who would have thought. Now onto Props and this one is the first legit position where i do not know who the two will be. Also, i must clarify, unfortunately i…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 82

Take Aways from the game

Positive Comments:No injuries. All other comments:After the first minute of the game I immediately knew that no matter how good we try to play that we would not win the game. The corruption was pretty clear. But wow we played awful.The sin bin was…

Read more…
57 Replies · Reply by Poppa 8 minutes ago
Views: 1243

Now that was a great game.

What a pleasure of a game tonight, we came out and really stepped up. The comradiere and composure shown by our players was tremendous, they stood up and showed enormous intensity at times. The team work was classy at worst and exceptional at best.…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by Tragiceel 11 hours ago
Views: 367

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>