ABCNEWS

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens

There's a reason Prime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia's households may have to self-isolate for another six months.

It's the maths.

There's a mathematical law driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which makes health experts so fearful.

Frustratingly, some of Australia's highest-paid commentators can't wrap their heads around it, which is why they're telling their listeners and readers the Government is overreacting by shuttering parts of the economy and enforcing strict social distancing measures for the winter.

The human brain wasn't built to think naturally about complicated mathematical phenomena. It's fine with basic maths, like simple percentages.

After a certain level of education, the brain intuitively understands that if you put $100 in a savings account with a 1 per cent interest rate, you'll have $101 after a specific period.

But the brain can turn to mush when faced with more complicated problems, if it hasn't been taught how to think them through.

 
 
A famous example is rice and chessboard problem.
 

If someone gave you a chessboard (which has 64 squares on it) and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?

It sounds like an easy question — it's simply asking you to double the number of rice grains from one square to the next, from 1 grain to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 to 32 to 64, and so on, until the 64th square.

 

 What's the answer? You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.

That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.

And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board — from squares 1 to 64 — would be 18.4 quintillion grains.

That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.

The educational joy of that problem comes from the lesson that when something tiny begins expanding at a constant rate it can become mindbogglingly large within a surprisingly short amount of time.

It also reveals how the human brain struggles with the concept of exponential growth — it can't fathom how something growing slowly can suddenly explode in size.

That's the phenomenon driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which is why the virus is so dangerous.

Fears for the US well-founded

It's also why people can look foolish when they complain that authorities in Australia are overreacting.

The total number of new cases of the virus is currently doubling every six to seven days in Australia. It's encouraging news, because last month the number of new cases was doubling every three to four days (according to the Grattan Institute).

It means our extreme efforts to slow the rate of contagion may be working.

But in the United States the situation is horrifying.

 

 

The total number of new cases there is doubling at a scary pace. According to the New York Times on Friday, the US death toll had grown six-fold in the previous eight days.

The healthcare system in some of its major cities is already at breaking point. New York is currently the country's ground zero, and the city's governor, Andrew Cuomo, says the city will run out of ventilators by the middle of this week.

They've built a field hospital in Central Park to cope with the overflow of critical patients.

A few weeks ago, President Donald Trump was still saying Democrats were overhyping the situation, claiming "this is their new hoax".

But now, a few weeks later, his administration admits 100,000 to 240,000 Americans will probably die from the virus — and that's its best-case scenario.

It demonstrates why an intuitive understanding of the maths of contagion is so important.

If you don't want a deadly virus to spread through a population to the point where it overwhelms your healthcare system and other institutions, it pays to try to slow the rate of growth in new cases as early as possible.

If you don't want your chessboard to start billowing grains of rice, you need to reduce the rate at which the rice is doubling.

Beware the 'second half of the chessboard'

In the late 1990s, the US inventor Ray Kurzweil wrote about the importance of the "second half of the chessboard", saying exponential growth is still crucial in the first half, but it's in the second half when growth appears to move into hyper-speed and the human mind gets overwhelmed.

Australia does not want to get anywhere near the second half of that board. 

Our healthcare system has finite resources — a small number of hospitals, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and equipment — which is a deliberate policy choice.

If we had 50,000 more hospitals, millions more medical staff, and all the equipment we needed, we wouldn't have to worry. But we can only work with the system we've built.

For Mr Morrison, if things go well in Australia and we "flatten the curve" of transmission to the point where our healthcare system isn't overwhelmed and we can crawl through the pandemic until a vaccine is discovered, he'll have to live with the fact that millions of Australians will believe he's wasted all that money — $213 billion in stimulus — and pushed the country into recession for nothing.

He's already acknowledged that.

It's similar to the problem former prime minister Kevin Rudd faced after he spent $67 billion to prevent Australia falling into recession during the global financial crisis.
 

But when it comes to financial markets, investors shrugged last week when a record 6.6 million Americans applied for unemployment benefits, with large parts of the US economy finally shutting down to impede the transmission of COVID-19.

It was the largest number of initial jobless claims in a single week in America's history, by a gigantic margin, but markets were more interested in Mr Trump's claim that Saudi Arabia and Russia would soon be cutting oil production by 10 million barrels a day in a bid to stabilise oil prices.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I get exponential growth. What I have been saying is that with the restrictions in place it is only going to go exponential for about 3 chess squares before it reaches a dead end. At least while the number of cases is easily manageable by testing and identifying contacts. There is also the concept of critical mass to allow the virus to get past local dead ends - especially with the restrictions.

    The bad news for Australia is not the exponential growth because we got inearly enough to keep the number of chess squares of exponential growth to a minimum and only several hundred cases getting in in the first place.

    The bad news is that it appears that the decline in new cases may level off so that there will be a low level remaining virus that restrictions will not eradicate. That means the powder keg of exponential growth will remain with a low level of new cases to motivate bankrupting everybody. If the restrictions are lifted then we become like Italy.So that makes for difficult decisions. In this case politicians usually partially lift restrictions until the threat increases to enough new cases to get everyone frightened enough to accept reinstatement of crippling restrictions.

     

  • Should we all go to the Gap at Watsons Bay and jump?

    • Not all at once, we would overwhelm the Gaps ability to do its job.

      • This reply was deleted.
      • This reply was deleted.
        • Mate, all we need to do is pick 64 even money winners, go all up, and we're quintillionaires - where the hell is my form guide?  :)

        • Go ploppa 4120437740?profile=RESIZE_710x

        • Poppa, your argument is a red herring. If a contagion has an expondential growth rate and continues unconstraind, it will take over the population. That is the only issue. Just because the population itself might be finite and constrained is the red herring. Your argument is like saying if you have a bucket of clear water, and everyone prefers clear to muddy water, and the bucket is finite in volume,and you introduce some mud into the bucket, at an exponential rate, the issue is not the end-point of muddy water but the start-point of the finite volume of the bucket. 

          Just playing the ball not the man!

        • gotchya, lol

      • Hahaha

      • LOL Maggie, gold right there.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

SuperEel 22 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 4 Team List v Penrith Panthers
"Kelly is our last fit centre. That's why he's been selected. Samrani and Penisini are both injured."
7 minutes ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Muttman's discussion Sneaky ploy which makes Panthers defense so good.
"Six again is a total blight on the game and open for corruption "
11 minutes ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"Don't know if realise that Samrami is out for six weeks with a knee injury Penisine still out as well . So really not much else to choose from  In saying that you're summation about the Panthers is pretty spot on and we wont be the last to feel the…"
14 minutes ago
Parra-Choker replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 4 Team List v Penrith Panthers
"as long as Ryles keeps making shit team selections the EELS will go nowhere , does he know who they are playing , PENRITH , undefeated after 3 rounds , I mean they never even raised a sweat , they are likely to go through undefeated on current form…"
48 minutes ago
Parra-Choker replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"all I can say around 12 -13th if he keeps picking players Brian Kelly to play in the team anywhere , what did Samrami do wrong that Kelly didnt do against the Storm , hasnt Ryles realised they are playing the Panthers , who on current form after 3…"
52 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner: We made a mistake, lets admit it, move forward; and it looks like we are overrated!
"I think Sam Tuivaiti can he's starting to mature and if we can get more quality starting minutes out of him then yes.Luca I'm not sure fingers crossed I guess but I think Sam is coming along.He's got a motor on him and definitely gives it a dig…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"Well we aren't winning the comp so my high tide for this side is the top 8.Would it surprise me if we just missed no it wouldn't.This side has some glaring weaknesses and JR understands this.R and R need to get some wins off the park to get that…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Muttman's discussion Sneaky ploy which makes Panthers defense so good.
"That's called a coach who understands the rules and how to exploit them.
Been saying this a lot but winning the initial collision sets up your attack and defense the latter especially if there outlawing the wrestle trying to make the game faster the…"
1 hour ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Muttman's discussion Sneaky ploy which makes Panthers defense so good.
"That's why the six again rule sucks!!!"
5 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"Rationale

We haven't lost our first 3/7 games like last year.
All our rookies have 1 solid year of experience, and a full preseason in their positions
We still have Mitch
Our bench is now a strength, not a weakness.
We don't have the media scrutiny…"
7 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"With a little lucky we climb higher than last year, I'm guessing 8-9th. We've started much better than last year, so why shouldn't we be giving the 8 a nudge?"
7 hours ago
playthedoors replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"We are not a top 4 team. PVL ball 2.0 throws so many uncertainties. I can see us finishing anywhere between 5th and last. "
8 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 4 Team List v Penrith Panthers
"I advocated for Da Silva to play some minutes in Cup. But at the moment, he needs to stay in NRL and continue to develop with the better and stronger league."
8 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 4 Team List v Penrith Panthers
"The only way Ryles would do it is going for 4 forwards. He only using Joash over Da Silva is due to injury in the backs or halves. If Ryles brought Joash in as a 14 and give Smith some time off then yeah not great for Da Silva."
8 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 4 Team List v Penrith Panthers
"Regardless, if Smith is coming off and you have Da Silva, you play Da Silva."
8 hours ago
EA replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner: We made a mistake, lets admit it, move forward; and it looks like we are overrated!
"Yea I rate Fletcher. I just think he is a year behind Lorenzo in development which is fair since he is one year younger."
9 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2237

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>