ABCNEWS

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens

There's a reason Prime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia's households may have to self-isolate for another six months.

It's the maths.

There's a mathematical law driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which makes health experts so fearful.

Frustratingly, some of Australia's highest-paid commentators can't wrap their heads around it, which is why they're telling their listeners and readers the Government is overreacting by shuttering parts of the economy and enforcing strict social distancing measures for the winter.

The human brain wasn't built to think naturally about complicated mathematical phenomena. It's fine with basic maths, like simple percentages.

After a certain level of education, the brain intuitively understands that if you put $100 in a savings account with a 1 per cent interest rate, you'll have $101 after a specific period.

But the brain can turn to mush when faced with more complicated problems, if it hasn't been taught how to think them through.

 
 
A famous example is rice and chessboard problem.
 

If someone gave you a chessboard (which has 64 squares on it) and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?

It sounds like an easy question — it's simply asking you to double the number of rice grains from one square to the next, from 1 grain to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 to 32 to 64, and so on, until the 64th square.

 

 What's the answer? You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.

That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.

And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board — from squares 1 to 64 — would be 18.4 quintillion grains.

That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.

The educational joy of that problem comes from the lesson that when something tiny begins expanding at a constant rate it can become mindbogglingly large within a surprisingly short amount of time.

It also reveals how the human brain struggles with the concept of exponential growth — it can't fathom how something growing slowly can suddenly explode in size.

That's the phenomenon driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which is why the virus is so dangerous.

Fears for the US well-founded

It's also why people can look foolish when they complain that authorities in Australia are overreacting.

The total number of new cases of the virus is currently doubling every six to seven days in Australia. It's encouraging news, because last month the number of new cases was doubling every three to four days (according to the Grattan Institute).

It means our extreme efforts to slow the rate of contagion may be working.

But in the United States the situation is horrifying.

 

 

The total number of new cases there is doubling at a scary pace. According to the New York Times on Friday, the US death toll had grown six-fold in the previous eight days.

The healthcare system in some of its major cities is already at breaking point. New York is currently the country's ground zero, and the city's governor, Andrew Cuomo, says the city will run out of ventilators by the middle of this week.

They've built a field hospital in Central Park to cope with the overflow of critical patients.

A few weeks ago, President Donald Trump was still saying Democrats were overhyping the situation, claiming "this is their new hoax".

But now, a few weeks later, his administration admits 100,000 to 240,000 Americans will probably die from the virus — and that's its best-case scenario.

It demonstrates why an intuitive understanding of the maths of contagion is so important.

If you don't want a deadly virus to spread through a population to the point where it overwhelms your healthcare system and other institutions, it pays to try to slow the rate of growth in new cases as early as possible.

If you don't want your chessboard to start billowing grains of rice, you need to reduce the rate at which the rice is doubling.

Beware the 'second half of the chessboard'

In the late 1990s, the US inventor Ray Kurzweil wrote about the importance of the "second half of the chessboard", saying exponential growth is still crucial in the first half, but it's in the second half when growth appears to move into hyper-speed and the human mind gets overwhelmed.

Australia does not want to get anywhere near the second half of that board. 

Our healthcare system has finite resources — a small number of hospitals, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and equipment — which is a deliberate policy choice.

If we had 50,000 more hospitals, millions more medical staff, and all the equipment we needed, we wouldn't have to worry. But we can only work with the system we've built.

For Mr Morrison, if things go well in Australia and we "flatten the curve" of transmission to the point where our healthcare system isn't overwhelmed and we can crawl through the pandemic until a vaccine is discovered, he'll have to live with the fact that millions of Australians will believe he's wasted all that money — $213 billion in stimulus — and pushed the country into recession for nothing.

He's already acknowledged that.

It's similar to the problem former prime minister Kevin Rudd faced after he spent $67 billion to prevent Australia falling into recession during the global financial crisis.
 

But when it comes to financial markets, investors shrugged last week when a record 6.6 million Americans applied for unemployment benefits, with large parts of the US economy finally shutting down to impede the transmission of COVID-19.

It was the largest number of initial jobless claims in a single week in America's history, by a gigantic margin, but markets were more interested in Mr Trump's claim that Saudi Arabia and Russia would soon be cutting oil production by 10 million barrels a day in a bid to stabilise oil prices.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I get exponential growth. What I have been saying is that with the restrictions in place it is only going to go exponential for about 3 chess squares before it reaches a dead end. At least while the number of cases is easily manageable by testing and identifying contacts. There is also the concept of critical mass to allow the virus to get past local dead ends - especially with the restrictions.

    The bad news for Australia is not the exponential growth because we got inearly enough to keep the number of chess squares of exponential growth to a minimum and only several hundred cases getting in in the first place.

    The bad news is that it appears that the decline in new cases may level off so that there will be a low level remaining virus that restrictions will not eradicate. That means the powder keg of exponential growth will remain with a low level of new cases to motivate bankrupting everybody. If the restrictions are lifted then we become like Italy.So that makes for difficult decisions. In this case politicians usually partially lift restrictions until the threat increases to enough new cases to get everyone frightened enough to accept reinstatement of crippling restrictions.

     

  • Should we all go to the Gap at Watsons Bay and jump?

    • Not all at once, we would overwhelm the Gaps ability to do its job.

      • What if we go in two's and stay 1.5 mtrs apart?.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • Mate, all we need to do is pick 64 even money winners, go all up, and we're quintillionaires - where the hell is my form guide?  :)

        • Go ploppa 4120437740?profile=RESIZE_710x

        • Poppa, your argument is a red herring. If a contagion has an expondential growth rate and continues unconstraind, it will take over the population. That is the only issue. Just because the population itself might be finite and constrained is the red herring. Your argument is like saying if you have a bucket of clear water, and everyone prefers clear to muddy water, and the bucket is finite in volume,and you introduce some mud into the bucket, at an exponential rate, the issue is not the end-point of muddy water but the start-point of the finite volume of the bucket. 

          Just playing the ball not the man!

        • gotchya, lol

      • Hahaha

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"Good post but what I think you identified in the top 2 paragraphs is always the issue I've had with our front office.The fact Ryles was never there first choice and they went in with everything to get Galvin and couldn't close.
Yes getting JR looks…"
21 minutes ago
Bob Smith replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"Ryles' instincts have been correct so far, regarding cutting players, signings, and trusting in youth. "
22 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to CarloEEL2's discussion Scouting report - today’s Tele
"100% coryn, i would even have guymer in front of kelma after how he played on the left edge at the back end of last year"
28 minutes ago
Bubba j replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"I hope so brother I think WB is past it as far as coaching goes much prefer JR and his culture he has brought to the club either buy in or piss off I had said for years you are never winning a comp with guys only there because you paid overs for…"
39 minutes ago
ScottX replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"Yep, all very valid points. It's funny how versatility can go against you at times.It's not a bad thing but it does make you an ideal bench player. I like him and see him improving a lot but I also had the same mindset about Brendan Hands a few…"
41 minutes ago
ScottX replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"You don't feel luck plays a role at all Chiefy? Certainly agree that the things in our control are being handled really well right now but I certainly think there are things outside of our control which can play out either for or against us. …"
51 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"I love the passion he is showing as well, and you never know i guess, he may make it into the starting side. What leads me to thinking he may end up as a backup player, is that he is 
i). So versatile, he grew up as a fullback, has played wing and…"
55 minutes ago
Hector replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"In my humble opinion  . Feel the vibe around the place is very different from the  last few years . You could notice it last  year at the  few training sessions i attended and also going to watch the lower grade games with a lot of the senior…"
58 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"haha, the corner is where i spent too much of my school life."
1 hour ago
ScottX replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"Joash is an interesting 1. I really like him but certainly not obviously a great 5/8 yet. I just have a feeling about him. He passes the eye test for mine. His passion is a beautiful thing and seems to just love the game. But we also have some…"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"Love the banter Boyz keep it up.   I think randy is one up on poppo atm watch his upper cut Rando"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"I don't believe in.luck. Ryles has made some great decisions and has the club in a good position to move forward.  Whilst most thought getting rid of Guth and rcg were head scratchers,  Ryles had a clear vision to turn this roster around.  Most if…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"Acme, just curious: What were the most interesting things to come out of that Bennett talk?
Like you, I enjoy listening to and learning from people in the game, and he’s obviously a great coach. I remember Bup raising some deep reservations about…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"err...i dunno how the dementia scorecard works either. I think maybe I used to though...I'll be seeing you at the clinic i guess.
DO NOT bring the goat"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to CarloEEL2's discussion Scouting report - today’s Tele
"I would guess that Ryley has bulked up a bit since his '25 time"
1 hour ago
ScottX replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"Truth be told, it was that exact thinking about WB that led to this blog and I was hoping for some thoughts from everyone in this specific regard. I just found it interesting that his own club isn't supporting the rule change that WB seems quite…"
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Friday
Views: 1905

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 216

 

Where to stay Round 1 2026 v Storm

G'day everyone.  Taking my son ( it's his 16th birthday pressie) and my 17 yo daughter to round 1 in Melbourne.  Hoping with the Storm rivalry (and the Lomax shenanigans) we get a decent away crowd.  Question, can anyone recommend a hotel within…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa 2 hours ago
Views: 590

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>