ABCNEWS

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens

There's a reason Prime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia's households may have to self-isolate for another six months.

It's the maths.

There's a mathematical law driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which makes health experts so fearful.

Frustratingly, some of Australia's highest-paid commentators can't wrap their heads around it, which is why they're telling their listeners and readers the Government is overreacting by shuttering parts of the economy and enforcing strict social distancing measures for the winter.

The human brain wasn't built to think naturally about complicated mathematical phenomena. It's fine with basic maths, like simple percentages.

After a certain level of education, the brain intuitively understands that if you put $100 in a savings account with a 1 per cent interest rate, you'll have $101 after a specific period.

But the brain can turn to mush when faced with more complicated problems, if it hasn't been taught how to think them through.

 
 
A famous example is rice and chessboard problem.
 

If someone gave you a chessboard (which has 64 squares on it) and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?

It sounds like an easy question — it's simply asking you to double the number of rice grains from one square to the next, from 1 grain to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 to 32 to 64, and so on, until the 64th square.

 

 What's the answer? You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.

That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.

And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board — from squares 1 to 64 — would be 18.4 quintillion grains.

That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.

The educational joy of that problem comes from the lesson that when something tiny begins expanding at a constant rate it can become mindbogglingly large within a surprisingly short amount of time.

It also reveals how the human brain struggles with the concept of exponential growth — it can't fathom how something growing slowly can suddenly explode in size.

That's the phenomenon driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which is why the virus is so dangerous.

Fears for the US well-founded

It's also why people can look foolish when they complain that authorities in Australia are overreacting.

The total number of new cases of the virus is currently doubling every six to seven days in Australia. It's encouraging news, because last month the number of new cases was doubling every three to four days (according to the Grattan Institute).

It means our extreme efforts to slow the rate of contagion may be working.

But in the United States the situation is horrifying.

 

 

The total number of new cases there is doubling at a scary pace. According to the New York Times on Friday, the US death toll had grown six-fold in the previous eight days.

The healthcare system in some of its major cities is already at breaking point. New York is currently the country's ground zero, and the city's governor, Andrew Cuomo, says the city will run out of ventilators by the middle of this week.

They've built a field hospital in Central Park to cope with the overflow of critical patients.

A few weeks ago, President Donald Trump was still saying Democrats were overhyping the situation, claiming "this is their new hoax".

But now, a few weeks later, his administration admits 100,000 to 240,000 Americans will probably die from the virus — and that's its best-case scenario.

It demonstrates why an intuitive understanding of the maths of contagion is so important.

If you don't want a deadly virus to spread through a population to the point where it overwhelms your healthcare system and other institutions, it pays to try to slow the rate of growth in new cases as early as possible.

If you don't want your chessboard to start billowing grains of rice, you need to reduce the rate at which the rice is doubling.

Beware the 'second half of the chessboard'

In the late 1990s, the US inventor Ray Kurzweil wrote about the importance of the "second half of the chessboard", saying exponential growth is still crucial in the first half, but it's in the second half when growth appears to move into hyper-speed and the human mind gets overwhelmed.

Australia does not want to get anywhere near the second half of that board. 

Our healthcare system has finite resources — a small number of hospitals, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and equipment — which is a deliberate policy choice.

If we had 50,000 more hospitals, millions more medical staff, and all the equipment we needed, we wouldn't have to worry. But we can only work with the system we've built.

For Mr Morrison, if things go well in Australia and we "flatten the curve" of transmission to the point where our healthcare system isn't overwhelmed and we can crawl through the pandemic until a vaccine is discovered, he'll have to live with the fact that millions of Australians will believe he's wasted all that money — $213 billion in stimulus — and pushed the country into recession for nothing.

He's already acknowledged that.

It's similar to the problem former prime minister Kevin Rudd faced after he spent $67 billion to prevent Australia falling into recession during the global financial crisis.
 

But when it comes to financial markets, investors shrugged last week when a record 6.6 million Americans applied for unemployment benefits, with large parts of the US economy finally shutting down to impede the transmission of COVID-19.

It was the largest number of initial jobless claims in a single week in America's history, by a gigantic margin, but markets were more interested in Mr Trump's claim that Saudi Arabia and Russia would soon be cutting oil production by 10 million barrels a day in a bid to stabilise oil prices.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I get exponential growth. What I have been saying is that with the restrictions in place it is only going to go exponential for about 3 chess squares before it reaches a dead end. At least while the number of cases is easily manageable by testing and identifying contacts. There is also the concept of critical mass to allow the virus to get past local dead ends - especially with the restrictions.

    The bad news for Australia is not the exponential growth because we got inearly enough to keep the number of chess squares of exponential growth to a minimum and only several hundred cases getting in in the first place.

    The bad news is that it appears that the decline in new cases may level off so that there will be a low level remaining virus that restrictions will not eradicate. That means the powder keg of exponential growth will remain with a low level of new cases to motivate bankrupting everybody. If the restrictions are lifted then we become like Italy.So that makes for difficult decisions. In this case politicians usually partially lift restrictions until the threat increases to enough new cases to get everyone frightened enough to accept reinstatement of crippling restrictions.

     

  • Should we all go to the Gap at Watsons Bay and jump?

    • Not all at once, we would overwhelm the Gaps ability to do its job.

      • This reply was deleted.
      • This reply was deleted.
        • Mate, all we need to do is pick 64 even money winners, go all up, and we're quintillionaires - where the hell is my form guide?  :)

        • Go ploppa 4120437740?profile=RESIZE_710x

        • Poppa, your argument is a red herring. If a contagion has an expondential growth rate and continues unconstraind, it will take over the population. That is the only issue. Just because the population itself might be finite and constrained is the red herring. Your argument is like saying if you have a bucket of clear water, and everyone prefers clear to muddy water, and the bucket is finite in volume,and you introduce some mud into the bucket, at an exponential rate, the issue is not the end-point of muddy water but the start-point of the finite volume of the bucket. 

          Just playing the ball not the man!

        • gotchya, lol

      • Hahaha

      • LOL Maggie, gold right there.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Micka replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Unity is Strength: Back the Badge
"Yeah, I've told him to just get back to posting the footy stuff. Some people want to be informed, some don't. I've told him to get back to what made his page grow.
But to be fair the Lidiard email was worth posting about imo. That's become pretty…"
1 minute ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Yes thx Mitchy.  I was just talking about the dragons recruitment as a whole,  they've picked up a few games changers.  I just hope we get someone. "
5 minutes ago
Strange-eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Unity is Strength: Back the Badge
"I agree, I'm sick of people telling me diveristy is our strength."
6 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion Mitchell Moses Club Games
"Crichton's risk is probably much higher him playing against the Dogs. A severe AC joint injury (initially graded as severe as Grade 5). Is worse than a hamstring strain according to Google "
17 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion Mitchell Moses Club Games
"For Origin 2 my friend. If he's ruled of his game against the Dogs which he was supposedly on medical advice as he wasn't 100% then I find it highly unlikely that he's going to be 100% ready to go for Origin 2 because even though it's 9 days later…"
21 minutes ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Unity is Strength: Back the Badge
"He also said he wants to move on and yet constantly posts updates that do not need to be posted. He has supporters that have and will stand by him, he doesn't need to post that. But constantly does and seems the Mole runs with it too. "
22 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion Mitchell Moses Club Games
"Stephen Crichton is currently suffering from a AC Joint injury ( shoulder and separation/cartilage damage) which we know has forced him out of Origin 2. The Severity of Crichton's original injury was a Grade 5 AC joint injury earlier this year which…"
27 minutes ago
Micka replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Unity is Strength: Back the Badge
"There is a lot of misguided information in this post and the comments. I can happily discuss to an extent if you like, or if you care, or if u want to listen. I can have debates and discussions without it turning aggressive. 
There's many things,…"
40 minutes ago
LB replied to Mallee57's discussion Mitchell Moses Club Games
"If the doctors say the risk of reinjury is too high, then that's a medical decision first and foremost. People are turning it into an Origin decision without actually knowing that.
Even if he was supposedly 95%, that doesn't mean he was cleared to…"
49 minutes ago
Mitchy replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Chief,like the avatar by the way mate.
I mentioned Shawn a while back; he would be decent but I would assume going to Wests / Us he would receive too much $$$$ if I am being honest - but its the work ethic and aggression - he is also an old…"
1 hour ago
Mitchy replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Yes Wiz, Beau was good for us - shame we got him a couple of years too late; I look at some teams and they ave forward leader type who does the talking and walking; we need that type of guy; or someone who just gets stuck in and does the 1%ers each…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 15 Team List v Canberra Raiders
"Lorenzo is 20. To old."
1 hour ago
RustyNuts replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 15 Team List v Canberra Raiders
"EA, was Lorenzo not considered because he's in Cup now, or because he's not playing well enough? Don't know the eligibility rules. If Lorenzo's form has dropped do you think it's better for him to stay in Cup to develop or drop back to Flegg in a…"
1 hour ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion Mitchell Moses Club Games
"It's not ridiculous at all. Age in some instances does affect all players. Look at Adam Reynolds and Cherry Evan's who have both played Origin both succumbed to injuries and both older than Moses. Evan's is 37 and Reynolds is 35. Yet both have a…"
1 hour ago
Parra_Greg replied to Mallee57's discussion Mitchell Moses Club Games
"Sorry LB the stench around this situation. I dint like what's been presented "
1 hour ago
Parra_Greg replied to Mallee57's discussion Mitchell Moses Club Games
"2 nd last 40 years ..... no point responding..... like bashing your head against the wall 🤯  keep defending the status quo Dez ..... honestly 🤷🏾‍♂️"
1 hour ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
8 Replies · Reply by Poppa 8 hours ago
Views: 319

 

Mitchell Moses Club Games

According to Dr. Google 😂 Mitchell Moses has played the following amount of Club Games for Parra. Quote:" Mitchell Moses has missed a total of 41 club games for the Parramatta Eels over the past three years (2023 to June 2026) due to a combination…

Read more…
32 Replies · Reply by Mallee57 17 minutes ago
Views: 422

Eels news

Courtesy from the cumberland throw Apparently The SMH Carrayannis has said the Moses Suli links with Parramatta are incorrect. Jayden Sua out 14 weeks. Pectoral Jessie Mclean linked to.the EelsMilky Jenkins Spencer Leniu Burton Moses Suli. - No. -…

Read more…
78 Replies · Reply by Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 5 minutes ago
Views: 2712

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>