ABCNEWS

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens

There's a reason Prime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia's households may have to self-isolate for another six months.

It's the maths.

There's a mathematical law driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which makes health experts so fearful.

Frustratingly, some of Australia's highest-paid commentators can't wrap their heads around it, which is why they're telling their listeners and readers the Government is overreacting by shuttering parts of the economy and enforcing strict social distancing measures for the winter.

The human brain wasn't built to think naturally about complicated mathematical phenomena. It's fine with basic maths, like simple percentages.

After a certain level of education, the brain intuitively understands that if you put $100 in a savings account with a 1 per cent interest rate, you'll have $101 after a specific period.

But the brain can turn to mush when faced with more complicated problems, if it hasn't been taught how to think them through.

 
 
A famous example is rice and chessboard problem.
 

If someone gave you a chessboard (which has 64 squares on it) and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?

It sounds like an easy question — it's simply asking you to double the number of rice grains from one square to the next, from 1 grain to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 to 32 to 64, and so on, until the 64th square.

 

 What's the answer? You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.

That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.

And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board — from squares 1 to 64 — would be 18.4 quintillion grains.

That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.

The educational joy of that problem comes from the lesson that when something tiny begins expanding at a constant rate it can become mindbogglingly large within a surprisingly short amount of time.

It also reveals how the human brain struggles with the concept of exponential growth — it can't fathom how something growing slowly can suddenly explode in size.

That's the phenomenon driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which is why the virus is so dangerous.

Fears for the US well-founded

It's also why people can look foolish when they complain that authorities in Australia are overreacting.

The total number of new cases of the virus is currently doubling every six to seven days in Australia. It's encouraging news, because last month the number of new cases was doubling every three to four days (according to the Grattan Institute).

It means our extreme efforts to slow the rate of contagion may be working.

But in the United States the situation is horrifying.

 

 

The total number of new cases there is doubling at a scary pace. According to the New York Times on Friday, the US death toll had grown six-fold in the previous eight days.

The healthcare system in some of its major cities is already at breaking point. New York is currently the country's ground zero, and the city's governor, Andrew Cuomo, says the city will run out of ventilators by the middle of this week.

They've built a field hospital in Central Park to cope with the overflow of critical patients.

A few weeks ago, President Donald Trump was still saying Democrats were overhyping the situation, claiming "this is their new hoax".

But now, a few weeks later, his administration admits 100,000 to 240,000 Americans will probably die from the virus — and that's its best-case scenario.

It demonstrates why an intuitive understanding of the maths of contagion is so important.

If you don't want a deadly virus to spread through a population to the point where it overwhelms your healthcare system and other institutions, it pays to try to slow the rate of growth in new cases as early as possible.

If you don't want your chessboard to start billowing grains of rice, you need to reduce the rate at which the rice is doubling.

Beware the 'second half of the chessboard'

In the late 1990s, the US inventor Ray Kurzweil wrote about the importance of the "second half of the chessboard", saying exponential growth is still crucial in the first half, but it's in the second half when growth appears to move into hyper-speed and the human mind gets overwhelmed.

Australia does not want to get anywhere near the second half of that board. 

Our healthcare system has finite resources — a small number of hospitals, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and equipment — which is a deliberate policy choice.

If we had 50,000 more hospitals, millions more medical staff, and all the equipment we needed, we wouldn't have to worry. But we can only work with the system we've built.

For Mr Morrison, if things go well in Australia and we "flatten the curve" of transmission to the point where our healthcare system isn't overwhelmed and we can crawl through the pandemic until a vaccine is discovered, he'll have to live with the fact that millions of Australians will believe he's wasted all that money — $213 billion in stimulus — and pushed the country into recession for nothing.

He's already acknowledged that.

It's similar to the problem former prime minister Kevin Rudd faced after he spent $67 billion to prevent Australia falling into recession during the global financial crisis.
 

But when it comes to financial markets, investors shrugged last week when a record 6.6 million Americans applied for unemployment benefits, with large parts of the US economy finally shutting down to impede the transmission of COVID-19.

It was the largest number of initial jobless claims in a single week in America's history, by a gigantic margin, but markets were more interested in Mr Trump's claim that Saudi Arabia and Russia would soon be cutting oil production by 10 million barrels a day in a bid to stabilise oil prices.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I get exponential growth. What I have been saying is that with the restrictions in place it is only going to go exponential for about 3 chess squares before it reaches a dead end. At least while the number of cases is easily manageable by testing and identifying contacts. There is also the concept of critical mass to allow the virus to get past local dead ends - especially with the restrictions.

    The bad news for Australia is not the exponential growth because we got inearly enough to keep the number of chess squares of exponential growth to a minimum and only several hundred cases getting in in the first place.

    The bad news is that it appears that the decline in new cases may level off so that there will be a low level remaining virus that restrictions will not eradicate. That means the powder keg of exponential growth will remain with a low level of new cases to motivate bankrupting everybody. If the restrictions are lifted then we become like Italy.So that makes for difficult decisions. In this case politicians usually partially lift restrictions until the threat increases to enough new cases to get everyone frightened enough to accept reinstatement of crippling restrictions.

     

  • Should we all go to the Gap at Watsons Bay and jump?

    • Not all at once, we would overwhelm the Gaps ability to do its job.

      • This reply was deleted.
      • This reply was deleted.
        • Mate, all we need to do is pick 64 even money winners, go all up, and we're quintillionaires - where the hell is my form guide?  :)

        • Go ploppa 4120437740?profile=RESIZE_710x

        • Poppa, your argument is a red herring. If a contagion has an expondential growth rate and continues unconstraind, it will take over the population. That is the only issue. Just because the population itself might be finite and constrained is the red herring. Your argument is like saying if you have a bucket of clear water, and everyone prefers clear to muddy water, and the bucket is finite in volume,and you introduce some mud into the bucket, at an exponential rate, the issue is not the end-point of muddy water but the start-point of the finite volume of the bucket. 

          Just playing the ball not the man!

        • gotchya, lol

      • Hahaha

      • LOL Maggie, gold right there.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Rabz S replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R8 v Manly: Back-to-Back Or Back to Reality? (L33—18)
"I really don't get the point of going short for dropkicks.
Both times Mitch buggers it up and Maly scored in that set. Just go for distance and back your defence."
8 seconds ago
ParraEels replied to jamie's discussion Ryles the Super Coach
"Piss off troll.
Don't seem to see your dumbass posting or commenting after a win."
4 minutes ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Hector Bob Down's discussion Is the Game getting to fast with all the changes?
"Your probably right Coryin but i just can't get my head around everything thing that's happening in the so called game of today "
5 minutes ago
ParraEels replied to jamie's discussion Ryles the Super Coach
"You're an idiot "
6 minutes ago
Sulkowicz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R8 v Manly: Back-to-Back Or Back to Reality? (L33—18)
"My comments are purely based on roster quality not their effort.
Its more than the Head of Football's fault. The CEO & the board need to take responsibility for not identifying his faults. The club is to reactive not proactive. A good club like the…"
9 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hector Bob Down's discussion Is the Game getting to fast with all the changes?
"The thing I hate the most about rugby league now is everyone pretty much has the same boring arse attacking structure left right rubbish the best teams have halves that play both sides of the ruck.The shithouse teams park there halves left and…"
15 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R8 v Manly: Back-to-Back Or Back to Reality? (L33—18)
"Russell was directly responsible for two tries "
18 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R8 v Manly: Back-to-Back Or Back to Reality? (L33—18)
"Anonymous R&R experts always know better. Apparently. "
19 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R8 v Manly: Back-to-Back Or Back to Reality? (L33—18)
"That's what slater said. A stat flashed up b4 that 73%. You can't win without the ball. The game looks totally different with more ball. They tried their arses off. Fatigue makes cowards of us all."
20 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R8 v Manly: Back-to-Back Or Back to Reality? (L33—18)
"Yes, it would have been crazy fo offed Russell overs. "
20 minutes ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R8 v Manly: Back-to-Back Or Back to Reality? (L33—18)
"Filling up jerry cans full of diesel "
21 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R8 v Manly: Back-to-Back Or Back to Reality? (L33—18)
"Many said it. How much $$$ do you want to lose betting "no one" said pay Russell overs?"
21 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hector Bob Down's discussion Is the Game getting to fast with all the changes?
"If we went down that road they'd be running meat raffles and wondering why the game and players are making no money.It's a common theme through a lot of professional sport world wide the nrl isn't immune that's how it's going to go and the game for…"
21 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R8 v Manly: Back-to-Back Or Back to Reality? (L33—18)
"You R&R experts have been saying Russell should have been offered overs. LOL"
23 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R8 v Manly: Back-to-Back Or Back to Reality? (L33—18)
"Probably the same people that wanted to pay 1.3 million for a souths bench player."
33 minutes ago
jamie replied to jamie's discussion Ryles the Super Coach
"30+ points is a good defensive effort.You lose more than you win with that thinking. Genius."
33 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2372

 

Ryles the Super Coach

So the supercoach has come up with run hard,tackle hard.The play book for any U13 dad coach.No shape,no defensive structure and no attacking plays at all.In the first time since watching the game 1977 I have turned a Parra game off.Ryles offers…

Read more…
49 Replies · Reply by ParraEels 4 minutes ago
Views: 664

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>