ABCNEWS

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens

There's a reason Prime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia's households may have to self-isolate for another six months.

It's the maths.

There's a mathematical law driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which makes health experts so fearful.

Frustratingly, some of Australia's highest-paid commentators can't wrap their heads around it, which is why they're telling their listeners and readers the Government is overreacting by shuttering parts of the economy and enforcing strict social distancing measures for the winter.

The human brain wasn't built to think naturally about complicated mathematical phenomena. It's fine with basic maths, like simple percentages.

After a certain level of education, the brain intuitively understands that if you put $100 in a savings account with a 1 per cent interest rate, you'll have $101 after a specific period.

But the brain can turn to mush when faced with more complicated problems, if it hasn't been taught how to think them through.

 
 
A famous example is rice and chessboard problem.
 

If someone gave you a chessboard (which has 64 squares on it) and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?

It sounds like an easy question — it's simply asking you to double the number of rice grains from one square to the next, from 1 grain to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 to 32 to 64, and so on, until the 64th square.

 

 What's the answer? You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.

That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.

And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board — from squares 1 to 64 — would be 18.4 quintillion grains.

That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.

The educational joy of that problem comes from the lesson that when something tiny begins expanding at a constant rate it can become mindbogglingly large within a surprisingly short amount of time.

It also reveals how the human brain struggles with the concept of exponential growth — it can't fathom how something growing slowly can suddenly explode in size.

That's the phenomenon driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which is why the virus is so dangerous.

Fears for the US well-founded

It's also why people can look foolish when they complain that authorities in Australia are overreacting.

The total number of new cases of the virus is currently doubling every six to seven days in Australia. It's encouraging news, because last month the number of new cases was doubling every three to four days (according to the Grattan Institute).

It means our extreme efforts to slow the rate of contagion may be working.

But in the United States the situation is horrifying.

 

 

The total number of new cases there is doubling at a scary pace. According to the New York Times on Friday, the US death toll had grown six-fold in the previous eight days.

The healthcare system in some of its major cities is already at breaking point. New York is currently the country's ground zero, and the city's governor, Andrew Cuomo, says the city will run out of ventilators by the middle of this week.

They've built a field hospital in Central Park to cope with the overflow of critical patients.

A few weeks ago, President Donald Trump was still saying Democrats were overhyping the situation, claiming "this is their new hoax".

But now, a few weeks later, his administration admits 100,000 to 240,000 Americans will probably die from the virus — and that's its best-case scenario.

It demonstrates why an intuitive understanding of the maths of contagion is so important.

If you don't want a deadly virus to spread through a population to the point where it overwhelms your healthcare system and other institutions, it pays to try to slow the rate of growth in new cases as early as possible.

If you don't want your chessboard to start billowing grains of rice, you need to reduce the rate at which the rice is doubling.

Beware the 'second half of the chessboard'

In the late 1990s, the US inventor Ray Kurzweil wrote about the importance of the "second half of the chessboard", saying exponential growth is still crucial in the first half, but it's in the second half when growth appears to move into hyper-speed and the human mind gets overwhelmed.

Australia does not want to get anywhere near the second half of that board. 

Our healthcare system has finite resources — a small number of hospitals, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and equipment — which is a deliberate policy choice.

If we had 50,000 more hospitals, millions more medical staff, and all the equipment we needed, we wouldn't have to worry. But we can only work with the system we've built.

For Mr Morrison, if things go well in Australia and we "flatten the curve" of transmission to the point where our healthcare system isn't overwhelmed and we can crawl through the pandemic until a vaccine is discovered, he'll have to live with the fact that millions of Australians will believe he's wasted all that money — $213 billion in stimulus — and pushed the country into recession for nothing.

He's already acknowledged that.

It's similar to the problem former prime minister Kevin Rudd faced after he spent $67 billion to prevent Australia falling into recession during the global financial crisis.
 

But when it comes to financial markets, investors shrugged last week when a record 6.6 million Americans applied for unemployment benefits, with large parts of the US economy finally shutting down to impede the transmission of COVID-19.

It was the largest number of initial jobless claims in a single week in America's history, by a gigantic margin, but markets were more interested in Mr Trump's claim that Saudi Arabia and Russia would soon be cutting oil production by 10 million barrels a day in a bid to stabilise oil prices.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I get exponential growth. What I have been saying is that with the restrictions in place it is only going to go exponential for about 3 chess squares before it reaches a dead end. At least while the number of cases is easily manageable by testing and identifying contacts. There is also the concept of critical mass to allow the virus to get past local dead ends - especially with the restrictions.

    The bad news for Australia is not the exponential growth because we got inearly enough to keep the number of chess squares of exponential growth to a minimum and only several hundred cases getting in in the first place.

    The bad news is that it appears that the decline in new cases may level off so that there will be a low level remaining virus that restrictions will not eradicate. That means the powder keg of exponential growth will remain with a low level of new cases to motivate bankrupting everybody. If the restrictions are lifted then we become like Italy.So that makes for difficult decisions. In this case politicians usually partially lift restrictions until the threat increases to enough new cases to get everyone frightened enough to accept reinstatement of crippling restrictions.

     

  • Should we all go to the Gap at Watsons Bay and jump?

    • Not all at once, we would overwhelm the Gaps ability to do its job.

      • This reply was deleted.
      • This reply was deleted.
        • Mate, all we need to do is pick 64 even money winners, go all up, and we're quintillionaires - where the hell is my form guide?  :)

        • Go ploppa 4120437740?profile=RESIZE_710x

        • Poppa, your argument is a red herring. If a contagion has an expondential growth rate and continues unconstraind, it will take over the population. That is the only issue. Just because the population itself might be finite and constrained is the red herring. Your argument is like saying if you have a bucket of clear water, and everyone prefers clear to muddy water, and the bucket is finite in volume,and you introduce some mud into the bucket, at an exponential rate, the issue is not the end-point of muddy water but the start-point of the finite volume of the bucket. 

          Just playing the ball not the man!

        • gotchya, lol

      • Hahaha

      • LOL Maggie, gold right there.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"The biggest problem is in the middle of the park.We don't roll the middle we have turned into a finesse pass first play with width not roll your sleeves up and playing tough through the middle type team.
Alot of fans are telling you because we look…"
34 seconds ago
EelsAgeMe replied to Comedian's discussion Can we get a LIKE on comments or a Paralike

Apologies for missing your singers but hege you go. "
1 minute ago
macybrown replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"they found him we found who?
Lomax no loss to the blues with Jenkins to replace"
2 minutes ago
Old School Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"Yep. Look at the difference between between the 2 sides tonight - and what they have done to rectify their poor start to last season. Both teams started 2025 poorly. Penrith have made it a massive priority to not let that happen again."
2 minutes ago
EelsAgeMe replied to Comedian's discussion Can we get a LIKE on comments or a Paralike
""
2 minutes ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"We also had legitimate try taken off us with JAC rules offside and he bombed 1 too.
Cant believe with Penrith side as good as they are needed luck to beat us by 30.  Our defence is putrid they made it lot harder than it had to be."
3 minutes ago
Yeah Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"We did beat Brisbane with Haas and Carrigan"
3 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"No BS you'd make a much better scout than the unimaginative lazy blokes we've got "
3 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"Blaize coming on very strong Penrith scored there "
4 minutes ago
Nitram replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"Yeah kelly played better than round 1."
5 minutes ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"I said a loss of 30 would be about par considering how poor how defence has been.  I actually expected Penrith to be better than they were.  Penrith have started the season on fire and shown how far ahead they are but we gifted field position and…"
5 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"💯 all it tells me is how steep the climb is NoS Riff just didn't turn out like this overnight it took them a decade to get like this we are in year 2.
We are a long way behind them and I think the realisation is there to be seen.I've always said…"
7 minutes ago
Comedian replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"Easier teams upcoming hopefully get the wins and build D"
7 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"Doorey & Hopgood out for season means the Eels are down to seven middles - Paulo, Tuivati, Moretti, Williams, DeBellin, Walker and Guymer - and each week they name six middles.
So their breathing room is basically one player if we consider Teacum…"
9 minutes ago
Old School Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"He was on the outer at Penrith last year. "
10 minutes ago
Yeah Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"Panthers had 3 trys scored kinda flukey. Expected to lose any team would have. 2-2 record included playing Storm Broncos Melbourne all away . "
11 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2245

 

The "want"

Its not in the who, the why, or the how its in the want. How can  It take 2 front rowers and a large hooker to put down a winger its in the want. How can a so so 2nd rower run thru 3 first up tacklers , side step a 5/8 and get a pass away, its in…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 40

This is frightning

Today minutes before H/T in Ball one of our own went down, and stayed down.Great concern for the player, while he was being cared for on the ground for 65 minutes.It took that long for the first ambulance to arrive, where the Ambos took over and…

Read more…
4 Replies · Reply by EA 14 minutes ago
Views: 213

Ragged dolled every week?

It seems to be boys V men entry week watching Parra play. We simply have been ragdolled every week. We have skill with the ball but are always chasing given we are on the back foot.Does the Centre of Excellence have a weights room ... we look weak…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by Trent 24 minutes ago
Views: 92

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>