ABCNEWS

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens

There's a reason Prime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia's households may have to self-isolate for another six months.

It's the maths.

There's a mathematical law driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which makes health experts so fearful.

Frustratingly, some of Australia's highest-paid commentators can't wrap their heads around it, which is why they're telling their listeners and readers the Government is overreacting by shuttering parts of the economy and enforcing strict social distancing measures for the winter.

The human brain wasn't built to think naturally about complicated mathematical phenomena. It's fine with basic maths, like simple percentages.

After a certain level of education, the brain intuitively understands that if you put $100 in a savings account with a 1 per cent interest rate, you'll have $101 after a specific period.

But the brain can turn to mush when faced with more complicated problems, if it hasn't been taught how to think them through.

 
 
A famous example is rice and chessboard problem.
 

If someone gave you a chessboard (which has 64 squares on it) and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?

It sounds like an easy question — it's simply asking you to double the number of rice grains from one square to the next, from 1 grain to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 to 32 to 64, and so on, until the 64th square.

 

 What's the answer? You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.

That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.

And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board — from squares 1 to 64 — would be 18.4 quintillion grains.

That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.

The educational joy of that problem comes from the lesson that when something tiny begins expanding at a constant rate it can become mindbogglingly large within a surprisingly short amount of time.

It also reveals how the human brain struggles with the concept of exponential growth — it can't fathom how something growing slowly can suddenly explode in size.

That's the phenomenon driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which is why the virus is so dangerous.

Fears for the US well-founded

It's also why people can look foolish when they complain that authorities in Australia are overreacting.

The total number of new cases of the virus is currently doubling every six to seven days in Australia. It's encouraging news, because last month the number of new cases was doubling every three to four days (according to the Grattan Institute).

It means our extreme efforts to slow the rate of contagion may be working.

But in the United States the situation is horrifying.

 

 

The total number of new cases there is doubling at a scary pace. According to the New York Times on Friday, the US death toll had grown six-fold in the previous eight days.

The healthcare system in some of its major cities is already at breaking point. New York is currently the country's ground zero, and the city's governor, Andrew Cuomo, says the city will run out of ventilators by the middle of this week.

They've built a field hospital in Central Park to cope with the overflow of critical patients.

A few weeks ago, President Donald Trump was still saying Democrats were overhyping the situation, claiming "this is their new hoax".

But now, a few weeks later, his administration admits 100,000 to 240,000 Americans will probably die from the virus — and that's its best-case scenario.

It demonstrates why an intuitive understanding of the maths of contagion is so important.

If you don't want a deadly virus to spread through a population to the point where it overwhelms your healthcare system and other institutions, it pays to try to slow the rate of growth in new cases as early as possible.

If you don't want your chessboard to start billowing grains of rice, you need to reduce the rate at which the rice is doubling.

Beware the 'second half of the chessboard'

In the late 1990s, the US inventor Ray Kurzweil wrote about the importance of the "second half of the chessboard", saying exponential growth is still crucial in the first half, but it's in the second half when growth appears to move into hyper-speed and the human mind gets overwhelmed.

Australia does not want to get anywhere near the second half of that board. 

Our healthcare system has finite resources — a small number of hospitals, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and equipment — which is a deliberate policy choice.

If we had 50,000 more hospitals, millions more medical staff, and all the equipment we needed, we wouldn't have to worry. But we can only work with the system we've built.

For Mr Morrison, if things go well in Australia and we "flatten the curve" of transmission to the point where our healthcare system isn't overwhelmed and we can crawl through the pandemic until a vaccine is discovered, he'll have to live with the fact that millions of Australians will believe he's wasted all that money — $213 billion in stimulus — and pushed the country into recession for nothing.

He's already acknowledged that.

It's similar to the problem former prime minister Kevin Rudd faced after he spent $67 billion to prevent Australia falling into recession during the global financial crisis.
 

But when it comes to financial markets, investors shrugged last week when a record 6.6 million Americans applied for unemployment benefits, with large parts of the US economy finally shutting down to impede the transmission of COVID-19.

It was the largest number of initial jobless claims in a single week in America's history, by a gigantic margin, but markets were more interested in Mr Trump's claim that Saudi Arabia and Russia would soon be cutting oil production by 10 million barrels a day in a bid to stabilise oil prices.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I get exponential growth. What I have been saying is that with the restrictions in place it is only going to go exponential for about 3 chess squares before it reaches a dead end. At least while the number of cases is easily manageable by testing and identifying contacts. There is also the concept of critical mass to allow the virus to get past local dead ends - especially with the restrictions.

    The bad news for Australia is not the exponential growth because we got inearly enough to keep the number of chess squares of exponential growth to a minimum and only several hundred cases getting in in the first place.

    The bad news is that it appears that the decline in new cases may level off so that there will be a low level remaining virus that restrictions will not eradicate. That means the powder keg of exponential growth will remain with a low level of new cases to motivate bankrupting everybody. If the restrictions are lifted then we become like Italy.So that makes for difficult decisions. In this case politicians usually partially lift restrictions until the threat increases to enough new cases to get everyone frightened enough to accept reinstatement of crippling restrictions.

     

  • Should we all go to the Gap at Watsons Bay and jump?

    • Not all at once, we would overwhelm the Gaps ability to do its job.

      • This reply was deleted.
      • This reply was deleted.
        • Mate, all we need to do is pick 64 even money winners, go all up, and we're quintillionaires - where the hell is my form guide?  :)

        • Go ploppa 4120437740?profile=RESIZE_710x

        • Poppa, your argument is a red herring. If a contagion has an expondential growth rate and continues unconstraind, it will take over the population. That is the only issue. Just because the population itself might be finite and constrained is the red herring. Your argument is like saying if you have a bucket of clear water, and everyone prefers clear to muddy water, and the bucket is finite in volume,and you introduce some mud into the bucket, at an exponential rate, the issue is not the end-point of muddy water but the start-point of the finite volume of the bucket. 

          Just playing the ball not the man!

        • gotchya, lol

      • Hahaha

      • LOL Maggie, gold right there.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Stevo replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"The NRL are involved because Melbourne got them involved with threats of penalities if Parra didnt comply"
4 hours ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"In return for lomax we should ask for the storm to buy all our Top 30 a boat. The boys can then rip up Parra River with donuts"
5 hours ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"We should. He'll be out of puff and sorts. Target him all game long."
5 hours ago
Blaze replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Lomax isnt on our cap, hes was released and cap space freed. his breaking the condition of his release, we should not be settling for a mid level player unless its multiple players.
if we were smart he would not be playing rd1 against us either. "
6 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"I think Warriors will be interested in a theee team swap or maybe even the Knights. I wonder if Josh King is interested in heading back up to Maitland, you probably think immediately Nup Bellyache loves Kingy, but I think every good coach is happy…"
6 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Yes 1000% Lomax is going to play Centre at Storm"
7 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
" I don't think Lomax  wants  to play Wing. Its a huge huge bugbear to him and appears to be the catalyst of why he keeps leaving clubs mid contract.
 "
7 hours ago
Richard B'Stard replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"Yep, there has been some amusing talk, but its all a load of bollocks innit.Dogs will offload him soon and he'll retire to a weak club that pays massive overs for him."
7 hours ago
Richard B'Stard replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"All the pundits love him, which in-turn gets punters like yourself excited. Sure, he kicks big floaty bombs which is lovely, (some might say a bit of a gimmick) but has he ever really dominated a game? "
7 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"😝"
7 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"I don't disagree that Williams is better on the edge than in the middle and that he is better than Blore. However I do believe that Blore is significantly better that Kelma, therefor making us better. 2 year deal means he isn't getting in the way of…"
8 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"If we take Coates he will likely be interested in PNG in what, 2028? I don't know if we would sign him if it means 1.5 seasons then we are back where we started with a high price winger. Yes he is great but the whole point is we shifted money out of…"
8 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"I still can't believe the nrl are involved it's got nothing to do with them.
Its a contract dispute between Lomax and Parra firstly then Melbourne secondly.
I said this weeks ago if this goes bad for us it will be because the nrl gets involved.
This…"
9 hours ago
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"I hope we get a player who we need from storm who we want i be happy anything else make Lomax sit it out for next 4 years"
9 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Well Cronulla want to free up cap space to keep 1-2 players for next year, using Ramien's money to front load deals. Why should Cronulla lose 2 players for nothing other than cap space? I doubt they go that far. Ramien is enough as they have two…"
9 hours ago
Bateau Bay Eel replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Yep this is exactly the outcome that I think will happen, all monetary & no player"
9 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2144

 

What's the Iongi Update?

Does anyone else find it weird that the chat on Iongi has gone very quiet? We've heard nothing from the NRL or the club directly, only through newspaper articles.May it be because the NRL don't see it as much of a serious issue? What do we think?…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Acme 12 hours ago
Views: 1032

Modern Day best 17

Evening everyone, how good is it having footy back.Now i want to do something different as a series. I will have surveys maybe once a day to decide who is the best player per position to create an overall top 17. Now positions like Fullback for…

Read more…
7 Replies · Reply by LB 20 hours ago
Views: 482

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>