ABCNEWS

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens

There's a reason Prime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia's households may have to self-isolate for another six months.

It's the maths.

There's a mathematical law driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which makes health experts so fearful.

Frustratingly, some of Australia's highest-paid commentators can't wrap their heads around it, which is why they're telling their listeners and readers the Government is overreacting by shuttering parts of the economy and enforcing strict social distancing measures for the winter.

The human brain wasn't built to think naturally about complicated mathematical phenomena. It's fine with basic maths, like simple percentages.

After a certain level of education, the brain intuitively understands that if you put $100 in a savings account with a 1 per cent interest rate, you'll have $101 after a specific period.

But the brain can turn to mush when faced with more complicated problems, if it hasn't been taught how to think them through.

 
 
A famous example is rice and chessboard problem.
 

If someone gave you a chessboard (which has 64 squares on it) and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?

It sounds like an easy question — it's simply asking you to double the number of rice grains from one square to the next, from 1 grain to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 to 32 to 64, and so on, until the 64th square.

 

 What's the answer? You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.

That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.

And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board — from squares 1 to 64 — would be 18.4 quintillion grains.

That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.

The educational joy of that problem comes from the lesson that when something tiny begins expanding at a constant rate it can become mindbogglingly large within a surprisingly short amount of time.

It also reveals how the human brain struggles with the concept of exponential growth — it can't fathom how something growing slowly can suddenly explode in size.

That's the phenomenon driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which is why the virus is so dangerous.

Fears for the US well-founded

It's also why people can look foolish when they complain that authorities in Australia are overreacting.

The total number of new cases of the virus is currently doubling every six to seven days in Australia. It's encouraging news, because last month the number of new cases was doubling every three to four days (according to the Grattan Institute).

It means our extreme efforts to slow the rate of contagion may be working.

But in the United States the situation is horrifying.

 

 

The total number of new cases there is doubling at a scary pace. According to the New York Times on Friday, the US death toll had grown six-fold in the previous eight days.

The healthcare system in some of its major cities is already at breaking point. New York is currently the country's ground zero, and the city's governor, Andrew Cuomo, says the city will run out of ventilators by the middle of this week.

They've built a field hospital in Central Park to cope with the overflow of critical patients.

A few weeks ago, President Donald Trump was still saying Democrats were overhyping the situation, claiming "this is their new hoax".

But now, a few weeks later, his administration admits 100,000 to 240,000 Americans will probably die from the virus — and that's its best-case scenario.

It demonstrates why an intuitive understanding of the maths of contagion is so important.

If you don't want a deadly virus to spread through a population to the point where it overwhelms your healthcare system and other institutions, it pays to try to slow the rate of growth in new cases as early as possible.

If you don't want your chessboard to start billowing grains of rice, you need to reduce the rate at which the rice is doubling.

Beware the 'second half of the chessboard'

In the late 1990s, the US inventor Ray Kurzweil wrote about the importance of the "second half of the chessboard", saying exponential growth is still crucial in the first half, but it's in the second half when growth appears to move into hyper-speed and the human mind gets overwhelmed.

Australia does not want to get anywhere near the second half of that board. 

Our healthcare system has finite resources — a small number of hospitals, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and equipment — which is a deliberate policy choice.

If we had 50,000 more hospitals, millions more medical staff, and all the equipment we needed, we wouldn't have to worry. But we can only work with the system we've built.

For Mr Morrison, if things go well in Australia and we "flatten the curve" of transmission to the point where our healthcare system isn't overwhelmed and we can crawl through the pandemic until a vaccine is discovered, he'll have to live with the fact that millions of Australians will believe he's wasted all that money — $213 billion in stimulus — and pushed the country into recession for nothing.

He's already acknowledged that.

It's similar to the problem former prime minister Kevin Rudd faced after he spent $67 billion to prevent Australia falling into recession during the global financial crisis.
 

But when it comes to financial markets, investors shrugged last week when a record 6.6 million Americans applied for unemployment benefits, with large parts of the US economy finally shutting down to impede the transmission of COVID-19.

It was the largest number of initial jobless claims in a single week in America's history, by a gigantic margin, but markets were more interested in Mr Trump's claim that Saudi Arabia and Russia would soon be cutting oil production by 10 million barrels a day in a bid to stabilise oil prices.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I get exponential growth. What I have been saying is that with the restrictions in place it is only going to go exponential for about 3 chess squares before it reaches a dead end. At least while the number of cases is easily manageable by testing and identifying contacts. There is also the concept of critical mass to allow the virus to get past local dead ends - especially with the restrictions.

    The bad news for Australia is not the exponential growth because we got inearly enough to keep the number of chess squares of exponential growth to a minimum and only several hundred cases getting in in the first place.

    The bad news is that it appears that the decline in new cases may level off so that there will be a low level remaining virus that restrictions will not eradicate. That means the powder keg of exponential growth will remain with a low level of new cases to motivate bankrupting everybody. If the restrictions are lifted then we become like Italy.So that makes for difficult decisions. In this case politicians usually partially lift restrictions until the threat increases to enough new cases to get everyone frightened enough to accept reinstatement of crippling restrictions.

     

  • Should we all go to the Gap at Watsons Bay and jump?

    • Not all at once, we would overwhelm the Gaps ability to do its job.

      • This reply was deleted.
      • This reply was deleted.
        • Mate, all we need to do is pick 64 even money winners, go all up, and we're quintillionaires - where the hell is my form guide?  :)

        • Go ploppa 4120437740?profile=RESIZE_710x

        • Poppa, your argument is a red herring. If a contagion has an expondential growth rate and continues unconstraind, it will take over the population. That is the only issue. Just because the population itself might be finite and constrained is the red herring. Your argument is like saying if you have a bucket of clear water, and everyone prefers clear to muddy water, and the bucket is finite in volume,and you introduce some mud into the bucket, at an exponential rate, the issue is not the end-point of muddy water but the start-point of the finite volume of the bucket. 

          Just playing the ball not the man!

        • gotchya, lol

      • Hahaha

      • LOL Maggie, gold right there.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Mallee57 replied to Yeah Man's discussion Are the Droagons saving us from wooden spoon?
"It's possible definitely but based on the current form especially of the Titans game, injury list, obvious fitness levels it's going to be a real struggle. Yes, the Eels are scoring points when they're really focused in on the match but they're…"
40 minutes ago
Poppa replied to EA's discussion Loko Pasifiki Tonga requests immediate release
"Just so you understand its the rhetoric of how it would be seen by the NRL with regard to us paying a transfer fee to St George in lieu of a cap inclusion.
I don't expect you to understand that and I am not even sure it will work....but its the cap…"
1 hour ago
Parrafan101 replied to Yeah Man's discussion Are the Droagons saving us from wooden spoon?
"If this team loses by 40+ or 50 or even 60, i think its time that they sack the GM and start making phone calls to Gus, Shane or anyone that has ball knowledge. We aren't going to win shit if MON and CO are still running the Football side of things.…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Yeah Man's discussion Are the Droagons saving us from wooden spoon?
"You are hoping."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Kelma to explore other options
"Sort of. Head of recruitment and GM of football would discuss with Head coach about what type of player(s) they want. Then take the information to get the players that suit what the coach wants. Ryles could say let's get this guy but head of…"
1 hour ago
Adam Magrath replied to Roy tannous's discussion Kelma to explore other options
"I hope we've got a bit of that going on with someone like Moses and the other way around with someone like Iongi "
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to Yeah Man's discussion Are the Droagons saving us from wooden spoon?
"Parramatta should be favourites for the spoon. Currently the Eels are $5.50. Dragons $1.50
If the dragons played us this week they would certainly win by at least 20.  
We have zero outside back reserves coming through who could save us.  Joash is…"
1 hour ago
Parra_Greg replied to Yeah Man's discussion Are the Droagons saving us from wooden spoon?
"Rd 7 and we are already spoon bound I am afraid ....Im really concerned for Sundays match in front of the 86 premiership wining team......what an embarrassment....If we can loose 30-6 or something that can be classified as a win lol"
1 hour ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Our Dream 2027 team
"Pops, Burton's kicking game aside Moses' would be huge, I hear you.
Bulldogs likely can't keep him due to Woods I am guessing, unless he transitions to centre, which they are also covered for?
Baracuda, great to see a new name posting. Keep it up.…"
1 hour ago
Parrafan101 replied to Mallee57's discussion What another Boring Year for Eels Fans
"LMAO"
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to Yeah Man's discussion Are the Droagons saving us from wooden spoon?
"It depends how much this temporary injury crisis impacts the team morale and belief over the next 10 weeks. Our Injuries are the reason why we're losing, as much as we don't want to rely on excuses, it's having a direct impact on our performances.…"
1 hour ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion What another Boring Year for Eels Fans
"So which team of the 17 are you following this week Hector? Let me take a guess. I reckon the Bulldogs 😂 I mean if you seriously supported the Eels as you claim then you would clearly be concerned about not winning a premiership in 40 years and…"
1 hour ago
Longfin Eel replied to Yeah Man's discussion Are the Droagons saving us from wooden spoon?
"We are still scoring points. Most wooden spoon teams struggle to put points on the board. If we can fix defensive lapses and stupid penalties we will start winning games again. Forget about last weekend's game - clearly the players didn't show up…"
1 hour ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Our Dream 2027 team
"I reckon the Knights will start struggling when Ponga returns. They will become the Ponga show once again. All ball will go to him and they'll start moving away from the collective way they have been playing."
1 hour ago
Bear replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Our Dream 2027 team
"Jacob Preston testing the market????"
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Our Dream 2027 team
"Knights are winning without Ponga and Brown in the Halves... They're averaging 25+ pts a game and have only have 20+ put on them once. Plus, his goal kicking is pretty steady and better than Moses' shitshow at the moment.
While it's obviously a…"
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2326

 

Kelma to explore other options

Personally I don't really mind this..his a rocks and diamonds player.Liability in defence and to many errors a game.Just a backup player at best.with sua taking his spot this is what our 27 side will prob look like before future signings and what we…

Read more…
57 Replies · Reply by LB 1 hour ago
Views: 1780

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>