ABCNEWS

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens

There's a reason Prime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia's households may have to self-isolate for another six months.

It's the maths.

There's a mathematical law driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which makes health experts so fearful.

Frustratingly, some of Australia's highest-paid commentators can't wrap their heads around it, which is why they're telling their listeners and readers the Government is overreacting by shuttering parts of the economy and enforcing strict social distancing measures for the winter.

The human brain wasn't built to think naturally about complicated mathematical phenomena. It's fine with basic maths, like simple percentages.

After a certain level of education, the brain intuitively understands that if you put $100 in a savings account with a 1 per cent interest rate, you'll have $101 after a specific period.

But the brain can turn to mush when faced with more complicated problems, if it hasn't been taught how to think them through.

 
 
A famous example is rice and chessboard problem.
 

If someone gave you a chessboard (which has 64 squares on it) and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?

It sounds like an easy question — it's simply asking you to double the number of rice grains from one square to the next, from 1 grain to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 to 32 to 64, and so on, until the 64th square.

 

 What's the answer? You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.

That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.

And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board — from squares 1 to 64 — would be 18.4 quintillion grains.

That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.

The educational joy of that problem comes from the lesson that when something tiny begins expanding at a constant rate it can become mindbogglingly large within a surprisingly short amount of time.

It also reveals how the human brain struggles with the concept of exponential growth — it can't fathom how something growing slowly can suddenly explode in size.

That's the phenomenon driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which is why the virus is so dangerous.

Fears for the US well-founded

It's also why people can look foolish when they complain that authorities in Australia are overreacting.

The total number of new cases of the virus is currently doubling every six to seven days in Australia. It's encouraging news, because last month the number of new cases was doubling every three to four days (according to the Grattan Institute).

It means our extreme efforts to slow the rate of contagion may be working.

But in the United States the situation is horrifying.

 

 

The total number of new cases there is doubling at a scary pace. According to the New York Times on Friday, the US death toll had grown six-fold in the previous eight days.

The healthcare system in some of its major cities is already at breaking point. New York is currently the country's ground zero, and the city's governor, Andrew Cuomo, says the city will run out of ventilators by the middle of this week.

They've built a field hospital in Central Park to cope with the overflow of critical patients.

A few weeks ago, President Donald Trump was still saying Democrats were overhyping the situation, claiming "this is their new hoax".

But now, a few weeks later, his administration admits 100,000 to 240,000 Americans will probably die from the virus — and that's its best-case scenario.

It demonstrates why an intuitive understanding of the maths of contagion is so important.

If you don't want a deadly virus to spread through a population to the point where it overwhelms your healthcare system and other institutions, it pays to try to slow the rate of growth in new cases as early as possible.

If you don't want your chessboard to start billowing grains of rice, you need to reduce the rate at which the rice is doubling.

Beware the 'second half of the chessboard'

In the late 1990s, the US inventor Ray Kurzweil wrote about the importance of the "second half of the chessboard", saying exponential growth is still crucial in the first half, but it's in the second half when growth appears to move into hyper-speed and the human mind gets overwhelmed.

Australia does not want to get anywhere near the second half of that board. 

Our healthcare system has finite resources — a small number of hospitals, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and equipment — which is a deliberate policy choice.

If we had 50,000 more hospitals, millions more medical staff, and all the equipment we needed, we wouldn't have to worry. But we can only work with the system we've built.

For Mr Morrison, if things go well in Australia and we "flatten the curve" of transmission to the point where our healthcare system isn't overwhelmed and we can crawl through the pandemic until a vaccine is discovered, he'll have to live with the fact that millions of Australians will believe he's wasted all that money — $213 billion in stimulus — and pushed the country into recession for nothing.

He's already acknowledged that.

It's similar to the problem former prime minister Kevin Rudd faced after he spent $67 billion to prevent Australia falling into recession during the global financial crisis.
 

But when it comes to financial markets, investors shrugged last week when a record 6.6 million Americans applied for unemployment benefits, with large parts of the US economy finally shutting down to impede the transmission of COVID-19.

It was the largest number of initial jobless claims in a single week in America's history, by a gigantic margin, but markets were more interested in Mr Trump's claim that Saudi Arabia and Russia would soon be cutting oil production by 10 million barrels a day in a bid to stabilise oil prices.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I get exponential growth. What I have been saying is that with the restrictions in place it is only going to go exponential for about 3 chess squares before it reaches a dead end. At least while the number of cases is easily manageable by testing and identifying contacts. There is also the concept of critical mass to allow the virus to get past local dead ends - especially with the restrictions.

    The bad news for Australia is not the exponential growth because we got inearly enough to keep the number of chess squares of exponential growth to a minimum and only several hundred cases getting in in the first place.

    The bad news is that it appears that the decline in new cases may level off so that there will be a low level remaining virus that restrictions will not eradicate. That means the powder keg of exponential growth will remain with a low level of new cases to motivate bankrupting everybody. If the restrictions are lifted then we become like Italy.So that makes for difficult decisions. In this case politicians usually partially lift restrictions until the threat increases to enough new cases to get everyone frightened enough to accept reinstatement of crippling restrictions.

     

  • Should we all go to the Gap at Watsons Bay and jump?

    • Not all at once, we would overwhelm the Gaps ability to do its job.

      • What if we go in two's and stay 1.5 mtrs apart?.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • Mate, all we need to do is pick 64 even money winners, go all up, and we're quintillionaires - where the hell is my form guide?  :)

        • Go ploppa 4120437740?profile=RESIZE_710x

        • Poppa, your argument is a red herring. If a contagion has an expondential growth rate and continues unconstraind, it will take over the population. That is the only issue. Just because the population itself might be finite and constrained is the red herring. Your argument is like saying if you have a bucket of clear water, and everyone prefers clear to muddy water, and the bucket is finite in volume,and you introduce some mud into the bucket, at an exponential rate, the issue is not the end-point of muddy water but the start-point of the finite volume of the bucket. 

          Just playing the ball not the man!

        • gotchya, lol

      • Hahaha

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Mannah-Brow replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Thanks NOS, always enjoy these reads. Our backline looks good and I like they way they are moving together in defence now, but our middle struggles and our edges don't fill me with confidence. Would like to see Matto included tonight, but he seems…"
1 minute ago
AlShaw replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"I just don't see the same swagger in the Sharks as previous years, their attack isn't quite flowing yet and they're getting a bit frustrated at time. I don't want to see us run them into form. 
The kick chase is just so important, how often has…"
1 minute ago
Kenny Power replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"I want it to be Cleary and Luis Moses is important for us 
plus Daley can't coach so NSW will lose series so better Moses not involved "
41 minutes ago
Axel replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Great write up NOS. Thank you.
I feel AFB is the key to the Sharks. If we don't limit his post contact metres then they'll run riot.
I'm tipping us for a close win purely because MM did the job for us last week."
54 minutes ago
LB replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"I would not say it would be a disaster. Moses' kicking would be lowered due to the left side sure but his kicking will still be a factor. Moses more so is there to take control and allow Cleary to play as he sees. The issue with Cleary of late in…"
55 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Eithe teAm to win in a high scoring match. Total points 51 - 60
 "
1 hour ago
LB replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"AFB, as apparent to SC podcast, is in doubt for tonight with shoulder issue. I bet he plays but his minutes might be limited. That helps. A lot of podcasts are giving us a chance and even tipping us for an upset. Normally do not like that. Sharks…"
1 hour ago
Blaze replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion We should have $4M buy players
"There was rumors spencer leniu was un happy at roosters. If he becomes available we would be stupid not to look at him.
Starling, bullemor, galvin, leniu, hass (can only dream)"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Ronaldo Mulitalo (30th), Sam Stonestreet (35th), Jesse Ramien (43rd) & Will Kennedy (46th).
This will decide the game wheather we can contain there back 5 coming out of yardage.The Moses kicking game can bury teams but we have to be able to contain…"
1 hour ago
Parraborn1 replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion We should have $4M buy players
"Gee, I'm glad you're not our Recruiter.
Grant Anderson - Going to Brisbane
Ethan Bullemor - meh
Bunty Afoa - Not too bad for a bench spot, but why would we if we have Sam Tuivati and Luca Morretti who are doing well. Stick with your juniors if you…"
1 hour ago
Parra2win replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Great write up NOS!
Contain their middle and trust in our edge defense.   Kick to the corners and make them earn metres.    Brown needs to run the ball and people need to run with him.   Riley needs to steal metres back at Brailey.   Sharks have a…"
2 hours ago
Michael W. replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"It would be suicide to pair Cleary and Moses. Moses biggest asset is his kicking game, it will be nullified playing on the left, NSW would be better off with Luai partnering Cleary, but with Daley as coach, he's more than likely to play someone like…"
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"This will be a tough game. They have such a well balanced roster and probably the best bench in the game. If we steal this game it will be something special, let's go Mitch 👑"
2 hours ago
Tin Tim replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"I think Cleary has being exposed as a halfback that can't play at his best without his champion side. I haven't seen him take Penrith over the line on his own this year, Moses made a huge difference to the Eels & Luai has done the same to the…"
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"I depends on the form of Mitch and Jerome over the next month. Cleary will be picked 1st, if Mitch keeps having blinders like he did the other week, Daly will go with Mitch and have him play at 6. Luai is playing well, but I wouldn't say he's…"
2 hours ago
Mac5733 replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"Cleary and Luai. And nsw will lose. they should pick mitch. cleary is struggling at the moment and has never played very well at origin. "
2 hours ago
More…

 

War chest, what could we look at?

So if Junior Paulo rumours are true and if Lane and Matto move on, Parramatta could have as much as $4mil to spend in 2026. NRL rules state they need to spend 90% of their cap so most of that $4mil will need to be spent. One issue being there is…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 50

AN ALTERNATIVE TO GALVIN

I'm not a huge fan of Galvin primarily because I think he has big ego and because who his manager is , having your halves both managed by Isaac Moses is a recipe for future disaster and we simply don't have the management who could handle Isaac if…

Read more…
38 Replies · Reply by Angry Eel 3 hours ago
Views: 1309

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>