ABCNEWS

By business reporter Gareth Hutchens

There's a reason Prime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia's households may have to self-isolate for another six months.

It's the maths.

There's a mathematical law driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which makes health experts so fearful.

Frustratingly, some of Australia's highest-paid commentators can't wrap their heads around it, which is why they're telling their listeners and readers the Government is overreacting by shuttering parts of the economy and enforcing strict social distancing measures for the winter.

The human brain wasn't built to think naturally about complicated mathematical phenomena. It's fine with basic maths, like simple percentages.

After a certain level of education, the brain intuitively understands that if you put $100 in a savings account with a 1 per cent interest rate, you'll have $101 after a specific period.

But the brain can turn to mush when faced with more complicated problems, if it hasn't been taught how to think them through.

 
 
A famous example is rice and chessboard problem.
 

If someone gave you a chessboard (which has 64 squares on it) and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?

It sounds like an easy question — it's simply asking you to double the number of rice grains from one square to the next, from 1 grain to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 to 32 to 64, and so on, until the 64th square.

 

 What's the answer? You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.

That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.

And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board — from squares 1 to 64 — would be 18.4 quintillion grains.

That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.

The educational joy of that problem comes from the lesson that when something tiny begins expanding at a constant rate it can become mindbogglingly large within a surprisingly short amount of time.

It also reveals how the human brain struggles with the concept of exponential growth — it can't fathom how something growing slowly can suddenly explode in size.

That's the phenomenon driving the growth in the number of coronavirus cases globally, which is why the virus is so dangerous.

Fears for the US well-founded

It's also why people can look foolish when they complain that authorities in Australia are overreacting.

The total number of new cases of the virus is currently doubling every six to seven days in Australia. It's encouraging news, because last month the number of new cases was doubling every three to four days (according to the Grattan Institute).

It means our extreme efforts to slow the rate of contagion may be working.

But in the United States the situation is horrifying.

 

 

The total number of new cases there is doubling at a scary pace. According to the New York Times on Friday, the US death toll had grown six-fold in the previous eight days.

The healthcare system in some of its major cities is already at breaking point. New York is currently the country's ground zero, and the city's governor, Andrew Cuomo, says the city will run out of ventilators by the middle of this week.

They've built a field hospital in Central Park to cope with the overflow of critical patients.

A few weeks ago, President Donald Trump was still saying Democrats were overhyping the situation, claiming "this is their new hoax".

But now, a few weeks later, his administration admits 100,000 to 240,000 Americans will probably die from the virus — and that's its best-case scenario.

It demonstrates why an intuitive understanding of the maths of contagion is so important.

If you don't want a deadly virus to spread through a population to the point where it overwhelms your healthcare system and other institutions, it pays to try to slow the rate of growth in new cases as early as possible.

If you don't want your chessboard to start billowing grains of rice, you need to reduce the rate at which the rice is doubling.

Beware the 'second half of the chessboard'

In the late 1990s, the US inventor Ray Kurzweil wrote about the importance of the "second half of the chessboard", saying exponential growth is still crucial in the first half, but it's in the second half when growth appears to move into hyper-speed and the human mind gets overwhelmed.

Australia does not want to get anywhere near the second half of that board. 

Our healthcare system has finite resources — a small number of hospitals, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and equipment — which is a deliberate policy choice.

If we had 50,000 more hospitals, millions more medical staff, and all the equipment we needed, we wouldn't have to worry. But we can only work with the system we've built.

For Mr Morrison, if things go well in Australia and we "flatten the curve" of transmission to the point where our healthcare system isn't overwhelmed and we can crawl through the pandemic until a vaccine is discovered, he'll have to live with the fact that millions of Australians will believe he's wasted all that money — $213 billion in stimulus — and pushed the country into recession for nothing.

He's already acknowledged that.

It's similar to the problem former prime minister Kevin Rudd faced after he spent $67 billion to prevent Australia falling into recession during the global financial crisis.
 

But when it comes to financial markets, investors shrugged last week when a record 6.6 million Americans applied for unemployment benefits, with large parts of the US economy finally shutting down to impede the transmission of COVID-19.

It was the largest number of initial jobless claims in a single week in America's history, by a gigantic margin, but markets were more interested in Mr Trump's claim that Saudi Arabia and Russia would soon be cutting oil production by 10 million barrels a day in a bid to stabilise oil prices.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I get exponential growth. What I have been saying is that with the restrictions in place it is only going to go exponential for about 3 chess squares before it reaches a dead end. At least while the number of cases is easily manageable by testing and identifying contacts. There is also the concept of critical mass to allow the virus to get past local dead ends - especially with the restrictions.

    The bad news for Australia is not the exponential growth because we got inearly enough to keep the number of chess squares of exponential growth to a minimum and only several hundred cases getting in in the first place.

    The bad news is that it appears that the decline in new cases may level off so that there will be a low level remaining virus that restrictions will not eradicate. That means the powder keg of exponential growth will remain with a low level of new cases to motivate bankrupting everybody. If the restrictions are lifted then we become like Italy.So that makes for difficult decisions. In this case politicians usually partially lift restrictions until the threat increases to enough new cases to get everyone frightened enough to accept reinstatement of crippling restrictions.

     

  • Should we all go to the Gap at Watsons Bay and jump?

    • Not all at once, we would overwhelm the Gaps ability to do its job.

      • This reply was deleted.
      • This reply was deleted.
        • Mate, all we need to do is pick 64 even money winners, go all up, and we're quintillionaires - where the hell is my form guide?  :)

        • Go ploppa 4120437740?profile=RESIZE_710x

        • Poppa, your argument is a red herring. If a contagion has an expondential growth rate and continues unconstraind, it will take over the population. That is the only issue. Just because the population itself might be finite and constrained is the red herring. Your argument is like saying if you have a bucket of clear water, and everyone prefers clear to muddy water, and the bucket is finite in volume,and you introduce some mud into the bucket, at an exponential rate, the issue is not the end-point of muddy water but the start-point of the finite volume of the bucket. 

          Just playing the ball not the man!

        • gotchya, lol

      • Hahaha

      • LOL Maggie, gold right there.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Alfred replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Dylan Lucas signs
"Well tbh how have Newcastle got the money to keep him unless he took a pay cut "
35 seconds ago
Eelovution replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Axel, one of the best replies on this site. Sick and tired of all the  'agony aunts' on here complaining about this and that. Looks like angst lives rent-free in their brains."
1 minute ago
Mallee57 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Dylan Lucas signs
"Why is there who the Knights are signing or resigning on an Eels site 🤣 Dont make sense. Who cares who the Knights, Dragons or really any other club signs? Who are Parra signing"
12 minutes ago
Rabz S replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Dylan Lucas signs
"He wasn't available to speak to until 01/Nov, so cannot blame MON for this."
13 minutes ago
ParraEels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Dylan Lucas signs
"Did anyone with a brain honestly expected Lucas to leave the Knights.
I feel embarrassed for whoever thinks he didn't come because of our recruitment team."
22 minutes ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"I mean we are all guilty of it at some points. I have been in the past. But it is just annoying to be fair that there is no in between. If the team is good it's "Premiers or nothing" or slightly bad "We are spooners for the next decade" all because…"
29 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"I think his family were caught up in the NSW floods so he went home to help out
 "
32 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Dylan Lucas signs
"That's the thing Jack, i too like many here am frustrated with missing out on targets. I too wonder what the team looks like in 2027. But seriously, unless we went for Lucas and another club got him, this is nothing. Good re-signing for Newcastle…"
33 minutes ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Roy tannous's discussion Samrani locked in centre?
"Samrani has shown it isn't always the young players with massive hype that will succeed at NRL level.  Didn't have the wraps some other players have but there is a reason he was given an opportunity and has grabbed it. 
Doesn't matter if a back…"
34 minutes ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"That is what was mentioned, personal issues. He spent a year or two out i think? But yeah no idea what happened as he would have debuted in 2021 had he stayed."
34 minutes ago
Jack Eelson replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Dylan Lucas signs
"Hahahah honestly I agree with Chief recruitment sucks. But you just buried him LB... I feel sorry for chiefy. Usually has a point but I see him get buried constantly. "
36 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Dylan Lucas signs
"Shhhh, doesn't fit the narrative. The narrative being everyone in the joint is inept and every player not with us who signs something makes us dumb, regardless if it's legal or not."
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"Does anyone know why Sam Hughes left? He was apparently one of our better juniors at the time but may have had personal issues???"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"What happens if both Moses' assume responsibility for parting one side of the red sea each?"
2 hours ago
Michael W. replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"You're right Axel, it's fucking hilarious."
2 hours ago
Axel replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"The bipolar reactions on the site are hilarious LB. One of the reasons I don't respond as often but they do provide some comical relief to lighten the day after a loss; or a win!   "
2 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa May 27
Views: 265

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>