In a long overdue decision, the Minneapolis City Council has demonstrated incredible forward vision by voting to abolish the city's police department, to be replaced by a yet to be announced new law and order regime based on love, inclusiveness, compassion & trust.

The City Council chair has announced that the model of publicly funded law enforcement is an outdated model and that the city will seek a more accomodating model. Not only has the city council voted to abolish the PD, but the vote was bipartisan to the extent that it had the necessary votes to overrule the expected mayoral veto.

A whopping 9 councillors voted to assume that all citizens of the great city of Minneapolis will never feel tempted to commit any crime in the future, as the outdated police department will no longer be there to discourage them.

When news of the vote was made public, career criminals rejoiced at the vision of the city's political leaders, complaining that their profession has been historically discriminated against and targeted by the MPD, citing statistics that show that 100% of prison inmates in Minnesota state prisons are criminals, despite only comprising less then 5% of the population. "Professional profiling at it's very worst", according to the state chapter of the Congress for the Rights of Individual Malevolence Society, or CRIMS. "We felons are a proud people, we are proud of our culture, we have been persecuted, we have been oppressed, America has a problem with instituionalised discrimanation against criminals of all shapes & sizes. This decision by the Minneapolis City Council is the breakthrough that we hope will see the dismantiling of all law enforcement in every American city, and ultimately that Great Satan, the FBI." The Minneapolis Council Chair intends to rename the main street in downtown Minneapolis "Criminal Lives Matter Plaza".

Law abiding citizens have launched counter protests to the dismantling of what they claim is necessary law enforcement for the safety of all law abiding citizens. However, criminal protesters have shouted down such protesters as bigots & criminalists. "Criminalism has no place in modern America. We are a nation that supports inclusiveness of all peoples, law abiding citizens are the problem." claim a CRIMS spokesman.

#criminallivesmatter

#CLM

#endcriminalismnow

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • LOL!!! outstanding initiative from the great progressive city of Minneapolis. They're on the right track - next they need to start targeting the other scurge on modern society - the "hard working tax payer".

    I have forwarded this outstanding news to my pimply, fat arsed, never worked a day or paid a cent of tax in her life niece so that she can put it up on social media with her gag inducing heavily airbrushed duck face selfies and her recent bandwagon- reeking black lives matter posts.

    • Duck face selfies, lol, Uncle Kramer, you're killing me !!!

  • I said to my friend from Minnesota they needed to sack the police commissioner or governor over a week ago but I didn't mean the lot.  

  • Howdy boys . U all hav big harts 😢♥️ like my sons . Gbu 

    forgive me i don agree with no coppers.

    whose gonna stop the crims. N black haters still gonna be pea brains. haters gonna hate more .. gonna fix nothin 😪

     

    • Princess Tess 

      YOur white privelege is shinning through. EXpecting that police will make things better and not worse is for the privleged. Left wing victims don't have the option to call the police (according to the MInniapolis Mayor)

      • Wile my dear son. Don make no sense what your sayin.

        You don want cleaner coppers  ? You wanna keep the bad eggs ? Or want no coppers, silly billy?

        maybe my lifes easy cause im white n beautiful sooo? no pea brain excuses dear . GBU luv uxxx mwauuuu 

  • The most idiotic decison known to man. Any one supporting this I have no hesitation in calling a complete brainless moron,   Reform , starting from the top is one thing, but this decision is lunacy.

  • Nothing to see here ,any state that is run by the Democrats it’s bedlam ,especially high crime rate ,low standard of living,and high debt ,any resemblance to the labor party here .

  • Hahaha......

    You can't make this shit up.

    Can't wait till the crims and thugs start targeting these SJWs and Commies - i'll pay to see it. They'll be crying for mummy as soon as it happens.

  • Okay, let's just set the record straight. They have not voted to 'abolish' the police force - i.e. no police to uphold law and order. The idea is to reset the department. This is what occured in Camden in New Jersey when the department was disbanded in 2013 and restablished under a different regime of rules and regulations.

    The existing police were invited to reapply for their jobs and, the advantage the Camden PD had was that they could scutinize the individual applicants based on their policing history and approve the applications accordingly. They were also able to bypass the powerful police union, which is not subject to the decisions of a federal industrial umpire as unions are here in Australia (the Fair Work Commission), instead they are subject to a court of arbitration that are based in the individual counties and suject to greater influence by local advocacy groups. 

    The upshot is that Camden has seen a dramatic reduction in crime with its lowest homicide rate since 1980.

    https://www.citylab.com/equity/2018/01/what-happened-to-crime-in-c...


    Minneapolis are proposing something similar.

    What Happened to Crime in Camden?
    Camden, New Jersey, closed out 2017 with its lowest homicide rate since the ‘80s. Are police reforms to thank?
This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Howarth and 200k transfer fee back in December and none of this would be happening. Storm just want everything their own way and that's not how life works. Two sides to the deal "
9 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"If Lomax and strom had approached the eels in good faith and said look Zach is wanting to return to the nrl let's work out something that helps both of us. I'm sure that would have been a better path. Not sneaking behind the eels backs and crying to…"
10 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Coates out for 3 months Achilles injury
"Is our club cheeky enough to equip Sparky with a blowtorch this year?"
18 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Alarms going off you reckon?"
37 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Maybe I didn't phrase my comment well post 2026. To be honest I'm not getting too hung up on the storm and what may or may not happen. I'd take Harry Grant or Cameron Munster off their hands, but we all know realistically that ain't happening. If…"
39 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Absolutely, all that stuff that's gone on goes in our favour with the judge in making his determination.
I don't think we're being vindictive at all towards Lomax. We just want to be adequately compensated for our loss which is a fair enough…"
48 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"You could potentially ban him from playing against the eels for the term of his contract but how is that fair on the other clubs who have to face Storm who get an origin winger for a 200k transfer. If Lomax really wants to play nrl then open it up…"
52 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Adam, that would be some meeting behind closed doors: us, the NRL, the Storm, some who-me-yes-you poker faces, and enough blowtorches to keep the fire exits relevant."
57 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Storm either get him this year or not at all, so player swap next year is quite impossible. But I agree I think a swap is hard as Melbourne are that proud in what they are doing they won't have a sense of losing by caving in.
Yeah he ain't sitting…"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"I don't think the eels want to keep Lomax out of the game they are open to sending him to any club who wants him. But the way the storm and Lomax acted trying to sneak around it, I doubt eels want to deal with Melbourne. Ryles seems like a man of…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Denan Kemp said, and he is right, Melbourne cannot say no to a player of theirs asking for a release again.
The main thing out of this is Melbourne do not give a flying you know what how people see them in this. If they win the comp this year all…"
1 hour ago
Adam Magrath replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"As much as I'd like Lomax to sit out from the nrl for the next 3 years (and he should) realistically that isn't happening. It isn't fair.
That is what this court case is all about, to determine what is fair. So it isn't 100% right or 100% wrong (or…"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"He was provided all the legal advice before signing the release and understood the stipulations. Just because R360 didn't eventuate doesn't mean he can force his way out of it lol. Spoilt brat defence is not going to work for Lomax or the storm 🤣 "
2 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"LB, Eli, good stuff gents. We've acted in good-faith. By the book. With clean hands. Lomax appears not to. Still, equity is not unlikely to view an NRL-wide 3-year restraint until 31Oct 28' as overly-punitive and read it down.
We'd still win,…"
3 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The best thing for the Eels is if we say nothing our position is clear we only have to come back to the table if Melbourne come with something we see as advantageous for us that really is the bottom line.
Best thing about this there the ones doing…"
5 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"If you look at it from a player for player deal, would you rather Lomax or Howarth if you are the Storm but ? I just don't see any way legally the storm can force the eels to hand them Lomax 🤣 either way don't really care what storm end up doing but…"
9 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2092

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>