Replies

    • Nice story about OJ. Nice that they thought it was OK for a man to stab a woman to death and revilled in him getting away with murdering a woman. That's touching.

      There was a white truck driver (Reg Denny) who was doing his job - driving his truck - when he came to the intersection of Florence and Normandy in SC LA back in '92. He had to stop at the intersection and was dragged from the cab and kicked, punched, beaten and hit with a claw hammer until he lay semi concious on the ground. One of the "protestors" stood on his neck to enable the other 3 to carry out the assault (oh, the irony). As he attempted to get to his feet one of the "protestors" raised a cinder block high above his head and smashed it into Denny's head then did a little dance while Denny lay unconcious and dying. Eventually 4 actual protesters came to Denny's rescue (absolute legends) and one of them actually drove him straight to hospital (in Denny's truck) no doubt saving his life. The four attackers were all black. The four saviours were also all black.

      Seeings as you were sharing stories Daz I thought this was a beauty. It was all caught on camera and you can check it out on youtube.

      There's no place for violence Daz. None whatsoever. Even racism isn't a worthy excuse. Even the 4 black angels who lived in South Central and were no doubt extremely angered over the debacle that was the Rodney King verdict understood and believed this.

      • Well said Kram!!

        Also at least you ain't cherry picking like the lefties always do.

        • And what cherries are you picking, Frank? You have hundreds of years of post-slavery America during which racial and economic inequalities experienced by blacks are perfectly well documented, but ya know, there is always some white person who had it rough too. Right? Who the fuck is cherry picking?!

      • Kram, lets have a look at this exchange and then see what point stands. 

        You claimed race relations were a convenient fig  leaf over violence, suggesting the protests could be divorced from race relations. 

        I told some anecdotes, because you had suggested anyone familiar with the US would know there is violence on either side of the racial divide. it's one thing to visit a place. What happens when you live there? I spent years there in both the south east and mid west 

        My stories were meant to indicate that many black Americans experience systemic racism extending to way before either of us were born. The OJ Simpson story illustrates Of course it makes sense to consider it reprehensible to cheer OJ. But to many blacks it represented a cynical response to a history of always getting the short end of the stick. It's a confronting interpretation but I'm telling you it's the thought that was conveyed to me repeatedly when I asked.

        Again, you can't extract the experience of systemic racism from that story or others and still pretend you understand the Black American experience. 

        Now look at your response. A story about a white guy suffering violence. How does that change the point that to understand blacks experience you have to understand their experience of their culture?

        Yeah, exactly, your story fails to address it. Put simply, it's invincible ignorance.

        You sound like the Nazi who told stories about the Jew over-charging them one time. I'm sure you don't mean to sound that way so I just say have a think about it. 

        • My point is that violence solves nothing - violence for, against, with or in the name of blacks, whites, yellows and any other color (American spelling) you choose to nominate is unacceptable.

          That's not a point that makes me sound like a Nazi, or invincibly ignorant. You've completely missed my very simple point. I don't disagree with anything you have said, or are argueing. I don't deny black systematic racism for a minute. I simply don't believe violence does the cause any favours whatsoever and ultimately does far more harm than good. That has been proven to be correct over many decades and it will be proven to be correct again in this instance - that may be unsatisfactory to you (and me) but it doesn't change the fact that nothing will change as a result of what is happening right now.

          I have lived in America as well. I still work in the US around 6 months of the year and have been doing so for 20 years. My business works exclusively for a US company. I understand American culture.

          There's no need to suggest that I'm ignorant Daz - this isn't an arguement that can be won or lost. I am absolutely, utterly convinced however that non violent mass protest would achieve so much more than what we are witnessing right now - it may even encourage a few elites who actually have the power to lobby government and actually achieve something to get involved. Won't happen though.

           

          • Fair points. Kram. 
            I agree violence rarely solves anything. Though violence as a reaction can certainly tell us a whole group has given up on non-violent solutions. With that thought in mind, what should be made of the violence? Does straight condemnation imply an easy acquisence about the conditions the violence reflects? That's my larger question. Put differently, yes we can condemn violence, but stopping at condemnation  without going on to give serious consideration to the conditions that led to it would be to let critique of those conditions off the hook. I have no issue with anyone condemning the violence if they then admit the underlying conditions are real and need to be tackled. 

            Apologies for the ignorance comment. Typed too fast. I was though thinking that I have seen so many comments that find some black on white crime and then falsely equate that with the situation blacks have found themselves in living in the US. The stats tell a different story. I think we are white washing of the problem. One can rebut that by metaphors like the Nazi who points to a Jewish tomato seller over charging him, but that metaphor of scale might not always hit home. But scale is the issue

            • Agree wholeheartedly mate.

              My story wasn't actually meant to be a tit-for-tat black on white violent crime story. I love that (albeit horrific) story because the four heroes were black. Some people are good and some aren't and skin colour has no bearing on it. Hate is hate. Love is love.

              Imagine how many more people would come out if the protests were guaranteed peacefull and the people knew there was no threat of violence. They could get 2 million at Central Park no problem and 500k in Sydney (probably alot more). I'd be there along with zillions others like me. The closest I've ever seen to something like this was Live Aid '85 - where the global community literally united - one of the great spectacles of my life. It's a pipe dream I know - but how good would it be . . . . . . . . . . 

              Take care mate :)

    • These "peaceful" demonstrations as the lefty media are calling them, are nothing more than riots now....no matter what the cause there's no excuse for this carnage.

      The main culprits of these fake demonstrations are ANTIFA - the vehicle the left use to incite civil unrest and rioting. Pallets of bricks and weapons being dropped off in strategic places in the dead of night so that these so called peaceful demonstrators can pickup next day and destroy property and hurl at police. 
      Yep only the left could defend these pieces of shit.

      • Franky do you have any prison tatts. You remind me of my best mate . Biker. Reel smart in the know is sayin the same thing as you. Hes got the hottest Swatsticker tattoo .. top guy . Lefties made his life hell. God bless you!! 

        • Yeah matter of fact I do Princess....

          I've got one on my old fella and it says
          Antidisestablishmentarianism.

           

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Parrafan101 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Why when parra have info to make Vlandys lose his job and reputation and can put the game 10 years back."
54 seconds ago
Parrafan101 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Parra have enough information that could possibly put the NRL and storms exposed which this could possibly or potentially start a war and a super league like comp being form."
3 minutes ago
Rabz S replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion We win the count case weget $250.000 of the storm
"No, the money goes to wherever PARRA paid the legal fees from."
4 minutes ago
Rabz S replied to Blue Eel's discussion The last of the BA Era.
"Didn't he recently get another concussion?
Surely medical retirement is on the cards now."
5 minutes ago
Rabz S replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
""
6 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"It's also interesting Paul Crawley stopped writing about this for Foxsport (he was voraciously pro-Eels, anti-Lomax) as soon as V'landys broke his two-week plus silence. After that, they all were written by Steve Zemek or the generic Foxsport team…"
27 minutes ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"I find it hard to believe that would have been enough to get deal done."
31 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Folks, We defeated the Storm and HQ, who would've probably registered Lomax's Storm contract if it weren't for this legal action. But a 1-2 year read-down was highly likely as I've noted numerous times.
If R360 starts in 2028, how long will Lomax be…"
35 minutes ago
Axel replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"I find it hard to believe that Matterson passed the Bellamy test.  "
36 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions — It's Over Folks Before Main Hearing Begins
"A TKO win. As clean as you could hope for avoiding a messy bloodbath. A settlement that foreshadows the likely read-down. And just like that, the elephant has left the building."
49 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Yes.  It could be that the Storm have agreed to sign Lomax for 2 years and then he can negotiate without any restrictions on his 3rd year with any club.
 "
54 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Well its obvious Matterson will not play another game of nrl. He obviously wants to take this years coin and call it a day. 
Moving to Melbourne is just an excuse "
58 minutes ago
Anguillidae replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"That's an interesting concession. There must be something else coming our way for us to agree to that..."
1 hour ago
Johnny Suede replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
""
1 hour ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"We did agree to lower the amount of time from 2029 return to 2028.
So two years can sit out."
1 hour ago
CarloEEL2 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions — It's Over Folks Before Main Hearing Begins
"Yes very well worded "
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2145

 

The last of the BA Era.

 It has to be discussed dosnt it. Now that Zac can't play NRL for the next 2 years, unless the Eels are compensated, I'd like to move on and discuss the elephant in the room.By all accounts the Eels have tried just about everything in the last 2…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by Rabz S 5 minutes ago
Views: 57

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>