Replies

    • Nice story about OJ. Nice that they thought it was OK for a man to stab a woman to death and revilled in him getting away with murdering a woman. That's touching.

      There was a white truck driver (Reg Denny) who was doing his job - driving his truck - when he came to the intersection of Florence and Normandy in SC LA back in '92. He had to stop at the intersection and was dragged from the cab and kicked, punched, beaten and hit with a claw hammer until he lay semi concious on the ground. One of the "protestors" stood on his neck to enable the other 3 to carry out the assault (oh, the irony). As he attempted to get to his feet one of the "protestors" raised a cinder block high above his head and smashed it into Denny's head then did a little dance while Denny lay unconcious and dying. Eventually 4 actual protesters came to Denny's rescue (absolute legends) and one of them actually drove him straight to hospital (in Denny's truck) no doubt saving his life. The four attackers were all black. The four saviours were also all black.

      Seeings as you were sharing stories Daz I thought this was a beauty. It was all caught on camera and you can check it out on youtube.

      There's no place for violence Daz. None whatsoever. Even racism isn't a worthy excuse. Even the 4 black angels who lived in South Central and were no doubt extremely angered over the debacle that was the Rodney King verdict understood and believed this.

      • Well said Kram!!

        Also at least you ain't cherry picking like the lefties always do.

        • And what cherries are you picking, Frank? You have hundreds of years of post-slavery America during which racial and economic inequalities experienced by blacks are perfectly well documented, but ya know, there is always some white person who had it rough too. Right? Who the fuck is cherry picking?!

      • Kram, lets have a look at this exchange and then see what point stands. 

        You claimed race relations were a convenient fig  leaf over violence, suggesting the protests could be divorced from race relations. 

        I told some anecdotes, because you had suggested anyone familiar with the US would know there is violence on either side of the racial divide. it's one thing to visit a place. What happens when you live there? I spent years there in both the south east and mid west 

        My stories were meant to indicate that many black Americans experience systemic racism extending to way before either of us were born. The OJ Simpson story illustrates Of course it makes sense to consider it reprehensible to cheer OJ. But to many blacks it represented a cynical response to a history of always getting the short end of the stick. It's a confronting interpretation but I'm telling you it's the thought that was conveyed to me repeatedly when I asked.

        Again, you can't extract the experience of systemic racism from that story or others and still pretend you understand the Black American experience. 

        Now look at your response. A story about a white guy suffering violence. How does that change the point that to understand blacks experience you have to understand their experience of their culture?

        Yeah, exactly, your story fails to address it. Put simply, it's invincible ignorance.

        You sound like the Nazi who told stories about the Jew over-charging them one time. I'm sure you don't mean to sound that way so I just say have a think about it. 

        • My point is that violence solves nothing - violence for, against, with or in the name of blacks, whites, yellows and any other color (American spelling) you choose to nominate is unacceptable.

          That's not a point that makes me sound like a Nazi, or invincibly ignorant. You've completely missed my very simple point. I don't disagree with anything you have said, or are argueing. I don't deny black systematic racism for a minute. I simply don't believe violence does the cause any favours whatsoever and ultimately does far more harm than good. That has been proven to be correct over many decades and it will be proven to be correct again in this instance - that may be unsatisfactory to you (and me) but it doesn't change the fact that nothing will change as a result of what is happening right now.

          I have lived in America as well. I still work in the US around 6 months of the year and have been doing so for 20 years. My business works exclusively for a US company. I understand American culture.

          There's no need to suggest that I'm ignorant Daz - this isn't an arguement that can be won or lost. I am absolutely, utterly convinced however that non violent mass protest would achieve so much more than what we are witnessing right now - it may even encourage a few elites who actually have the power to lobby government and actually achieve something to get involved. Won't happen though.

           

          • Fair points. Kram. 
            I agree violence rarely solves anything. Though violence as a reaction can certainly tell us a whole group has given up on non-violent solutions. With that thought in mind, what should be made of the violence? Does straight condemnation imply an easy acquisence about the conditions the violence reflects? That's my larger question. Put differently, yes we can condemn violence, but stopping at condemnation  without going on to give serious consideration to the conditions that led to it would be to let critique of those conditions off the hook. I have no issue with anyone condemning the violence if they then admit the underlying conditions are real and need to be tackled. 

            Apologies for the ignorance comment. Typed too fast. I was though thinking that I have seen so many comments that find some black on white crime and then falsely equate that with the situation blacks have found themselves in living in the US. The stats tell a different story. I think we are white washing of the problem. One can rebut that by metaphors like the Nazi who points to a Jewish tomato seller over charging him, but that metaphor of scale might not always hit home. But scale is the issue

            • Agree wholeheartedly mate.

              My story wasn't actually meant to be a tit-for-tat black on white violent crime story. I love that (albeit horrific) story because the four heroes were black. Some people are good and some aren't and skin colour has no bearing on it. Hate is hate. Love is love.

              Imagine how many more people would come out if the protests were guaranteed peacefull and the people knew there was no threat of violence. They could get 2 million at Central Park no problem and 500k in Sydney (probably alot more). I'd be there along with zillions others like me. The closest I've ever seen to something like this was Live Aid '85 - where the global community literally united - one of the great spectacles of my life. It's a pipe dream I know - but how good would it be . . . . . . . . . . 

              Take care mate :)

    • These "peaceful" demonstrations as the lefty media are calling them, are nothing more than riots now....no matter what the cause there's no excuse for this carnage.

      The main culprits of these fake demonstrations are ANTIFA - the vehicle the left use to incite civil unrest and rioting. Pallets of bricks and weapons being dropped off in strategic places in the dead of night so that these so called peaceful demonstrators can pickup next day and destroy property and hurl at police. 
      Yep only the left could defend these pieces of shit.

      • Franky do you have any prison tatts. You remind me of my best mate . Biker. Reel smart in the know is sayin the same thing as you. Hes got the hottest Swatsticker tattoo .. top guy . Lefties made his life hell. God bless you!! 

        • Yeah matter of fact I do Princess....

          I've got one on my old fella and it says
          Antidisestablishmentarianism.

           

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

macybrown replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"But if storm are trying to negotiate a swap aren't they then agreeing our contract is valid? And if it's valid and per Beach's words, there are fifteen other clubs out there to talk turkey with, or them with us? "
4 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"The Storm should follow V'Landys request that the clubs forget about what they want and put the NRL first. So come on Storm cough up a fair player, get this deal over the line and put the NrL first. Save Lomax from leaving the NRL.
Melbourne and the…"
5 minutes ago
macybrown replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Exactly BE, it'll be zero on cap for dodgy bros and maybe even close to nothing for the turdmax :( after all the nrl will view that storm was trying to keep him in game per V’landys deep wishes 
 "
6 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Yes cuzzy "
10 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Is it Blore or Bore "
14 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Cause Lomax it seems only wants to go to the storm. Hence why we are where we are. I said the other day, what we are doing is gaining us time, improving our negotiating position and shining a media light on all the contract bullshit."
15 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"funny Mace how $250k Lawyers fees can become $30K with a new retainer for the lawyers firm to represent Mr Billionaire owner of say $220K with more to come. mmmmmmm
That sort of thing doesnt happen, just  ask the NRL, the salary cap is being adhered…"
15 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Why would they need another forward "
16 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Did Lomax want to return to Parra? and would it be in the Eels interest to have a player who doesn't want to be there"
16 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Really depends on what player. Knowing the Storm it won't be anyone of value"
20 minutes ago
BEM replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"In breaking news, Parra has knocked back the 200k and settled on 150k instead.
In all seriousness, we have a plethora of forwards and don't need anymore especially a dud like Blore.
It has to be a quality outside back or nothing."
21 minutes ago
macybrown replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Are we not part of the game?
yes it's mind blowing Acme, never once not one iota of understanding to us at all, nor to the signed registered by nrl release contract either!
 Think as much as "Lomax is acting for his family ..." and has a duty too…"
23 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Oh they have what we want but not willing to give what we want. Thats why it stalled. Now I reckon NRL are saying to Storm get it done and Ramien popping into their laps for nothing helps."
31 minutes ago
Acme replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"It's mind blowing to watch V'landy's argue that giving Lomax free reign to ignore his agreements, switch between any club he wants and be totally unnaccountable for his actions is "in the best interest of the game as whole"."
31 minutes ago
macybrown replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Melb can swap deal any player they want on paper but the player must absolutely want to come to us, or else we face the huge issue with the Players Union.
they already said something about the three players we asked in swap not wanting to switch I…"
32 minutes ago
Stevo replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"I reckon we can negotiate harder now and also make the NRL show us the same favouritism they show all the top clubs
 "
39 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2140

 

What's the Iongi Update?

Does anyone else find it weird that the chat on Iongi has gone very quiet? We've heard nothing from the NRL or the club directly, only through newspaper articles.May it be because the NRL don't see it as much of a serious issue? What do we think?…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Acme 1 hour ago
Views: 691

Modern Day best 17

Evening everyone, how good is it having footy back.Now i want to do something different as a series. I will have surveys maybe once a day to decide who is the best player per position to create an overall top 17. Now positions like Fullback for…

Read more…
7 Replies · Reply by LB 8 hours ago
Views: 467

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>