Every year I put it forward. injuries and hias especially in key positions it shows more than ever the extra on bench is needed.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Pezet is no longer our problem now. He is going to that fortress of happiness,brotherhood and......Madge Maguire. Good luck- you are going to need it in that environment."
"Puts an end to this head scratching rumour"
"Nice rhetoric Steely but Pezet was a rookie who we paid virtually nothing for, the idea was he would be an ideal backup and give us time for young players to come through.
Pezet's problem (injuries aside) was not commitment but ABILITY, he wasn't…"
Pezet's problem (injuries aside) was not commitment but ABILITY, he wasn't…"
"I was never sold on peasant as he's a poo player. 1 year signings are shit, and there's not many examples wheras a player has gone on a loan type deal for a year and killed it. TPJ was just ok , sorta . Let's hope Luai is the exception.
DCE has…"
DCE has…"
Replies
Yeah, it's rediculous why they haven't done it yet already with all the injuries that occur. It would improve the product on tv. I think you only need to go to a 5 man bench though, with an 18th man still.
It's getting to a stage where even the lesser concussions are treated more seriously it may even help them make the decision to keep the players off easier .
In 2000 season because it started early because of the Olympics they had a 6 man bench.
4 interchange 2 reserves if the reserve came on the person he replaced was off.
Id like a variation of that 3 man 6 interchange bench.
2 reserves good coaches could be real tactical with the reserves plus they cover injuries aswell
Sounds interesting offside could work well