Every year I put it forward. injuries and hias especially in key positions it shows more than ever the extra on bench is needed.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I had no issues with Guymer playing Centre and honestly felt he did fine. Was not a liability at all. Though me saying he was playing out of position must give him grace in the eyes of others as if you put Moses at Fullback you are going to get a…"
"Have you watched Manly, Cowboys, and Titans play this year? They are mud, and completely out of form. I am definitely saying we should beat them. Anything can happen, but we're a better team than these 3. Tigers halves have both copped injuries, but…"
"Both true.
"
"
"I havn't seen the replay but at the game is was WTF?"
Replies
Yeah, it's rediculous why they haven't done it yet already with all the injuries that occur. It would improve the product on tv. I think you only need to go to a 5 man bench though, with an 18th man still.
It's getting to a stage where even the lesser concussions are treated more seriously it may even help them make the decision to keep the players off easier .
In 2000 season because it started early because of the Olympics they had a 6 man bench.
4 interchange 2 reserves if the reserve came on the person he replaced was off.
Id like a variation of that 3 man 6 interchange bench.
2 reserves good coaches could be real tactical with the reserves plus they cover injuries aswell
Sounds interesting offside could work well