Every year I put it forward. injuries and hias especially in key positions it shows more than ever the extra on bench is needed.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"The NRL are involved because Melbourne got them involved with threats of penalities if Parra didnt comply"
"In return for lomax we should ask for the storm to buy all our Top 30 a boat. The boys can then rip up Parra River with donuts"
"We should. He'll be out of puff and sorts. Target him all game long."
"Lomax isnt on our cap, hes was released and cap space freed. his breaking the condition of his release, we should not be settling for a mid level player unless its multiple players.
if we were smart he would not be playing rd1 against us either. "
if we were smart he would not be playing rd1 against us either. "
Replies
Yeah, it's rediculous why they haven't done it yet already with all the injuries that occur. It would improve the product on tv. I think you only need to go to a 5 man bench though, with an 18th man still.
It's getting to a stage where even the lesser concussions are treated more seriously it may even help them make the decision to keep the players off easier .
In 2000 season because it started early because of the Olympics they had a 6 man bench.
4 interchange 2 reserves if the reserve came on the person he replaced was off.
Id like a variation of that 3 man 6 interchange bench.
2 reserves good coaches could be real tactical with the reserves plus they cover injuries aswell
Sounds interesting offside could work well