Every year I put it forward. injuries and hias especially in key positions it shows more than ever the extra on bench is needed.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"So why have 5 and a replacement just have 6 it's simple "
"Carlo, my daughter and I are 1.5 seasons away from the ST finale. No spoilers! An entrancing little series. Episodes also long enough to flesh out characters and plot elements. The Kid has also become a Kate Bush fan and is on the synthesizer…"
"I don't watch it , but heard my son and all his mates whining about them just having to add in a gay angle to it for no reason. It's good to see the kids are totally aware that Netflix has an agenda to force this rubbish into their heads. I…"
"Replacements makes sense. I don't think you even need 6, it is something that can work though at the same time. 5 could do with an extra replacement.
But I understand as 18 and 19 more times than most would be a Half and a back."
But I understand as 18 and 19 more times than most would be a Half and a back."
Replies
Yeah, it's rediculous why they haven't done it yet already with all the injuries that occur. It would improve the product on tv. I think you only need to go to a 5 man bench though, with an 18th man still.
It's getting to a stage where even the lesser concussions are treated more seriously it may even help them make the decision to keep the players off easier .
In 2000 season because it started early because of the Olympics they had a 6 man bench.
4 interchange 2 reserves if the reserve came on the person he replaced was off.
Id like a variation of that 3 man 6 interchange bench.
2 reserves good coaches could be real tactical with the reserves plus they cover injuries aswell
Sounds interesting offside could work well