Every year I put it forward. injuries and hias especially in key positions it shows more than ever the extra on bench is needed.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Blue Eel, the thought that kept coming back to me about Dylbag$ was that I didn't think the player options were clearly and simply bad negotiator failures. I understand they were weaponized and so we can now say "bad idea" (same Luai!). But the club…"
"All cat typing memes are confessions!"
"Poppa, I can add to your anecdote about the grade cricketer. Sometimes I see grad students whom I think "they will make it", and others "nah they will not make it". Academia is a hyper competitive market, with precariat positions more the norm now…"
"Captain, I agree with all of that above. The distinction between being responsible and being accountable is vital.
I will note here, though, that under the glare of a critique of scaepgoating, you took the time to clearly articulate a…"
I will note here, though, that under the glare of a critique of scaepgoating, you took the time to clearly articulate a…"
Replies
Yeah, it's rediculous why they haven't done it yet already with all the injuries that occur. It would improve the product on tv. I think you only need to go to a 5 man bench though, with an 18th man still.
It's getting to a stage where even the lesser concussions are treated more seriously it may even help them make the decision to keep the players off easier .
In 2000 season because it started early because of the Olympics they had a 6 man bench.
4 interchange 2 reserves if the reserve came on the person he replaced was off.
Id like a variation of that 3 man 6 interchange bench.
2 reserves good coaches could be real tactical with the reserves plus they cover injuries aswell
Sounds interesting offside could work well