Every year I put it forward. injuries and hias especially in key positions it shows more than ever the extra on bench is needed.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"This contravenes code of conduct number 5."
"This contravenes Guideline 4: sexist. "
"No doubts about it. Hopefully this will make clubs second this before trying this with us again thinking we'll just rollover."
"21-23 is the age I want to see if the club can retain the key to this crop of kids.
Thats for the most part where the bell toll's mentally and physically for these kids.
We just have to keep stacking the talent and identifying the next group…"
Thats for the most part where the bell toll's mentally and physically for these kids.
We just have to keep stacking the talent and identifying the next group…"
Replies
Yeah, it's rediculous why they haven't done it yet already with all the injuries that occur. It would improve the product on tv. I think you only need to go to a 5 man bench though, with an 18th man still.
It's getting to a stage where even the lesser concussions are treated more seriously it may even help them make the decision to keep the players off easier .
In 2000 season because it started early because of the Olympics they had a 6 man bench.
4 interchange 2 reserves if the reserve came on the person he replaced was off.
Id like a variation of that 3 man 6 interchange bench.
2 reserves good coaches could be real tactical with the reserves plus they cover injuries aswell
Sounds interesting offside could work well