me personally I prefer Cleary. I think he will be even better in the future. But so is Munster unless grog ruins him. if you could buy one of those two. Who would it be
Views: 499
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.
If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation.
"HOE i hear experts a few times say players like say Andrew Fifita who grew up never watching the game and not really dreaming of playing are the best players to have as the occasion doesn't get to them as much. To that i say can be true but can also…"
"Mate I obviously haven't seen all the lower grade games but I've seen my share and I've never rated him. Personally I think JA showed far more in the lower grades than Talagi ever did and he's absolutely miles away from some of the gun kids that are…"
"I was wondering who you were talking about, yes Ethyn Martin. He is still super raw as i mentioned. But the upside is higher with him compared to say Lumelume, yet was not picked. That is where i am going with it. On the Wing i want to see how he…"
"I think that's right... and a massive concern. They are corporate types, banker / finance mentality... I think they are absolutely linking the 2 i.e. good corp governance / good returns = success on footy field. As such, like you say... they wait.…"
Replies
Depending on your teams needs, Cleary is more of an organizer and would be more valuable on the open market
Munster for me he is unpredictable while Cleary is Predictable. We don't need predictable we already have enough.
Exactly
Bingo. Cleary is just Moses with bigger balls.
As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.
If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation.
Munster isn't a halfback for starters.
The comparison should be Cleary or one of Moses DCE Reynolds
That's what's unique about the storm, Hughes, Paps and Munster are all fullbacks
I think he meant half's not halfbacks.
For our team, Munster.
I believe with Munster we'd get that elusive premiership. That's how great he'd be for this team.
I still think we'd be a massive threat with...
1. Perham
4 Gutherson
6. Munster
7. Moses
9. D Brown
The rest filled with mainly current players and young and exciting players from our development to get those big names under the cap.
If the Storm and Rorters can get so many big names under the cap, why can't we?
Perham will be lucky to be in the 17 once everyone's back.
If we put DB to 9 it would be the worst career move for him.
Gutho to centre umm I guess you missed last weeks game.
Munster is a great player but it's just not a realistic move for him to come here.
Moses yep 7s his spot much like 6 is DBs spot.