Graham Annesley has conceded a controversial obstruction call that cost Roosters star Joey Manu a fair try against the Panthers was wrong.

 

The NRL head of football has wasted no time conceding that video referee Chris Butler failed to use the necessary level of discretion in incorrectly deeming that Panthers fullback Dylan Edwards was obstructed from defending the no-try due to a collision with Roosters decoy runner Jared Waerea-Hargreaves.

 

The alleged obstruction from Waerea-Hargreaves on Edwards occurred 20-metres away from where Manu grounded the football.

 

The no-try call happened in the 22nd minute with the Roosters trailing 12-0 nil.

 

Instead of waiting until Tuesday’s media briefing to respond to the howler, Annesley stepped forward on Friday morning.

 

Annesley moved to differentiate the call between last weekend’s polarising decision to pull back a Manly try due to Jake Trbojevic running an obstruction against Parramatta’s Luca Moretti.

 

“Last week I supported two obstruction rulings by the Bunker,’’ Annesley said.

 

“I talked about the need for the lead runner to continue through the defensive line, and for the play not to be turned back through the gap created by a collision with a defender.

 

“Neither of these factors were present in last night’s decision (for the Manu no-try).

 

“In the circumstances, the Bunker does have discretion to consider whether a defender could have prevented the try.

 

“In my opinion, the try would have been scored regardless and the on-field decision should not have been overturned”.

 

The Daily Telegraph understands Annesley was comfortable with Butler’s decision to award Sunia Turuva a try for the Panthers even though Liam Martin ran through as the lead runner and interfered with Sitili Tupouniua and Luke Keary as they came across in cover defence.

 

***************

How many calls go Penriths way? It's dead set embarrassing and blatant favoritism. Whether it's 50/50 calls like this or their players not getting suspended 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Latest comments

Prof. Daz replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"Low doses maybe 24 hrs max but medium to high up to 72 hrs. "
32 seconds ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"The Eels' props are mostly young, so how much of Paulo's salary is on-field and how much is off-field (trainining, mentoring etc)?
Tuivati, Brown & Talangi are all still in the rookie stage, ditto Pryke (listed as pro now), leaving Paulo and Moretti…"
3 minutes ago
Poppa replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"Can't i join in?
"Imagine driving your car past a primary school at 3pm doing 200km/h, but you don't kill anyone,"
 
I don't understand the conversation, so you don't need to thank me.
 "
6 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"LB, the fact Ryda T is 19 is why EE is correct to have concerns that Ryda was gassed after just a few sets in his debut!
How much of Paulo's potential salary is tied up with showing the young props how to make sure they're not gassed after 4-5 sets?!"
9 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"The principle behind pay while suspended was made clear in the court cases against the NRL's no-fault stand down policy. Obviously a player is paid while suspended if the suspension is from an on-field incident. Though suspensions longer than 8…"
15 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"Victor Radley got 10 weeks unpaid. So it's possible JAC could get 12 weeks unpaid. JAC might have to agree, I think, lest restraint of trade considerations arise. Recall in DBL's restraint of trade case, one reason for finding it legal was…"
25 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"Seems Wiz is unable to grasp moral vs legal impairment, including why assuming reckless driving due to above-zero drug count is incorrect. 
You know what they say, if it's too much for your small brain, just don't comment "
31 minutes ago
Wizard “Alcatraz “Sleeve replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"If he was suspended due to an act at work ( playing for the club)  , then yes his salary would and should be covered.  But do you think he should be paid what 115k ? For getting on the bags and driving whilst hes serving his suspension ?  It's…"
41 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"$650k per year is nothing to sneeze at! I wouldn't mind that per year"
45 minutes ago
Wizard “Alcatraz “Sleeve replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"And you'd be wrong.  Laws stance is zero tolerance.  The amount of words you can post on the wall of text you both  wrote or level of impairment is as relevant as what thongs he was wearing. You wish to change the laws , go for gold, it'd be…"
53 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"You are the only one one here who thinks he left on his own accord.  Sarantinos said himself he sees himself as a future ceo at another club at some stage.   If that was the case,  why would Sarantinos leave the eels in such a lowly position?   …"
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Brad was about saving himself. 
- The way reserve grade was turned into.a holding yard for drifters rather than concentrate on development.  That was criminal 
- the choices he made not to have better assistants who could challenge him further down…"
2 hours ago
JEELman replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Swings and roundabouts. It's just magnified because of the finals.
 "
2 hours ago
Bourbon Man replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"I agree with you Wiz. The Dogs cut him loose because he was on big money, was carrying too much weight and was out with injury too often.
With us, he has lost the weight, has been relatively injury free, is teaching the younger players, is a clear…"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Chiefy, what the fcuk are you talking about, there were no politics with Saratinos, he was doing his best to hold the ship together.....just reinforcing, he was not tapped or ousted as you have said......he volunteered because he realised we were…"
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
2 hours ago
More…

 

Warriors injustice?

No warriors fan but seriously some of the worst refereeing or more so inaction of the bunker that I’ve ever seen. This game has gone to shit. The Cherry Evans no penalty / sin bin was bad enough but that shit was just appeasing the betting…

Read more…
30 Replies · Reply by Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 2 hours ago
Views: 912

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>