Graham Annesley has conceded a controversial obstruction call that cost Roosters star Joey Manu a fair try against the Panthers was wrong.

 

The NRL head of football has wasted no time conceding that video referee Chris Butler failed to use the necessary level of discretion in incorrectly deeming that Panthers fullback Dylan Edwards was obstructed from defending the no-try due to a collision with Roosters decoy runner Jared Waerea-Hargreaves.

 

The alleged obstruction from Waerea-Hargreaves on Edwards occurred 20-metres away from where Manu grounded the football.

 

The no-try call happened in the 22nd minute with the Roosters trailing 12-0 nil.

 

Instead of waiting until Tuesday’s media briefing to respond to the howler, Annesley stepped forward on Friday morning.

 

Annesley moved to differentiate the call between last weekend’s polarising decision to pull back a Manly try due to Jake Trbojevic running an obstruction against Parramatta’s Luca Moretti.

 

“Last week I supported two obstruction rulings by the Bunker,’’ Annesley said.

 

“I talked about the need for the lead runner to continue through the defensive line, and for the play not to be turned back through the gap created by a collision with a defender.

 

“Neither of these factors were present in last night’s decision (for the Manu no-try).

 

“In the circumstances, the Bunker does have discretion to consider whether a defender could have prevented the try.

 

“In my opinion, the try would have been scored regardless and the on-field decision should not have been overturned”.

 

The Daily Telegraph understands Annesley was comfortable with Butler’s decision to award Sunia Turuva a try for the Panthers even though Liam Martin ran through as the lead runner and interfered with Sitili Tupouniua and Luke Keary as they came across in cover defence.

 

***************

How many calls go Penriths way? It's dead set embarrassing and blatant favoritism. Whether it's 50/50 calls like this or their players not getting suspended 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Latest comments

The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Undisclosed settlement ...so win/win?"
8 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Serious question...forced his hand to do what?
He signed an agreement, which I assume is legally binding. As you say, we hold all the leverage whether he was released or whatever you think he'd be forced to do."
10 minutes ago
RB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"He's not signed to parramatta anymore. The old contract was torn up conditionally."
13 minutes ago
GM replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Fkn fruit loop"
14 minutes ago
RB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"How'd that go?"
14 minutes ago
CarloEEL2 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"You would think so "
17 minutes ago
CarloEEL2 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"This !!!!!"
17 minutes ago
CarloEEL2 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"What a shit head "
18 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Club shouldn't have released him and forced his hand we held all the leverage and still do.
Cant afford to lose this court case and he walks to Melbourne.
If that does happen then the strong just stay strong."
21 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"would parra be able to countersue lomax for breach of contract if this case goes ahead ?"
43 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to Roy tannous's discussion 😂😂😂😂
"I see the future and the present, if these juniors become the all mighty which is confident they will. Then we need a good R&R to keep the core players here. And I don't see MON to do thaT."
45 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to Roy tannous's discussion 😂😂😂😂
"I'm confident will win but I know the implications it'll have with a shit R&R."
46 minutes ago
Axel replied to Roy tannous's discussion 😂😂😂😂
"At least he's consistent LOL"
1 hour ago
Axel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"....and that's the reason why Ryles was more than happy to let him go. He's an odd character and I have no doubt there's more to this story, which is not being made public..
Going legal is not the same as his manager leaking a few bits of…"
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels reject Melbourne Storm’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax for 2026 season
"And if we have. Whomever is responsible and accountable should be shown the door immediately it comes to pass."
1 hour ago
Seraph replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Correct me if I'm wrong, but thinking back to when BA was sacked, weren't there rumors at the time he wanted to backflip on the deal?"
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Tin Tim on Wednesday
Views: 1822

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 178

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>