Graham Annesley has conceded a controversial obstruction call that cost Roosters star Joey Manu a fair try against the Panthers was wrong.

 

The NRL head of football has wasted no time conceding that video referee Chris Butler failed to use the necessary level of discretion in incorrectly deeming that Panthers fullback Dylan Edwards was obstructed from defending the no-try due to a collision with Roosters decoy runner Jared Waerea-Hargreaves.

 

The alleged obstruction from Waerea-Hargreaves on Edwards occurred 20-metres away from where Manu grounded the football.

 

The no-try call happened in the 22nd minute with the Roosters trailing 12-0 nil.

 

Instead of waiting until Tuesday’s media briefing to respond to the howler, Annesley stepped forward on Friday morning.

 

Annesley moved to differentiate the call between last weekend’s polarising decision to pull back a Manly try due to Jake Trbojevic running an obstruction against Parramatta’s Luca Moretti.

 

“Last week I supported two obstruction rulings by the Bunker,’’ Annesley said.

 

“I talked about the need for the lead runner to continue through the defensive line, and for the play not to be turned back through the gap created by a collision with a defender.

 

“Neither of these factors were present in last night’s decision (for the Manu no-try).

 

“In the circumstances, the Bunker does have discretion to consider whether a defender could have prevented the try.

 

“In my opinion, the try would have been scored regardless and the on-field decision should not have been overturned”.

 

The Daily Telegraph understands Annesley was comfortable with Butler’s decision to award Sunia Turuva a try for the Panthers even though Liam Martin ran through as the lead runner and interfered with Sitili Tupouniua and Luke Keary as they came across in cover defence.

 

***************

How many calls go Penriths way? It's dead set embarrassing and blatant favoritism. Whether it's 50/50 calls like this or their players not getting suspended 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Latest comments

Darren Munro replied to Roy tannous's discussion Is this the bench moving foward
"I think Jr starts tds and edwards 14."
2 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"He left Penrith for the big coin. As for the dogs who's to say they're not pushing him out or he's disillusioned with the direction of the dogs. I'm tipping he wants to stay in Sydney with a young family or I reckon Perth might have got him by now.…"
3 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I thought Hayward lifted the tempo when he came on and really had the bulldogs punching holes in the middle which gave Burton room to run which is when he's at his best. Less organising more running (Galvin is much the same). Melbourne must be…"
3 hours ago
Gucci replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"He is honestly a great player already would be stoked to sign him"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"But then you lose a quality player."
3 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Is this the bench moving foward
"If it was 27 I'd have Paulo, Mataele starting and maybe have Tuivati, Moretti coming off bench or we buy a Spencer could be a game changer. What we really need is a meter eater winger and X factor centre."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"It can work, Burton is not like Norman where he tried to take over. Burton is more than happy playing 2nd fiddle and eyes up. But can also do some organising if asked upon him."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"If he was comfortable moving to the Centres, he would have stayed at Penrith and even Dogs for 2027."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Don't think he would need to recommend him. Ryles would have know all about him before chasing, if they are chasing. If anything, Ryles asked JAC his opinion of playing alongside Burto."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Dogs would pitch in for next year you would assume. $750k is a decent price for an experienced 5/8 with rep level experience and a premiership winner. 
Though to get him over i reckon you need to go $850k. Which even then i feel is not too bad."
3 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Adam Hayne's discussion Will Penisini Gone
"Rocco berry would be handy"
4 hours ago
Richard Jackson replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"You're exactly right Angry. Star of the night even though earlier I had stated he had nothing.....except a kicking game!
Haven't seen that quality in him before and may have to re-assess him. Chuckle"
4 hours ago
Aracom replied to Adam Hayne's discussion Will Penisini Gone
"Good riddance. What a waste of an investmentWe did right by him, gave him coaching, gave him good deals,Very happy to be moving on,Penisini has never impressed meHim and his brother have chewed up enough space"
4 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"now we talking......make it happen MON or have a shot at these three"
4 hours ago
Slippery. replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?

 I misread. Burton is reported to be on $750,000 for this year and next.  Anything around that figure would be ok. "
4 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I hope so we need something...with lomax fucking off we have no elite players in our backline besides Mo and Iongi. and Moses cant goal kick anymore he is rubbish last few years"
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2442

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>