Featured Discussions (1119)

Sort by

Round 21, 2024

I was going through my camera roll earlier, and came across this photo of our lineup from exactly one year ago — Round 21, 2024 against the Melbourne Storm.


13667599097?profile=RESIZE_710x

Upon reading the names, it was mind-blowing the quantity of players who are no longer at th

Read more…
24 Replies · Reply by Joeyboyz Jul 24, 2025
Views: 1190

More stuff to read

The Badger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"A good young player that will add value to our football program over time is ok, I reckon.
Someone like Mariner or T'oa and another decent youngster in an identified position (e.g. #6) would probably be acceptable."
50 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"I note 7 of the 20 occured in 25/26
 "
2 hours ago
Eelovution replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Will. Yes you are corect in that Galvin was under contract when the Eels approached him. However the circumstances were different and the Eels approach was totally legal. At that time Richardson-Tigers CEO- had offered Galvin a large increse in…"
4 hours ago
will replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Just playing devil's advocate here,  but wasn't Galvin still under contract with the tigers when Parra was trying to recruit him?
We are arguing that there is one rule for the storm and one rule us, but really we do it too"
5 hours ago
More…