Eels thrashed in final trial

The Parramatta Eels have been well beaten by a resurgent Sydney Roosters going down 40 to 14 after conceding 28 points in a poor second half.

The Roosters were fielding a near full-strength side while the Eels had a host of stars missing. While Timana Tahu was back in the Blue and Gold, Justin Poore, Shane Shackleton and Eric Grothe joined Jarryd Hayne, Ben Smith and Daniel Mortimer on the sidelines.

The Roosters started the better and scored on the 11th minute mark via a Todd Carney kick for Anthony Minichiello. Mitchell Pearce then scored under the posts to extend the lead to 12 to nil.

However, the Eels worked back into the match and dominated the second quarter. A Kris Keating bomb bounced between defenders and was picked up by Joel Reddy and then Brendan Oake buried over from a Keating short pass.

The second half saw the Roosters score first and then gift a try straight back to the Eels when they dropped the kick-off. Mateo picked up a loose ball and scored the easiest of four pointers.

From then on though it was all Roosters running, however, it should be pointed out that Daniel Anderson experimented with a lot of combinations in the second half including Humble at half.

Importantly, Nathan Hindmarsh got through the match and will be fine for Round One.

While, the three straight losses don't look great on paper, it's worth noting we have never fielded a team that looks anything like our top 17. Daniel Anderson has some work to do but it will be a very different team that runs out for the Eels in Round one.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Agreed. We may or may not have a slow start to the season, but surely we can't say our chances have diminished based on three ordinary trial results.
  • Score doesn't matter. No injuries, Tahu got to play and get rid of the cobwebs. You don't win a comp in February. Bring on Round 1!!
    • so very true.
  • How'd Tahu go?
  • It seemed that Parra had no real game plan other then throw the ball one way and then the other and see what happens. I don't think Anderson was too worried about a plan to beat the Roosters.

    Mateo looked threatening most of the time he played (though there were some passes he should have held). There seems to be a nice little combination forming with him and Kris Keating (who also did well). Out right side defence leaked all night which is a worry.

    But in the end it was just a trial. Roosters obviously were happy but I wonder how it feels to have your team peak in February?
  • Forgot to add Tahu had some nice runs in the first half. But the ball seemed to not go his way as often as it should have.
    • From my vantage point I'd say that Tahu had 2 good runs and made one massive hit.
      Other than that his game was pretty ordinary.
      He went for a lazy intercept, which led to their second try. He didn't bother chasing once their second rower broke through. But, in a trial game why would you bother?
      He was also responsible for another one of their tries. He was in the right position to catch a bomb and from the way Humble left it alone it seemed as if Tahu had actually called for it. Neither of them ended up contesting it and it was the easiest of tries for the Roosters.

      It's TT's first game back and his first chance to work on any kind of match fitness. He certainly has a lot of work to do over the next fortnight, and after seeing him tonight I'm not expecting him to start playing well until maybe round 5.
      • Just for the record, that messed up bomb was not Tahu and Humble, it was Uaisele and Humble. It happened right where I was sitting. Presuming we're talking about the same thing of course! Didn't see the attempted intercept, that was probably on the other side of the ground to me.
  • Who really cares about the result of a trial? Some of the comments regarding the coach and team were Kindie stuff. Don't worry about losing a few trials where the smartest coach in the NRL has decided to try a few things that he hasn't cared to share with us.

    After watching first grade league since about 1967 I can't ever say that winning trials has ever been a reliable yardstick for anything. All I ever care about is that no one is injured.

    Providing your second round is good like ours was last year, even the first round doesn't account for much. But having said that I'd rather the team be winning regularly from the start.

    I'm very keen to learn about how Tom Humble went. Can Phil or Daneel shed any light there?

    Thanks fellas, for keeping us informed.

    Regards,
  • Look the only thing we can really take out of 2010 trials is we may be a bit underdone. That's very understandable considering we played in a grand final and every other team has a few weeks extra training on us.
    In the hagan years we were frustratingly patchy. Good one week average the next.

    I expect we will be off the pace for the first 5 rounds then start to dominate as our match fitness improves and catches the rest of the field.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin posted a discussion
From what I've just heard from Rylsey's latest presser, Galvin looks to.be all but done at Parramatta.  When asked the club wouldn't be in a hurry to sign Galvin as our halves are set for 25,  Ryles answered.  " a lot of strange things happen in…
15 seconds ago
Mathew Clarke replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Dogs now heavy favourites for Galvin.
"If Galvin decides to go to the Dogs, good for him and them, the Eels will move on.
As previously stated by others in this blog, there are other options who would be cheaper (possibly better), leaving the Eels with more money to buy some other…"
3 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Dogs now heavy favourites for Galvin.
""
7 minutes ago
ParraEels replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Dogs now heavy favourites for Galvin.
"Thanks for confirming he is coming here."
11 minutes ago
More…