Replies

  • Bah? I think we need some context here.

    • Posted as humour, so I think yo is meant to laugh

       

      • Been a eels supporter up here in Queensland for 45 years it's a joke a bit like our team at the moment eel down to blue and gold blood.signed a long time eel suffer since 1986 maybe before I die

        • Hey Randolph, good to see you posting in humour.....why don't you ask to set up a "druggie" column.

          DRUGs! Where to buy them, how to use them, what to do when your addicted.... you could write a column every week? Best bargains?.....maybe even a Travel section "come trip with me"? 

          Also you may be able to come up with a Euthanasia drug especially for me, but I would be careful of the timing at the moment.....we could lose half the site!

          Just remember Randy, I am in your corner ...... I never believed you were good for nothing!

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Phil Mann replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"As I read it, the storm are paying $250 toward our legal costs but in addition they will have to look after their own, so it's $250k +
Hope they engaged their legal team on a: "no win, no fee" basis!!   hahaha"
48 seconds ago
The Captain replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"I have a feeling the NRL will be pretty nice to us for a while given we obviously have a few smoking guns they obviously don't want public."
1 minute ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Just one question, and i don't think it will matter much because Lomax will get a league deal somewhere  -  was the 3 years  reduced to 2 as part of an agreement between the two clubs or was it ordered by the courts.
Thats the only part that is…"
3 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion One of these 6 players will be an Eel
"moale has a 3yr deal at manly starting in 27"
3 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"$250k in our legal fees. Didn't they also agree to pay Lomaxs?"
4 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion One of these 6 players will be an Eel
"What happens with this blog now lol?"
4 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"What the heck were the skeletons in the closet for the NRL and the Storm to lose the game of chicken this badly?
This is an epic back down and I guarantee this comes with more than what was agreed to in court. It's pretty clear that the Eels have…"
9 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"eli the aru dont want to offer a contract to lomax "
10 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Whilst it is a legal cost, the interesting thing is that Storm is paying on his behalf. If Storm come to a deal and Lomax joins them, there would be a argument to say the money is eqivalent to a payment to lomax. 
Lomax may see that 250k coming off…"
15 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Bit hard when he's on the verge of a medical retirement."
18 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"So no deal, Storm just didn't want to fae the court and get cross examined. Lomax settles for the status quo. Wow I said it last night that it came down to Matterson sleeping on it and once again he turns up in the morning and says nah not helping…"
19 minutes ago
CarloEEL2 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Corporate box for Arthur and Gladys for life I say "
21 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Sets the tone for the season ahead doesn't it."
21 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"on the basis that, if proven, Melbourne were footing thye legal bills of Lomax, a player not contracted to them. "
24 minutes ago
CarloEEL2 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Sucks to have an SC who's a die hard Parra fan 😆😆😆😆🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻"
24 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Agree with you LB. If he has a case for medical retirement, which seems so, can't we just persue that now? Win/win."
26 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2145

 

Eels win in the Supreme Court

Summary:Zac Lomax has settled his legal dispute with the Parramatta Eels, agreeing he cannot return to the NRL without the club’s written consent before the 2028 season.In a surprise development in the NSW Supreme Court, both parties reached a…

Read more…
62 Replies · Reply by Phil Mann 48 seconds ago
Views: 1192

What's the Iongi Update?

Does anyone else find it weird that the chat on Iongi has gone very quiet? We've heard nothing from the NRL or the club directly, only through newspaper articles.May it be because the NRL don't see it as much of a serious issue? What do we think?…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Acme 18 hours ago
Views: 1128

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>