One year contracts only with no TPAs...would this work?

Just a thought, if the NRL shook things up and implemented one year contracts only with no TPAs do you all think this would work. It would stop back ending deals, players would be playing for a contract every year and the Mr Politis and alike would have to play fair. I’m sure there are many reasons why it wouldn’t work, however could it? Interested in opinions on this. Smoke me if you must. Just asking.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If you're banning TPA's your banning TPA's. The duration seems irrelevant. Good luck policing it any case.

    Backending is a different issue and it's not outside the rules. All clubs do it. So why ban it?

    Clubs and players association would never buy into it in any case.
    • What other VEO's Fong? They weren't banging down the door when the job was vacamt after Seward got punted
  • We would have players leave our game or get poached by other sports
  • 1. Illegal/Against regulations to restrict trade

    2. Union would take our best players

    3. TPA's would still exist, just not out in the open

    • Spot on Fuuuii ..
  • Bernie not using TPA's. I thought the rules were that clubs can not have anything to do with a TPA, it had to be at arms length. My understanding is that the rules state that CEO's / Clubs cannot organise or guarantee any TPA, they must be sourced by the player or player manager all on their own to be legal under NRL rules. It's just all a great big capital F joke. Remove all restrictions and let each club sign who they want for whatever they want. Sink or swim, no bailouts. At the moment only a handful of clubs appear to be abiding by the rules and a select few at the top of the ladder hide the breach of salary cap so well that they literally have no cap now anyway.

    Calling Bernie a dope, well I'm not convinced he is, I think he is just very honest and operates by the rules. Unfortunately in the NRL world he is in the minority and whilst the others get away with it, then we can't compete in the market. The NRL are the only ones that can do something about it. Enforce it properly or get rid of it. 

  • The argument from the NRL is by removing TPA"s your removing a stream of cash that is investing in the NRL. The problem is it's only an extension of the salary cap. Politis and crow and I'm sure directors from the storm have businesses overseas. How hard would it be for crow to purchase a house for a Burgess in the UK, how the he'll will that be tracked. Same as politis.
  • The Players Association would never allow it, it's a blatant restraint of trade if there was one.

  • Put a cap on tpa’s and make all contracts public, just like they do in usa

    • They don't restrict how much players can outside of their game.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Frankie Fong replied to Cranky Brad is here!!!'s discussion Bye bye Brad Arthur
"Having Meninga around any club is not good , this aura that has been built around him because he is seen as some kind of man management guru is hilarious . 
 
It's very easy to man manage champion and once in a generation players like he had in…"
6 minutes ago
Nitram replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Lane is cooked
"Yeah so true. I remember thinking a couple of years ago, how is this bloke in first grade. The coach persisted and for while he was just hanging onto a spot from the bench getting some minutes in the middle. Then bang, he came good and was for at…"
8 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Cranky Brad is here!!!'s discussion Bye bye Brad Arthur
"Nathan Cayless is an option. "
11 minutes ago
TolEllts replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Lane is cooked
"Reckon he wants to quit being a player and be a psychologist but could not give away his fat salary"
12 minutes ago
More…