Eels Dont Want to Move Games

Parramatta expect the NRL to ask them to shift their upcoming blockbuster against South Sydney to ANZ Stadium but want the clash to remain at Pirtek Stadium, where they are unbeaten this season.

A sell-out crowd of 18,631 watched Saturday afternoon's 36-0 thrashing of St George Illawarra, which keeps the Eels entrenched in the top eight.

But while the renaissance of the 2012 and 2013 wooden spooners has their large fanbase crawling out of the woodwork, it is presenting a dilemma for their management and officials at League Central. Parramatta are wary of not locking out supporters from marquee matches such as Sydney derbies due to the capacity restraints at Pirtek. However, they are reticent to abandon a happy hunting ground where they have prevailed on all five occasions this season.

With the potential for a crowd well in excess of 30,000, the round-19 encounter with Souths is exactly the kind of major fixture the NRL has in mind with its stadiums policy of playing big games at big venues such as ANZ and Allianz Stadium. Parramatta are not against that principle but they don't want this particular match relocated.
"At the end of the day we want to win footy games. That is the No.1 thing right now," Eels chief executive Scott Seward said. "We also understand we have a responsibility to our members and our fans and also the rugby league public, so it is a real balancing act right now. But certainly our preference is we stay at Pirtek Stadium and maintain our unbeaten record there. We will obviously get the views of the NRL on it and I imagine what their view will be. We'll make a decision very quickly or a decision will be made for us, one way or the other."

Already this season the Eels have had a "home" game against Wests Tigers, on Easter Monday, at ANZ, drawing an attendance of 50,668. The meeting with Souths is set down for a Friday night in July.

The quandary facing the Eels and the NRL may not be an isolated one if Parramatta continue to impress under Brad Arthur. It is the reason they are desperate to get an answer on their $120 million joint proposal with Western Sydney Wanderers to transform Pirtek Stadium into a 32,000-seat venue.

"The other issue that this highlights and that needs to be addressed very quickly is: what is the future of Parramatta Stadium. What is the government going to do there?" Seward said. "Are they seriously going to redevelop Parramatta and give it the capacity it deserves or are we going to continue to have these discussions. It's a fantastic problem to have. It means things are starting to improve and the club is going in the right direction. The fear that I've got right now, and it's a great fear, is if we get where we expect we're going to end up in a short period of time this is going to be a question that gets asked every week regardless of who we're playing. It's a hard argument if you think you can draw 35,000 to 40,000 for that (Souths) game. How do you justify not moving it? The simple way to look at it is if we played at ANZ Stadium we would get a bigger crowd. But we want to play at Parramatta."



Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/eels-success-puts-pressure-on-club-to-shift-marquee-matches-to-bigger-venues-20140518-zrggy.html#ixzz3299MUIRw

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If NRL want us to move a home game then they should give us another home game like canberra at pirtex

  • LOL

    When I read this, straight away I thought Seward HAS to say.., "we don't want to leave Pirtek".

    I bet deep down he does though! 

    • Indeed.  Sounds very much at odds with what was said earlier on in the year.  I expect it's simply lip-service.

  • Never stand between a chief executive and a bag of money.

  • There won't be any money to revamp Parra stadium, I just saw on the news that the government are pumping 250 million to upgrade Roosters home stadium, because, boohoo, it hasn't had a facelift since 1988...
    Maybe it's time to simply burn down Parra, then they'll be forced to fix it. Oh wait, it's made of concrete....
    • You need a facelift!!!
    • The cream's working, I'm looking heaps better now....
  • Grow a pair Seward, make a decision and stick by it.
    The team needs every advantage, and means playing at Pirtek. We've filled our obligations at ANZ, meaning the NRL have no say in the matter.
    KEEP GAMES AT PARRA!!!
  • Don't move this one. And I'd fight the NRL if they oppose it. Even 30k isn't enough to move it. Would would need at least 40-50k before even thinking about it.
  • I honestly much rather a 19K game with 16000 parra supporters and 3000 Souths supporters (as it was against dragons) over 16000 parra supporters and 18000 rabbits supporters at ANZ, a little selfish I know, but we deserve home games at parra stadium, we only have 9 or so as it is.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

SuperEel 22 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Presser v Knights
"We all do that. It takes an incredible amount of practice to phase that out of your speech. And most of the time it's our brains forming a response."
48 minutes ago
Parramanaic replied to Rabz S's discussion Momax have been selected for the blues
"May shot himself in the foot by posting that stupid live stream about tossing the jumper in the bin. If he'd kept his ghob shut, he would've gotten in. TBH he was the one who fucked it."
1 hour ago
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER replied to Rabz S's discussion Momax have been selected for the blues
"Hope QLD  wins then we need to win games het away from the bottom we losr this week with no Moses n Lomax "
1 hour ago
LB replied to Rabz S's discussion Momax have been selected for the blues
"Turbo is a shell of himself lately, he's been playing cautiously. Against NQ he was a passenger. Now, watch him carve up on Friday night, but I, at this stage, am not too concerned with Trbojevic. I'd be more concerned on Olakau'atu, Garrick and…"
1 hour ago
More…