Making a motza getting banned by YouTube , Google and a host of other communist sites .  This video has been taken down , but for what ?  

 

 

 

 

 

https://rutube.ru/video/3275a95f55c78c2f0f57c8dd709317c8/?pl_type=user&pl_id=7944019

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

              • They are lucky to have you mate! 

          • 3659341447?profile=RESIZE_710x

            I know I repost betoota content alot, but sometimes they are just to real to ignore.

  • 3651406825?profile=RESIZE_710x

  • 3651413626?profile=RESIZE_710x

  • Only the gullible would believe NASA and 97% of science, that actually practice science - outside the scientists "in the know" alongside the democracy-freedom-warriors like Exxon, Cato Institute of science, Koch and their ilk...

    Climate change has always happened, every cycle is exactly the same. From the dinosaurs to today.

    3652298948?profile=RESIZE_930x

    • Let’s not get caught up in the semantics of the meaning of change....

      The change in climate change is supposed to mean variable, not only up as you and the 97% of ‘experts’ claim.............at least that is why the IPCC changed the current catastrophic predictions from global warming right? 

      Was it to cover all possible outcomes and variables so as to make them correct no matter the outcome?

      I guess we will blame carbon dioxide when temperatures drop also?

      I know, a cold winter or record snow is only weather but a hot day is climate - I get it.

       

  • https://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/climate-change/why-s...

    Sound like people we know?

    :)

    Have these traits? You’re more likely to be a climate change denier
    At its heart, climate change denial is a conflict between facts and values. People deny the climate crisis because, to them, it just feels wrong.
    • "They found that self-identified conservatives and liberals both showed a robust partisan bias when evaluating empirical evidence, to an almost identical degree. "It's an equal-opportunity bias," he says."

      "People often dismiss those who hold opposing views as idiots (or worse). Yet highly educated people are just as likely to make biased judgments—and they might actually do it more often."

      https://www.apa.org/monitor/2017/05/alternative-facts

    • Yes it’s primarily a right vs left ideological debate.

      Majority of the right deny and the left lap this shit up.

      It also depends who is basically in charge of government at the time. We are coming out of a leftist period in western power (US & UK) - expect to see more countries move away from this scam.

      Its ideological at its core IMO. 

       

  • 3652470107?profile=RESIZE_710x

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

iamnot replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Fitzy had no idea how to build ongoing success, or build sucess at all. He was politically strong and connected, that was it. He ensured the club constitution was setup in a way that made it very hard to boot him out of office.
He got extremely…"
26 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"That's the entire purpose of our junior development now. The entire focus is on those juniors. We have now got the largest junior investment in the competition. And that's what is partially frustrating about these discussions saying "where's our big…"
37 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"They were when the club was a development first that's the difference what we were then is what we are trying to get back to I suspect.
Those 09 and 22 appearances tells you all you need to no about the club they aren't consistent and until we get…"
1 hour ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"2001? A squad built over a 5 year period culminating in one of the best NRL era teams of all time that fell at the final hurdle. The team that beat the defending premiers in the preliminary final.
2005. Again, a squad rebuilt following 2001 and a…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"This is it if you want sustained success it's the club across every level that is strong not just a coach or a particular administrator that's the key for success here we have to be top of class in the key categories and have the people that are the…"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"101, take your meds or hand the phone to the other person who posts on your account.....I like them better"
2 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"How can you say we 'should have' made a grand final in a given year? When have we ever had the best or second best squad in the comp? Not since 1986. Any year we've made the grand final since then, we've overachieved."
2 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"BA had enough support, if not all were convinced. Not many clubs sack a coach immediately after a GF. But after it, there was a nuanced change in strategy up-top, which may have affected BA & seems to align with his emotional flatlining — when his…"
3 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"LB, do you get the feeling JR is ultimately aiming for a reasonably high footy IQ six? Not just your archetypical "running" six who can defend and has some ball skills.
Think his connection with Pezet. Walker. Iongi. He chose Junior over RCG. Foxxy…"
4 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Thats the bit that upsets me, we should have sacked BA after that GF for not taking it seriously. That 2020 squad should have also made the GF, same the 17 squad as well. "
4 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Well i can say we are going in the right direction, not rushing in to buy or sign anyone. Just annoyed over the 22 GF and that BA era. It really did upset me on how we handle the GF week and day and i just blame those at top that we should have been…"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"I do not know much on Fletcher either but i wonder if he is in the awkward spot of Moses still has another 4 years left and Fletcher could be looking at FG in 2 years. Does he wait? Or can he be a 5/8?
Overall of course you pick the best player out…"
4 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Defensively fragile and in free-fall post 2020, it's an illusory narrative, self-trickery, that we should have built on the 22' GF. It was an inevitable fall under the Jeckyl-Hyde defence and unadaptive coaching systems of the previous era."
4 hours ago
LB replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Right and the same board that brought Ryles in. I am not letting board off the hook as i have stated im holding my judgements til end of 2026 to see if it is working or not. I feel we would benefit from someone like Brian Smith at least with some…"
4 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Because this board was the same board that got us in the mess, we should have been on a roll after 22. Yet we signed duds and kept BA at the helm for too long. Ryles comes in and parra start to play better than they have in the past 20 years go…"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"So we are going in the right direction but the f the board? How can that be the case? Like saying this VW golf is the best car i have ever driven, engineers did a great job but f*** VW. 
Doesn't work that way, if we somehow won a comp are you still…"
4 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>