Making a motza getting banned by YouTube , Google and a host of other communist sites .  This video has been taken down , but for what ?  

 

 

 

 

 

https://rutube.ru/video/3275a95f55c78c2f0f57c8dd709317c8/?pl_type=user&pl_id=7944019

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

          • 3659341447?profile=RESIZE_710x

            I know I repost betoota content alot, but sometimes they are just to real to ignore.

  • 3651406825?profile=RESIZE_710x

  • 3651413626?profile=RESIZE_710x

  • Only the gullible would believe NASA and 97% of science, that actually practice science - outside the scientists "in the know" alongside the democracy-freedom-warriors like Exxon, Cato Institute of science, Koch and their ilk...

    Climate change has always happened, every cycle is exactly the same. From the dinosaurs to today.

    3652298948?profile=RESIZE_930x

    • Let’s not get caught up in the semantics of the meaning of change....

      The change in climate change is supposed to mean variable, not only up as you and the 97% of ‘experts’ claim.............at least that is why the IPCC changed the current catastrophic predictions from global warming right? 

      Was it to cover all possible outcomes and variables so as to make them correct no matter the outcome?

      I guess we will blame carbon dioxide when temperatures drop also?

      I know, a cold winter or record snow is only weather but a hot day is climate - I get it.

       

  • https://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/climate-change/why-s...

    Sound like people we know?

    :)

    Have these traits? You’re more likely to be a climate change denier
    At its heart, climate change denial is a conflict between facts and values. People deny the climate crisis because, to them, it just feels wrong.
    • "They found that self-identified conservatives and liberals both showed a robust partisan bias when evaluating empirical evidence, to an almost identical degree. "It's an equal-opportunity bias," he says."

      "People often dismiss those who hold opposing views as idiots (or worse). Yet highly educated people are just as likely to make biased judgments—and they might actually do it more often."

      https://www.apa.org/monitor/2017/05/alternative-facts

    • Yes it’s primarily a right vs left ideological debate.

      Majority of the right deny and the left lap this shit up.

      It also depends who is basically in charge of government at the time. We are coming out of a leftist period in western power (US & UK) - expect to see more countries move away from this scam.

      Its ideological at its core IMO. 

       

  • 3652470107?profile=RESIZE_710x

    • Haha triggered.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"Just defined roles is all you'll have a footy side and business side you'll have JR driving the football side for the FG team Nathan Browns job is looking after the pathways and final decisions roster wise will be on JR.JS probably has very little…"
13 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"He'll be back in the nrl eventually but eels going to make him sweat and get something out of it. No rush at all for parra 🤣"
13 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Being reported that Steve Gillies the other half to, his and Clinton Schifcofske's sports management company GS Sports Management is now releasing statements favouring Lomax and attempting to explain and clear a path for his return to the NRL.
It…"
19 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"Zero tackle has him contracted to the storm until 2027 for $1.1 million. "
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Lomax's agent now saying he left because Arthur was sacked and Gutho left. 
A grade sook! "
1 hour ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"If Melbourne go cold, which I think is possible, do not be surprised if a team like Sydney City come in."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"Macy I think the clubs done well here they've outlined there terms and have the leverage.
I agree if we don't get what WE want and I mean exactly what we want he sits."
2 hours ago
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER replied to Roy tannous's discussion Does anyone know what it is ?
"Ye what happened to him he was going to manly 
Im glad he came to us but"
2 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"why not just make munster an offer now as his only contracted for 26 atm"
2 hours ago
BringBackSemi replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion Can someone please tell me
"From what I read, neither party is wanting a reunion. Lets face it, we tried him at centre and he had some issues defensively there so was moved back to the wing. Flannagan was right. Ryles doesn't want to pay a winger centre money, and someone who…"
2 hours ago
SuperEel 22’s discussion was featured
When Zac Lomax approached the Eels hierarchy in 2025 that he would like to depart the club only one year into a four year deal, it was clear the representative winger was going his own way.
Parramatta, while not exactly keen to release a marquee…
3 hours ago
Mannah-Brow replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"As per comment above, "It also opens up a roster spot and cap space so we can go to market." 
Have you also not seen him play recently?"
3 hours ago
will replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Ryles is wanting speed.
He wants fast mobile forwards and speedy backs
Howarth does tick a box for the 6 man interchange. 
A 2nd rower who can play centre could be valuable "
4 hours ago
Longfin Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"I have a feeling Melbourne will go cold on this now that we have called their bluff. Not sure where that leaves the situation. It's unfathomable what Schifcofske has done here. What's more baffling is that the media seems to have left him alone. "
4 hours ago
Eel for life replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"Totally support the club and the way they've handled things in this scenario. We have to give them credit where credit is due. We're quick to critisise when they get something wrong, so we should be quick to give them credit when they do something…"
4 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"One of the issues with Howarth for Lomax is that if we set aside that it's not an appropriate value exchange (all remarks about rep status etc) we are still left with an unknown. Specifically, what does Ryles want in an outside back?
We don't have…"
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1921

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 231

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>