Making a motza getting banned by YouTube , Google and a host of other communist sites .  This video has been taken down , but for what ?  

 

 

 

 

 

https://rutube.ru/video/3275a95f55c78c2f0f57c8dd709317c8/?pl_type=user&pl_id=7944019

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

          • 3659341447?profile=RESIZE_710x

            I know I repost betoota content alot, but sometimes they are just to real to ignore.

  • 3651406825?profile=RESIZE_710x

  • 3651413626?profile=RESIZE_710x

  • Only the gullible would believe NASA and 97% of science, that actually practice science - outside the scientists "in the know" alongside the democracy-freedom-warriors like Exxon, Cato Institute of science, Koch and their ilk...

    Climate change has always happened, every cycle is exactly the same. From the dinosaurs to today.

    3652298948?profile=RESIZE_930x

    • Let’s not get caught up in the semantics of the meaning of change....

      The change in climate change is supposed to mean variable, not only up as you and the 97% of ‘experts’ claim.............at least that is why the IPCC changed the current catastrophic predictions from global warming right? 

      Was it to cover all possible outcomes and variables so as to make them correct no matter the outcome?

      I guess we will blame carbon dioxide when temperatures drop also?

      I know, a cold winter or record snow is only weather but a hot day is climate - I get it.

       

  • https://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/climate-change/why-s...

    Sound like people we know?

    :)

    Have these traits? You’re more likely to be a climate change denier
    At its heart, climate change denial is a conflict between facts and values. People deny the climate crisis because, to them, it just feels wrong.
    • "They found that self-identified conservatives and liberals both showed a robust partisan bias when evaluating empirical evidence, to an almost identical degree. "It's an equal-opportunity bias," he says."

      "People often dismiss those who hold opposing views as idiots (or worse). Yet highly educated people are just as likely to make biased judgments—and they might actually do it more often."

      https://www.apa.org/monitor/2017/05/alternative-facts

    • Yes it’s primarily a right vs left ideological debate.

      Majority of the right deny and the left lap this shit up.

      It also depends who is basically in charge of government at the time. We are coming out of a leftist period in western power (US & UK) - expect to see more countries move away from this scam.

      Its ideological at its core IMO. 

       

  • 3652470107?profile=RESIZE_710x

    • Haha triggered.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Daz, appreciate the response mate and you expressing your position.
I still would like to understand why NOS claims you made "very personal attacks" on Muttman.
You both definitely vigorously debated/argued (as above).
No doubt, there is a fine…"
31 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"NOS, I received a message from HOE, noting you had made this accusation I see above. HOE was clearly suggesting I should address it and if I had made a "very personal attack" upon Muttman (as accused) then I would be held to account. 
I replied that…"
46 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"NOS, before we get onto all the questions and claims you've raised in relation to "moderation" please let's start with your claims of Daz's "very personal attacks" on Muttman. 
You may be completly correct, but please provide evidence supporting…"
52 minutes ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"NOS, Muttman and I have been members of this forum for the better part of 20 years. 
I completely respect him and often compliment his considered judgment. 
On one occasion, out of frustration, I reacted to his regime of agendered negative…"
56 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"TolElls, Set up a new Averillo blog if you want to discuss it. I'm not going to reopen a blog closed by moderation. Hopefully, people keep it relatively civil (as much as possible) or drift horribly off topic and it will stay open and no posts will…"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Well if those above JRcant get the players he needs, what choice does he have, he needs to have 30 players. "
2 hours ago
Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Wtf, which blog was this in?"
2 hours ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Hey HOE,
I have a question.
So, Daz & a few others attacked Muttman with very personal attacks a few weeks back, he has since left the site which is a massive loss.
For some reason, those attacks from Daz, Bourban Man and others seemed to slip…"
3 hours ago
TolEllts replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Admins, Why can't we reply to Averillo blog? What bad will it do the forum of the Eels executives and R&R team if Eels fans are venting their frustrations about the recruitment which unfortunately are contributing to the bad results in the field.…"
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
""
3 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"At the same time he still has a percentage to meet in terms of how much the cap needs to be spent whether he likes it or not.
So if it is like "This player wants $400k and we have $900k available" well he has to spend that money anyway.
So the issue…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"They are fine players, though are they just better in better teams? Do they themselves make you better?"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Surely if MON does not go, which no idea whether he will or wont, Rogers goes."
5 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Well true. I mean i mentioned all the Lomax stuff based on a contact and they were spot on with pretty much most of what was told. So cannot 100% discount this but still it was a friend of Jack's that said it."
5 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"That's easy you'd take Bostock purely from an athletic perspective he offers more and his body type is prototypical for outside backs that go well in the game at the moment."
5 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Wasn't their rumours about the players disliking Jim because his inept ability to sign anyone. I guess the more things you see and hear the more and brighter things become clear. Poor MON, maybe the guy tries to sign some stars but our ceo is tight…"
5 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 240

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>