Making a motza getting banned by YouTube , Google and a host of other communist sites .  This video has been taken down , but for what ?  

 

 

 

 

 

https://rutube.ru/video/3275a95f55c78c2f0f57c8dd709317c8/?pl_type=user&pl_id=7944019

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

          • 3659341447?profile=RESIZE_710x

            I know I repost betoota content alot, but sometimes they are just to real to ignore.

  • 3651406825?profile=RESIZE_710x

  • 3651413626?profile=RESIZE_710x

  • Only the gullible would believe NASA and 97% of science, that actually practice science - outside the scientists "in the know" alongside the democracy-freedom-warriors like Exxon, Cato Institute of science, Koch and their ilk...

    Climate change has always happened, every cycle is exactly the same. From the dinosaurs to today.

    3652298948?profile=RESIZE_930x

    • Let’s not get caught up in the semantics of the meaning of change....

      The change in climate change is supposed to mean variable, not only up as you and the 97% of ‘experts’ claim.............at least that is why the IPCC changed the current catastrophic predictions from global warming right? 

      Was it to cover all possible outcomes and variables so as to make them correct no matter the outcome?

      I guess we will blame carbon dioxide when temperatures drop also?

      I know, a cold winter or record snow is only weather but a hot day is climate - I get it.

       

  • https://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/climate-change/why-s...

    Sound like people we know?

    :)

    Have these traits? You’re more likely to be a climate change denier
    At its heart, climate change denial is a conflict between facts and values. People deny the climate crisis because, to them, it just feels wrong.
    • "They found that self-identified conservatives and liberals both showed a robust partisan bias when evaluating empirical evidence, to an almost identical degree. "It's an equal-opportunity bias," he says."

      "People often dismiss those who hold opposing views as idiots (or worse). Yet highly educated people are just as likely to make biased judgments—and they might actually do it more often."

      https://www.apa.org/monitor/2017/05/alternative-facts

    • Yes it’s primarily a right vs left ideological debate.

      Majority of the right deny and the left lap this shit up.

      It also depends who is basically in charge of government at the time. We are coming out of a leftist period in western power (US & UK) - expect to see more countries move away from this scam.

      Its ideological at its core IMO. 

       

  • 3652470107?profile=RESIZE_710x

    • Haha triggered.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"By what? A mere 25mins. Journo article at 7:35am, announced at 8am. Hardly call it a leak. Unless there was another one that you had in mind Analyst?"
4 minutes ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"I don't think there is any question on that Daz, welcome to the world of commercial reality.
If the NRL wanted to run on a socialistic basis, they would contract all the players to the NRL, bring in a draft and go for a competetion that is based on…"
15 minutes ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Cheefy, it seems that you won't allow LB to have fun and guess what, this concept that the fans pay their wages is a bit of a myth! if you do an analysis of the balance sheet you will see much of the income comes from aspects outside of the physical…"
26 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Nah there was a blog before Walker was announced."
33 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"LOL"
35 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Thats the most depressing thing i've read, Gamble at parra. Why we sign depth players when we need starters now and for next year."
50 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"I won't answer any questions from yourself daz unless you can answer my previous questions of what are the recruitment and retention team doing right, as to your defence of them in nearly every blog"
1 hour ago
The Captain replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"I don't know what the current criteria of success is, but it doesn't have to be rocket science. For instance:
Creating and maintaining a squad that:

Regularly play finals football (heck be super lenient and say >50% of the time on average)
Is Top 4…"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Ok ill allow you to have your fun.  At the end of the day its only a game.  If the club fails, they'll be hit financially anyway through memberships and ticket sales.  So its in their best interests to do what's best for the fans who pay their wages…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Why can i not have some fun? I have FOMO."
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Titan, maybe you're right. Can you list clubs by whether that club has a recruitment committee or a single key member that handles recruitment? Given your assertion that strong clubs have a single key member, you must have that evidence to hand, and…"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"But if TPA's are the issue, that means what folks are really saying is that the richer the club the better they do in recruitment. "
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Sure, can you explain if "I have heard" from an anonymous Internet forum account is better or the same or worse than "I know someone in the know" from an anonymous Internet facebook account?"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"With all the talk of recruitment, Chiefy asserted the board should sack the recruitment and retention staff for failing to meet recruitment criteria. Which raises an interesting question: can anyone answer the following?
1) What is the recruitment…"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Chiefy, you have not answered Super's point that you appear to make everyone in charge of recruitment. 
But we can make the query very specific. You have claimed the board can sack recruitment "if recruitment criteria isn't met". Thus, two…"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"LB, there is no need for you to get involved in this conversation.  "
2 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 247

 

RECRUITMENT

Seems like every week there are good quality players coming onto the market or that are available that would add something to our team and roster but we aren't seeming to be as active in the player market as we were earlier this year. EG Keon.…

Read more…
62 Replies · Reply by LB 4 minutes ago
Views: 1333

Eels Next Match vs Bulldogs

I've noticed some comments from Bulldogs coach Ciraldo that he's not very happy with the refereeing/bunker calls made yesterday in his team's loss to the West Tigers.Not too sure if his concerns are justified or not! As I've not actually watched the…

Read more…
8 Replies · Reply by BlacJac 6 hours ago
Views: 669

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>