The Dolphins, is a geographical name essential?

So the Dolphins are apparently going with the name 'The Dolphins' for 2023, which brings to questions is geographical names essential. Now you have old fashioned footy fans like myself who love calling teams but their geographical names (i.e. Parramatta, Penrith, South Sydney, St. George Illawarra etc.) but i do not like the non geographical name approach but i think i know why they are doing it.

It is not as uncommon for the only one name team, the Warriors are technically the 'New Zealand Warriors' but 95% of the time they are called the Warriors. In the early 2000's Canterbury simply went by the Bulldogs, before going back to Canterbury-Bankstown, but this is different to me as these teams have had geographical names prior, early 2000's though Canterbury did not go by Canterbury i still called them that. The Dolphins though not quite the same, people call them Redcliffe though this is not completely a take over to the QRL Redcliffe Dolphins to call them that.

Names that have been brought forward have been Redcliffe, though considered too small an area (fair enough). Another is Sunshine Coast or Sunshine State Dolphins (do not mind this), another is Moreton Bay Dolphins which is my favourite as it is a wider geographical area. Or even go with South-East Queensland Dolphins or Brisbane Dolphins or South Brisbane Dolphins or whatever. I feel with the Broncos taking hold of majority of the QLD market in terms of fans, this is a missed opportunity in branding, having Brisbane or Queensland in the name my not seem like a big deal though i feel it adds proudness of area, rivalry to other teams.

The reason though i can see to most names like Redcliffe or Moreton Bay is the Dolphins are playing most of their games at Suncorp in Brisbane. Now, Brisbane is roughly and hour from Moreton Bay area, so i do understand the NRL trying to avoid the talk of fans having to travel a long distance to see their team named Moreton Bay play in Brisbane instead of locally. Though why not call them Brisbane or South Brisbane or East Brisbane? Well again falls a trap of Redcliffe fans, they would feel betrayed having a team in the NRL but not called by that name, it is not theirs, it will be Brisbane's. The team play there, train there.


So i can see the point of view a little bit for the NRL as it is a difficult spot, and they chose the Dolphins rightfully so as they produced the most assests and money to last in the league, but i hope they find a comprimise in the situation of the name.

 

I know most reading this will be like who cares, though it is fascinating to me, love to hear what names you may like or even your thoughts on the situation, maybe you love the name being 'The Dolphins'.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They are doing it because some marketing knob with a pony tail named Gavin (nod to Billy Birmingham) probably 'consulted' with management and decided that it was more 'inclusive' not to be defined by a geographical area.

    I imagine they'll go with that for a couple of seasons and once they've got their fan base up and running, they'll probably change their name to Moreton Bay Dolphins.

    • But the issue is playing out of Suncorp.

      Like having Manly play out of central coast stadium all the time.

      • Not an issue, public transport is excellent to Suncorp from anywhere in and around Brisbane 

        • it is an hour away from Moreton Bay, hardly Moreton Bay if playing in a stadium and hour and a bit away

          • Yes but it's a free train to and from, trust me that's nothing here in Brisbane. 

    • hahaha BM, never a truer word spoken.

    • I can throw a sinker from from my deck and land it in Moreton Bay yet it would take me the best part of an hour to Redcliffe

      Anything but the Moreton Bay Dolphins

      • I don't feel strongly about it and being a Brisbane based supporter of Parramatta for the 42 years I have been here it maybe hard for some to understand the value of my opinion ......But.... I think Brisbane Dolphins defines a whole set of options if you live in Brisbane and are not aligned with any particular team since Brisbane Broncos polarised a lot of locals who chose not to follow them.

        I believe it will be a succesful franchise and that also means Brisbane Jets (ipswich to Springfield) will also be the last/next team for Brisbane representation. AFL has the ability to take a lot of ground through the AFL connection to Springfield and it will need to be combated. Imagine a team in Sydney that has no representation for what we now call the West Tigers.

        • I believe they erred when they picked Redcliffe as the 4th QLD team.  lpswich or even Logan would have been a much better base to grow the game instead of a place nestled between the Broncos and Storm feeder clubs

  • Yep, hate teams that are just nicknames, unless it is something culturally significant like Rangers or Celtic. I dont know why they just don't call themselves Redcliffe. It won't stop people who don't live in Redcliffe from supporting them. Brisbane isn't tribal in that way like Sydney is. 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Parrafan101 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kemp: Eels vs Storm R1 refereeing was "really, really bad...disgraceful"
"The sport it's self is becoming so hard to watch. Six agains every minute for no reason, Todd Smith was waving his hand like he was at some 90's rave. I'm still shocked at how poorly the refree was. Yeah we could have came back in the second half if…"
2 minutes ago
Pato replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kemp: Eels vs Storm R1 refereeing was "really, really bad...disgraceful"
"The first half was home team refereeing at its best"
13 minutes ago
The Badger replied to LB's discussion 1eE Modern day Eels team: Second-row
" Tough choice as I don't think there's an outright stand out.
Ma'u got my vote simply because he was a personal favourite and the list so far lacks mongrel."
18 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"An organisation should always be looking to improve itself. If that means getting rid of a person to get a better person then so be it.
Question is this: is Richardson the best person for our specific role?"
28 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"Sarantinos is not on Eels board I believe so he doesn't fit within the 9 year rule. It said in the constitution that members of the board serve 3 years and can serve an additional 2x3 year terms, so 9 years.
But Sarantinos is not elected of course…"
40 minutes ago
Alfred replied to Alfred's discussion The next generation
"I hope you're right Paul. Need to end the drought "
45 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Izack Tago dropped to bench for Penrith
"Chatter on Tago to Eels getting louder but i actually do not want Lomax going to Penrith in a swap as that means he more likely wins a comp and do not want him rewarded hahaha. But also, i feel if we hang on long enough, with Tago being on so much…"
58 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"We'll also be looking for a new ceo next year too won't we as JS has done 8 years on the Parra board and by constitution 9 is the most they can stay on it.Please correct me if I'm wrong.
MoN why bother getting rid of him now why have we just…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Izack Tago dropped to bench for Penrith
"Ummm when Penrith signed him he was playing park footy in Newcastle. At the time we were rebuilding it would have been a dud signing opinion by most here. 
Unless you were talking about when Alamoti came in for him late in the year, in that case…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Charbs's discussion JAC CHANCE TO RETURN THIS WEEK VS BRONCS
"Yeah he is a Winger, but he adds energy and leadership to our squad. Also speed. One thing Brisbane lacked v Penrith was energy, JAC at times creates something from nothing."
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"haha all good."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"Too true, he has what MON obviously doesn't which is that ability to talk a player into the club. Like Anderson at Dragons would have talked Keaon into coming. That is why I have been in favour bringing Brian Smith back. Also, getting Luai gets the…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"Though I believe they wouldn't want to take the risk of Brown leaving. That's now changed with Ryles but Moses more so was sweetened with captaincy and be committed.
but also who is to say we wanted him as a 6 and he wanted to be a 6? Similar to…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"Big difference, Fogarty had a year left on his deal. Moses and Brown, regardless of options or not, had several with no guarantee that either will leave.
Now you say vision of Brown at Lock, well they wouldn't of done that as Brown would have not…"
2 hours ago
Muttman replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"Parra want to keep Sanders. You go to Brown and say we need you to commit today and take your options off the table. If he hesitates you give him permission to shop around. Either way it needs to get resolved because we have a young half we do not…"
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"Yep great write up.  Exactly why we need to get Richardson.  "
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2175

 

1eE Modern day Eels team: Second-row

Sorry guys i don't think the survey worked so will add it again. PJ Marsh has come out of nowhere to secure the starting Hooking role for this side. With a 3 way tie for 2nd between Drew, Mahoney and Riddell.Now onto the back-row, one of them is a…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by The Badger 18 minutes ago
Views: 37

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>