The Dolphins, is a geographical name essential?

So the Dolphins are apparently going with the name 'The Dolphins' for 2023, which brings to questions is geographical names essential. Now you have old fashioned footy fans like myself who love calling teams but their geographical names (i.e. Parramatta, Penrith, South Sydney, St. George Illawarra etc.) but i do not like the non geographical name approach but i think i know why they are doing it.

It is not as uncommon for the only one name team, the Warriors are technically the 'New Zealand Warriors' but 95% of the time they are called the Warriors. In the early 2000's Canterbury simply went by the Bulldogs, before going back to Canterbury-Bankstown, but this is different to me as these teams have had geographical names prior, early 2000's though Canterbury did not go by Canterbury i still called them that. The Dolphins though not quite the same, people call them Redcliffe though this is not completely a take over to the QRL Redcliffe Dolphins to call them that.

Names that have been brought forward have been Redcliffe, though considered too small an area (fair enough). Another is Sunshine Coast or Sunshine State Dolphins (do not mind this), another is Moreton Bay Dolphins which is my favourite as it is a wider geographical area. Or even go with South-East Queensland Dolphins or Brisbane Dolphins or South Brisbane Dolphins or whatever. I feel with the Broncos taking hold of majority of the QLD market in terms of fans, this is a missed opportunity in branding, having Brisbane or Queensland in the name my not seem like a big deal though i feel it adds proudness of area, rivalry to other teams.

The reason though i can see to most names like Redcliffe or Moreton Bay is the Dolphins are playing most of their games at Suncorp in Brisbane. Now, Brisbane is roughly and hour from Moreton Bay area, so i do understand the NRL trying to avoid the talk of fans having to travel a long distance to see their team named Moreton Bay play in Brisbane instead of locally. Though why not call them Brisbane or South Brisbane or East Brisbane? Well again falls a trap of Redcliffe fans, they would feel betrayed having a team in the NRL but not called by that name, it is not theirs, it will be Brisbane's. The team play there, train there.


So i can see the point of view a little bit for the NRL as it is a difficult spot, and they chose the Dolphins rightfully so as they produced the most assests and money to last in the league, but i hope they find a comprimise in the situation of the name.

 

I know most reading this will be like who cares, though it is fascinating to me, love to hear what names you may like or even your thoughts on the situation, maybe you love the name being 'The Dolphins'.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They are doing it because some marketing knob with a pony tail named Gavin (nod to Billy Birmingham) probably 'consulted' with management and decided that it was more 'inclusive' not to be defined by a geographical area.

    I imagine they'll go with that for a couple of seasons and once they've got their fan base up and running, they'll probably change their name to Moreton Bay Dolphins.

    • But the issue is playing out of Suncorp.

      Like having Manly play out of central coast stadium all the time.

      • Not an issue, public transport is excellent to Suncorp from anywhere in and around Brisbane 

        • it is an hour away from Moreton Bay, hardly Moreton Bay if playing in a stadium and hour and a bit away

          • Yes but it's a free train to and from, trust me that's nothing here in Brisbane. 

    • hahaha BM, never a truer word spoken.

    • I can throw a sinker from from my deck and land it in Moreton Bay yet it would take me the best part of an hour to Redcliffe

      Anything but the Moreton Bay Dolphins

      • I don't feel strongly about it and being a Brisbane based supporter of Parramatta for the 42 years I have been here it maybe hard for some to understand the value of my opinion ......But.... I think Brisbane Dolphins defines a whole set of options if you live in Brisbane and are not aligned with any particular team since Brisbane Broncos polarised a lot of locals who chose not to follow them.

        I believe it will be a succesful franchise and that also means Brisbane Jets (ipswich to Springfield) will also be the last/next team for Brisbane representation. AFL has the ability to take a lot of ground through the AFL connection to Springfield and it will need to be combated. Imagine a team in Sydney that has no representation for what we now call the West Tigers.

        • I believe they erred when they picked Redcliffe as the 4th QLD team.  lpswich or even Logan would have been a much better base to grow the game instead of a place nestled between the Broncos and Storm feeder clubs

  • Yep, hate teams that are just nicknames, unless it is something culturally significant like Rangers or Celtic. I dont know why they just don't call themselves Redcliffe. It won't stop people who don't live in Redcliffe from supporting them. Brisbane isn't tribal in that way like Sydney is. 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

The Captain replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Galvin as a 6 I would take in a heartbeat. We better be regularly sliding into his DMs reminding him how easy it was for him to get out of his Tigers contract...and if you can do it once..."
15 minutes ago
EA replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Nope. He is a centre that can kick."
17 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I don't get the love for Burton.
No one has really figured out to use his skills in a way that makes him as valuable as everyone expects him to be (and what he'd expect his pay packet to be).
He's a talented footy player who's hype over the years…"
18 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I'd prefer Galvin ahead of Burton but I guess we've already been down that road. Gus has certainly changed his tune on the wonder kid of late"
23 minutes ago
Stevo replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Yes please, 2 bigs boots with he and moses and can cover a multitude of positions if needed with his size"
26 minutes ago
sloth replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"No thanks. Unless he takes a pay cut and comes over as a centre."
33 minutes ago
sloth replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Our big signing Jayden Sua badly injured
"Yep I have. He's been underperforming but to be fair he's also playing through a leg injury.
To be honest, I'm thinking the same as you. Koloamatangi was a good signing target, but when considering price and contract length as a whole I'm not too…"
35 minutes ago
Yehez replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"If we go for Burton then Ryles does not think Lorenzo is ready next year, that's for sure. I am willing to trust Ryles about that if it happens.
I would try and keep Lorenzo while snaggin Burton, but that's pretty hard. 
Ideally, we are just…"
38 minutes ago
Eels95 replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Big yes for me. It has been doing the rounds on the Kennel, social media and Hooper is talking about it. While all these things don't mean anything. The fact its being reported in all different parts of social media hopefully means there are some…"
40 minutes ago
Richard Jackson replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Don't agree withgoing after Burton. Apart from his kicking game and ability to convert, he offers nothing else in attack.
He'd be the usual average. Why have the dogs gone cool on him?
Draw from inside, or wait and be generous for the more talented.…"
44 minutes ago
Eels tragic replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"OK I'll bite.  Just for one moment imagine if the two rumours that have emerged over the past week come true.  Spenser and Burton would make us a real threat in 2027 and if we could jag Herbie in the centres....well!  My juices will flow once…"
44 minutes ago
Matt McDermott replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"All that was said by James Hooper is that he`s been getting mail for a ` coupla ' weeks that Eels and Bears are monitoring the Matt Burton situation at Canterbury . Nothing to get excited bout yet , if at all . "
45 minutes ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Unless Ryles does not think he is up to it? As to why they are going for Burton."
45 minutes ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Yeah that's a fear, he could go elsewhere and be better than what Burton is. Many here will then use it as a "why did we let him go?" Claim while cheering on the Burton signing now.
Thats footy and that's what Ryles is paid for, to make the decision…"
46 minutes ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"But again would he take that? He's only 26.
Burton would be looking for 3-4 years on 5/8 money. Simple as that. He can demand it as teams would pay it."
48 minutes ago
Yehez replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"True. I think this unsuredness if because you are never sure about juniors until they play first grade. 
I hope Lorenzo gets his chance next few weeks and we starting seeing for sure."
53 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2441

 

Is this the bench moving foward

14-Tayln da Silva-Getting better with more games under his belt and electric.15.Dylan Walker-Our X factor of the bench and good attacking threat.16.Sam t-Big bopper and tank17.Toni matele-Same as tuivati big bopper to and will run through a brick…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by JC 2 hours ago
Views: 240

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>