The Dolphins, is a geographical name essential?

So the Dolphins are apparently going with the name 'The Dolphins' for 2023, which brings to questions is geographical names essential. Now you have old fashioned footy fans like myself who love calling teams but their geographical names (i.e. Parramatta, Penrith, South Sydney, St. George Illawarra etc.) but i do not like the non geographical name approach but i think i know why they are doing it.

It is not as uncommon for the only one name team, the Warriors are technically the 'New Zealand Warriors' but 95% of the time they are called the Warriors. In the early 2000's Canterbury simply went by the Bulldogs, before going back to Canterbury-Bankstown, but this is different to me as these teams have had geographical names prior, early 2000's though Canterbury did not go by Canterbury i still called them that. The Dolphins though not quite the same, people call them Redcliffe though this is not completely a take over to the QRL Redcliffe Dolphins to call them that.

Names that have been brought forward have been Redcliffe, though considered too small an area (fair enough). Another is Sunshine Coast or Sunshine State Dolphins (do not mind this), another is Moreton Bay Dolphins which is my favourite as it is a wider geographical area. Or even go with South-East Queensland Dolphins or Brisbane Dolphins or South Brisbane Dolphins or whatever. I feel with the Broncos taking hold of majority of the QLD market in terms of fans, this is a missed opportunity in branding, having Brisbane or Queensland in the name my not seem like a big deal though i feel it adds proudness of area, rivalry to other teams.

The reason though i can see to most names like Redcliffe or Moreton Bay is the Dolphins are playing most of their games at Suncorp in Brisbane. Now, Brisbane is roughly and hour from Moreton Bay area, so i do understand the NRL trying to avoid the talk of fans having to travel a long distance to see their team named Moreton Bay play in Brisbane instead of locally. Though why not call them Brisbane or South Brisbane or East Brisbane? Well again falls a trap of Redcliffe fans, they would feel betrayed having a team in the NRL but not called by that name, it is not theirs, it will be Brisbane's. The team play there, train there.


So i can see the point of view a little bit for the NRL as it is a difficult spot, and they chose the Dolphins rightfully so as they produced the most assests and money to last in the league, but i hope they find a comprimise in the situation of the name.

 

I know most reading this will be like who cares, though it is fascinating to me, love to hear what names you may like or even your thoughts on the situation, maybe you love the name being 'The Dolphins'.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They are doing it because some marketing knob with a pony tail named Gavin (nod to Billy Birmingham) probably 'consulted' with management and decided that it was more 'inclusive' not to be defined by a geographical area.

    I imagine they'll go with that for a couple of seasons and once they've got their fan base up and running, they'll probably change their name to Moreton Bay Dolphins.

    • But the issue is playing out of Suncorp.

      Like having Manly play out of central coast stadium all the time.

      • Not an issue, public transport is excellent to Suncorp from anywhere in and around Brisbane 

        • it is an hour away from Moreton Bay, hardly Moreton Bay if playing in a stadium and hour and a bit away

          • Yes but it's a free train to and from, trust me that's nothing here in Brisbane. 

    • hahaha BM, never a truer word spoken.

    • I can throw a sinker from from my deck and land it in Moreton Bay yet it would take me the best part of an hour to Redcliffe

      Anything but the Moreton Bay Dolphins

      • I don't feel strongly about it and being a Brisbane based supporter of Parramatta for the 42 years I have been here it maybe hard for some to understand the value of my opinion ......But.... I think Brisbane Dolphins defines a whole set of options if you live in Brisbane and are not aligned with any particular team since Brisbane Broncos polarised a lot of locals who chose not to follow them.

        I believe it will be a succesful franchise and that also means Brisbane Jets (ipswich to Springfield) will also be the last/next team for Brisbane representation. AFL has the ability to take a lot of ground through the AFL connection to Springfield and it will need to be combated. Imagine a team in Sydney that has no representation for what we now call the West Tigers.

        • I believe they erred when they picked Redcliffe as the 4th QLD team.  lpswich or even Logan would have been a much better base to grow the game instead of a place nestled between the Broncos and Storm feeder clubs

  • Yep, hate teams that are just nicknames, unless it is something culturally significant like Rangers or Celtic. I dont know why they just don't call themselves Redcliffe. It won't stop people who don't live in Redcliffe from supporting them. Brisbane isn't tribal in that way like Sydney is. 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"What if another club want to start. His path is, dear I say it around you, blocked as a Fullback. As a back-up he is fine but if a club is willing to give him a start he would take it.
I think Lorenzo is seen as an option but if someone like…"
4 minutes ago
LB replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Disclosure Day
"Heard mixed things about the film itself. More so in the final act it gets a bit ahead of itself. 
Still to me, Spielberg's masterpiece is Jaws."
6 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Yeah interesting and fair. "
1 hour ago
EA replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"I am not confident that Papalii wil get snapped up that easily. I think the bench spot is his future in the NRL for now. Can't see him being the first choice fullback for an NRL club right now with the amount of talent in that position. If he wants…"
3 hours ago
EA replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Yea Gabrael played HM with us in 2022 but in 2023 he played SG ball for the dogs before moving to the sharks."
3 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Papalii will get snapped up soon I think, if he elects to stay on a club friendly deal as a loyal servant in expression and passion for the club then that'd be great but I definitely see a home for Bamblett as our back up full back in the next…"
3 hours ago
Yehez replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"We have actually quite a lot of fullback prospects coming. 
Bamblett, Davis, Martin, Seuseu all look quite good playing there. Risati and Bloomfield have played there too. "
4 hours ago
LB replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"That's the thing. If he wants to play NRL for Parra it will be through 6. Thing is too is in NRL not many teams looking for a 1 either. If they have a great 1 they snap them up."
4 hours ago
Yehez replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Ah yes forgot Guymer. 
Gabreal left us at HM really? I remember hearing so much about him for a while. Ah well."
4 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Bamblett is a gun fullback and will put pressure on Iongi in a few years, this is how these things should work. His path isn't blocked, he is just facing a challenge. He can play first grade on the wing, he will grow into his frame"
4 hours ago
EA replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"I believe we just have to build the next man up mentality up .Keep developing gun juniors because you never know when you may need one to replace an existing star. If they get poached then so be it, as long as the NRL team has a current star in that…"
4 hours ago
EA replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"M Gabrael left our club at HM level so he wasnt at eels when he mad the 19 team. From that 2023 SG Ball team, Tuivita, Sanders, Arthur & Guymer made the team. Talagi didnt play because he was in the NRL team. Richie did his ACL at the start of 2024…"
4 hours ago
EA replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"maybe 14/18th man maybe even the 7 if he guided eels to win the SG ball comp.
Speaking of halves, I was so pissed off when they didnt select Lorenzo in the team last year. They picked Rodwell, Woods and Harrison. Lorenzo, Walsh and Reed couldn't…"
4 hours ago
Yehez replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"I said in my post that Fletcher might have had a chance, considering he was an aussie schoolboy. Do you think he would've been a 14 or even a half for this NSW team?"
5 hours ago
Yehez replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"We've had 3 in 2023 and 2024 in NSW I think. Tuivati both years, Sanders, Arthur, Talagi as well. I think Michael Gabreal too?
So yeah, good crop. And the likes of Bloomfield and Fletcher would've had a chance if it wasn't for injury/rugby. "
5 hours ago
paul taylor replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Bamblett is a beautiful runner of the football at fullback. Glides across the ground. He has a major obstacle for the next 5 years in Longi .  He is more than capable of playing 6 and has game awareness and eyes up footy ability. Very talented boy. "
6 hours ago
More…

 

Disclosure Day

What would you think if definitive proof of alien life emerged? Would it consign all religious thought to, as Mark Twain once predicted, the fate of a stuffed ornament in museums? How would suggestive confirmation of the principles of uniformity and…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by LB 6 minutes ago
Views: 41

U19 origin

Looks like bamblett has been called in to the blues side at 18 man with Rex falling out and possibly will be named to start come game day. We now have 4 players in the squads in Bamblett, Petrus, Ryda and Koina. Is this our best rookie class in a…

Read more…
25 Replies · Reply by LB 4 minutes ago
Views: 699

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>