The Dolphins, is a geographical name essential?

So the Dolphins are apparently going with the name 'The Dolphins' for 2023, which brings to questions is geographical names essential. Now you have old fashioned footy fans like myself who love calling teams but their geographical names (i.e. Parramatta, Penrith, South Sydney, St. George Illawarra etc.) but i do not like the non geographical name approach but i think i know why they are doing it.

It is not as uncommon for the only one name team, the Warriors are technically the 'New Zealand Warriors' but 95% of the time they are called the Warriors. In the early 2000's Canterbury simply went by the Bulldogs, before going back to Canterbury-Bankstown, but this is different to me as these teams have had geographical names prior, early 2000's though Canterbury did not go by Canterbury i still called them that. The Dolphins though not quite the same, people call them Redcliffe though this is not completely a take over to the QRL Redcliffe Dolphins to call them that.

Names that have been brought forward have been Redcliffe, though considered too small an area (fair enough). Another is Sunshine Coast or Sunshine State Dolphins (do not mind this), another is Moreton Bay Dolphins which is my favourite as it is a wider geographical area. Or even go with South-East Queensland Dolphins or Brisbane Dolphins or South Brisbane Dolphins or whatever. I feel with the Broncos taking hold of majority of the QLD market in terms of fans, this is a missed opportunity in branding, having Brisbane or Queensland in the name my not seem like a big deal though i feel it adds proudness of area, rivalry to other teams.

The reason though i can see to most names like Redcliffe or Moreton Bay is the Dolphins are playing most of their games at Suncorp in Brisbane. Now, Brisbane is roughly and hour from Moreton Bay area, so i do understand the NRL trying to avoid the talk of fans having to travel a long distance to see their team named Moreton Bay play in Brisbane instead of locally. Though why not call them Brisbane or South Brisbane or East Brisbane? Well again falls a trap of Redcliffe fans, they would feel betrayed having a team in the NRL but not called by that name, it is not theirs, it will be Brisbane's. The team play there, train there.


So i can see the point of view a little bit for the NRL as it is a difficult spot, and they chose the Dolphins rightfully so as they produced the most assests and money to last in the league, but i hope they find a comprimise in the situation of the name.

 

I know most reading this will be like who cares, though it is fascinating to me, love to hear what names you may like or even your thoughts on the situation, maybe you love the name being 'The Dolphins'.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They are doing it because some marketing knob with a pony tail named Gavin (nod to Billy Birmingham) probably 'consulted' with management and decided that it was more 'inclusive' not to be defined by a geographical area.

    I imagine they'll go with that for a couple of seasons and once they've got their fan base up and running, they'll probably change their name to Moreton Bay Dolphins.

    • But the issue is playing out of Suncorp.

      Like having Manly play out of central coast stadium all the time.

      • Not an issue, public transport is excellent to Suncorp from anywhere in and around Brisbane 

        • it is an hour away from Moreton Bay, hardly Moreton Bay if playing in a stadium and hour and a bit away

          • Yes but it's a free train to and from, trust me that's nothing here in Brisbane. 

    • hahaha BM, never a truer word spoken.

    • I can throw a sinker from from my deck and land it in Moreton Bay yet it would take me the best part of an hour to Redcliffe

      Anything but the Moreton Bay Dolphins

      • I don't feel strongly about it and being a Brisbane based supporter of Parramatta for the 42 years I have been here it maybe hard for some to understand the value of my opinion ......But.... I think Brisbane Dolphins defines a whole set of options if you live in Brisbane and are not aligned with any particular team since Brisbane Broncos polarised a lot of locals who chose not to follow them.

        I believe it will be a succesful franchise and that also means Brisbane Jets (ipswich to Springfield) will also be the last/next team for Brisbane representation. AFL has the ability to take a lot of ground through the AFL connection to Springfield and it will need to be combated. Imagine a team in Sydney that has no representation for what we now call the West Tigers.

        • I believe they erred when they picked Redcliffe as the 4th QLD team.  lpswich or even Logan would have been a much better base to grow the game instead of a place nestled between the Broncos and Storm feeder clubs

  • Yep, hate teams that are just nicknames, unless it is something culturally significant like Rangers or Celtic. I dont know why they just don't call themselves Redcliffe. It won't stop people who don't live in Redcliffe from supporting them. Brisbane isn't tribal in that way like Sydney is. 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

KENDOZA replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Did he fall out with arthur lb?"
51 minutes ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Breaks my heart not seeing him at Parra coaching again. Wish he was at least coaching our NSW Cup team."
57 minutes ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"To be fair FMP, Chief was in favour in letting Gutho go early. Mainly due to his hatred of BA, he linked Gutho to that too and wanted all traces of BA gone. That is not me being smart allic either i am actually serious that is a reason he was in…"
57 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"also this guy should be at Parramatta.   A Parramatta man"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"So now you're back tracking.  Let's just agree to disagree and get on with it"
1 hour ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Don't have time to go through all your wrong predictions, you delete blogs anyway when proven wrong like your recent blog about Sua being a bad signing at 28 years old.
Even if you didn't mention Gutho making them better I bet you compared Saints…"
1 hour ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Of course they wouldn't, but as soon as he has a good game for saints, it will be mentioned how the front office stuffed up signing him. "
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Angry Eel's discussion Hypothetical Question
"The front office screwed it because they got caught cheating that was the bigger issue.Foran unfortunately his body was at the end of it by the time he got to us and the mental state hurt him also."
1 hour ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Angry Eel's discussion Hypothetical Question
"The front office didn't screw that, Kieran Foran did. Unless you're talking about the salary cap cheating, in which case, we wouldn't have signed all those players without it."
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Angry Eel's discussion Hypothetical Question
"Throw in a Micheal Jennings, Hindmarsh,Vella and Dylan Brown. Yep."
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I reckon they'll retire Gutherson and someone said they'll offer him something in coaching. "
2 hours ago
Michael W. replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I wouldn't sign him for 1yr, he is way overrated, imo."
2 hours ago
EA replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"If dragons can fix their outside backs and get a good coach, I recon they will challenge for the 8 next year. Gutho and Holmes at centre is cooked. Atkinson and Metcalf in the halves with Reed and LKT still developing. Drinkwater at fullback. Liddle…"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Angry Eel's discussion Hypothetical Question
"Not be me.
I really thought in 2016 when we signed Kieran Foran that was our circuit breaker with him in the mix with the team he had around him I thought we would have been top 4 for that year and many years after that.How cruel it was the front…"
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Nope. That's false.  I've always been in favour of letting Gutherson go early.  
You should be called fake news midget 
Gp and find where I said they'd be better with Gutherson genius.  "
3 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Chief, you also said dragons would be better then us when they recruited Cook, Gutho and Holmes when we relied on younger players so how did that turn out for you.  You don't have a very good record with predictions and your credibility on…"
3 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>