The Dolphins, is a geographical name essential?

So the Dolphins are apparently going with the name 'The Dolphins' for 2023, which brings to questions is geographical names essential. Now you have old fashioned footy fans like myself who love calling teams but their geographical names (i.e. Parramatta, Penrith, South Sydney, St. George Illawarra etc.) but i do not like the non geographical name approach but i think i know why they are doing it.

It is not as uncommon for the only one name team, the Warriors are technically the 'New Zealand Warriors' but 95% of the time they are called the Warriors. In the early 2000's Canterbury simply went by the Bulldogs, before going back to Canterbury-Bankstown, but this is different to me as these teams have had geographical names prior, early 2000's though Canterbury did not go by Canterbury i still called them that. The Dolphins though not quite the same, people call them Redcliffe though this is not completely a take over to the QRL Redcliffe Dolphins to call them that.

Names that have been brought forward have been Redcliffe, though considered too small an area (fair enough). Another is Sunshine Coast or Sunshine State Dolphins (do not mind this), another is Moreton Bay Dolphins which is my favourite as it is a wider geographical area. Or even go with South-East Queensland Dolphins or Brisbane Dolphins or South Brisbane Dolphins or whatever. I feel with the Broncos taking hold of majority of the QLD market in terms of fans, this is a missed opportunity in branding, having Brisbane or Queensland in the name my not seem like a big deal though i feel it adds proudness of area, rivalry to other teams.

The reason though i can see to most names like Redcliffe or Moreton Bay is the Dolphins are playing most of their games at Suncorp in Brisbane. Now, Brisbane is roughly and hour from Moreton Bay area, so i do understand the NRL trying to avoid the talk of fans having to travel a long distance to see their team named Moreton Bay play in Brisbane instead of locally. Though why not call them Brisbane or South Brisbane or East Brisbane? Well again falls a trap of Redcliffe fans, they would feel betrayed having a team in the NRL but not called by that name, it is not theirs, it will be Brisbane's. The team play there, train there.


So i can see the point of view a little bit for the NRL as it is a difficult spot, and they chose the Dolphins rightfully so as they produced the most assests and money to last in the league, but i hope they find a comprimise in the situation of the name.

 

I know most reading this will be like who cares, though it is fascinating to me, love to hear what names you may like or even your thoughts on the situation, maybe you love the name being 'The Dolphins'.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They are doing it because some marketing knob with a pony tail named Gavin (nod to Billy Birmingham) probably 'consulted' with management and decided that it was more 'inclusive' not to be defined by a geographical area.

    I imagine they'll go with that for a couple of seasons and once they've got their fan base up and running, they'll probably change their name to Moreton Bay Dolphins.

    • But the issue is playing out of Suncorp.

      Like having Manly play out of central coast stadium all the time.

      • Not an issue, public transport is excellent to Suncorp from anywhere in and around Brisbane 

        • it is an hour away from Moreton Bay, hardly Moreton Bay if playing in a stadium and hour and a bit away

          • Yes but it's a free train to and from, trust me that's nothing here in Brisbane. 

    • hahaha BM, never a truer word spoken.

    • I can throw a sinker from from my deck and land it in Moreton Bay yet it would take me the best part of an hour to Redcliffe

      Anything but the Moreton Bay Dolphins

      • I don't feel strongly about it and being a Brisbane based supporter of Parramatta for the 42 years I have been here it maybe hard for some to understand the value of my opinion ......But.... I think Brisbane Dolphins defines a whole set of options if you live in Brisbane and are not aligned with any particular team since Brisbane Broncos polarised a lot of locals who chose not to follow them.

        I believe it will be a succesful franchise and that also means Brisbane Jets (ipswich to Springfield) will also be the last/next team for Brisbane representation. AFL has the ability to take a lot of ground through the AFL connection to Springfield and it will need to be combated. Imagine a team in Sydney that has no representation for what we now call the West Tigers.

        • I believe they erred when they picked Redcliffe as the 4th QLD team.  lpswich or even Logan would have been a much better base to grow the game instead of a place nestled between the Broncos and Storm feeder clubs

  • Yep, hate teams that are just nicknames, unless it is something culturally significant like Rangers or Celtic. I dont know why they just don't call themselves Redcliffe. It won't stop people who don't live in Redcliffe from supporting them. Brisbane isn't tribal in that way like Sydney is. 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Muttman replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"I don't mind this. Our outside back depth is paper thin. We need outside backs with nrl experience. Kelly has some skill. I'm sure Ryles can get the best out of him. We're not signing stars, we're signing players like Kelly, Walker, Jack Williams…"
14 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eelawarra's discussion THE EELS SUPERTEE
"Thanks Eelwarra, if the players engage fully it is beneficial for them personally. 
PS...your avatar is creepy as fuck. Cheers"
19 minutes ago
Yehez replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"He's usually right center, no? So he'll compete with Will P and Simonsson for the right edge of the backs. He's a good backup. I think he played wing before too. 
If he's signing to play left center then he can hack it there well enough and Russell…"
20 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"I almost need glasses to read that the font is so small."
22 minutes ago
The Badger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"To ensure we spend the mandatory required amount of salary cap, are they simply going to pay the juniors they're pinning their hopes on and the (currently) rookie players exorbitant amounts? What is Plan B if Pissants replacement does not live up to…"
30 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"Ya know where you can stick those big foam fingers"
32 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"So you'd break up JAC and Russell to just move him to the Wing? It might happen but doubt since how well it worked."
45 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Lol. Just a happy coincidence it was"
45 minutes ago
HKF replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"To be fair Kelly is decent and you won't be breaking the bank,  well you hope not. But I see where you are coming from. 
Let's be honest,  we are buckleys  chance of snaring a star at the moment,  we are going to have to build to that."
1 hour ago
ParraEels replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"What are their opinions on a supporter coterie
When are they bringing back the cheerleaders 
Any thoughts on removing the chairs behind the posts and making it standing only
Any thoughts on big foam fingers or a special type supporter hat like they…"
1 hour ago
Jack replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Yep don't mind this at all "
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Very good question HOE.
It wasnt meant " as not getting Hollywood names didn't worry me. ". It was more that I'm not worried who Ryles first choice is, I trust that judgement in what he needs. Hollywood player type or not. My concern is foremost…"
1 hour ago
Frank The Tank replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"What's happened to ALL THE CASH??"
2 hours ago
RB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Interesting take on Penisini which I'm not against. I think the only thing stopping that is his ability to draw and pass (especially when he was coming through) is why he was so highly rated. Have to disagree on Simmonson though, I think he's an out…"
2 hours ago
Eelawarra replied to Eelawarra's discussion THE EELS SUPERTEE
"Randy...It’s Jordan Samrani in the above photo, here’s some more photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 "
2 hours ago
Offside replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Won't be on the wing 
Will provide depth competition 
If Simmons goes down (likely) you have Rusty to cover wing Jelly in to centre we've had worse.
 
Hes no tom opiac but he will do"
2 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>