The Dolphins, is a geographical name essential?

So the Dolphins are apparently going with the name 'The Dolphins' for 2023, which brings to questions is geographical names essential. Now you have old fashioned footy fans like myself who love calling teams but their geographical names (i.e. Parramatta, Penrith, South Sydney, St. George Illawarra etc.) but i do not like the non geographical name approach but i think i know why they are doing it.

It is not as uncommon for the only one name team, the Warriors are technically the 'New Zealand Warriors' but 95% of the time they are called the Warriors. In the early 2000's Canterbury simply went by the Bulldogs, before going back to Canterbury-Bankstown, but this is different to me as these teams have had geographical names prior, early 2000's though Canterbury did not go by Canterbury i still called them that. The Dolphins though not quite the same, people call them Redcliffe though this is not completely a take over to the QRL Redcliffe Dolphins to call them that.

Names that have been brought forward have been Redcliffe, though considered too small an area (fair enough). Another is Sunshine Coast or Sunshine State Dolphins (do not mind this), another is Moreton Bay Dolphins which is my favourite as it is a wider geographical area. Or even go with South-East Queensland Dolphins or Brisbane Dolphins or South Brisbane Dolphins or whatever. I feel with the Broncos taking hold of majority of the QLD market in terms of fans, this is a missed opportunity in branding, having Brisbane or Queensland in the name my not seem like a big deal though i feel it adds proudness of area, rivalry to other teams.

The reason though i can see to most names like Redcliffe or Moreton Bay is the Dolphins are playing most of their games at Suncorp in Brisbane. Now, Brisbane is roughly and hour from Moreton Bay area, so i do understand the NRL trying to avoid the talk of fans having to travel a long distance to see their team named Moreton Bay play in Brisbane instead of locally. Though why not call them Brisbane or South Brisbane or East Brisbane? Well again falls a trap of Redcliffe fans, they would feel betrayed having a team in the NRL but not called by that name, it is not theirs, it will be Brisbane's. The team play there, train there.


So i can see the point of view a little bit for the NRL as it is a difficult spot, and they chose the Dolphins rightfully so as they produced the most assests and money to last in the league, but i hope they find a comprimise in the situation of the name.

 

I know most reading this will be like who cares, though it is fascinating to me, love to hear what names you may like or even your thoughts on the situation, maybe you love the name being 'The Dolphins'.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They are doing it because some marketing knob with a pony tail named Gavin (nod to Billy Birmingham) probably 'consulted' with management and decided that it was more 'inclusive' not to be defined by a geographical area.

    I imagine they'll go with that for a couple of seasons and once they've got their fan base up and running, they'll probably change their name to Moreton Bay Dolphins.

    • But the issue is playing out of Suncorp.

      Like having Manly play out of central coast stadium all the time.

      • Not an issue, public transport is excellent to Suncorp from anywhere in and around Brisbane 

        • it is an hour away from Moreton Bay, hardly Moreton Bay if playing in a stadium and hour and a bit away

          • Yes but it's a free train to and from, trust me that's nothing here in Brisbane. 

    • hahaha BM, never a truer word spoken.

    • I can throw a sinker from from my deck and land it in Moreton Bay yet it would take me the best part of an hour to Redcliffe

      Anything but the Moreton Bay Dolphins

      • I don't feel strongly about it and being a Brisbane based supporter of Parramatta for the 42 years I have been here it maybe hard for some to understand the value of my opinion ......But.... I think Brisbane Dolphins defines a whole set of options if you live in Brisbane and are not aligned with any particular team since Brisbane Broncos polarised a lot of locals who chose not to follow them.

        I believe it will be a succesful franchise and that also means Brisbane Jets (ipswich to Springfield) will also be the last/next team for Brisbane representation. AFL has the ability to take a lot of ground through the AFL connection to Springfield and it will need to be combated. Imagine a team in Sydney that has no representation for what we now call the West Tigers.

        • I believe they erred when they picked Redcliffe as the 4th QLD team.  lpswich or even Logan would have been a much better base to grow the game instead of a place nestled between the Broncos and Storm feeder clubs

  • Yep, hate teams that are just nicknames, unless it is something culturally significant like Rangers or Celtic. I dont know why they just don't call themselves Redcliffe. It won't stop people who don't live in Redcliffe from supporting them. Brisbane isn't tribal in that way like Sydney is. 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Mathew Clarke replied to Speech's discussion Jai Field available for NRL
"Speed and a little X factor would be exactly what the doctor ordered for the Eels backline. A Radradra esk player would be perfect."
21 seconds ago
Mathew Clarke replied to LB's discussion Most impressive and disappointing: Trial week 2 v Gold Coast
"I think Lussick is just a little slow due to being over in the Super League which is a little slower but will come good. It will be a good battle between him and hands which is what we want. It seems we finally have a number of people pushing for…"
6 minutes ago
CarloEEL2 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Sivo gets 3 weeks for high shot is this a good or bad thing lol ?
"Won't stay a fan favourite if he is letting every man , his dog and its litter through though 🤔"
24 minutes ago
JEELman replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Sivo gets 3 weeks for high shot is this a good or bad thing lol ?
"First sentence nails it. Eels power brokers won't want to lose a fan favourite though. Sivo, Sivo, Sivo = more money through the gates."
38 minutes ago
BEM replied to LB's discussion Most impressive and disappointing: Trial week 2 v Gold Coast
"Mostly good things from that trial.but still som concerns.
Our backs are nothing to write home about, our hookers are definitely mid tier and our defence is still shit.
Other than that, not to bad at all."
41 minutes ago
BEM replied to Speech's discussion Jai Field available for NRL
"That's exactly what we need."
45 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Speech's discussion Jai Field available for NRL
48 minutes ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Sivo gets 3 weeks for high shot is this a good or bad thing lol ?
"Exactly "
56 minutes ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Sivo gets 3 weeks for high shot is this a good or bad thing lol ?
"Cannot understand why they didn't look for some backs but continually focus on forwards. Doesn't make sense "
56 minutes ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Sivo gets 3 weeks for high shot is this a good or bad thing lol ?
"Sometimes as I don't live locally "
58 minutes ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Sivo gets 3 weeks for high shot is this a good or bad thing lol ?
"Yep have to agree "
58 minutes ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Sivo gets 3 weeks for high shot is this a good or bad thing lol ?
"Well said and absolutely agree👍"
59 minutes ago
Bup replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Sivo gets 3 weeks for high shot is this a good or bad thing lol ?
"Spot on , both our centres don't seem to be big on defensive comminication.Thats always a worry.
Teams that have continuity throughout the year with centre and wing combinations not only have better defensive structures but end up on the pointy end…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion Most impressive and disappointing: Trial week 2 v Gold Coast
"I think Paulo looks more mobile this year he's definitely dropped some kegs.
The ball movement once they get the fast play the ball and off load is good to see aswell it means we are going to be harder to defend.
Fowards passing to fowards beautiful…"
1 hour ago
Speech replied to LB's discussion Most impressive and disappointing: Trial week 2 v Gold Coast
"You are being harsh with Lussick. The team was slick early and that was when he was on the field. It was also very humid. The big concern is depth same as last year. If we get another injurt or suspension while Sivo is out we are in a bit of trouble."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him's discussion Bali ?
"I remember this " i'm pretty certain" it was all made in Hoolywood.
They don't make like this anymore Sluggo"
1 hour ago
More…

 

What am I missing here?

For the past three seasons at least, opposition teams have gone to our wing on the tryline and found at least 20 meters of unmarked territory. they just stroll over for a try. Again today. What's going on? If I can see it surely a coach can see it…

Read more…
28 Replies · Reply by Cumberland Eel 3 hours ago
Views: 1048

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>