The Dolphins, is a geographical name essential?

So the Dolphins are apparently going with the name 'The Dolphins' for 2023, which brings to questions is geographical names essential. Now you have old fashioned footy fans like myself who love calling teams but their geographical names (i.e. Parramatta, Penrith, South Sydney, St. George Illawarra etc.) but i do not like the non geographical name approach but i think i know why they are doing it.

It is not as uncommon for the only one name team, the Warriors are technically the 'New Zealand Warriors' but 95% of the time they are called the Warriors. In the early 2000's Canterbury simply went by the Bulldogs, before going back to Canterbury-Bankstown, but this is different to me as these teams have had geographical names prior, early 2000's though Canterbury did not go by Canterbury i still called them that. The Dolphins though not quite the same, people call them Redcliffe though this is not completely a take over to the QRL Redcliffe Dolphins to call them that.

Names that have been brought forward have been Redcliffe, though considered too small an area (fair enough). Another is Sunshine Coast or Sunshine State Dolphins (do not mind this), another is Moreton Bay Dolphins which is my favourite as it is a wider geographical area. Or even go with South-East Queensland Dolphins or Brisbane Dolphins or South Brisbane Dolphins or whatever. I feel with the Broncos taking hold of majority of the QLD market in terms of fans, this is a missed opportunity in branding, having Brisbane or Queensland in the name my not seem like a big deal though i feel it adds proudness of area, rivalry to other teams.

The reason though i can see to most names like Redcliffe or Moreton Bay is the Dolphins are playing most of their games at Suncorp in Brisbane. Now, Brisbane is roughly and hour from Moreton Bay area, so i do understand the NRL trying to avoid the talk of fans having to travel a long distance to see their team named Moreton Bay play in Brisbane instead of locally. Though why not call them Brisbane or South Brisbane or East Brisbane? Well again falls a trap of Redcliffe fans, they would feel betrayed having a team in the NRL but not called by that name, it is not theirs, it will be Brisbane's. The team play there, train there.


So i can see the point of view a little bit for the NRL as it is a difficult spot, and they chose the Dolphins rightfully so as they produced the most assests and money to last in the league, but i hope they find a comprimise in the situation of the name.

 

I know most reading this will be like who cares, though it is fascinating to me, love to hear what names you may like or even your thoughts on the situation, maybe you love the name being 'The Dolphins'.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They are doing it because some marketing knob with a pony tail named Gavin (nod to Billy Birmingham) probably 'consulted' with management and decided that it was more 'inclusive' not to be defined by a geographical area.

    I imagine they'll go with that for a couple of seasons and once they've got their fan base up and running, they'll probably change their name to Moreton Bay Dolphins.

    • But the issue is playing out of Suncorp.

      Like having Manly play out of central coast stadium all the time.

      • Not an issue, public transport is excellent to Suncorp from anywhere in and around Brisbane 

        • it is an hour away from Moreton Bay, hardly Moreton Bay if playing in a stadium and hour and a bit away

          • Yes but it's a free train to and from, trust me that's nothing here in Brisbane. 

    • hahaha BM, never a truer word spoken.

    • I can throw a sinker from from my deck and land it in Moreton Bay yet it would take me the best part of an hour to Redcliffe

      Anything but the Moreton Bay Dolphins

      • I don't feel strongly about it and being a Brisbane based supporter of Parramatta for the 42 years I have been here it maybe hard for some to understand the value of my opinion ......But.... I think Brisbane Dolphins defines a whole set of options if you live in Brisbane and are not aligned with any particular team since Brisbane Broncos polarised a lot of locals who chose not to follow them.

        I believe it will be a succesful franchise and that also means Brisbane Jets (ipswich to Springfield) will also be the last/next team for Brisbane representation. AFL has the ability to take a lot of ground through the AFL connection to Springfield and it will need to be combated. Imagine a team in Sydney that has no representation for what we now call the West Tigers.

        • I believe they erred when they picked Redcliffe as the 4th QLD team.  lpswich or even Logan would have been a much better base to grow the game instead of a place nestled between the Broncos and Storm feeder clubs

  • Yep, hate teams that are just nicknames, unless it is something culturally significant like Rangers or Celtic. I dont know why they just don't call themselves Redcliffe. It won't stop people who don't live in Redcliffe from supporting them. Brisbane isn't tribal in that way like Sydney is. 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Michael W. replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"I'd say Lomax and his manager have done their due diligence, wouldn't be surprised if a payment has already been made, I don't think Lomax would go into it without some sort of assurance. Money is no object with these Saudis, V'landys calls it a…"
52 seconds ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Keon 👀
"No, why would it? They need middles.
8. Tatola
9. Smith
10. Koloamatangi
11. Fifita
12. Arrow
13. Murray
 
Take out Keaon, who do you put in? Keppie? Could move Duncan to edge and Arrow to middle but Tatola is not playing how he used to. Moale will…"
3 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"He's not worth the money."
17 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"In other words, the coaches, BA and Ryles, signed the good players, and MON signed the lesser players. So, MON doesn't get to talk to  any potential rep class signings, he only deals with reserve graders and journey men."
18 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Rabz S's discussion Jonah Pezet Joins Parramatta Eels - OFFICIAL
"lol"
34 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"No more so than repping for both coachs and players"
43 minutes ago
EA replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"I also losing him helps the coaching staff make a decision fitting our outside backs into the SG ball side for next year

Bamblett
Roksuka
Bloomfield
Howlett
Sorovi

Davis, Moala, Cobi somehow need to be in the team too. Perhaps start a couple of…"
1 hour ago
Darren Munro replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"Surely has to be a conflict of interest. "
1 hour ago
Darren Munro replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"Lost Hawkins, matto and simmo backflip. Imho this has been a booged deal. "
1 hour ago
Electric Eel 2 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Keon 👀
"They just signed Fafita. Does that change your thoughts?"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Keon 👀
"Not middles."
1 hour ago
EA replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"Just found it thanks. Yea don't think it's a big loss especially since we have Richie who is similar to him. Lacks a yard of pace too
Just hope Bloomfield and Sorovi really develop into guns. Even Cobi had a great year despite not being able to…"
1 hour ago
EA replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"Sorovi in the one game he played passed the eye test for sure. Really hope he gets an injury free year in SG ball. 18 years old next year. I recon he could be like Semi. But very small sample size I have seen of him."
1 hour ago
EA replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"Nah I dont see Bamblett as a centre or winger. I don't think Johanssonis a big loss. No gurantee he makes the NRL."
1 hour ago
Sonic Boom replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"Short answer is no. Casey was a freak who went from Matt's directly to flegg/nsw cup. Outside backs are our weakest position with the only player that I would say it an exciting talent is Bloomfield however as EA said he had an underwhelming 2025"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"Captain, all the evidence points to you being spot on. Complete with all the buzzwords. "Diversification" of portfolios. Sportswashing. Disruptors, etc. I wouldn't be surprised if the opaque Saudi groups funding R360's US-UK-Consortium are tied to…"
1 hour ago
More…

 

Keon 👀

We have money to spend and were in need of a strong foward.1.Isiah iongi2.Zac lomax3.Will penisni4.Sean russell5.Josh addocarr6.Jonah pezet7.Mitchell moses8.Keon koloamatangi9.Ryley smith10.Junior paulo11.Kitione kautoga12.Jack williams13.Jack de…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by LB 3 minutes ago
Views: 344

Lomax Gone

Just listening to Braith Anasta who has stated that Lomax won't be playing with Parra in 2026 and that's he's basically signed with Rugby Union. Anasta reckons he will not play NRL again and will likely move to UK to prepare for the October start of…

Read more…
58 Replies · Reply by Michael W. 53 seconds ago
Views: 1301

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>