The Dolphins, is a geographical name essential?

So the Dolphins are apparently going with the name 'The Dolphins' for 2023, which brings to questions is geographical names essential. Now you have old fashioned footy fans like myself who love calling teams but their geographical names (i.e. Parramatta, Penrith, South Sydney, St. George Illawarra etc.) but i do not like the non geographical name approach but i think i know why they are doing it.

It is not as uncommon for the only one name team, the Warriors are technically the 'New Zealand Warriors' but 95% of the time they are called the Warriors. In the early 2000's Canterbury simply went by the Bulldogs, before going back to Canterbury-Bankstown, but this is different to me as these teams have had geographical names prior, early 2000's though Canterbury did not go by Canterbury i still called them that. The Dolphins though not quite the same, people call them Redcliffe though this is not completely a take over to the QRL Redcliffe Dolphins to call them that.

Names that have been brought forward have been Redcliffe, though considered too small an area (fair enough). Another is Sunshine Coast or Sunshine State Dolphins (do not mind this), another is Moreton Bay Dolphins which is my favourite as it is a wider geographical area. Or even go with South-East Queensland Dolphins or Brisbane Dolphins or South Brisbane Dolphins or whatever. I feel with the Broncos taking hold of majority of the QLD market in terms of fans, this is a missed opportunity in branding, having Brisbane or Queensland in the name my not seem like a big deal though i feel it adds proudness of area, rivalry to other teams.

The reason though i can see to most names like Redcliffe or Moreton Bay is the Dolphins are playing most of their games at Suncorp in Brisbane. Now, Brisbane is roughly and hour from Moreton Bay area, so i do understand the NRL trying to avoid the talk of fans having to travel a long distance to see their team named Moreton Bay play in Brisbane instead of locally. Though why not call them Brisbane or South Brisbane or East Brisbane? Well again falls a trap of Redcliffe fans, they would feel betrayed having a team in the NRL but not called by that name, it is not theirs, it will be Brisbane's. The team play there, train there.


So i can see the point of view a little bit for the NRL as it is a difficult spot, and they chose the Dolphins rightfully so as they produced the most assests and money to last in the league, but i hope they find a comprimise in the situation of the name.

 

I know most reading this will be like who cares, though it is fascinating to me, love to hear what names you may like or even your thoughts on the situation, maybe you love the name being 'The Dolphins'.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They are doing it because some marketing knob with a pony tail named Gavin (nod to Billy Birmingham) probably 'consulted' with management and decided that it was more 'inclusive' not to be defined by a geographical area.

    I imagine they'll go with that for a couple of seasons and once they've got their fan base up and running, they'll probably change their name to Moreton Bay Dolphins.

    • But the issue is playing out of Suncorp.

      Like having Manly play out of central coast stadium all the time.

      • Not an issue, public transport is excellent to Suncorp from anywhere in and around Brisbane 

        • it is an hour away from Moreton Bay, hardly Moreton Bay if playing in a stadium and hour and a bit away

          • Yes but it's a free train to and from, trust me that's nothing here in Brisbane. 

    • hahaha BM, never a truer word spoken.

    • I can throw a sinker from from my deck and land it in Moreton Bay yet it would take me the best part of an hour to Redcliffe

      Anything but the Moreton Bay Dolphins

      • I don't feel strongly about it and being a Brisbane based supporter of Parramatta for the 42 years I have been here it maybe hard for some to understand the value of my opinion ......But.... I think Brisbane Dolphins defines a whole set of options if you live in Brisbane and are not aligned with any particular team since Brisbane Broncos polarised a lot of locals who chose not to follow them.

        I believe it will be a succesful franchise and that also means Brisbane Jets (ipswich to Springfield) will also be the last/next team for Brisbane representation. AFL has the ability to take a lot of ground through the AFL connection to Springfield and it will need to be combated. Imagine a team in Sydney that has no representation for what we now call the West Tigers.

        • I believe they erred when they picked Redcliffe as the 4th QLD team.  lpswich or even Logan would have been a much better base to grow the game instead of a place nestled between the Broncos and Storm feeder clubs

  • Yep, hate teams that are just nicknames, unless it is something culturally significant like Rangers or Celtic. I dont know why they just don't call themselves Redcliffe. It won't stop people who don't live in Redcliffe from supporting them. Brisbane isn't tribal in that way like Sydney is. 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Yep he said it can be used for their junior development
He said exactly it was a great deal."
59 minutes ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"This isn't just Vlandy's doing.  We all know certain clubs seem to get everything there own way and all this is doing is allowing the fans to see what has been happening for years due to the court case.
Protected clubs using the NRL to bully smaller…"
1 hour ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Lomax has played this perfectly for his boxing career not so much for his footy career or reputation.
If he is as good as reports say, he will earn a lot in boxing as he is getting the public to hate him which means they will tune in hoping he gets…"
1 hour ago
Mitchy replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"HOE, spot on, and you can only assume (and I know we can assume a lot) that his has occurred. I am really impressed with the club here and just hope we can get a decent win from this; as if not it will mean that the NRL and the stronger clubs…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"He certainly has Bobbie, I have been a past admirer of PVL and his astuteness, in this area he has shown himself to be complacent and mis reading the room...... My suspicions are he has become over confident and probably tired, unfortunately for him…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Hoey, That's an excellent point re Crawley.....one of the side benefits of these issues is seeing how the media is manipulated by their masters......its not just sugar you get when sqeezing cane, there is the side benefit of the Rum! Lol
 "
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Thanks, Mitchy. 
It's interesting, Crawley was emphatic on Feb 12 in backing the Eels, labelling Lomax’s case “complete nonsense.”
Since then, there’s been no follow-up column on Lomax despite significant reported developments, including messages…"
1 hour ago
Muttman replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"I didn't see the entire interview. Did he really say he thought $300k was a great deal? "
2 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Anyone hear Brent Read? He said no issues with what Rodski did. He said all clubs contact Abdo. What he is not getting is the wording. Applying blowtorch is pretty much saying to the NRL "Get them to accept whatever we want" plus he must've missed…"
2 hours ago
Mitchy replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Ohh please Randy....."
2 hours ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Ryles 2.0: 2026 gets off to a bright start in Eels trial
"I think Samrani could be a choice on the wing. He's a big boy and posted some great numbers yesterday. 15 runs for 168 metres of which 50 were post contact. I didnt recall him being pushed back once. He has intent and plays hard. Really like this…"
2 hours ago
SuperEel 22 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Ryles 2.0: 2026 gets off to a bright start in Eels trial
"Tago's contract finishes this year. I imagine we'll be releasing him and replacing him either with an external signing or a junior."
2 hours ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Picking Up Where We Left Off?
"Agee BE"
3 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Mahe Fonua was there first I think."
5 hours ago
Kurupt - He Be Trippin On A Matt replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Great work HOE"
5 hours ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"PVL seems like he's on the take. Tripp potentially lining his and Abdo's pockets gimping themselves out for the cheating storm's benefit.
Instead of being neutral on the matter or taking Parra's side they are both looking out for the best possible…"
10 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2079

 

V'Landys on Hello Sport

Happy Monday, if anyone wants a good laugh to start their week, skip to 32:50 mark and listen to this f***wit talk. It is laughable seriously. Claiming the offer of $300k was a great deal and we can put that into our junior system. But said we can…

Read more…
33 Replies · Reply by LB 59 minutes ago
Views: 1509

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>