The Dolphins, is a geographical name essential?

So the Dolphins are apparently going with the name 'The Dolphins' for 2023, which brings to questions is geographical names essential. Now you have old fashioned footy fans like myself who love calling teams but their geographical names (i.e. Parramatta, Penrith, South Sydney, St. George Illawarra etc.) but i do not like the non geographical name approach but i think i know why they are doing it.

It is not as uncommon for the only one name team, the Warriors are technically the 'New Zealand Warriors' but 95% of the time they are called the Warriors. In the early 2000's Canterbury simply went by the Bulldogs, before going back to Canterbury-Bankstown, but this is different to me as these teams have had geographical names prior, early 2000's though Canterbury did not go by Canterbury i still called them that. The Dolphins though not quite the same, people call them Redcliffe though this is not completely a take over to the QRL Redcliffe Dolphins to call them that.

Names that have been brought forward have been Redcliffe, though considered too small an area (fair enough). Another is Sunshine Coast or Sunshine State Dolphins (do not mind this), another is Moreton Bay Dolphins which is my favourite as it is a wider geographical area. Or even go with South-East Queensland Dolphins or Brisbane Dolphins or South Brisbane Dolphins or whatever. I feel with the Broncos taking hold of majority of the QLD market in terms of fans, this is a missed opportunity in branding, having Brisbane or Queensland in the name my not seem like a big deal though i feel it adds proudness of area, rivalry to other teams.

The reason though i can see to most names like Redcliffe or Moreton Bay is the Dolphins are playing most of their games at Suncorp in Brisbane. Now, Brisbane is roughly and hour from Moreton Bay area, so i do understand the NRL trying to avoid the talk of fans having to travel a long distance to see their team named Moreton Bay play in Brisbane instead of locally. Though why not call them Brisbane or South Brisbane or East Brisbane? Well again falls a trap of Redcliffe fans, they would feel betrayed having a team in the NRL but not called by that name, it is not theirs, it will be Brisbane's. The team play there, train there.


So i can see the point of view a little bit for the NRL as it is a difficult spot, and they chose the Dolphins rightfully so as they produced the most assests and money to last in the league, but i hope they find a comprimise in the situation of the name.

 

I know most reading this will be like who cares, though it is fascinating to me, love to hear what names you may like or even your thoughts on the situation, maybe you love the name being 'The Dolphins'.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They are doing it because some marketing knob with a pony tail named Gavin (nod to Billy Birmingham) probably 'consulted' with management and decided that it was more 'inclusive' not to be defined by a geographical area.

    I imagine they'll go with that for a couple of seasons and once they've got their fan base up and running, they'll probably change their name to Moreton Bay Dolphins.

    • But the issue is playing out of Suncorp.

      Like having Manly play out of central coast stadium all the time.

      • Not an issue, public transport is excellent to Suncorp from anywhere in and around Brisbane 

        • it is an hour away from Moreton Bay, hardly Moreton Bay if playing in a stadium and hour and a bit away

          • Yes but it's a free train to and from, trust me that's nothing here in Brisbane. 

    • hahaha BM, never a truer word spoken.

    • I can throw a sinker from from my deck and land it in Moreton Bay yet it would take me the best part of an hour to Redcliffe

      Anything but the Moreton Bay Dolphins

      • I don't feel strongly about it and being a Brisbane based supporter of Parramatta for the 42 years I have been here it maybe hard for some to understand the value of my opinion ......But.... I think Brisbane Dolphins defines a whole set of options if you live in Brisbane and are not aligned with any particular team since Brisbane Broncos polarised a lot of locals who chose not to follow them.

        I believe it will be a succesful franchise and that also means Brisbane Jets (ipswich to Springfield) will also be the last/next team for Brisbane representation. AFL has the ability to take a lot of ground through the AFL connection to Springfield and it will need to be combated. Imagine a team in Sydney that has no representation for what we now call the West Tigers.

        • I believe they erred when they picked Redcliffe as the 4th QLD team.  lpswich or even Logan would have been a much better base to grow the game instead of a place nestled between the Broncos and Storm feeder clubs

  • Yep, hate teams that are just nicknames, unless it is something culturally significant like Rangers or Celtic. I dont know why they just don't call themselves Redcliffe. It won't stop people who don't live in Redcliffe from supporting them. Brisbane isn't tribal in that way like Sydney is. 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Muttman replied to Muttman's discussion Apa Twidle signs with the Bears
"You're missing the point entirely.  Our club fucked the Brown contract so badly that everyone involved should have been fired. Brown had options IN HIS FAVOUR. That's the key point. The club stupidly convinced itself that Dylan was all locked up…"
23 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion Araz Nanva signs Top 30 Contract for 2027
"Is that the only minute of the game you watched?"
28 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Muttman's discussion Apa Twidle signs with the Bears
"The blood sacrifices would soon be like the Monty Python song 'Brave Little Robin', where 'off with their heads' never ends?!"
41 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Simmonson Update
"Yep, heaps of clicks bait on fb. Half tge stuff on there is bs"
46 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Simmonson Update
"Well,  I wish him all the best. It was a very strange situation when he came out in the media and wanted a release, so weather he was in our long term plans or not i don't think he was.  I think he's on a pretty low contract as when we signed him he…"
48 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Simmonson Update
"My first reaction when I saw this pic was, he won't be back to best."
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Who wins and by how many ??
"Yep,  I should have had him on the bench "
2 hours ago
JC replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Who wins and by how many ??
"No guymer ?"
2 hours ago
Muttman replied to EA's discussion Araz Nanva signs Top 30 Contract for 2027
"Didn't Timiko score a solo try under the posts? "
3 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Muttman's discussion Apa Twidle signs with the Bears
"I look at outside backs and outside of Iongi it looks decidedly average.
JaC I think is well into the back 9 much like Simonsson also we can't be relying on that in 2 seasons if we are we are in trouble.
Thats where the club needs to spend some…"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Who wins and by how many ??
"I will say that is a pretty poor 2027 squad and with only 9 spots available with more to re-sign, dear lord.
But i would lean on the departing team. Mainly due to the spine."
8 hours ago
ParraPride replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Who wins and by how many ??
"xD"
8 hours ago
Mat Bo replied to Muttman's discussion Apa Twidle signs with the Bears
"I saw that this moring (UK time), yes. But we'll never know if he cost us 50k more than he would have a few weeks ago. Same for Apa, I think he would have signed a 1y NRL contract for next year."
9 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Muttman's discussion Apa Twidle signs with the Bears
"The 2026-2031 stuff was player options. His contract ended at the end of 2025, meaning he was free to talk to rivals in November 2024. The options only came into play if he activated them, and he didn't. Matterson's contract also ended in 2025 but…"
9 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Who wins and by how many ??
"Lol chat gpt said they'd never heard of the Parramatta Eels so im blaming chat "
10 hours ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Who wins and by how many ??
"That's some shocking spelling 😂 but 2027 eels "
10 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2365

 

Araz Nanva signs Top 30 Contract for 2027

The Parramatta Eels are pleased to announce that emerging outside back Araz Nanva has extended his contract with the club for a further year and will be elevated to the Top 30 squad for the 2027 NRL season.An Eels junior, Nanva’s extension comes on…

Read more…
42 Replies · Reply by EA 28 minutes ago
Views: 1224

Apa Twidle signs with the Bears

 Rising Apa Twidle will leave the Parramatta Eels at the end of 2026 after agreeing to a three-year deal with the new Perth Bears (joining in 2027).  The deal is in a cooling-off period, but he’s expected to go ahead with it because the offer is…

Read more…
199 Replies · Reply by Muttman 23 minutes ago
Views: 4124

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>