The Dolphins, is a geographical name essential?

So the Dolphins are apparently going with the name 'The Dolphins' for 2023, which brings to questions is geographical names essential. Now you have old fashioned footy fans like myself who love calling teams but their geographical names (i.e. Parramatta, Penrith, South Sydney, St. George Illawarra etc.) but i do not like the non geographical name approach but i think i know why they are doing it.

It is not as uncommon for the only one name team, the Warriors are technically the 'New Zealand Warriors' but 95% of the time they are called the Warriors. In the early 2000's Canterbury simply went by the Bulldogs, before going back to Canterbury-Bankstown, but this is different to me as these teams have had geographical names prior, early 2000's though Canterbury did not go by Canterbury i still called them that. The Dolphins though not quite the same, people call them Redcliffe though this is not completely a take over to the QRL Redcliffe Dolphins to call them that.

Names that have been brought forward have been Redcliffe, though considered too small an area (fair enough). Another is Sunshine Coast or Sunshine State Dolphins (do not mind this), another is Moreton Bay Dolphins which is my favourite as it is a wider geographical area. Or even go with South-East Queensland Dolphins or Brisbane Dolphins or South Brisbane Dolphins or whatever. I feel with the Broncos taking hold of majority of the QLD market in terms of fans, this is a missed opportunity in branding, having Brisbane or Queensland in the name my not seem like a big deal though i feel it adds proudness of area, rivalry to other teams.

The reason though i can see to most names like Redcliffe or Moreton Bay is the Dolphins are playing most of their games at Suncorp in Brisbane. Now, Brisbane is roughly and hour from Moreton Bay area, so i do understand the NRL trying to avoid the talk of fans having to travel a long distance to see their team named Moreton Bay play in Brisbane instead of locally. Though why not call them Brisbane or South Brisbane or East Brisbane? Well again falls a trap of Redcliffe fans, they would feel betrayed having a team in the NRL but not called by that name, it is not theirs, it will be Brisbane's. The team play there, train there.


So i can see the point of view a little bit for the NRL as it is a difficult spot, and they chose the Dolphins rightfully so as they produced the most assests and money to last in the league, but i hope they find a comprimise in the situation of the name.

 

I know most reading this will be like who cares, though it is fascinating to me, love to hear what names you may like or even your thoughts on the situation, maybe you love the name being 'The Dolphins'.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They are doing it because some marketing knob with a pony tail named Gavin (nod to Billy Birmingham) probably 'consulted' with management and decided that it was more 'inclusive' not to be defined by a geographical area.

    I imagine they'll go with that for a couple of seasons and once they've got their fan base up and running, they'll probably change their name to Moreton Bay Dolphins.

    • But the issue is playing out of Suncorp.

      Like having Manly play out of central coast stadium all the time.

      • Not an issue, public transport is excellent to Suncorp from anywhere in and around Brisbane 

        • it is an hour away from Moreton Bay, hardly Moreton Bay if playing in a stadium and hour and a bit away

          • Yes but it's a free train to and from, trust me that's nothing here in Brisbane. 

    • hahaha BM, never a truer word spoken.

    • I can throw a sinker from from my deck and land it in Moreton Bay yet it would take me the best part of an hour to Redcliffe

      Anything but the Moreton Bay Dolphins

      • I don't feel strongly about it and being a Brisbane based supporter of Parramatta for the 42 years I have been here it maybe hard for some to understand the value of my opinion ......But.... I think Brisbane Dolphins defines a whole set of options if you live in Brisbane and are not aligned with any particular team since Brisbane Broncos polarised a lot of locals who chose not to follow them.

        I believe it will be a succesful franchise and that also means Brisbane Jets (ipswich to Springfield) will also be the last/next team for Brisbane representation. AFL has the ability to take a lot of ground through the AFL connection to Springfield and it will need to be combated. Imagine a team in Sydney that has no representation for what we now call the West Tigers.

        • I believe they erred when they picked Redcliffe as the 4th QLD team.  lpswich or even Logan would have been a much better base to grow the game instead of a place nestled between the Broncos and Storm feeder clubs

  • Yep, hate teams that are just nicknames, unless it is something culturally significant like Rangers or Celtic. I dont know why they just don't call themselves Redcliffe. It won't stop people who don't live in Redcliffe from supporting them. Brisbane isn't tribal in that way like Sydney is. 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Eli Stephens replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"No doubt Lomax will be back in the nrl eventually but it's going to be a process, Parra just needs to ask for compensation of a player of decent value and something will eventually get done. If it's not the storm another club will come to the party "
31 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger commented on Hell On Eels’s status
"We can't keep him on the couch for more than 1 season, it won't fly.
Sooo, we scrub him out for next year, then offer him to the Bears. Instead of a player swap, they agree not to target Eels players.
Failing that, we absolutely should stand…"
1 hour ago
KENDOZA replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Exactly"
1 hour ago
ParramAddict replied to Roy tannous's discussion Does anyone know what it is ?
"Billy Rogers
 "
2 hours ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"The main reason for him and Abdo, who I cannot stand, would do that is they see $ signs with promoting Lomax v Parra for Round 1 and Magic Round."
2 hours ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Roy tannous's discussion Does anyone know what it is ?
"Parra hold all the cards. No need to fold."
3 hours ago
Hell On Eels commented on Hell On Eels’s status
"We need to hold the line— stand up for ourselves— regardless of what other stakeholders do. Fair swap or no deal.
Lomax can threaten to leave for Japanese or French Rugby, to get PLV on side, for all I care."
5 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Watch pvl get involved and fuck us over"
6 hours ago
Eelovution replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Flow basket- have you been living in a news vacuum? Brown-$1.4 million per year on a 10-year deal(till he reaches 36 years) and Lomax relinquished his contract as he wanted to go to the non-starter R369."
6 hours ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Did you just ask why Brown left? I could think of 14 million reasons why Brown left. Not that hard to work out."
7 hours ago
Flow Basket replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Why did Brown and lomax leave .I thought we offered fair money good facilities. The agents do the deal that's asked of them .where's the advice coming from . The game needs non profit welfare if the fans aren't happy "
7 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Finally a coach who actually knows what he's doing and makes decent decisions lol. Can sleep well at night 🤣 honestly don't care if the Lomax thing just happens in the background till mid season or whatever. He can wait "
19 hours ago
Longfin Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Yep exactly LB. Ryles is calling the shots here. It's comforting knowing that the club is backing his decisions. We would not be able to promote such a strong position if the club was not completely united. "
21 hours ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Before this saga did anyone think that Samrani was Ryles pet project to mirror a player like Howarth?"
21 hours ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Sarantinos pretty much laid it out to Melbourne and all NRL clubs, pretty much if we receive something very good whether cap space or a rep player, he can leave. Ball is now in the court of the other 16 teams whoever can make the best trade…"
22 hours ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"I heard him say that on Kenty podcast. Kent pretty much laughed at him when he said Lomax goes for a challenge, Kent said yeah and money too. He saw through the rubbish.
But at the same time, Gillis is doing exactly what he should be doing,…"
22 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1923

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 235

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>