The Dolphins, is a geographical name essential?

So the Dolphins are apparently going with the name 'The Dolphins' for 2023, which brings to questions is geographical names essential. Now you have old fashioned footy fans like myself who love calling teams but their geographical names (i.e. Parramatta, Penrith, South Sydney, St. George Illawarra etc.) but i do not like the non geographical name approach but i think i know why they are doing it.

It is not as uncommon for the only one name team, the Warriors are technically the 'New Zealand Warriors' but 95% of the time they are called the Warriors. In the early 2000's Canterbury simply went by the Bulldogs, before going back to Canterbury-Bankstown, but this is different to me as these teams have had geographical names prior, early 2000's though Canterbury did not go by Canterbury i still called them that. The Dolphins though not quite the same, people call them Redcliffe though this is not completely a take over to the QRL Redcliffe Dolphins to call them that.

Names that have been brought forward have been Redcliffe, though considered too small an area (fair enough). Another is Sunshine Coast or Sunshine State Dolphins (do not mind this), another is Moreton Bay Dolphins which is my favourite as it is a wider geographical area. Or even go with South-East Queensland Dolphins or Brisbane Dolphins or South Brisbane Dolphins or whatever. I feel with the Broncos taking hold of majority of the QLD market in terms of fans, this is a missed opportunity in branding, having Brisbane or Queensland in the name my not seem like a big deal though i feel it adds proudness of area, rivalry to other teams.

The reason though i can see to most names like Redcliffe or Moreton Bay is the Dolphins are playing most of their games at Suncorp in Brisbane. Now, Brisbane is roughly and hour from Moreton Bay area, so i do understand the NRL trying to avoid the talk of fans having to travel a long distance to see their team named Moreton Bay play in Brisbane instead of locally. Though why not call them Brisbane or South Brisbane or East Brisbane? Well again falls a trap of Redcliffe fans, they would feel betrayed having a team in the NRL but not called by that name, it is not theirs, it will be Brisbane's. The team play there, train there.


So i can see the point of view a little bit for the NRL as it is a difficult spot, and they chose the Dolphins rightfully so as they produced the most assests and money to last in the league, but i hope they find a comprimise in the situation of the name.

 

I know most reading this will be like who cares, though it is fascinating to me, love to hear what names you may like or even your thoughts on the situation, maybe you love the name being 'The Dolphins'.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They are doing it because some marketing knob with a pony tail named Gavin (nod to Billy Birmingham) probably 'consulted' with management and decided that it was more 'inclusive' not to be defined by a geographical area.

    I imagine they'll go with that for a couple of seasons and once they've got their fan base up and running, they'll probably change their name to Moreton Bay Dolphins.

    • But the issue is playing out of Suncorp.

      Like having Manly play out of central coast stadium all the time.

      • Not an issue, public transport is excellent to Suncorp from anywhere in and around Brisbane 

        • it is an hour away from Moreton Bay, hardly Moreton Bay if playing in a stadium and hour and a bit away

          • Yes but it's a free train to and from, trust me that's nothing here in Brisbane. 

    • hahaha BM, never a truer word spoken.

    • I can throw a sinker from from my deck and land it in Moreton Bay yet it would take me the best part of an hour to Redcliffe

      Anything but the Moreton Bay Dolphins

      • I don't feel strongly about it and being a Brisbane based supporter of Parramatta for the 42 years I have been here it maybe hard for some to understand the value of my opinion ......But.... I think Brisbane Dolphins defines a whole set of options if you live in Brisbane and are not aligned with any particular team since Brisbane Broncos polarised a lot of locals who chose not to follow them.

        I believe it will be a succesful franchise and that also means Brisbane Jets (ipswich to Springfield) will also be the last/next team for Brisbane representation. AFL has the ability to take a lot of ground through the AFL connection to Springfield and it will need to be combated. Imagine a team in Sydney that has no representation for what we now call the West Tigers.

        • I believe they erred when they picked Redcliffe as the 4th QLD team.  lpswich or even Logan would have been a much better base to grow the game instead of a place nestled between the Broncos and Storm feeder clubs

  • Yep, hate teams that are just nicknames, unless it is something culturally significant like Rangers or Celtic. I dont know why they just don't call themselves Redcliffe. It won't stop people who don't live in Redcliffe from supporting them. Brisbane isn't tribal in that way like Sydney is. 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"I like the signing of Kelly, it gives our outside backs, Russell and Simmonson a bit of competition. Most of the narrative around Kelly's signing has been about his terrible defence. I watched four Titans games from this year, his defence is not as…"
3 hours ago
Michael W. replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"It's a footy forum, and that should be it. We've lost quite a few good posters the last few years, I don't know whether it's because of politics, religion, racism, language or we have lost them because of the lack of success the club has had for…"
3 hours ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I read a few eels forums and there is always lots of infighting. Seperating the politics is a good idea as it is toxic and devisive. I actually think think the quality of this site has improved somewhat in the last year or so. "
4 hours ago
GOLDEEL replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I'm not sure when this site started but I've been on here from the early days and while I don't comment or post much I always check in to read everyone's opinions if they are good or bad. In all my time I've been here HOE I can say I enjoyed reading…"
4 hours ago
Bob Smith replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"Politics on here is pointless, for reasons i'm not even going to explain. That's all I'll say on this matter."
4 hours ago
Bob Smith replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"He was tried there under BA and had little idea. He couldn't position himself correctly. Ryles might be better at coaching him there though. "
4 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Randy, you and Pops, have much more in common than you might think. You're both truth seekers. Have deep empathy for others, Are willing to learn and open your mind to new knowledge. Strong-willed. Expressive. Blunt at times. Your minds are not…"
5 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Also, I did not respond to Poppas blog as one part in particular left me with something to think about strongly enough that I then had to reflect on whether I needed to do some small self-adjustments. Turns out that he made one small specific point…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"I mean could be wrong, doubt it is only for one year. Two years and more likely an option for a 3rd in our favour as that was the apparent sticking point. Also, he would be on ok money for his experience. As for coming here to be a back-up, i think…"
6 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Well said."
6 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Oh ok fair enough. Bloomfield moving to Centre and Wing is promising since we have Iongi so Cyrus can find a spot somewhere else and have time to develop in those spots.
Rokosuka getting some Flegg time as well would help. Wouldn't surprise me if…"
6 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Hes only here as a back up.  There's no use getting excited fongi. We'll probably offer 1 year with an option in our favour.   If people think we are offering good coin or a two or three year deal,  they're wrong "
6 hours ago
Frank The Tank replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"No - he just likes cheap 😂😂😂"
7 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Does anyone else think Penisini could play wing. His carries are always strong he just doesn't make as many as a centre. I think Penisini could possibly emulate what To'o does for Penrith "
7 hours ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"How can they afford him 🤔 "
8 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Frankie, I get it, but this is actually quality moderation. He contacted the poster, they agreed, and it is public. I know you will think it is because "also lefty" but the mods have shown restraint and given out rope.
Hoe...You are navigating a…"
8 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
11 Replies · Reply by Flow Basket on Wednesday
Views: 1378

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 109

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>