If any non-Indigenous player boycotted last week's Indigenous round there would have been outrage. Imagine if a player refused to acknowledge the histories and cultures of Indigenous peoples that were demonstrated on a national stage last weekend. Any player who showed disrespect would have been torn to pieces by the green left media. I can so easily envisage social commentators like Waleed Aly having an absolute field day about something like this. And perhaps they would have been right. Refusing to pay respect to Indigenous cultures would have been wrong and a huge middle fingle to the attempt by the NRL to create an inclusive playing environment. So why is it okay or at least tolerated if an Indigenous player refuses to sing the national anthem preceeding a major sporting event? I guarentee that if anyone does this they won't be targeted by the same commentators. They may even rationalise or excuse such behaviour. Can someone please explain the difference? I'm being serious I think this is a fair question.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • Mate, it's not a fair question at all!

    I ask you, why would players boycott the indigenous round? On what basis? You need a reason. In comparison to - invasion of land/homes - ancestors/family killed - miss treatment - racism. 

    • Shutup idiot and answer the question 

      • I think my reply answers the question you wanker. But I do appreciate your intelligent reply on the topic. Deep thinker you are. 

    • To protest against aboriginals whacking native wildlife over the head with clubs and boomerangs.

      • This post was always going to attract the racism within some. 

    • My ancestor was killed by the indigenous. He was merely a Convict who was seeking refugee status ans they speared him for being in their country.  I think it's fair that players should be given the chance to turn their back on GI receiving his pile of sticks tonight. 

  • I can't stand this victim culture by some of these blokes.As none of them are full-blooded aborigines, do they despise their own white part, enough to punish it, by not accepting  evil white-fella things like the fantastic money they get,the fame, the car they drive etc,and go back to nakedness and eating witchetty grubs? What group  of people hasn't experienced horrors in the past? Most get on with life,as should these idiots.

  • The aboriginal players are saying that the anthem doesn't represent who they are so they are not going to sing it. I am just thankful we live in a country where people can voice a concern and not get persecuted by anyone....other than the deep thinkers on a football forum.

    • As you are a deep thinker,are they not Australian ?

      • Aboriginal people weren't considered Australian citizens till the 1967 referendum. So there are people alive today who were told         " Sorry your not Australian" ok but now " Why aren't you proud to be an Australian?".

        Nobody could be an " Australian" before Federation on Jan 1st 1901. Most people for most of our history have considered themselves british subjects first, Australian citizens second. Our longest serving PM Menzies spoke like a toff despite  being brought up poor in Victoria.

        If we help a referendum and changed the name of the country back to New Holland, nobody would be legally an Australian.

        But I bet you'd still say you were an                      " Australian" based on shared  cultural and social practices you have in common with others. A way of behaving, interacting and communcating with others learnt from the society in which you grew up. Welcome to the concept of cultural heritage!

        Your " bloodedness" doesn't make you Australian ( Show me a true blue fullblooded "white" person, and I'll show you at best 4000 yrs of mongrel input) anymore than it does fir Aboriginal people.

        And beautifully you can have more than one cultural heritage! You can be Irish Australian, Greek Australian, Vietnamese Australian etc based on the cultural ideas you have been exposed to.

        The " victim culture" ( shitty phrase) might come from the fact that Australia ticks off every convention of what is considered the legal definition of Genocide in our historical  treatment of Aboriginal people ( not to mention the for all intensive purposes total wiping out off Tasmanian Aboriginal people. Hitler tried to get rid of a population of people and he's rightly despise and decried, here in Oz we actually did it!)

        We also rountinely get target by the UN for Indigenous communities existing in third world conditions. Indigenous health statistics, life expectancy, suicide rates, incarseration rates are all disproportionately outside other groups in Australian society. 

        This isn't Oz bashing though. Where ever you have a colonization situation it usually goes bad for the Indigenous group. French philosopher John-paul Satre went so far as to say " Colonialism equals Genocide". Same statistics basically corralate to native American communities.

        Ever wondered why the Irish copped shit as lazy, dumb, trouble making drunkards? 700 years of colonization. Or why many Aboriginal people also have Irish ancestors? Both groups in early Australian history where marginalized and targeted by the English majority so they had lots of commonalities.

        One young Irish Catholic in Australia even became a national hero and martyr for standing up against injustice towards his people by thecmajority population. When he said " Such is life" he meant such is the lot of the poor irish to die at the hands of an oppressive majority English.

         

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to Anubis's discussion NFL Superbowl LIX Continuous thread
26 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Pou, Violence comes from the extremes on the politico-religo spectum. Hard far-right. Hard far-left. Hardline fanatic any ideology. To assume it's only one ideology that is the problem is a false reality. Dangerous even.
For me, the moral of the…"
48 minutes ago
KENDOZA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion National Schoolboys cup final 1pm today (ch 9)
"Is bamblett contracted long term?"
55 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
""
1 hour ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion National Schoolboys cup final 1pm today (ch 9)
"Cannot believe of Cobi is not in their team. Must have some other serious wingers. Cobi was amazing in HM this year on the wing. His defence and finishing was elite. Arguably would have been in the HM TOTY."
1 hour ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion National Schoolboys cup final 1pm today (ch 9)
"Bamblett, Petrus and Davis are the big ones to watch. I think Bamblett is a better fullback than 6 to be honest. But to fit the electric speed of Davis, he is at 6.
Funny how our HM & SG ball fullback are both in the same team for St. Pats."
1 hour ago
Richard Jackson replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion National Schoolboys cup final 1pm today (ch 9)
"Thanks for the heads up Chief. Six parra guys in-I'm in."
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Gentlemen,
I really don't want this blog to be closed. It's been largely civil up to this point.
One post (Bob Smith's) has been deleted for breaching COCs. I already warned of this from the onset."
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Poppa, I am OK with radical and lunatic and I am a leftist. But I draw the line at ... duck. C'mon, that is literally dehumanizing. Even disgusting can be human."
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Well, Poppa, I thought I should ask the internet if it was true, that all smurfs are blue. The internet told me there was an episode with a yellow smurf and others with multi-coloured smurfs. Apparently the wife of the creator of the smurfs chose…"
2 hours ago
Flow Basket replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Some Rumours circling Pezet
"Joash is nearly my favourite player "
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Well I certainly didn't describe you that way..... but there is an old saying that "if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and goes Quack Quack....it is more than likely a DUCK!"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eelawarra's discussion 1947 RUGBY LEAGUE NEWS (16 pages) EELS FIRST EVER GAME
"I had a problem with that "garment" Wiz..... in those days I couldn't afford any underware but I always wanted to look good from the outside. The womens change rooms were unfortunate but I had to get underware from somewhere!"
2 hours ago
Flow Basket replied to LB's discussion Three Sydney clubs circle Radley
" Head knocks and coke who wouldn't invest in that "
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eelawarra's discussion 1947 RUGBY LEAGUE NEWS (16 pages) EELS FIRST EVER GAME
"Myopia does that to you!"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Poppa, I thought that comment was spot on. But what do I know, I am a radical lunatic disgusting leftist"
2 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>