Replies

            • Poverty and lack of opportunity are the culprit.  Gee Even Elvis Presley sang "In the Ghettos". USA  has needed an overall for a long time. They are brain washed to believe they are the land of the free hand on heart. .They will tell you their country is the best in the world and the land of opportunity. They don't even report news that is past their shores . Yes I've been to Disneyland 5 times and Universal Studios once. 

              • Yes well Elvis sung about Clambakes and Blue Suede Shoes as well....

                Poverty and lack of opportunity are not the culprit there any more than they are in countless countries all over the world - infact in the massive majority of cases - it's far, far worse elsewhere. Have a look at what is going on in other parts of the world - such as Africa, South America, Asia, The Middle East, Europe and Oceania - the US is a walk in the park compared to some of the shit that's going on outside of our western bubble. You say America doesn't report what's outside their border or social interest - no western country does - 150 kids get blown up in Pakistan but we lead our news with a footy player and a prostitute.

                As far as America's ACTUAL social issues go Brett Allen is bang on. Alot of the other bullshit in this blog is just statistics or incidents being used incorrectly to make an arguement. What's happening RIGHT NOW is a bunch of people are using a despicable act as an excuse for violence and theft - the people engaging in that shit aren't any better than the police who killed a man.

                Remember that time Martin Luther King starting looting business and bashing people?

                • Kram, respectfully, I think you're wrong. I agree looting and violence cannot be condoned. 

                  But to basically say protesters need to behave themselves is to implicitly deny there is a history. At what point is enough enough? Notably, you capitalize "right now", as if all that matters is right now and every act of social insurrection is to be judged according to the daily happenings. So when the French peasants rose up against aristocratic land-owners who had taxed them to oblivion, we interpret a beheading through the lens of the mornings events and not hundreds of years of inequality? When a HK protester throws a brick at police we ask whether they might have missed their wheaties and not whether they think their society had become a police state?

                  • No, what I meant by right now was that, at present, much of the protesting has simply degenerated into, or been overtaken by, vandalism and looting. There are plenty of people ruining private property, stealing private property and laughing away while their doing it. People grabbing piles of stolen propertyand taking it home (they're not sticking around to protest) while others smash in shop fronts. That's not protesting and there's no excuse for it. Plenty of these grubs are white - I'm not saying in any way that it's a race issue.

                    It's LA all over again.

                    Why is it OK to steal and ruin a fellow human being's property and livelihood in the name of race? Would President Obama condone it? or MLK?

                    You mention A HK protester lobbing a brick at police - go for it - that's very different to violent destruction and theft of private property.

                    I know there are huge issues in The States and it's horrific - but violent acts won't solve anything - it never has. It will actually make it worse. Just watch.

                     

                     

                    • Kram, maybe the violence in the protests will make it worse; maybe it won't. 
                      What we do know is that the whole thing shows a  society that features a whole (black) population totally fed up, with some more violent about it than others, plus a large population sympathetic with the blacks and their experience,  plus conservatives protecting private property and myopic enough to have that as the big issue, and then piling in is the far right who have got in there stoking the violence along and then blaming the left for the violence. 
                      Overall, a massively fractured society, that will either listen to internal discontent or it won't. No one can deny the last two points. 

          • I have lived in the US. I can tell you it can be racially divided and there are no go zones. It's drugs, it's poverty, and it's race. Race can't be extracted from the story. End of story

        • This reply was deleted.
          • AND I wear the tag with pride Frankie.

            BUT - you left out Conspirator - got to be a conspiracy theory in there somewhere.

          • No, Fong, what we say is that if you are a racist we won't excuse you just because you say all the cool kids you know are racist

        • Col, calling it as it is does not save one from being a racist. 
          In Wiz's comment, he points out known discrepancies: we know blacks commit many crimes on blacks and we rarely see white looting in response to black on white crime. 
          But there can be OTHER explanations for those facts other than systemic racism in American NOT existing. Wiz is a racist for trying to white-wash the systemic racism of the US and it's effects from the causal story. Instead it is, as Wiz said, a matter of blacks not being that smart. 

          Col, as you said, the environment of the child shapes the child. And many US blacks grew up under discrimination and inequality and we are seeing that long history play out. 

      • Super I think there is a lot of truth in what you say, but I'd like to ask one question about a line you typed:

        "They're protesting because a black person can't walk down the street without being seen as a threat."

        Do you think anything the protesters are doing right now is helping to change that mentality?

        Given the gun ownership laws in the US, if I were a cop I'd be looking at every single person walking down the street as a threat.

        And none of what I'm saying here is trying to justify what that cop did. The footage of the incident is horrible to watch.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Tough, he took the chance and if he was asking for a release back in July R360 "mirage" was more uncertain for him then, months later. Still despite terms he continued on with his release request. Just wanted out of his contract no matter what by…"
3 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"nrl have stated any manager dealing with R360 is shown the door....just more Vlandys blather"
4 minutes ago
Strange-eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"What was the suspension for?
 "
11 minutes ago
macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Thanks all!
was just a bit concerned that according to this article, that's the basis of his argument.
love Moses' word used that him wanting to re-enter the nrl under the circumstances appears to be bit of a 'mirage', guess we can go about showing…"
19 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Stop it...I'm getting a chubby"
31 minutes ago
The Badger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Please mythical sky fairy, let there be clear evidence of player tampering etc from these subpoenas. Something exposing collusion between Storm and NRLHQ about the whole thing would also be great."
37 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"If he lied and planned to join Melbourne all along he should be excluded from the NRL for the next 3 years."
42 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"From what Ive read it only hit 450k with an ARU top up and they refused to come to the party. The average SR player earns significantly less then the equivalent NRL player in Australia."
46 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"one would not think so as he clearly understood the terms of release"
1 hour ago
Muttman replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"No, I think his argument for restraint of trade is extremly weak."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Of course it is Civil, but depending what has transpired it is possible that new matters come to light that change that. We are going hard at this. Who knows where it ends?"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"So we got voted in top 4 of clubs want to play for. Yet cannot sign players to save our lives haha."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Looks like our club knows what happened. They just have to prove it was organised. Not easy, but Zac may have left a trail. text kills
 "
1 hour ago
Adam Magrath replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"To my thinking, simply adhering to your contract is a restraint of trade. That's sort of the idea. By releasing him we afforded him more freedom than what he had before, the only proviso being he couldn't join one of our competitors."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"It just got a lot bigger on all of them and I bet none of them like it, not one little bit. We are going hard at them and I need popcorn."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Documents you say, and witness' called, do tell. 
So much for contract validity only. Interestinger & Itnerestinger"
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1958

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 262

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>