Replies

            • Poverty and lack of opportunity are the culprit.  Gee Even Elvis Presley sang "In the Ghettos". USA  has needed an overall for a long time. They are brain washed to believe they are the land of the free hand on heart. .They will tell you their country is the best in the world and the land of opportunity. They don't even report news that is past their shores . Yes I've been to Disneyland 5 times and Universal Studios once. 

              • Yes well Elvis sung about Clambakes and Blue Suede Shoes as well....

                Poverty and lack of opportunity are not the culprit there any more than they are in countless countries all over the world - infact in the massive majority of cases - it's far, far worse elsewhere. Have a look at what is going on in other parts of the world - such as Africa, South America, Asia, The Middle East, Europe and Oceania - the US is a walk in the park compared to some of the shit that's going on outside of our western bubble. You say America doesn't report what's outside their border or social interest - no western country does - 150 kids get blown up in Pakistan but we lead our news with a footy player and a prostitute.

                As far as America's ACTUAL social issues go Brett Allen is bang on. Alot of the other bullshit in this blog is just statistics or incidents being used incorrectly to make an arguement. What's happening RIGHT NOW is a bunch of people are using a despicable act as an excuse for violence and theft - the people engaging in that shit aren't any better than the police who killed a man.

                Remember that time Martin Luther King starting looting business and bashing people?

                • Kram, respectfully, I think you're wrong. I agree looting and violence cannot be condoned. 

                  But to basically say protesters need to behave themselves is to implicitly deny there is a history. At what point is enough enough? Notably, you capitalize "right now", as if all that matters is right now and every act of social insurrection is to be judged according to the daily happenings. So when the French peasants rose up against aristocratic land-owners who had taxed them to oblivion, we interpret a beheading through the lens of the mornings events and not hundreds of years of inequality? When a HK protester throws a brick at police we ask whether they might have missed their wheaties and not whether they think their society had become a police state?

                  • No, what I meant by right now was that, at present, much of the protesting has simply degenerated into, or been overtaken by, vandalism and looting. There are plenty of people ruining private property, stealing private property and laughing away while their doing it. People grabbing piles of stolen propertyand taking it home (they're not sticking around to protest) while others smash in shop fronts. That's not protesting and there's no excuse for it. Plenty of these grubs are white - I'm not saying in any way that it's a race issue.

                    It's LA all over again.

                    Why is it OK to steal and ruin a fellow human being's property and livelihood in the name of race? Would President Obama condone it? or MLK?

                    You mention A HK protester lobbing a brick at police - go for it - that's very different to violent destruction and theft of private property.

                    I know there are huge issues in The States and it's horrific - but violent acts won't solve anything - it never has. It will actually make it worse. Just watch.

                     

                     

                    • Kram, maybe the violence in the protests will make it worse; maybe it won't. 
                      What we do know is that the whole thing shows a  society that features a whole (black) population totally fed up, with some more violent about it than others, plus a large population sympathetic with the blacks and their experience,  plus conservatives protecting private property and myopic enough to have that as the big issue, and then piling in is the far right who have got in there stoking the violence along and then blaming the left for the violence. 
                      Overall, a massively fractured society, that will either listen to internal discontent or it won't. No one can deny the last two points. 

          • I have lived in the US. I can tell you it can be racially divided and there are no go zones. It's drugs, it's poverty, and it's race. Race can't be extracted from the story. End of story

        • This reply was deleted.
          • AND I wear the tag with pride Frankie.

            BUT - you left out Conspirator - got to be a conspiracy theory in there somewhere.

          • No, Fong, what we say is that if you are a racist we won't excuse you just because you say all the cool kids you know are racist

        • Col, calling it as it is does not save one from being a racist. 
          In Wiz's comment, he points out known discrepancies: we know blacks commit many crimes on blacks and we rarely see white looting in response to black on white crime. 
          But there can be OTHER explanations for those facts other than systemic racism in American NOT existing. Wiz is a racist for trying to white-wash the systemic racism of the US and it's effects from the causal story. Instead it is, as Wiz said, a matter of blacks not being that smart. 

          Col, as you said, the environment of the child shapes the child. And many US blacks grew up under discrimination and inequality and we are seeing that long history play out. 

      • Super I think there is a lot of truth in what you say, but I'd like to ask one question about a line you typed:

        "They're protesting because a black person can't walk down the street without being seen as a threat."

        Do you think anything the protesters are doing right now is helping to change that mentality?

        Given the gun ownership laws in the US, if I were a cop I'd be looking at every single person walking down the street as a threat.

        And none of what I'm saying here is trying to justify what that cop did. The footage of the incident is horrible to watch.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Alfred Mateo replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Hey Captain-thoughts on what Lomax' legal team will be using as their defence option? Restraint of trade? Signing agreement under duress? Virtually impossible to see how he wins this given he had legal representation when signing the agreement. Is…"
2 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Spot on"
2 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Clint newtown is a dickhead"
2 hours ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Bout right."
3 hours ago
Perpetual Motion replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"He dumped the NRL for R360. He should be on a 10 year ban.  "
3 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"You think Lomax is not good enough for the Storm? Their last premiership had these angels:
Munster, Bromwich, NAS, Brandon Smith
The premiership before that had Curtis Scott."
3 hours ago
BringBackSemi replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"The thing that really grates me in all this, is that the NRL had their chest puffed out that if anyone was even talking to R360, they'd be banned for 10 years. Lomax gets a release to chase the dollars in R360, but now it's gone pear shaped, they…"
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
""
3 hours ago
parra supporter replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Not a lawyer in any way but do follow industrial disputes closely as part of my job. I don't believe the Supreme Court is to mediate in any way. I think it's just going to be a black and white the.clause is legally binding and can be enforced at…"
3 hours ago
parra supporter replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Correct but clubs are also smart enough to see a steal. Play the I only can give 450K due to cap restraints but we will be able to give your your value for 27 & 28. Lomax is in the position now where it's sign with rugby or be at the mercy of other…"
4 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"We should call the Titans. Fotuaika."
4 hours ago
Clintorian replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"I think there's a point where Storm realise Lomax is just not worth the energy, the cost, and the time it takes to settle through the courts. Their pre-season will be over which means he won't be able to learn their defensive structures.
Lomax will…"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Lomax has been poorly advised for years, yet still has not changed management. Someone said why doesn't he sack them? Well he is gullible enough to take their advice, he is gullible enough to forgive them for their troubles. 
R360 was definately the…"
4 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"In that case, he wont be going to Melbourne. They haven't offered any players to my knowledge. 
$200k is definately not their best offer. That is lowballing as it comes. We get that from a day from the pokies at Parra Leagues."
4 hours ago
Muttman replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Maybe partially true but Paps didn't express a desire to leave until very late in the season. Bellamy may have been a contributing factor too. His intensity has a limit too. "
4 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"I just seen on instagram Parra no longer follow Lomax. That's when you know shit is serious hahaha."
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1956

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 256

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>