Replies

            • Poverty and lack of opportunity are the culprit.  Gee Even Elvis Presley sang "In the Ghettos". USA  has needed an overall for a long time. They are brain washed to believe they are the land of the free hand on heart. .They will tell you their country is the best in the world and the land of opportunity. They don't even report news that is past their shores . Yes I've been to Disneyland 5 times and Universal Studios once. 

              • Yes well Elvis sung about Clambakes and Blue Suede Shoes as well....

                Poverty and lack of opportunity are not the culprit there any more than they are in countless countries all over the world - infact in the massive majority of cases - it's far, far worse elsewhere. Have a look at what is going on in other parts of the world - such as Africa, South America, Asia, The Middle East, Europe and Oceania - the US is a walk in the park compared to some of the shit that's going on outside of our western bubble. You say America doesn't report what's outside their border or social interest - no western country does - 150 kids get blown up in Pakistan but we lead our news with a footy player and a prostitute.

                As far as America's ACTUAL social issues go Brett Allen is bang on. Alot of the other bullshit in this blog is just statistics or incidents being used incorrectly to make an arguement. What's happening RIGHT NOW is a bunch of people are using a despicable act as an excuse for violence and theft - the people engaging in that shit aren't any better than the police who killed a man.

                Remember that time Martin Luther King starting looting business and bashing people?

                • Kram, respectfully, I think you're wrong. I agree looting and violence cannot be condoned. 

                  But to basically say protesters need to behave themselves is to implicitly deny there is a history. At what point is enough enough? Notably, you capitalize "right now", as if all that matters is right now and every act of social insurrection is to be judged according to the daily happenings. So when the French peasants rose up against aristocratic land-owners who had taxed them to oblivion, we interpret a beheading through the lens of the mornings events and not hundreds of years of inequality? When a HK protester throws a brick at police we ask whether they might have missed their wheaties and not whether they think their society had become a police state?

                  • No, what I meant by right now was that, at present, much of the protesting has simply degenerated into, or been overtaken by, vandalism and looting. There are plenty of people ruining private property, stealing private property and laughing away while their doing it. People grabbing piles of stolen propertyand taking it home (they're not sticking around to protest) while others smash in shop fronts. That's not protesting and there's no excuse for it. Plenty of these grubs are white - I'm not saying in any way that it's a race issue.

                    It's LA all over again.

                    Why is it OK to steal and ruin a fellow human being's property and livelihood in the name of race? Would President Obama condone it? or MLK?

                    You mention A HK protester lobbing a brick at police - go for it - that's very different to violent destruction and theft of private property.

                    I know there are huge issues in The States and it's horrific - but violent acts won't solve anything - it never has. It will actually make it worse. Just watch.

                     

                     

                    • Kram, maybe the violence in the protests will make it worse; maybe it won't. 
                      What we do know is that the whole thing shows a  society that features a whole (black) population totally fed up, with some more violent about it than others, plus a large population sympathetic with the blacks and their experience,  plus conservatives protecting private property and myopic enough to have that as the big issue, and then piling in is the far right who have got in there stoking the violence along and then blaming the left for the violence. 
                      Overall, a massively fractured society, that will either listen to internal discontent or it won't. No one can deny the last two points. 

          • I have lived in the US. I can tell you it can be racially divided and there are no go zones. It's drugs, it's poverty, and it's race. Race can't be extracted from the story. End of story

        • This reply was deleted.
          • AND I wear the tag with pride Frankie.

            BUT - you left out Conspirator - got to be a conspiracy theory in there somewhere.

          • No, Fong, what we say is that if you are a racist we won't excuse you just because you say all the cool kids you know are racist

        • Col, calling it as it is does not save one from being a racist. 
          In Wiz's comment, he points out known discrepancies: we know blacks commit many crimes on blacks and we rarely see white looting in response to black on white crime. 
          But there can be OTHER explanations for those facts other than systemic racism in American NOT existing. Wiz is a racist for trying to white-wash the systemic racism of the US and it's effects from the causal story. Instead it is, as Wiz said, a matter of blacks not being that smart. 

          Col, as you said, the environment of the child shapes the child. And many US blacks grew up under discrimination and inequality and we are seeing that long history play out. 

      • Super I think there is a lot of truth in what you say, but I'd like to ask one question about a line you typed:

        "They're protesting because a black person can't walk down the street without being seen as a threat."

        Do you think anything the protesters are doing right now is helping to change that mentality?

        Given the gun ownership laws in the US, if I were a cop I'd be looking at every single person walking down the street as a threat.

        And none of what I'm saying here is trying to justify what that cop did. The footage of the incident is horrible to watch.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

EA replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"Nvm Moretti back on the field. Weird his opening stint was 10min"
21 minutes ago
EA replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"I hope Moretti and Richie are not injured because they only played 10 and 20min of the cup trial lol. I didn't notice any injury "
23 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"Make no mistake, V'Landys is in this up to his eyeballs. He thought he could simply bulldoze this through. He thought as Chairman of the NRL he had the ultimate authority and could simply decree what was to happen. Sorry Peter, the NSW Supreme Court…"
24 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"That's good to know "
25 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"haha, Sorry Mr Tripp and Mr V'Landys. I gave myself an uppercut and I've now seen the light. Can I now have my brown paperbag full off kick backs please, And I promise i'll toe the line from now on."
41 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"BE how dare you, don't you understand Melbourne are the victims here. Being bullied constantly by NSW media for years and the jealous little brothers, we will take them down for however long it takes. Parra are being unreasonable and should just let…"
43 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"Lee Hagipitalis mentioned Arthur Moses as one of the best Barristers he has seen, he has been on the scene for a long time and knows his shit. My wife worked for him for years and though he was dodgy with personal life and not a great person he was…"
47 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"Interesting that it has now been confirmed as i suggested at the start. That the mediation process between the Eels and the Storm/Lomax had the NRL smack in the middle of it.
There are kick backs coming left right and centre, love this if it finally…"
58 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Eels HM and SG ball continue the winning my ways with both teams starting the season 3-0. HM won 22-8 whilst the SG ball team won 54-12. 
The SG ball team were up 30-12 at HT. And I can have not seen a worse team performance in one half for a team…"
1 hour ago
Stevo replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"One thing is for certain and that is Arthur Moses at the forefront of this. He would not be persuing this to the fullest without having everything in place for an Eels win, this bloke by all accounts is at the top of his game.
 "
1 hour ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"Phone calls are harder as you can't prove what was said unless it was tapped. Emails and the rest yeah. Parra had this in their back pocket for a while and were waiting for the final nail to drop and them threatening us with cap penalties was the…"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"I am not saying we shouldn't try, just if we lose and it is a possibility even if slight, that's more likely what happens. If that does happen then it is us against the NRL mentality to fuel us."
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The Seventy Maxims of Maximally Effective Mercenaries clearly states ....#29. The enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy. No more. No less."
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"As evident in our forums, getting folks to pull their heads in is not as easy as it seems. What if we said Fuck it. WWE needs it's villains
The Parramatta Squeaky-whEels.....We have whinged in these pages forever that we always get shafted. What…"
3 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"Well if there is clear cut evidence ( emails, texts, phone calls, etc...) then how can he deny these allegations with a clear conscience. I'm sure the Eels legal team are not that incompetent to claim these allegations without any evidence. "
3 hours ago
Tin Tim replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"🥱😴"
3 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2093

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>