Replies

                    • Thanks Wiz, likewise. Nothing like a good debate, mate. I think it's healthy to disagree on things, too and talk about it. You're a very intelligent poster, so it's always a pleasure. 

                      PS: I'm a Aussie-Euro-wog, and also have an Asian wife, a stunner in my eyes, and she has promised to not walk out if I ever get into trouble or we are penniless. Only if there's another woman! So, not all Asians are the same. 

              • Perhaps the word "curfew" menas just that and that is exactly what they have been instructed to enforce?  EVERYONE aside from Law Enforcement off the streets! No dount the media have been seen on many instance to be worsening the situation and they just want to shut it down.

                • Media are permitted to be out during curfew. Their own First Amendment dictates that.

          • I did not see what happened to this reporter . Can anyone give a top line summary ?  The ultra short clip seems to show police telling people to move on and then they charged the defiant? 

            • HOE, why is your post not open for reply.  Perhaps, it might just be as simple that African American Criminals and Hispanic Criminals are 4 times more likely to produce a firearm, other weapon or life endangering violence when engagde by Police becasue of their up bringing or circumnstances?  

              • Electric Eel, Maybe, maybe not. I wouldn't conclude that white criminals produce firearms less (though they may feel safer).

                How many US mass shooters and serial killers are black compared to whites? 

                However, the trend is certainly worsening for non-whites. It does suggest worsening bias.

                • This is not about serial  or mass killers and yes I take your point in that regard. This is about every day crime.  Big difference. Again, a hell of a lot of this comes back to Americas bulshit gun laws.

                   

            • FYI

              https://youtu.be/jBPJNohU7xE

            • They were peacefully protesting. They weren't advancing on the police at all. They were standing there. The cops then fired tear gas and rubber bullets before charging at protesters, the media included. It was all so Trump could get his photo op outside a church that did not give their permission for him to be there. The police also tear gassed the clergy from that church. The First Amendment in the US Constitution permits freedom of the press and freedom of speech. For police to then start beating camera men and reporters is a violation of the law.

              By the way, those aren't really rubber bullets. They're steel slugs wrapped in plastic. They aren't non-lethal, they're less lethal. They're supposed to be fired at the ground to bounce into the legs of protesters, instead police are firing them at head height, putting people in hospital and making others go blind. 

  •  

    Wiz, I had a look at stats you shared on US crime figures, by race. I think they actually suggest the bias is increasing against coloured people in the US, if you look more closely.

    If you look at it in terms of population numbers, African Americans are more than four times more likely than a white coloured person to being shot and killed by the police, and it's been getting been consistently and progressively getting worse since 2017. Same for Hispanics. But, it's improving for the majority population (whites). 

    Bear in mind, the autopsy on the Floyd case has also been ruled a homocide by asphyxiation.

    So that suggests there could very well be bias, as many African Americans will tell you, based on their personal experiences, even well educated ones and ones in respectable professions.

    Including, Burbon's wife, who can account for many cases of being prejudiced by police.

    The other thing is, humans are biased! Whether it's ideological, racial, value systems, or other tribal differences such as say views on footy teams. It's natural. It takes a lot to transcend bias, in reality.

    Houston, we have a problem. And it seems to be getting worse.

    5507133470?profile=RESIZE_930x

     Getting shot to death by police.

     

    As an aside:

    The above calculations were based on figures from  https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-death-by... and then extrapolated to reflect it in terms of population numbers. Say for example, African Americans were almost six times (5.6) less the population. So their figures were multiplied by 5.6.

     

    People shot to death by U.S. police, by race 2020 | Statista
    Sadly, the trend of fatal police shootings in the United States seems to only be increasing, with a total 228 civilians having been shot, 31 of whom…
This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"I had no issues with Guymer playing Centre and honestly felt he did fine. Was not a liability at all. Though me saying he was playing out of position must give him grace in the eyes of others as if you put Moses at Fullback you are going to get a…"
3 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"Have you watched Manly, Cowboys, and Titans play this year? They are mud, and completely out of form. I am definitely saying we should beat them. Anything can happen, but we're a better team than these 3. Tigers halves have both copped injuries, but…"
3 hours ago
Strange-eel replied to Muttman's discussion Sneaky ploy which makes Panthers defense so good.
"Both true.
 "
3 hours ago
Strange-eel replied to Nitram's discussion Charlie Guymer send off
"I havn't seen the replay but at the game is was WTF?"
3 hours ago
Blaze replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"Strong attack but almost non existant defence, if our defence doesnt improve through the year we will be around 7-10th range i reckon."
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"look I am very pessimistic but I do believe we have can be top 4, its just the way we a playing, I cannot see it happening.
If we get exponential improvement like last year....then yes we can beat anybody.....the way we are playing and presenting at…"
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"I don't think there is a game we play where you can say we should win.....if you are using Manly,St George,Titans and Cowboys as examples, then we on paper are no better than them.....
Wests are obviously stronger this year, as are Knights....but we…"
4 hours ago
Eels95 replied to Nitram's discussion Charlie Guymer send off
"I think the bigger issue is that you can't have a decision that is allowed to be challenged and then allow a quick tap. Especially when 80% of the time the ref sends them back and says I didn't give you the mark.
We genuinely wanted to challenge…"
4 hours ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Nitram's discussion Charlie Guymer send off
"I thought Charlie and another one of our players were pointing at someone to challenge the call also and there was no fair time window allowed by the referee before he responded the way he did."
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"Agreed LB, out of all our young forwards with the variations in the performances (Taiviti aside) I think Guymer is the most consistent in terms of performance, i say that because others have higher planes but Guymer is very trustworthy in his…"
4 hours ago
Muttman replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"I had us for the spoon. For a very large chunk of the season it was looking like a sure thing. Happy to lose that bet. No way you can watch the current Eels performances and suggest we're playing finals. We'd need a big spike in performance. "
4 hours ago
Will 5150 replied to Muttman's discussion Sneaky ploy which makes Panthers defense so good.
"It was a great segment and he's spot on... I did laugh at his language... "these f**ckers...".
If any other coach was smart enough, they are doing the same from this round. Mind you, they should have already been doing it.
Many will say it's against…"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"You realise Guymer played out of position right?"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"You're hoping."
4 hours ago
Nitram replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"If we manage to avoid anymore injuries between 9th and 12th. If we get more injuries fighting off spoon."
4 hours ago
Yehez replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"6th to 10th. 
More likely 7th to 9th. 
Yes, we have things to work on like Pezet, early game forward momentum etc......but so do other teams. And so far, there is plenty of other teams that have as much problems as us if not more. 
And I trust us to…"
5 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2238

 

Charlie Guymer send off

I know we won, but the Jacob Liddle "strip" penalty at the 24:21 to go mark needs to be called out as a failure of the ref's knowledge of the rules.A penalty restart cannot legally occur until the referee has officially designated the mark. Yet, as…

Read more…
3 Replies · Reply by Strange-eel 3 hours ago
Views: 219

Where do we see the EELS finishing?

Just eager to see where everyone thinks we will place on the table come season end?As of now, I have us between 6th-10th, just depending on injuries and how much our middle defence improves throughout the year. Another factor is if we unearth some…

Read more…
45 Replies · Reply by LB 3 hours ago
Views: 762

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>