Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide

PREAMBLE: Ladies and Gentleman, Super is happy for this discussion to continue if we can remain civil and disagree respectfully, updated as necessary. If not, comments will be removed and if necessary the blog closed and any future Kirk-related blogs closed for discussion. 

Part 1, by Wiz (more right leaning)

Part 2, by Prof Daz (more left leaning)

SYNOPSIS: Charlie Kirk spoke his final words at 12:23 p.m. on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University, in front of around three thousand people. Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old alleged shooter of the 31-year-old Republican, remains under investigation. Utah’s governor suggested he may have been radicalized by the Left, though his MAGA-entrenched family and transgender partner complicate the narrative.

The attack shook the United States, exposing deep ideological fractures. Two days later, President Donald Trump concluded that “the radicals on the left are the problem” rather than the radical right who, he said, merely want to “stop crime,” framing the debate in partisan terms during a live Fox News interview. However, voices such as Jack Posobiec and Steve Bannon, speakers at Kirk’s conventions, had long used hard-line rhetoric, calling the Left “demonic” and urging the building of “an army of the awakened.”

History offers a far broader perspective. Abraham Lincoln, Yitzhak Rabin, Mahatma Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr. were assassinated by right-wing extremists. John F. Kennedy and Archduke Franz Ferdinand, whose death helped ignite World War I, were killed by left-leaning radicals. A two-way street.

Just months earlier, on June 14, Democrats Melissa and Mark Hortman were gunned down in their Brooklyn home by Vance Boelter, a hard-right evangelical, white Christian who disguised himself as a police officer. Married nearly 32 years, the couple left behind two children. The killings, however, received far less attention than Kirk’s death and did not prompt a presidential call to confront the radical right.

“What do they all share in common? Every political assassination is an attack on the collective; on our ability to disagree without destroying,” an academic observer noted. George Bernard Shaw called it the "extreme form of censorship."

Left or Right isn't the problem in my view. The greater danger lies in the radical mind and in how easily society nurtures the “us versus them” divide. As Desmond Tutu warned, “The moment we divide the world into ‘us’ and ‘them,’ we begin to lose our humanity.”

13712347853?profile=RESIZE_710xCharlie Kirk (above and below) is survived by his wife and two children.

13712347677?profile=RESIZE_710x

13712348254?profile=RESIZE_710x

Married nearly 32 years, Melissa and Mark Hortman as well as Gilbert, their Labrador (below) leave behind two children.

13712347889?profile=RESIZE_710x

13712348297?profile=RESIZE_710x

Boelter who assasinated the Hartmans allegedly kept a hit list of 70 targets, including Democratic lawmakers and even some anti-abortion clinics. The same early morning at 2am he invaded the Minnesota home (above) of the Hoffmans and their children who survived the shooting following surgery.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • Raising mental health is a good point. I'd argue that the poor mental health of these political extremists is a symptom of a more broader cultural and spiritual problem.

  •  

    HKF September 11, 2025 at 10:14am 

    The violent far left strike again, no doubt they will try to claim the killer was a right wing nut trying to escalate the dislike of the left.

    Since receipts are the in thing i thought i might leave one of my own from the original Charlie kirk blog.

    • HKF, it is unclear what you mean. Can you clarify?

      After CK's murder, the right launched definitively claimed it was "the left" that was culpable. Are you denying this?

      Also you say there was a receipt to the effect that "the killer was a right wing nut trying to escalate the dislike of the left". Do you mean false flag? I do not recall anyone making false flag claims but happy to stand corrected if a false flag claim was made. 

      • What i meant was that there would be attempts to claim the killer was in fact right wing not left wing. This is exactly what happened, there were fake documents and doctored photos plastered all over the next, even on this site.

  •  I wish i knew
    which button to push
    So i'd know how to please you
    It's sad but true
    but i keep lookin'
    on down the line
    All i see is chaos and pain
    Scared and hiding
    in the blaze
    our fucking lives are not your game
    You try to play us just the same
    Just wish i knew
    which button to push

                       apologies B,Fanning

  • I mean no offence to anyone here, purely my own opinion, neither ‘Left' or ‘Right’ aligned, as I personally believe these two spectrums of political & ideological beliefs are purely a mythology, a tool or weapon, for division, for distraction, control. 

    At it’s core, the idea of choosing a definitive side - ‘Left' or ‘Right’ - is extreme in nature. This ideological absolution feeds and nurtures extremism, extreme beliefs, violence and extreme results.
     
    It’s tribalism. A definitive loyalty to either tribe that clouds or destroys the ability for constructive debate, for understanding, for open-mindedness, for empathy.
     
    Debate, negotiation, understanding, its constructive, its empowering. Watching a young father's death celebrated for his views, or young parents murdered for theirs, regardless of your tribe, is a reflection of how disassociated we have become.
     
    These two-sided political factions developed during the French Revolution, a dictatorship, where regardless of your beliefs & ideologies, you were forced to pick a side, your life, your salvation depended on it.
     
    Fear, threats, violence, death, not exactly the best strategy for liberation? Here we are, 220+ years later, and the same irrationalle remains. 
     
    Truth, justice, equilibrium, don’t exist in an imbalance, they can’t be separated into two political divisions. They can’t exist in the ‘us verse them' mentality. 
     
    At the heart of these ideological factions lies division, division is a powerful means of control - its far easier to control masses divided, than united.
     
    Division weakens us, it distracts us. Our political leaders and governing bodies are the ones consistently fuelling these fires.
     
    Because politicians and media alike thrive on polarities, the conflict sells, the fear mongering motivates, and chaos of fighting divisions distracts us from far deeper & more pertinent questions of those empowered. 
     
    Humans are complex, we evolve, we grow, develop, we are shaped by experience, turmoil or trauma, by education, faith, pain & happiness.
     
    It ts embarrassing to the human race to assume we are so un-evolved, that our ideological stances & beliefs should remain confined into one loyal tribe, as though we all stand at a t-intersection & must decide a direction, in absolution.
     
    It is irrational, and void of critical thinking.
     
    Politics, ideologies, beliefs, are far too complex to be confined into just two thought processes, they are multifaceted, as we should be?
     
    We truely are being challenged right now, there is so much frustration, anger, suffering, and resentment grows towards those who we feel are causing the problems.
     
    If it wasn’t for the ‘Left’, or if it wasn’t for the ‘Right’, everything would be great.
     
    Would it though?
     
    Completely eliminate one side of the debate, and whichever remained would more likely start turning on themselves than live in harmony.
     
    All of a sudden, some just aren’t ‘Left’ or ‘Right’ enough, that group is too ‘Centre-Left’ or that faction is too ‘Extreme Right' and history would continue to repeat itself. Tribalism repeats. 
     
    Who knows where this ends, but signs are troubling. Parts of Europe are fracturing under ideological tension, and the US seems perennially on the brink of civil unrest. Online discourse has become hositle, and people are dying, not for their actions, but for their beliefs and words, and thier deaths celebrated - hisotry repeats. 
     
    When a young father or young parents are murdered, for nothing more than their words, their beliefs, how can we not feel sadness for how irrational this has all become.
     
    No offence intended, purely opinion.
    • Great post NOS.

    • I used to think like this NOS, but it really feels like i need to choose a side in this. So i did. I chose the Broad Church, not the Christofascists(they hate being called that, but the only reason to attack abortion is.). Fuck their Purity tests. I mean, they see Prof Daz as a huge threat and dangerously hateful. I'm not having it. I chose a side

      and people are dying, not for their actions, but for their beliefs and words.. his words actively encouraged the actions of others and his beliefs were christofascist. 

      We are not going to unite around blatant lies and "othering people". Buckle Up

       

      • Thanks MeelK and likewise, as HoE said, you're always very balanced.

        Randy, I get it, genuinely. You're a highly intelligent person, and your views on many things clearly come from being such a deep thinker, as opposed to being reactionary or emotional. 

        My post definitely wasn't an attack on you, and I'm not naive enough to think we can all 'hug this out', that's for sure.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Eelawarra replied to Eelawarra's discussion 1947 RUGBY LEAGUE NEWS (16 pages) EELS FIRST EVER GAME
"This photo is a bit clearer "
57 minutes ago
Bob Smith replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"The irony is that the left are far more lonely than the right. The right have family, religion, cultural heritage and the nation. The left hate all those things. They have no foundation to build a meaningful life. Existential anxiety is therefore…"
1 hour ago
Joel K replied to ParraEels's discussion How much longer is our apparel partnership with macron?
"Our current alternate jersey should be our permanent home kit"
1 hour ago
Bob Smith replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"It isn't my solution. It's the solution that occurs when both sides have radically different views and refuse to budge. This isn't anything new. It's happened in history countless times. Things will continue to escalate in the US until one side has…"
1 hour ago
Bob Smith replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Raising mental health is a good point. I'd argue that the poor mental health of these political extremists is a symptom of a more broader cultural and spiritual problem."
1 hour ago
Bob Smith replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"The current underlying 'philosophy' of leftism is intersectionality. It places everyone into categories of race, gender and sexuality. It then moralises which categories are superior and inferior, good and bad. White males are immoral and the cause…"
2 hours ago
Tin Tim replied to LB's discussion Three Sydney clubs circle Radley
"We should be one of them, he would be the difference. Don't carry on about his injuries he contract would be in line with it. The young kids would go to another level with him beside them. "
2 hours ago
Bob Smith replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Disperse, child."
2 hours ago
Bob Smith replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Gibberish "
2 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to LB's discussion Three Sydney clubs circle Radley
"I think most agree he makes the team better but with concerns over HIA and likehood of a month or more sit out period after his next failed HIA is he worth paying what teams like Saints, tigers and dogs will pay to drive up his price."
2 hours ago
Bob Smith replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"If a solution could be found by a 'liberal-democratic-secular' solution, it would have been found already. "
2 hours ago
Jack replied to LB's discussion Three Sydney clubs circle Radley
"I'd take him for sure "
2 hours ago
adnan replied to LB's discussion Three Sydney clubs circle Radley
"Hope he joins south's just to piss off the roosters"
2 hours ago
Gaz Nelson replied to LB's discussion Three Sydney clubs circle Radley
"Lol .. 😂 coincidence that  Radleys supplier was a former storm player? "
2 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels intrested in Cody ramsey
"I agree"
3 hours ago
Wizardssleeves official receipts replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"no it didn't have a scope , but it may have been used to disassemble the rifle.
 
I don't know enough about the kind of rifle they say it is to know how long it'd take to pull down. But Google says it'd look like this once pulled down. Easily fit in…"
3 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>