Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Acme replied to Prof. Daz's discussion R1 vs STORM: Gilgamesh and the Beer Goddess
"Moses is always a huge factor, all we can hope for is an injury free season. If that happens and the rest of the squad consistently perform as they have so far, we should be very competitive.
Ryles is orchestrating an entertaining brand of football,…"
2 minutes ago
John Boyle replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"It is a no brainer from me, in my opinion Moses has the 2nd best long kicking game in the competition, he can really turn an average set into a good one with a decent kick, he essentially bosses the game in terms of territory and control.
Burton is…"
17 minutes ago
EA replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"was not a good day for HM and SG Ball. The ref was horrendous in both games. HM losing the lead with the countless penalties and 6 agains.
SG Ball bombed how many tries and dropped how many balls? Petrus and Talagi (to win the game) both drop the…"
27 minutes ago
KENDOZA replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"He would work well with mitch. We would have the two best kickers in the game"
2 hours ago
paul taylor replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"Lorenzo is a generational talent. In both trials he barely ran the ball. Once he gets that out of the bag, you will see how lethal a talent he is. He has great footwork and a fantastic initial 30 metres in him.  I really look forward to watching him…"
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"Burton would be a great 6 to have, but there's no doubt we'd have to get into a bidding war to win his signature. As soon as that happens the move loses appeal for me because he's not worth the salary Bulldogs had to pay to bring him over from the…"
2 hours ago
Richard Jackson replied to Prof. Daz's discussion R1 vs STORM: Gilgamesh and the Beer Goddess
"You're on the money as usual Coryn, but also, when the Storm are getting no reward late in the tackle, their 6 7 and 9 resort to angled grubbers thru our line or staying with angle lob one to allow their winger to catch and drop down over line.…"
2 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"I'm guessing they see Lorenzo as our future 6. I love to see him as our left centre though"
3 hours ago
Prof. Daz’s discussion was featured
Epic heroes come and they go. What truly makes the hero is whether their fame goes to their head and they become a self-obsessed jerk, or they accept their limitations and try to serve others. Many think Odysseus (Ulysses to the Romans) from Homer’s…
3 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Prof. Daz's discussion R1 vs STORM: Gilgamesh and the Beer Goddess
"History has to end sometime and I can't think of a better team to beat or a better round 1 run to end than that of the Storm away.
Middle 1/3 is the key to beating these guys if we can win and negate the Storm middles you lessen the Harry Grant…"
3 hours ago
Richard Jackson replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Recalling Our Favourite Fijian Superstars
"Daz, live and now, I was gobsmacked to see Semi destroy the 'enemy' in that manner. Do you think Teddy and Graham would have been 'more sensible' from then on"
3 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Recalling Our Favourite Fijian Superstars
"https://youtu.be/b88Ed7dOnrU?si=n-VSPE6ENPa4UiRW
I mean this guy here has huge potential the ceiling is extremely high I think the body type for an nrl outside back this guys the guy."
3 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Prof. Daz's discussion R1 vs STORM: Gilgamesh and the Beer Goddess
"I reckon the Eels will win this game by 10+ If the Lomax court issue is on the 3rd ( not sure) the outcome ( hopefully/surely ) in Eels favour could have some 'mental' influence on the game depending on the outcome..On paper and trial form the Eels…"
3 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Recalling Our Favourite Fijian Superstars
"Sivo versus Tedesco: "call an ambulance; maybe a priest"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vli99SRmyhA"
4 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Recalling Our Favourite Fijian Superstars
"Radradra versus a prop (Graham)
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dP6N_RwRckw"
4 hours ago
Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Recalling Our Favourite Fijian Superstars
"That's a change, he's usually called an old gent"
5 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2129

 

Matt Burton

He has yet to extend with the Bulldogs.   Do you think we should have a red hot crack at him.  Such a great player,   versatile, kicker,goalkicker.Lots of positives....BUT could we afford him or attract him to Parra ??

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by John Boyle 17 minutes ago
Views: 321

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>