Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"You are the only one one here who thinks he left on his own accord.  Sarantinos said himself he sees himself as a future ceo at another club at some stage.   If that was the case,  why would Sarantinos leave the eels in such a lowly position?   …"
7 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Brad was about saving himself. 
- The way reserve grade was turned into.a holding yard for drifters rather than concentrate on development.  That was criminal 
- the choices he made not to have better assistants who could challenge him further down…"
14 minutes ago
JEELman replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Swings and roundabouts. It's just magnified because of the finals.
 "
21 minutes ago
Bourbon Man replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"I agree with you Wiz. The Dogs cut him loose because he was on big money, was carrying too much weight and was out with injury too often.
With us, he has lost the weight, has been relatively injury free, is teaching the younger players, is a clear…"
30 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Chiefy, what the fcuk are you talking about, there were no politics with Saratinos, he was doing his best to hold the ship together.....just reinforcing, he was not tapped or ousted as you have said......he volunteered because he realised we were…"
36 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
36 minutes ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"Though Coryn, we aren't giving Ryles what he needs, but where are the players dying to play for him? His message is not strong enough to pry them over. I mean BA at least was able to get some decent signings. He got Lomax basically on his own."
43 minutes ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"He is also 19, let's see him after 2027 then pass judgement."
45 minutes ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"To us, his value is only one year, until Talagi and Koina are ready. Once they are, he is expendable to us."
45 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Yes well.Super, you were making excuses for Sarantinos when I was pushing out blogs on why he should be ousted.    You were one of those people hellbent on making sure Sarantinos was untouchable.   Seems like a case of politics before on feild…"
49 minutes ago
Bourbon Man replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"What does that mean? Who are these people?
Seriously guys - if you know something then let us all know. Otherwise it justs sounds like you are just making shit up. "
55 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to shane's discussion Dragons land rising Eels winger The talented outside back has picked up a new deal in 2027 after a breakout junior season. Leo Twemlow Leo Twemlow WRITER | September 20, 2026 - 7:33am 1,462 The St G
"thanks EA"
58 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Holbrook wasn't signed by Newcastle until September 2025. By then Brown, Mooney and Saulo had already signed. The only player recruited to the Knights after Holbrook signed was Sandon Smith who was happily released by the Roosters.
Peter O'Sullivan…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Exactly BA had to go through more than any other coach in nrl history off the field JR has had an easy ride in comparison don't worry about that discussion with Chief I told him that 3 years ago."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Holbrook who did he recruit he hasn't been there long enough.
DB is a OSullivan hire I think moreso he's the key.
Dolphins and Knoghts look eerily similar athletically."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"This is what happens when you can't recruit you have these struggles.
We can't afford to let him go because we lack experience if we had have landed Barnett or Kolomatangi the club holds the cards in this negotiation.If we don't sign him and we go…"
2 hours ago
More…

 

Warriors injustice?

No warriors fan but seriously some of the worst refereeing or more so inaction of the bunker that I’ve ever seen. This game has gone to shit. The Cherry Evans no penalty / sin bin was bad enough but that shit was just appeasing the betting…

Read more…
30 Replies · Reply by Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 7 minutes ago
Views: 835

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>