Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Dunno about you EAM, but I remember our last "chat". Fun times. But I'll let bygones be bygones and see how we go.
Let's hope the snowflake doesn't just meltdown anyways "
36 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"In state parliament Vlandys would get ICAC'd  and might be in line to become Obeid's celly"
41 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
""
54 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Randy Handlinger 
Pressure ! what Presure?......"
56 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Hoey,I don't think a player swap will emerge with the storm deal, Newcastle with Best is possibly our best bet in like for like and that will only work for emotional reasons of Best's partner wanting to be in Sydney.
We don't know of course but that…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"@fake midget pseudoachondroplasia
FM Good point's FM and what I dont understand that he asked for his release in July, who was around at that stage, presumably not R360, if you want to drag someone else into this Shikoske seem's to be the missing…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"V’landys’ lack of support for the Eels, coupled with multiple backflips on his tough-talking rhetoric on contract sanctity, anit-tampering, player loyalty over R360 money grabs met with ten year bans, is disappointing.
This is exactly right it's why…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Walters, is not the sharpest tool in the shed either Randolph, something is going on.......we should offer to take him back and see the reaction we get......we can then negotiate with anyone to take him......even we would only have to pay 6 months…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Adam, I think your right.....something is going on. Vlandys seemed happy to wait for the legals, now he is "gung ho"."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"That bloody cat again!...tell the truth Randolph, its your cat isn't!"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
" Thanks Bluey,
Could be, dunno. But I wonder whether Walters would change his tune if his players do a Lomax on him, signing multiple contracts and chats with others while still under contract with him.
 Or maybe tell him they did the right thing…"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Eels' 2026 Backline?
"Daz, good blog and you have addressed a very pertinent issue."
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Eels' 2026 Backline?
"Cobbo was a chance, Staggs, Farnworth, Best ( Best maybe given rhetoric) but none of them Cobbo (not likely) would have come to Parra. Losing Lomax was a killer but to coin one of my favourite sayings, you cannot control the uncontrollable!
We need…"
2 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Thanks Mutts. I’ve enjoyed your commentary on this as well.
Like you, I feel, after looking at timelines despite initial concerns, Lomax made some form of provisional agreement with Melbourne first. Reading between the lines of what Tripp said (Feb…"
2 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"EAM / Randy, gents,
One wonders. If Lomax is treated differently because he’s a “marquee player” and “human”, what rules apply to all the other humans in the game?
V’landys’ lack of support for the Eels, coupled with multiple backflips on his…"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Eels' 2026 Backline?
"I thought adding JAC & Lomax went a long long way to remedying a weakness the clubs had since the likes of Radradra Takarangi Sivo Opacic Fergo and alike left.We aren't in that position to lose such talent and expect to come out of it smelling of…"
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2042

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 318

 

Eels' 2026 Backline?

To those with knowledge of the Eels' lower grades, do the Eels have players coming through in the outside backs who might be within 1-2 years of a) breaking into first grade, and/or b) have the potential to be star outside backs?I think the Eels'…

Read more…
13 Replies · Reply by Poppa 2 hours ago
Views: 638

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>