Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Poppa replied to adnan's discussion Pre-Season Challenge, R2: Game day blog vs Sharks
"Well the Russell thing can be made to work a couple of ways. He may have been up against a Reserve Grade side yesterday but he wasn't when he quietened the Broncos back line last year....We are allowed to be wrong and Russell is definately a lot…"
2 minutes ago
Acme replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Is there a font that can be used for sarcasm?"
6 minutes ago
Parrastew replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Just a thought if nrl forces the signing can Melbourne storm be a 3rd party sponsor for a couple of Eels players over the next few years . Would effectively add money to our salary cap and stick it right up Melbourne - would love to see the big…"
9 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"They may suggest his mental "issues" began with the collapse of 360 and we are now exacerbating that by being unreasonable and directly causing him harm. Melb say ok, Nrl say ok,  Eels say no...so WE are causing his on-going decline into "dangerous"…"
12 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"move on. Im sure PVL will find a way to help us out in the future....or he might just buttstuff us with a blowtorch again, whatever.
Loader, why, the fuck, are you so sure of that. I sure as hell don't. Aren't you furious?....If not, I don't think…"
18 minutes ago
Poppa replied to adnan's discussion Pre-Season Challenge, R2: Game day blog vs Sharks
"Yes he was impressive and now join's the same queue/crew as Joash Pappalii lining up behind the first choice 5/8 and the fullback.
I think his key issue will be his physique, if he becomes more solid, i think he could be a good centre, just not…"
26 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Picking Up Where We Left Off?
"It's exciting, the buzz and the buy in from the players. Watching the comraderie of the players, whether at training, at a BBQ, at a golf course or having a coffee together. That comraderie extends past just the team. The culture and respect of…"
27 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"It's good but not if used as a bargaining tool "
30 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Agree, you wouldn't think it would stand up in court! Sounds a bit like the boy who cried wolf "
31 minutes ago
Poppa replied to adnan's discussion Pre-Season Challenge, R2: Game day blog vs Sharks
"In those days Teencum's Dad's name was Glasscock, he changed it to Brown because he was sick of being told we could see you were  were coming.
Sorry Fishy, with your Avatar that is probably unfair!"
34 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"They don't think we're stoopid, they just think that they're smarter and know better than us Plebs. They assume we look up to them and believe whatever they spout, because a lot of us (eg poppa) do. We all complain about the uneven playing field but…"
34 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Longfin, your right, I can only think of Fa'alago. Thats actually a disgrace when you think about it, not giving back to the game by producing young players for the next generation. Puts the theory that the only way to be a successful club is…"
41 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Picking Up Where We Left Off?
"The Easts trial will just be that, Ryles and Robinson are wily enough to not show too much.'
No one will come crashing back to Earth as we have no reason to have left it!"
52 minutes ago
fishbulb replied to adnan's discussion Pre-Season Challenge, R2: Game day blog vs Sharks
"I believe Teancum Brown was the highest seller on the Dulux colour chart in the 70s."
1 hour ago
Longfin Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"The trouble with Melbourne is that they have been in the competition now for about 27 years. I'm yet to see any local players that have come through the ranks to play NRL. Compare that to Sydney Swans, who by 2009 (27 years) had many local players.…"
1 hour ago
Longfin Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"V'lanys' position is becoming untenable. What poor leadership he has shown through this matter. The only thing on his mind is a big dollar sign, with the clubs and fans nowhere to be seen."
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2076

 

V'Landys on Hello Sport

Happy Monday, if anyone wants a good laugh to start their week, skip to 32:50 mark and listen to this f***wit talk. It is laughable seriously. Claiming the offer of $300k was a great deal and we can put that into our junior system. But said we can…

Read more…
9 Replies · Reply by Parrastew 9 minutes ago
Views: 902

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>