Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Finally some mainstream scrutiny since Crawley's sudden silence.











Hagipantelis: NRL should be concerned by Storm CEO's audacious texts

By Charles Goodsir





Former Wests Tigers chair Lee Hagipantelis has been left staggered at the lack…"
7 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"Yeah what was most impressive was he did not look tired at all really, he got one stint i believe so played a big portion of minutes straight. 
Have to remember as well he has only played 1-2 NSW Cup games."
20 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"LOL, but true. Villans get paid"
26 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"I wouldn't say he gets Round 1 debut but he will get a debut at some point for sure. Just too many middles vying for spots at the moment. Once Origin and injuries happen he will get a look in."
35 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"The only TDS evident is Trump Dicklicking Sociopathy"
55 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"I see him on the same trajectory Tuivati had last year. He will definitely get some game time, I think that was clear by how much time they gave him in that trial. I watched the game again last night it it felt like he was everywhere. Really stood…"
55 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Quiet, Piggy
 "
57 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"Can I add to that chief, whilst making the  most tackles for the game ,  made the most fantasy points for an all over performance. Played out of his skin and has really taken his chances. Loved his enthusiasm and the 1%ers.  His first stint started…"
59 minutes ago
Anguillidae replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"If he has another performance like that in the next trial, he'll be very hard to ignore. This is exactly what we want - development players bashing down the door for a shot at first grade. Fantastic."
59 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"Yeah good point.  What id like to know is what numbers he was punching out in reserve grade last year.  We'll see if he goes well again this weekend.  "
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Ryles 2.0: 2026 gets off to a bright start in Eels trial
"I watched the game again and Samrani killed it. For me, he's too good for that level now and should be regularly fighting for a first grade spot with Simmo and Russell, and Richard Penisini isn't far behind him. Maybe our backline stocks are in a…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Yep Hoe. Kevvie was going at the "public interest" equity plank. So is Slippery Pete.
Would he really be trying to sway Justice Kunc's veiw on where the public interest is in this matter?.
I thought his yapping was for the punters but he may be…"
1 hour ago
Roy tannous replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"You can't really judge of that considering it was sharks reserve grade.We don't really know how he ll go against actual first graders."
1 hour ago
LB replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"The issue is not so much V'Landys siding with Storm, for him it is publically saying so. He already is a hypocrite showing his muscles over a 10 year ban. When push came to shove he decides to defend the person that signed for R360. Go figure.
But…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"I think it's one of the first things I mentioned the nrl have zero business in this discussion it's a A & B conversation I don't know how the nrl get involved in this unless Melbourne know physically they can't get past Lomax's signed sealed deal…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Brent Read came in saying all was fair game, Riccio said V'Landys has made it clear whose side he is on. It is poor, they should be nutural and say "It's between two clubs and how it should be"."
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2079

 

V'Landys on Hello Sport

Happy Monday, if anyone wants a good laugh to start their week, skip to 32:50 mark and listen to this f***wit talk. It is laughable seriously. Claiming the offer of $300k was a great deal and we can put that into our junior system. But said we can…

Read more…
44 Replies · Reply by Randy Handlinger 55 minutes ago
Views: 1679

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>