Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Prof. Daz replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"So the Eels missed out on Barnett, and Keon K and Haas before him. Just how much of a tragedy those missed opportunities will be might be determined by what happens with the Eels' current prop protégés Tuivati and T. Brown? Even though the Eels were…"
1 minute ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Yeh, bingo. Poor signing or not, we went after him and didn't get him."
7 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Eels2025's discussion Anyone else feeling a parramatta win tonight?
"Win v Broncos? No, can't see it, barely even feel it. Of course as an Eels Tragic I'd be ecstatic to be wrong in this case. However, another 50+ loss to start the season has me thinking the conspiracy theory - that the Eels tanked against the Storm…"
10 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Would have been a terrible signing, yuck 🤣🤣🤣"
11 minutes ago
Die hard eels Supporter replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"It also looks like they are entering the desperate stage for the signings as they offered him overs so the next player that might come along the Eels will give him a huge offer if they are great "
12 minutes ago
Die hard eels Supporter replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"I know right, we offered him a 100k more and an extra year, not as an option and we still couldn't land him. I'm alright with not signing this player but far out the Eels can't sign anyone for shit. We also need like 2 extra backline players"
13 minutes ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Its up to the club to turn itself around on the field. We were heading in the right direction with a blip last week.
If you want in demand players when you havent proven youre a compeitiive side week to week you have to pay huge overs. Simple as…"
16 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Whether you think signing him or not is a good or bad thing isn't the point.  Here we have yet another player that we clearly wanted to sign and they turned us down. In this case we offered more money, are closer to his family in Taree and he still…"
17 minutes ago
Richard B'Stard replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Poor Broncos, it must be devastating for them to be able to keep adding internationals to their roster."
18 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Eels2025's discussion Anyone else feeling a parramatta win tonight?
"Hope so "
19 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Good! Glad he signed with Broncos "
20 minutes ago
Joel K replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Glad we didn't sign him.
Keaon was the signing to make, he wanted an extra year but we didn't give it to him."
22 minutes ago
Parra Eels Fanatic replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"good that we didn't sign him but it is a worry that players aren't signing with us . Galvin ; keoan , Barnett. Even with our offers be higher and more years "
24 minutes ago
Zip zip replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Good. 
Eels looked too desperate, with the 3 years and $2.6m for an aging forward who recently had an ACL injury."
31 minutes ago
Zip zip replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Will Penasini out - Jordan Samrani in
"Samrani is a bigger body with a little more speed. Anyone else think Penisini may be more suited to wing, with his strong carries and he does lack a bit of speed a skill in the centres to create opportunities for his winger. Can he be used more like…"
34 minutes ago
jjeel replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Thank God we missed him. Good footballer but not worth the reported money we were offering"
35 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2188

 

State of the Site 2026

With the 2026 season now underway I thought I would provide an overview of how the site is tracking both in numbers and in overall feedback we've been receiving. Analytics 2025 built on the 2024 season and 1 Eyed Eel continues to grow. Numbers-wise…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by Hell On Eels 1 hour ago
Views: 104

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>