Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf to test market
"The Warriors just can't afford to let him go.
Tanah Boyd just isn't FG quality and if they don't pony up for Metcalfe then I fear the Warriors come back to the pack in a big way."
28 minutes ago
Frank The Tank replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"No there's one dumb mother."
6 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"Wasn't you were simply just walking past him? Haha."
7 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"Yeah but in 2023 teams looked at him and he stayed with us. Since then gone cold heavily."
7 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"Brad Arthur's "
7 hours ago
HKF replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"Everything he has done has rubbed teams the wrong way. Left the eels because they told him his future was in the back row not 6 only for his new team the roosters to move him to the back row where his career blossomed. The roosters didn't want to…"
8 hours ago
ParramAddict replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bulldogs logo change - any artists here should we change ours ??
" not my design but funny "
8 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"Our 2022 Recruitment team."
8 hours ago
Muttman replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"He yelled 'not today' then walked away. Lol"
8 hours ago
Kurupt - Porn Addict, But I'm In Control replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bulldogs logo change - any artists here should we change ours ??
"😂🤣😂🤣"
9 hours ago
Kurupt - Porn Addict, But I'm In Control replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"Who'd be dumb enough to take him?"
9 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"You are best mates with Matto aren't you Mutts? From the time he just walked away from you, shows he is close with hahahaha."
9 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"Only issue is though a team may want a Lock, doesn't mean they want Matto. I wonder if him taking the suspension over the fine rubbed other teams the wrong way?"
9 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"Until Bellamy gets there and does an army camp."
9 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"He doesn't give a fuck, it's all about him him him and his BS Instagram posts."
9 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to LB's discussion Parra willing to pay half of Matterson’s deal
"Its in his best interests to go and try and win another contract.  If he stays in reserve grade here, it would most likely be tge end of him and we all know how tight he is with his pesos.   Heard titans "
9 hours ago
More…

 

R.I.P Ace

 Ace Frehley, founding member of rock band KISS, dead at 74Ace Frehley, original lead guitarist and founding member of the rock band KISS, has died. He was 74.  One of my favourite bands ever, many a raunchy night listening to Ace and the rest of…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Parra_Greg 14 hours ago
Views: 221

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>