Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

shane replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"Out"
36 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"Running count Chiefu?...I'm not sure which option is in front"
39 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Wait, Clintorian, you're suggesting the monotonous sack-a-thon, mostly directed at "management", is, ya know, monotonous? "
39 minutes ago
Titan replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"With the upcoming upheaval of our western neighbour, need to get Cameron back to our club. Nothing is impossible now that the Clearys have started the exodus. Cherry pick and tear the heart out of the Panthers. We need as many of them as we can get"
41 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Clintorian, I was thinking the opposite. Play Yeo at prop. Yeo often plays first receiver at Panthers, to get Cleary or Talagi a little wider, but in SOO you cannot rely on that width trick giving you a staggered defensive line? Earlier ball to…"
43 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Laurie Daley must be playing 3D chess in saying he picked Tedesco over Edwards because of "the game we want to play". There is not that much difference? On the Dally M leaderboard after 11 Rounds Edwards has 32 points and Tedesco 27 points, though…"
53 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"That is total bs. I have spoken, recently, to a very high profile player agent who says the opposite to what you say."
1 hour ago
Alfred Mateo replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"Out. Chiefy-where can we donate to make this happen?"
1 hour ago
Gustarny replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"Definitely Out"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Don't punch Matto though....might kill him"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"Keep.
As there is no Will for change and so let's get on with it."
2 hours ago
EA replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Waqa Blake?"
2 hours ago
Yehez replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Iongi playing in NSW Cup today - some positive news
"Yeah he doesn't seem right. "
2 hours ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Iongi playing in NSW Cup today - some positive news
"Wouldn't surprise me if Walker gets a extended break. His minutes have been way too low off late. So has to be carrying something "
2 hours ago
BlacJac replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"OUT"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Penisini back soon 
 "
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2433

 

Spence

It's been a while. the Spence touring our centre of excellence today. I heard we are signing him before June 30 for 26-27 only. He wants a PNG contract. Not sure if we should bother. Thoughts?

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 28

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>