Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"100% Ron"
3 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Of course they want their cake and eat it too, it's Melbourne who for decades got their way. No someone is standing up to them and the NRL is stunned, plus the NRL world is behind the underdog.
Though there could be a chance that Melbourne just drop…"
3 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
""
3 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"I do remember the nrl investigating Brisbane for any contact with Ben hunt before his contract was up but they couldn't prove it. If any emails or paper trail shows Zach was in contact with the storm while under contract at Parra, could be a big…"
11 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"It won't. The court will interpret the contract.... But we can drive that narrative out of court if we want and demand investigation, while selectively leaking comms. Fuck these guys. We need to make them think twice about fucking with us for a…"
14 minutes ago
The Captain replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"It'll be about the amount of compensation.
A smart play by Parra. You can read it in the club statement - they are putting the focus on the compensation to our football department (ie the transfer fee).
If we talk about fair value transfer fee for…"
15 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"I wonder with it going to court how much will come out about storm actions and Zach contact with other clubs while he was under contract ? Seems like Parra has done everything legally correct but Lomax and Storm might be sweating a little and nrl…"
21 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Fair enough, but if this escalates we need someone to leak and bleat off the record. He is the one I would use."
24 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"I just want to sit him out for this year and then write it off. 
 "
30 minutes ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"The court can't make a player move to Parra, unless a player wants to go to Parra and I just don't see an upside for any player other than stefano utoikamanu if he was home sick which I don't believe he is. Why would Coates or Howarth want to go to…"
34 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"It is not outrageous conspiracy. Melbourne are sneaky cunts being sneaky cunts. NRL are duplicitous cunts being duplicitous cunts. They do it everyday
It's happening."
35 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Nah, that doesn't get you an immeadiate Supreme court hearing. The Nrl indicating that they would register the contract this week against our wishes would though. 
 "
39 minutes ago
Archie replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Absolutley LB"
43 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"MON handles player contracts, but for something like Lomax's release, it would have been signed off on by Jim and the board with legal advice sought regarding the release conditions."
47 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Hey Poppa,...no nrl involvement 'eh.
 "
49 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"It serves Parra to have this sorted quickly so if Melbourne are forced to hand over a player if they want Lomax, we get that player before the season starts.
And you don't just wake up one morning and decided to go to the Supreme Court. It's likely…"
50 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1954

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 256

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>