Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Randy Handlinger replied to christeel's discussion J.Ryles potential new middle man
"I loved watching him play sometimes Mace and he should be acknowledged for what he did on the field but he makes it hard for most people to put him on a pedestal.
No club  ties, no opportunities but we should not zero him out"
29 minutes ago
macybrown replied to christeel's discussion J.Ryles potential new middle man
"Yes I know and agree. About time we stuck up for our own. Remember recently watching greatest tries of finals over last twenty years on tele, thought ok we might get to see Haynsey's  vs StGeorge one there...but nah and totally honest it deserved…"
43 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
"DB didn't open himself up to anything if Parra were strong enough in the front office like they seemingly are now there's no way those options are included that's the thing that has crushed that theory.Whomever is responsible for allowing DBs PA to…"
46 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to christeel's discussion J.Ryles potential new middle man
"I did some clicking to see if he was for real and try to find a price... what I found looked more like grifting, or a cry for help....like a Chris Sandow clinic"
54 minutes ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
"Commitment doesnt just mean competing on the field. Lomax had personal ambitions on and off the field. Theres no secret amongst the league he marches to the beat of his own drum.
He still wanted to play centre. Hes the only person in the rugby…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to christeel's discussion J.Ryles potential new middle man
"Maybe he need's you as his Manager Randolph....about time you did something positive and good, rather than disapearing behind that BONG!
Sort of says something about you as well, going to some effort to "white ant" seems a little too familiar!"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to christeel's discussion J.Ryles potential new middle man
"Old School Eel I was identifying that when he was 21 and said at the time someone has to mentor him on the finer attributes of being idenfied as a champion......My Fair Lady Territory....education and speech.....we all knew he could dance!"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to christeel's discussion J.Ryles potential new middle man
"We have gone past that Wiz. His communication skils would make it be very difficult (people skills also fit) to be a Head coach. A talent scout or specialist fits definately within his realms."
1 hour ago
LB replied to christeel's discussion J.Ryles potential new middle man
"I am also not saying De Belin should be treated differently either, like he was not found guilty. Not found innocent either but the adage is innocent til proven guilty. If it is fine for the club to bring De Belin in as a member of the club, Hayne…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
"Sorry, but I disagree with both of you in this "curates egg".
I think there is dancing around and wishful thinking and easy answers to prove points, but factually failing.
Snottie for example said DB had a bad 2024. This was the year he basically…"
1 hour ago
macybrown replied to christeel's discussion J.Ryles potential new middle man
"Absolutely sickening that we can't acknowledge and nor can the nrl it's like he didn't exsist; and great point re DeBelin too! "
2 hours ago
macybrown replied to christeel's discussion J.Ryles potential new middle man
"Hey Carlo, thanks for mentioning that podcast 'Talking Parra'  Haynesy as guest appearance, I enjoyed it. Wow shame Smithy didn't get to put that young team together and have them grow and develop as a unit under him. Geez what a talented young…"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Parramatta ramp up pursuit of Kangaroos star after Zac Lomax's immediate exit from NRL
"Yeah i get a lot of players are jumping now hoping even just one year of a big pay cheque happens. I don't think Lomax would care if it went longer than a season or two, if he can get reported $1.7 mil a year, so $3.4 mil over 2 years and get out…"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Parramatta ramp up pursuit of Kangaroos star after Zac Lomax's immediate exit from NRL
"Yeah true, bit like how Isaac Moses when banned sat in the room of one of his associates and told them what to say mid call."
2 hours ago
LB replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Parramatta ramp up pursuit of Kangaroos star after Zac Lomax's immediate exit from NRL
"More so Japan as their season ends before R360 begins i believe."
2 hours ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
"I think it all comes down to alignment . If Ryles and the front office are aligned in what they want , who they want to recruit , how they want to spread the cap etc things aren't as bad as you think.  If Ryles and the club want Galvin it's hard to…"
3 hours ago
More…

NAS Not Saying No

https://www.zerotackle.com/nas-discusses-potential-eels-move-228804/?utm_campaign=Zero+Tackle&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter"The 29-year-old admitted he's uncertain whether his next chapter will be in the NRL, rugby union, or even away from…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by Coryn Hughes on Thursday
Views: 287

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>