Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Mitchy replied to LB's discussion Parramatta sign New Zealand cross-code convert
"Interesting - shows we are looking in places....lets see how the kid goes in the jnr reps. I am sure EA will be all over him during the season.."
26 minutes ago
ParramAddict replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
"I dunno if it's a Macron thing, but whoever is approving their colours need to be sacked! we should be a royal blue and gold"
34 minutes ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
""
1 hour ago
Danny Crnk it up replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"We've signed Ellen Degeneris "
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
"Both jerseys look great, just no white ones 😂😂"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
"I reckon they’re just waiting until the fanbase stops refreshing social media every 20 seconds "
2 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
"Sign some fcuking players you dopes. Even the NRLW are signing more."
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀

Only difference can see the actron sleeve sponsor has a border around it making it stand out "
2 hours ago
Trent replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
"We have the worst designs in the comp need a rocket up there butts"
2 hours ago
HKF replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
"That's a better quality picture,  the one I found above the blue looks really light."
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀

Can't see a y changes from tge 2025 heritage.  The away looks exactly the same.
 
 
 "
2 hours ago
HKF replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
"I'm disappointed once again they went with a lighter blue, they seem to do that every 2nd or 3rd jersey change.  Personally I prefer the darker blue but either way the shade of blue should not be changing,  pick one and stick with it."
2 hours ago
HKF replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
""
2 hours ago
Acme replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
"Just imagining the photographer saying, "now Mitch, bend over in front of Isaiah, that looks great, nothing sus at all""
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Defense first in the middle for mine that's where your line speed starts and we know how important kick pressure and slowing the ruck is.TDS at the moment is miles away from that but your right the variation is good because when the game loosens up…"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
"As a captains run shirt yeah
But they'll have same away jersey as they have to have 2 years of a jersey by rules, unless that only applies to home jersey."
4 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>