Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Jerome Luai Has More Get Out Clauses!
"If we are interested and somehow get him, by all means would welcome him. Though i think he would want to be top dog at a club, not behind Moses in terms of commanding a team.
Perth could be very likely."
17 minutes ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"Yeah i agree, 27' should be the start of the window."
19 minutes ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"You prefer standing behind the posts? Interesting, Wests Tigers do that for their Commbank games. Could be a nice experience for games."
21 minutes ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"Well considering we have Lomax's money."
23 minutes ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"Well Politis gets TPA's from his connections, as far as i know and could be wrong it is just cannot be involved with the club as a sponsor. 
Laundy would be the same at Dogs."
23 minutes ago
HKF replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"As others have mentioned, 
The quality and value of players that have departed the club far outweighs those that have been recruited, where has our cap gone?."
49 minutes ago
GM replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"That's just sad....the forever wait "
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"First choice is easy BE your looking for a alpha to lead your pack and out of those names it's Tino A Keon B.
What I suspect and I'm hoping for is Tuivaiti and Moretti make big strides and we don't need to make such a move.Then we can supplement…"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"I'd suggest we'll never know either way it's not as though our front office have learnt from the Bennett chase.For me that was an absolute shit show of an exercise.Media are no better than fan forums outside of having these contacts it's speculative…"
2 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"There was an attempt at organising a coterie on here years ago (like 10 years ago) and it never got off the ground. Good idea though.
I like your idea of removing those sections of seating, not sure how that would go from a safety perspective,…"
3 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Blue Eel's discussion Jerome Luai Has More Get Out Clauses!
"If there open about talking to Luai then I'd say your pretty much putting the line through our junior development around our halves that's what a move like this tells me.All the Renzo Fletcher noise is just exactly that front office speak around…"
3 hours ago
Trent replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Bring back Dylan "
3 hours ago
iamnot replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"At what point were the club actually after Tino, Luke Garner or Frizell? That was just media click bait. "
3 hours ago
The Captain replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"If it's a third party agreement it by definition must be at arms length from the club and therefore can't be used to influence or attract recruitment.
Otherwise it'll be considered as part of the salary cap.
I know some clubs fly pretty close to the…"
3 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Blue Eel's discussion Jerome Luai Has More Get Out Clauses!
"if you don't even try to get him I'll be done with this ass club and the people that run the club."
4 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"💯 "
4 hours ago
More…

 

Jerome Luai Has More Get Out Clauses!

If you've kept up to date recently with the drama at the Wests Tigers, you'd know that the club is in complete turmoil, tearing itself apart from within. Board members being sacked , the CEO being investigated for family contracts, possibly gone by…

Read more…
7 Replies · Reply by LB 17 minutes ago
Views: 454

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>