Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

DYNASTY.LOADING replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"Amazing. Very very happy. 1 slip up from a guy who has a lot to work on and from Kelma who won't be here much longer. Plus a weak performance from Pryor who I think might get squeezed out also.
Otherwise we completely dominated them. 
---
Future…"
30 seconds ago
Mitchy replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"EA, Twidle is a keeper for me; he seems to have a bit of that class and reads the play"
5 minutes ago
Poppa replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"Combinations of both I feel EA, the new rules will make 6 agains look to be much higher than last year.....I don't like it but dont have the answer's either. Yes it makes the game faster and 6 agains will (i believe) make them more seemless and…"
7 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"alamadine looked solid on the left wing"
10 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"His style seems to rely a bit more on a powerful strike through the ball which might correlate with a development of his own strength as he is growing"
16 minutes ago
EA replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"JDB is definitely going to be in the team. Probably starting 13"
20 minutes ago
EA replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"He has starting this year on fire. Converted all the goals last week in trials. Last year in SG ball he was not this good"
21 minutes ago
LB replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"He looks the most confident i have ever seen him. Ryles loved him from day 1 and now the faith has reaped rewards."
21 minutes ago
LB replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"I think Ryles would select Samrani on the Wing even before Tago in NRL. Samrani had been training on the Wing during pre-season. "
22 minutes ago
LB replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"He is 20, so that is on his side."
24 minutes ago
Poppa replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"Yes EA"
24 minutes ago
LB replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"We had way more ball in that first portion of the half, including numerous back to back sets. Now could it be some were out there too long? With Talagi coming off and Doorey having to play 10-15mins more than needed? Perhaps but it wasn't until the…"
24 minutes ago
LB replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"They had a few sets in a row late in that first half and were dropping off tackles, were not controlling the ruck as Cronulla were rolling with quick play the balls. That Cronulla try i was not blaming all on fatigue for Da Silva, he read it poorly."
27 minutes ago
LB replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"I found his passing straight away off the ground was better then fatigue set in quick. Too quick. 
He is still only 20 hard to believe, but has had a few NRL pre-seasons now. Smith is just your simply high effort Hooker who does not have many, if…"
28 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"Fletcher is an excellent goal kicker"
28 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to adnan's discussion Game day blog vs the sharks
"When you think about it, at the moment we really only have 4 locked in players in the forward pack
Paulo
hopgood
williams
walker
then we have a long list of competition for spots
tuivati
JDB
Katouga 
Kelma Tulagi
guymer
Doorey 
moretti
T Brown
W…"
28 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2073

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>