Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Perpetual Motion replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"I see a Youtube doco begging to be made. "
5 minutes ago
Cumberland Eel replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"Yep Beau Scott was good "
23 minutes ago
paul taylor replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"HKF , re Dom Farrugia - NO,  Didnt come on last season like they hopeed after NRL pre season. Reasonable finisher and goal kicker but is not NRL quality IMO.  Nice kid though and fits in so will have further development but I think he will struggle. "
35 minutes ago
John Boyle replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"Totally agree about controlling all we can control, people on here are acting like superstar players are immediately available for Season 2026.
If we can't sign a superstar we will no doubt promote a kid and give him an opportunity on minimal money…"
36 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"If you are that blind you are gonna end up putting some nasty things in your mouth.
Aussie bongs have a brass conepiece and a shotty hole. They are descended from the Orchy, Garden Hose and Can technology passed down from our ancestors."
38 minutes ago
HKF replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"The eels have lost young centre/wing Dominic Farrugia to the roosters. 
Is he any good?"
44 minutes ago
LB replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"Foran at the time at signing was the right thing to do. Nobody could foresee the issues that were presented.
Watmough on other hand was incompetence giving him 4 years."
45 minutes ago
Poppa replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"Can only control the controllable JB, i suspect the Pezit was bought more for that insurance than actually being a 5/8.
I wonder if it is possible that Joash mounts a case for 5/8 over Pezit, unlikely I know, but the preseason  creates direct…"
49 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"I strongly dislike you slightly less....How about Jello or Refused?
You do realize that Punk bands en masse lean Hard Left yeah?
If you talked your shit backstage to them they'd eat you"
52 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"your mother let me into the shower, well at least she said she was your mother?
Sorry about the Bong, totally out of my depth, I thought it was a smokey milkshape, well explains why she was licking her chin!"
1 hour ago
John Boyle replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"I don't see why everyone is in 'Panic Mode' on here ?
We beat the Premiers away from home in Round 20 this season, from the side that played that game we have only lost Lomax and Hawkins.
For me, surely Pezet is an upgrade on Hawkins but yes Lomax…"
1 hour ago
Bob Smith replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Sure do."
1 hour ago
Parrafan101 replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"Well look at the juniors we have, all we need is keaon and an outside back or 2"
1 hour ago
Offside replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"Beau Scott had 2 good years and helped reshape culture at the time and bridged a gap till players came in He was a leader."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
""
1 hour ago
Cumberland Eel replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"Foran was a waste of time, Jennings was good value and Scott ? Don't recall Scott so he must have been incredible "
1 hour ago
More…

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 16

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>