Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"I like the signing of Kelly, it gives our outside backs, Russell and Simmonson a bit of competition. Most of the narrative around Kelly's signing has been about his terrible defence. I watched four Titans games from this year, his defence is not as…"
2 hours ago
Michael W. replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"It's a footy forum, and that should be it. We've lost quite a few good posters the last few years, I don't know whether it's because of politics, religion, racism, language or we have lost them because of the lack of success the club has had for…"
2 hours ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I read a few eels forums and there is always lots of infighting. Seperating the politics is a good idea as it is toxic and devisive. I actually think think the quality of this site has improved somewhat in the last year or so. "
4 hours ago
GOLDEEL replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I'm not sure when this site started but I've been on here from the early days and while I don't comment or post much I always check in to read everyone's opinions if they are good or bad. In all my time I've been here HOE I can say I enjoyed reading…"
4 hours ago
Bob Smith replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"Politics on here is pointless, for reasons i'm not even going to explain. That's all I'll say on this matter."
4 hours ago
Bob Smith replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"He was tried there under BA and had little idea. He couldn't position himself correctly. Ryles might be better at coaching him there though. "
4 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Randy, you and Pops, have much more in common than you might think. You're both truth seekers. Have deep empathy for others, Are willing to learn and open your mind to new knowledge. Strong-willed. Expressive. Blunt at times. Your minds are not…"
4 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Also, I did not respond to Poppas blog as one part in particular left me with something to think about strongly enough that I then had to reflect on whether I needed to do some small self-adjustments. Turns out that he made one small specific point…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"I mean could be wrong, doubt it is only for one year. Two years and more likely an option for a 3rd in our favour as that was the apparent sticking point. Also, he would be on ok money for his experience. As for coming here to be a back-up, i think…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Well said."
5 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Oh ok fair enough. Bloomfield moving to Centre and Wing is promising since we have Iongi so Cyrus can find a spot somewhere else and have time to develop in those spots.
Rokosuka getting some Flegg time as well would help. Wouldn't surprise me if…"
6 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Hes only here as a back up.  There's no use getting excited fongi. We'll probably offer 1 year with an option in our favour.   If people think we are offering good coin or a two or three year deal,  they're wrong "
6 hours ago
Frank The Tank replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"No - he just likes cheap 😂😂😂"
6 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Does anyone else think Penisini could play wing. His carries are always strong he just doesn't make as many as a centre. I think Penisini could possibly emulate what To'o does for Penrith "
6 hours ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"How can they afford him 🤔 "
7 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"Frankie, I get it, but this is actually quality moderation. He contacted the poster, they agreed, and it is public. I know you will think it is because "also lefty" but the mods have shown restraint and given out rope.
Hoe...You are navigating a…"
7 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
11 Replies · Reply by Flow Basket on Wednesday
Views: 1378

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 109

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>