Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Mannah-Brow replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Thanks NOS, always enjoy these reads. Our backline looks good and I like they way they are moving together in defence now, but our middle struggles and our edges don't fill me with confidence. Would like to see Matto included tonight, but he seems…"
10 minutes ago
AlShaw replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"I just don't see the same swagger in the Sharks as previous years, their attack isn't quite flowing yet and they're getting a bit frustrated at time. I don't want to see us run them into form. 
The kick chase is just so important, how often has…"
10 minutes ago
Kenny Power replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"I want it to be Cleary and Luis Moses is important for us 
plus Daley can't coach so NSW will lose series so better Moses not involved "
50 minutes ago
Axel replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Great write up NOS. Thank you.
I feel AFB is the key to the Sharks. If we don't limit his post contact metres then they'll run riot.
I'm tipping us for a close win purely because MM did the job for us last week."
1 hour ago
LB replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"I would not say it would be a disaster. Moses' kicking would be lowered due to the left side sure but his kicking will still be a factor. Moses more so is there to take control and allow Cleary to play as he sees. The issue with Cleary of late in…"
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Eithe teAm to win in a high scoring match. Total points 51 - 60
 "
1 hour ago
LB replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"AFB, as apparent to SC podcast, is in doubt for tonight with shoulder issue. I bet he plays but his minutes might be limited. That helps. A lot of podcasts are giving us a chance and even tipping us for an upset. Normally do not like that. Sharks…"
1 hour ago
Blaze replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion We should have $4M buy players
"There was rumors spencer leniu was un happy at roosters. If he becomes available we would be stupid not to look at him.
Starling, bullemor, galvin, leniu, hass (can only dream)"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Ronaldo Mulitalo (30th), Sam Stonestreet (35th), Jesse Ramien (43rd) & Will Kennedy (46th).
This will decide the game wheather we can contain there back 5 coming out of yardage.The Moses kicking game can bury teams but we have to be able to contain…"
1 hour ago
Parraborn1 replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion We should have $4M buy players
"Gee, I'm glad you're not our Recruiter.
Grant Anderson - Going to Brisbane
Ethan Bullemor - meh
Bunty Afoa - Not too bad for a bench spot, but why would we if we have Sam Tuivati and Luca Morretti who are doing well. Stick with your juniors if you…"
1 hour ago
Parra2win replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Great write up NOS!
Contain their middle and trust in our edge defense.   Kick to the corners and make them earn metres.    Brown needs to run the ball and people need to run with him.   Riley needs to steal metres back at Brailey.   Sharks have a…"
2 hours ago
Michael W. replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"It would be suicide to pair Cleary and Moses. Moses biggest asset is his kicking game, it will be nullified playing on the left, NSW would be better off with Luai partnering Cleary, but with Daley as coach, he's more than likely to play someone like…"
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"This will be a tough game. They have such a well balanced roster and probably the best bench in the game. If we steal this game it will be something special, let's go Mitch 👑"
2 hours ago
Tin Tim replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"I think Cleary has being exposed as a halfback that can't play at his best without his champion side. I haven't seen him take Penrith over the line on his own this year, Moses made a huge difference to the Eels & Luai has done the same to the…"
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"I depends on the form of Mitch and Jerome over the next month. Cleary will be picked 1st, if Mitch keeps having blinders like he did the other week, Daly will go with Mitch and have him play at 6. Luai is playing well, but I wouldn't say he's…"
2 hours ago
Mac5733 replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"Cleary and Luai. And nsw will lose. they should pick mitch. cleary is struggling at the moment and has never played very well at origin. "
2 hours ago
More…

 

War chest, what could we look at?

So if Junior Paulo rumours are true and if Lane and Matto move on, Parramatta could have as much as $4mil to spend in 2026. NRL rules state they need to spend 90% of their cap so most of that $4mil will need to be spent. One issue being there is…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 65

AN ALTERNATIVE TO GALVIN

I'm not a huge fan of Galvin primarily because I think he has big ego and because who his manager is , having your halves both managed by Isaac Moses is a recipe for future disaster and we simply don't have the management who could handle Isaac if…

Read more…
38 Replies · Reply by Angry Eel 3 hours ago
Views: 1315

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>