Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

MeelK replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"In many ways I agree Randy. I have absolutely no problem with our current flag, and would support it till the day I die. Conversely, if our great democracy decided it was time for something new, I'd be fine with that too. I'm more about what the…"
4 seconds ago
MeelK replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Yeah it's a good point HOE, I guess circumstances would or should dictate how others, inlcuding us, should respond."
8 minutes ago
MeelK replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Great post NOS."
13 minutes ago
adnan replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Hoops was fried 😂😂😂
"your not the only one
 "
17 minutes ago
Wizardssleeves official receipts replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Tell me which rights you're talking about that have been removed or floated to be removed and we can discuss . 
Os there a particular right that worries you that's on the table to be scrapped for trans or gays ?  
These are the topics that awareness…"
24 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"What rule/law/thing would you make/change to bring about your  Christofascist Utopia, BobtheGronk???
One at at time now, this ain't your mums boudoir
 "
30 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it. I have too much emotion attached to this one. Family phots at events, Anzac Day, ADF, Olympics etc. Please wait till i am past.
I hate flags on shirts and merch.
A good poles are where it's at, but in frontyards it…"
40 minutes ago
Bob Smith replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"You haven't answered the questions I asked, so why should I answer yours? I'm not getting dragged into a long, drawn out 'debate', when I'm to be the only one answering questions. "
44 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"The difference Wiz is the widespread vocal public calls now to harm them, after their rights have been established (by us!). They are demonised for everything under the sun. In reality, they cause fuck all damage to anyone else. Believe what you…"
49 minutes ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"I mean no offence to anyone here, purely my own opinion, neither ‘Left' or ‘Right’ aligned, as I personally believe these two spectrums of political & ideological beliefs are purely a mythology, a tool or weapon, for division, for distraction,…"
51 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Thanks, Meelk. You're a balanced poster mate. Kudos.
You're right in principle. It's a subjective projection and expression of their ideology.
I'm just talking about extreme cases (which who knows how extreme it is nowadays). If someone was to say…"
53 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"But then how will I settle my beefs?"
59 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Industrial-scale inhumanity always, always, always backfires, and leads to those who have been the most merciless inevitably being the ones begging for mercy...to no avail.
....and who the fuck wants to wear our flag on a shirt. It's disrespectful…"
1 hour ago
MeelK replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"I agree that it's time for a new flag. Something that just moves us a little away from our colonial past. I also agree that whatever our flag is, I'll always support it."
1 hour ago
MeelK replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"HOE, as always, thanks for providing your balanced views on this whole topic.
As a thought about your response here: "I suppose if it were ever used to celebrate an assassination or murder, I might question it."
Isn't that more just a reflection of…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Bob, Correct me if I'm wrong.
You said: "one side is being told to "reform" while "the other keeps being violent".
1. Facts. Both radical sides have been violent, no?
2. How is the "Right" being told to "reform" or 'surrender" ? By using pronouns?…"
1 hour ago
More…

 

We Could Of Won This Year

If only we didn't lose Moses at the beginning of the year we could of won this comp this year. The form we were in. The quality of the finals from all teams this weekend has been the most average I can remember. Please anyone but the Broncos win it.…

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Mark yesterday
Views: 799

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>