Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

KENDOZA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Agreed coryn. People don't realise the roosters went hard for him but chose parra"
38 minutes ago
KENDOZA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"1.longi 2.kelly 3.penisini 4.howarth 5. Fox 6.pezet 7.moses 8. Hopegood 9.smith 10.debelin 11.kit kat 12.williams 13.junior 14.desilva 15.walker 16.tuilagi 17.tuivati."
40 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Worse comes to worse parramatta takes him back and make him honour his contract. Screw Melbourne.  I would take coates or no one. They don't get to choose. Even if lomax wins in court. The nrl are within there rights to not registered his…"
45 minutes ago
KingGutho replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"1: I Longi
2: B Simonson 
3: W Penisini
4: B Kelly
5: J Addo Carr
6: J Pezet
7: M Moses ( c ) ( gk )
8: Jr Paulo 
9: R Smith 
10: J Hopgood 
11: K Tuilugi
12: K Kautoga 
13: JDB
 
14: T Silva
15: J Williams ( edge, middle )
16: S Tuivita 
17: D…"
1 hour ago
Parra_Greg replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"agree if our centres can defend ...we in for a reasonable year "
1 hour ago
Parra_Greg replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"lomax against us be interesting..... tip Rylesy ...look for the Muster kick to the wing.......ffs what a team I support "
2 hours ago
GM replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Bailey is very good, he needs to stop bitching and get on quit, not sure he is much better than Kelly, Kelly more elusive and Bailey plus the collision game "
2 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"When he's healthy he's been one of our better players on the wing. 200+ metres and strong as. Just hope his body holds up cause he will be good "
2 hours ago
ScottX replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Agree Russell should go to the extended bench to be used in case of backline injury. But will Ryles follow last years example? He did use Brown as 18th man but only late in the season when semis were out of reach. I'd like to see it done earlier.…"
2 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"I've got a feeling De Belin will be starting prop and junior will come off the bench. I'm not sure how everything else fits together but that's what my gut is telling me."
2 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Simonsson is significantly better than Kelly. But Simonsson is a winger. Don't understand the Bailey disrespect on this site"
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"please don' call it a safe space.  Don't get snowflake hopes up. "
3 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"I think Bailey is the closest like for like replacement to Lomax. His work out of the backfield is strong and he's a much better finisher then Sean. What may happen is Ryles gives Russell the Dylan brown treatment and he's the 18th man most weeks ?…"
3 hours ago
Yehez replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"I think Simonsson and Russell will battle for Lomax's spot. Penisini - Kelly - JAC are set IMO. 
If Richie goes well and not injured we might see him introduced later on for Kelly. "
3 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Sam Moa is going to be key for success this year.
If he can get our middle soughted especially in first contact and we can keep our middle tight and eat yards while suffocating others we could well surprise a few teams.
As if I'm coming after Parra…"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"I think the big difference for this team, opposed to a lot of the kids now a year old in experience, is this squad believes in the coaching staff and each other. That end to the year showed how much this group love Ryles."
3 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Tin Tim Jan 1, 2026
Views: 1844

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 187

 

Rnd 1 team vs storm

1.Isaiah iongi 2.Bailey Simonsson 3.Will pensini4.Brian kelly5.Josh addocarr6.Jonah pezet7.Mitchell Moses 8.Jmaine hopgood9.Ryley smith10.Junior paulo11.Kitione kautoga12.Jack williams13.Jack debelin 14.Tayln da silva15.Dylan walker 16.Sam…

Read more…
25 Replies · Reply by KENDOZA 38 minutes ago
Views: 554

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>