Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

TolEllts replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"This just now confirms that our R&R negotiators are sh*t!"
5 minutes ago
CarloEEL2 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion State of the Site 2026
"As long as I can still declare I'll send " a shit in a box " if it's needed 
I'm ok with the changes 🤔😆😆"
6 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"Squads Finalized. The Fox is in. Samrani still named at centre. Kelly is cut."
6 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Nothing new to see here that's the third big name target we've had a shot at on the market and can't seemingly compete even offering overs.
The fact Barnett is 32 isn't the worry Brisbane don't care how old he is he's the type of player that they…"
7 minutes ago
Mitchy replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"People complaining that we could not land him.....he went to a team that has just won the comp; his wife has extended family up there and as others have said its Brisbane with their backing etc. Hells Bells, its hardly a suprise - he probably feels…"
8 minutes ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"All it takes is one player to join and others follow. Luai went to Wests and others followed.
Foran was that for us in 2016."
13 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Longfin and Macy. Good points. Hard Yakka. Even Panthers-like premiership success won't necessarily mean we'll be recruiting a bevy of marquee players. Think of the last big name they signed, despite winning 4-straight titles. Instead they kept…"
14 minutes ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Well we have a host of forwards coming through probably why Ryles is desperate to get a big name forward to lead them as Paulo could call it quits this year we don't know."
15 minutes ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"I remember that. It was a massive discussion of who should we keep.
The mass public all said Norman, I said Moses due to simply loving the game more he would work on his game. Norman was good but bit laid back."
16 minutes ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Again I don't think Moses and Mahoney hate each other. It is more so they couldn't play together as they get in each others way. Outside they are fine apparently.
Though they got results. Still to this day I contend Moses has played his best footy…"
18 minutes ago
Richard Jackson replied to Eels2025's discussion Anyone else feeling a parramatta win tonight?
"Considering the Broncos made a heap of errors last week and succumbed to pressure, they are not infalliable and so we have the chance to redeem ourselves. No one else gives us a chance....after 1 round but we'll be keen to  gain some respect…"
19 minutes ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"I think Moses and Mahoney relationship was more they hated working together, but outside are fine.
But it they offered Mahoney 2 years to start then 3 last minute, MA would have been 20-21 at the end of that deal.
The talk was very strong that Parra…"
22 minutes ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"What if Ryles brings it up? Arthur surely would have as the failed Smith-Shields signing he was livid.
If Ryles mentions it surely they'll listen if another coach speaks up. Ryles surely has to be livid."
33 minutes ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"I've said here before, Lachy loved Ryles. Felt so comfortable even to the point of ringing him to say he's not coming and had a 30min convo. "
38 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Mark O'Neill’s next big target is Blake Lawrie "
39 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Not one eel fan wants o'neill here. Unbelievable how he's still here"
41 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2188

 

State of the Site 2026

With the 2026 season now underway I thought I would provide an overview of how the site is tracking both in numbers and in overall feedback we've been receiving. Analytics 2025 built on the 2024 season and 1 Eyed Eel continues to grow. Numbers-wise…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by CarloEEL2 6 minutes ago
Views: 241

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>