Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Flow Basket replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"Should we slot matterson on the wing for some experience against the storm"
22 minutes ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner: A Very Special Young Man Who Just Happens to Be a Parramatta Player
"Great blog, Poppsy!
Smith indeed is some special and I can see him defo being a rep player.
TDS has speed to burn and will crucify lazy and slow ruck defence in the last 15-20 mins. He'll target tired forwards straight down the middle. I like JR's…"
30 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"Let's hope Moses is 100%."
2 hours ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"Start Samrani either centre or wing. He smashed the sharks and the chooks. Was fast, tackle-busting and once he set his eyes on the try line it was curtains for the opposition.
I'd start him on the wing as not to disrupt Rusty and the combos set up…"
5 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"Who replaces him? "
5 hours ago
ParraPride replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"Will we ever get a full season out of him?? "
6 hours ago
EA replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"I am starting to think the same. Samrani and Papalii as 18th and 19th man with Tuilagi starting the year in NSW Cup."
6 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner: A Very Special Young Man Who Just Happens to Be a Parramatta Player
"I don't understand why we went for such a long contract with TDS unless Ryles really wanted a 2 hooker rotation.  With the 6 again and speed of the game I think a quick running dummy half is needed and that probably wasn't Ryley strongest area.  At…"
7 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"Hang on.. . just saturday I gave you a Unicorn gif for saying we'd beat them both easy "
8 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"Yep. He can by 4th round hopefully"
8 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"Storm smashed with injuries as well, broncos week 2 we would have lost anyway. Just glad he's back rd 3/4 lol "
8 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"The Kelly signing is looking more like a master-stroke now with very little notice.  - well done to Ryles, and Mark O’Neill.  "
8 hours ago
BEM replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"As our backline isn't top class to begin with, losing Fox is disastrous.
At least if it was a forward we have plenty of semi quality backups."
8 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"He will do A job, not THE job. We have a problem"
8 hours ago
ParraEels replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"Probably a stupid question but can't he strap it down and play?"
8 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox broken thumb. Per nrl physio
"Have to fully expect injuries all season, our depth will be key and it's next man up. Kelly in for ado Carr will do a job "
8 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2108

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>