Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Sneaky Pete's discussion What we need.
"Yeah I think that is pretty accepted across the site. We need a top quality middle, a Centre and a Winger.
Many have said Jenkins, Tago and a middle is good business."
19 seconds ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!
"Mall-e, you use a giggling emoji and the crudity the common vernacular offends your sense of decorum. Did you wedge that stick right up your own arse or is it anotther birth defect?
You must be fun at Parties"
3 minutes ago
BEM replied to Mannah-Brow's discussion Game Stats tell the story
"But apparently, this isn't the coaches fault."
7 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!
"But people on here would never allow our juniors to develop and remain in the system. We seem to go off course and think it's a fantastic idea to spend a million dollars plus on koloamatagi or Farnsworth (two of the most recent examples). Ryles has…"
15 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Iongi playing in NSW Cup today - some positive news
"Iongi Kautoga Pezet Penisini and Tuaviti prob back in rd 13. Need some experience "
19 minutes ago
Slippery. replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!

 The number1 of 1st grade players currently playing throughout the NRL that either played 1st grade or were in the junior development systems at the Eels is mind boggling. Normally such a large turnover of aplayers is due 1 of 2 things. Regular…"
24 minutes ago
Sneaky Pete replied to Sneaky Pete's discussion What we need.
"Just hoping the imbeciles running the club get the message. We may need to repeat the message a few times for these clowns to work out there is a problem."
24 minutes ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Iongi playing in NSW Cup today - some positive news
"how is laughable. Both Beattie and Vaiveila are SG ball graduates. Beattie only 20 and Vaivela 21. The later was the winger when we won sg ball in 2023.
Chiefly not knowing juniors is normal lol"
36 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Iongi playing in NSW Cup today - some positive news
"How did Lorenzo go thats the big question.  I haven't heard many positives about him lately "
41 minutes ago
Desieels replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!
"I have cancelled the Fox Sports subscription and will probably move away from the NRL. I cannot take the season after season we achieve nothing. We, the fans, put everything into our clubs, but clubs don't care. I have seen enough. Our club is, how…"
47 minutes ago
JC replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!
"Out of the box short term 6 solution, 
Walker.
Volkman and pezet both don't defend well enough to be in first grade within a team that isn't able to cover their short comings in defence. 
Walker playing lock hasn't had the same impact this season…"
49 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!
"Such an articulated well thought out response of a sentence there Dude.It must have taken some deep thinking to put that together. 🤣 "
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!
"Good Blog Pops, it's not only guys in heaven that are a bit grumpy this morning. I wrote this and posted it on another blog, but it also serves well here. 
 Ryles can only select the players that get signed to the club. Fight and attitude are…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Iongi playing in NSW Cup today - some positive news
"Cause there is no need for Iongi to play full 80. Just needed a hit out for 40."
2 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!
"I thought Moretti for us at least had a crack I thought "
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!
"Lol yes Parra Greg.  I really need a couple of weeks off from here for the same reason "
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2429

 

What we need.

Firstly a new recruitment and retention team. The clowns currently running the show have no idea. We desperately need a centre or two and prop that can eat some metres. 

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by LB 20 seconds ago
Views: 74

Game Stats tell the story

Possession was Storm 52-48All runs Storm 176-155Metres Gained Storm 1680 - 1164Tackles Busted Storm 43-18Post Contact Metres 493-376Tackles Made Eels 277-271Missed Tackles Eels 43-18essentially we are as soft as butter with and without the ball.

Read more…
3 Replies · Reply by BEM 7 minutes ago
Views: 259

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>