Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"I maintain the bloke is shit for the game and has no clothes. If he leaves us posted on this we should frag him
You are spot on with the visionary delusion. He needs to be martyred. "
53 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"I liked V'Landys, i felt he would be great for the game as he was for Racing NSW. Issue with V'Landys is he seems to inspire to be legendary. He wants to look back on things and say "I did that". He comes up with these grand ideas, mirroring those…"
1 hour ago
Michael W. replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Never liked V'landys or his puppet Abdo. He can't order Parra to drop the contract agreement, he can ask but, he is not the law, and not above it. My guess is V'landys will come out with some threats, hoping g that we will cave in and allow Lomax to…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"I agree. If the NRL do not back us in this then, Fuck Them indeed...but Fuck Them rough and in public.
Refs do us no favours and the NRL ignore us so what have we to lose by becoming The Squeakywheel. They want WWE, well lets give them some fucking…"
1 hour ago
Bear replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Never gonna happen, the repercussions if validated, means any player wishing to exit any club can do the same thing. It would be utter chaos "
1 hour ago
Alfred Mateo replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Another click bait story aimed at getting a response from Parra fans. If the nrl is stepping in surely it's to say Lomax signed a contract and we hold all the aces. $200k is a joke and we don't need the money. The comparison with Galvin is even more…"
2 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"If he signed with Storm in March-April, he'd be not too far off half-price. Why should we be disadvantaged with a new contract from the same time? He's hardly been contributing to the Eels in any capacity since his release. No Eels' pay since then."
2 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"NRL would say pay full value, not sure how much that would be from February, but also HOE have to think about the 2 extra spots in our top 30 we have to meet by June, we have to have cap space."
2 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Ummmmmmm that is for 2027? i mean this year Not hard to work that one out.
Yeah Braith also said the plan was to only be 1 year with Pezet then said yeah we wanted him long term. Braith also knew how sour this deal was to fans so why not try to…"
2 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"We probably could fit him in. A 2026 deal would likely sit around $350–450k if it started between February and April. We've probably kept some powder dry for a mid-season buy anwyay if something attractive emerges, like Walker or TDS last year.…"
2 hours ago
Blaze replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"We just offered keon 1mill how the fuck do we not have cap space, what are you smoking? Lomax was on 650k, we never replaced dbrown, and braith said we signed pezet for unders this year. We have a war chest."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Kelly would have taken some, then we re-signed a host of players who get upgrades for this year, include Pezet in that too. 
We have cap space but not enough to accommodate Lomax for full price and fill the final spot in our top 30. We might have…"
3 hours ago
Stevo replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"How do we not have any cap space? Makes no sense that we have so many players leave and we replace a fraction of the numbers and we have no cap space?? mind boggling 
 "
3 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Well in fairness, we thought too that the contract he signed, with his own free will, would be enough, as it should be.
Plus we probably felt we wanted him gone."
4 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Well we technically cannot do that even if we wanted him as we don't have the cap space to accommodate him."
4 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Well put it this way, when you had channel 9 show Billy Slater and have "4x premiership winner" that's says all that needs to be said about their reputation. They cheated 2 titles and channel 9 of all corporations still acknowledge it.
David Gallop…"
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1932

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 241

 

Knights Chasing Moretti

Eels forward to remain in Parramatta despite Knights links - NRL News - Zero TackleWas surprised when I saw this story. Had anyone heard anything about this? I think he has been progressing really well and was hoping he would be sticking around.

Read more…
24 Replies · Reply by EA 6 hours ago
Views: 1034

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>