Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Another one
"Interesting it's very similar to what happened to Iongi but the article has been written to make May look like the victim. Meanwhile Iongi was written making him look terrible 🤣"
17 minutes ago
Anguillidae replied to Rabz S's discussion Official: Parramatta Eels upgrade Teancum Brown
"Must be pretty good tea for what happens next..."
18 minutes ago
Mitchy replied to Rabz S's discussion Official: Parramatta Eels upgrade Teancum Brown
"Chiefy, pls don't mate. I am still getting psychology from some of these."
29 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Rabz S's discussion Official: Parramatta Eels upgrade Teancum Brown
"I didn't like Brad's style of filling reserve grade with rejected players from other clubs.  That's what you call a shitbox system that Ryles cleared up pretty quickly. 
Werimu Greig 
Jack Cini 
Momosia 
Murchie
Isaac Lumelume
Michael Oldfield …"
31 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Rabz S's discussion Official: Parramatta Eels upgrade Teancum Brown
"Cameron Bamblett and Chris Petrus. Bamblett has played fullback/five-eighth and was the Australian schoolboys fullback last year. We pinched him from Penrith.
Chris Petrus is a barnstorming backrower and turned the match last week when he came off…"
32 minutes ago
Mitchy replied to Rabz S's discussion Official: Parramatta Eels upgrade Teancum Brown
"BA did well for the club and reached his peak IMO; we then paid too much $$ for certain players including forwards and hence lost too many younger players. Hindsight says we need to continually bring on some kids while allowing others to leave.…"
34 minutes ago
RustyNuts replied to Rabz S's discussion Official: Parramatta Eels upgrade Teancum Brown
"Any other hidden gems about to burst on the scene? SG Ball seem to be flying at the moment. I'm trying to keep my eye on Koina. Hoping he can make the next step being a son of a former player and a qlder."
45 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels demand the NRL hand over all information relating to its involvement in the Lomax saga
"There is no doubt in my mind that the Eels have already floated the Barnet / Lomax swap, in documents to the Warriors, it will in my opinion be raised at court on the 13th March as a way to show that the Eels are actively trying to find a suitable…"
45 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Rabz S's discussion Official: Parramatta Eels upgrade Teancum Brown
"Brad arthur didn't debut jnr paulo 
Brad arthur didn't debut Matterson 
Jake Arthur - no comment 
Khafusi he should never have been let go as with Utokimanu who ba chose to sign Alvaro rather than give Utokimanu a go"
56 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Rabz S's discussion Official: Parramatta Eels upgrade Teancum Brown
"Reed Mahoney (we didn't poach him, he was released and we picked him up). So what's that, 8/17. pretty close to half. 
Interestingly, some of the key players in that 2022 grand final side, all played in Parramatta's 2017 Under 20s grand final:…"
57 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels demand the NRL hand over all information relating to its involvement in the Lomax saga
"PVL and Abdo weill not be going anywhere. PVL said it himself when he was first appointed chairman of the ARLC - the NRL is entertainment, not sport. 
We all know ther NRL is corrupt. But it is a law onto itself. If the governing body wants certain…"
1 hour ago
Eelovution replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels demand the NRL hand over all information relating to its involvement in the Lomax saga
"jjeel, your comments might be valid under the past regime. In Matthew Beach, as chairman, the policy is club first and foremost. Take us on at your own risk because we are not taking it anymore. Have a look at the player negotiations, e.g., Brown-…"
1 hour ago
Mitchy replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels demand the NRL hand over all information relating to its involvement in the Lomax saga
"Seriously, we as a club have taken a stand here and I applaud them and I bet many other clubs have been clapping in the background too.The NRL change the rules to suit them and the bigger clubs; when have they done Parra any favours? SFA"
1 hour ago
iamnot replied to Rabz S's discussion Official: Parramatta Eels upgrade Teancum Brown
"Half the GF side? From my memory, out of the top 17, the only players that came through the Parramatta development pathways system were 
3. Will Penisini
6. Dylan Brown
10. Junior Paulo
13. Matterson
15. Jake Arthur*
16. Oregon Kaufusi
17. Marata…"
1 hour ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Rabz S's discussion Official: Parramatta Eels upgrade Teancum Brown
"If development is part of a coach's KPIs he will focus on it. If it isn't, he won't. Half the 2022 grand final side came through our pathways."
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Rabz S's discussion Official: Parramatta Eels upgrade Teancum Brown
"Ea is the king of development.  The club need to give him some sort of role"
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2118

 

Eels interested in Barnett

Parramatta are interested in Mitch Barnett. Now at 33 in 2027 and coming off ACL, good idea? Having Paulo and De Belin being 34 and 36 respectively is it good to have that much age? Ryles wants a Paulo replacement that can lead the forwards, Barnett…

Read more…
83 Replies · Reply by Poppa 11 hours ago
Views: 1791

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>