Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"💯 "
3 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Maybe thought Ryles being from there he would be fair and reasonable and instead has told them to bend over while he shoves their proposal up their arse."
7 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Money won't do it the Roosters can match that in after football options.I'd give us about a 10% chance.Understood the nrl are clowns for even wanting any part of this argument.They should be the ones with the popcorn enjoying the show as there's…"
16 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"A fair player swap would be ideal, but they don’t always eventuate. Exhibit A: When the Storm refused to release JAC. A swap was talked about for years. Never happened. JAC had to accept the contractual terms until its end."
19 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"So I believe one of the reasonings from the NRL would be Newton's claim that no player should be used as a piece to get another player over to their club without them wanting them to. They will claim no Melbourne players wanted to go to Parra. 
Our…"
29 minutes ago
Stevo replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"HAHA I dont think they expected the kind of fight that has come to them, very intertested to see how this all pans out
 "
31 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Does anyone remember this?
"Using the media to pressure is one thing, but V'landys can’t force the club in any lawful way. He’d want it resolved, yet his public silence to date is telling. Out of character. Legal escalation would drag this out and be worse for him and Lomax."
36 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Yeah pretty much. I wonder how the relationship between Ryles and Bellamy is now? Ryles seems to be holding his ground as well as everyone at the club. Good to see there is no looking after mates here.
"You won't give us Zac for nothing? Peter!…"
37 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Seriously mate you are the one off base here. Parra hold all the cards. Lomax is costing us nothing. Why allow a SOO and Australian winger go to Melbourne which make Melbourne a whole lot better, a team we have to play against and possibly compete…"
39 minutes ago
Stevo replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Take your own advice and scroll on if you dont like what you see
 "
40 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Do we know for sure? 1.2 million reasons to sign with Parra. lol I was being a bit facetious to be honest but I really don't see what the NRL can offer to situation other than try and strong arm us"
46 minutes ago
Stevo replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Parra and the Storm arent warring, its a case of Parra not giving the Storm want they want so the Storm went crying to V'Landys to fix it for them"
46 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Geez I'd love to see what you would all be saying if Parra was the one trying to sign Suaalii and the chooks had a clause. We currently have nothing. We could get something. It's not harder than that. Stefano would be amazing, Blore + an outside…"
52 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Does anyone remember this?
"Well forcing us? well they will lose fans from the game. if we say ..."
57 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to LB's discussion Lomax's management confident of deal
"100% blue eel "
1 hour ago
Mark Laurie's butler replied to LB's discussion Lomax's management confident of deal
"We can't be forced to do anything. Take us to court. Everything is in our control. "
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1935

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 243

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>