Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Eli Stephens replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"Why would anyone be complaining, this was originally what his release was for. Glad it's over lol "
17 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kemp: Eels vs Storm R1 refereeing was 'Disgraceful"
"Considering the following night where Jenkins lost the ball in the tackle when it went forward and was called back? Funny who the team was that benefitted from it.
I mean it seems they don't even try to hide it anymore, it is like they think "Fans…"
21 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"Nope, this is exactly what we were demanding. Now he goes off to Rugby and Melbourne don't get an international."
22 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"Though i have said i disagree taking the Melbourne deal, i do agree we missed out not getting something for him."
23 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"But what take a player that Melbourne would rather debut two players ahead of just to get something for him? Meanwhile strengthening Melbourne in the process?"
24 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"I disagree, Melbourne get stronger and we get nothing. Vaalepu and Pahulu weren't even near the 19 for Melbourne. I would rather him not benefit Melbourne more than take any 1 of those 2 players."
25 minutes ago
RB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"How dumb could our club possibly be. Should've taken Melbournes offer."
34 minutes ago
Bubba j replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"Good I don't want to hear his name again up there with the worst signings of all time"
37 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"Exactly! It's a big ask for clubs to want to deal with him for swap deal esp after season start, rosters set after he showed his extremely bad form. Hope everyone remembers he signed a contract that he then immediately said he didn't believe we…"
45 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kemp: Eels vs Storm R1 refereeing was 'Disgraceful"
"Yes well if you don't respect possession,  you end up without the ball and no chance of getting an advantage through penalties "
1 hour ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"No one should complain now, I said we should take what we could get while we could. We got pumped by all the players that everyone said weren't good enough for a trade. "
1 hour ago
Longfin Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kemp: Eels vs Storm R1 refereeing was 'Disgraceful"
"The NRL want Penrith to be successful, because if they are not, fans stop coming to games and tuning in. Brisbane's a bit like Parra in that fans will go to games regardless of how well their team is going."
1 hour ago
Mallee57 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"Oh well it could be worse. "
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kemp: Eels vs Storm R1 refereeing was 'Disgraceful"
"Daz, IMO, kicking earlier in the set with an agressive kick-chase would have been a better strategy than trying to get around them and force passes when on the back foot. The Storm feed off errors and momentum."
1 hour ago
Strange-eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"This
 "
1 hour ago
macybrown replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"What he ought to have done in first place. Reality strikes hard!"
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2181

 

1eE Modern day Eels team: Winger (redo)

Jim Dymock is the Lock Forward, meaning the starting 13 is now complete bar the last Wing spot which was a tie between Luke Burt and Eric Grothe Jr.Now bias is Burt i hope gets it, i mean who would think Burt is my favourite all time player? Weird…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 39

1eE Modern day Eels team: Lock

Nearly at the starting 13, Manu Ma'u just scraped by with one vote over Beau Scott for the other Second-Row spot next to Nathan Hindmarsh.Now onto Lock forward.After this i will do one revote on the final wing spot between Eric Grothe Jr. and Luke…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 80

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>