Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

KENDOZA replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Walters couldn't coach a bear to shit in the woods. Deadset dribbler"
48 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Why Academics Suck
"Reason 2,457"
53 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Knowing Walters, he is only backing V'landys to keep his Aussie coaching job."
1 hour ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"I noticed in a video of 1st grade players wishing younger teams good luck that Talagi and Flether were signed out by many players by name in the video message.
Does that mean they have spent more time with the NRL side to build these relationships…"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"You will get "you heard it hear first" credit Blue....Cannibal Zac"
2 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Hoe , another great summary and viewpoint, Love it.
Does anyone else think that V'Landys has shown his hand with Walters coaching the NRL owned inaugural Papa New Guinea Chiefs with Zachary Lomax as their first Marquee signing. mmmm cynical much."
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Why Academics Suck
"Poupou, now you just divert to other unsubstantiated claims, rather than address the counter-example of the  lawyer example I provided and which you claimed was invalid. 
This is shoddy argument on your part by being unable to warrant the specific…"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"You're as lame as a no-legged dog"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Why Academics Suck
"Poupou, you think academics "speaking outside the narrow remit" are the worst offenders for speaking outside their remit?"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Speaking of NRL backflips...
"with theNRL backing down this week from its push to give teams the choice to receive the ball if they concede." ...These head office moneybugs are feeling the pressure.
 "
2 hours ago
LB replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"I was there to watch HM as my wife's friend had their brother playing in the Wests team, we are local so had a look. 
Bell was good, Capovilla was fine but nothing overly special in this game. Seu Seu was class in a lot of his runs"
2 hours ago
LB replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Though Russell coming through was seen as a toiler type Fullback, not this flashy player. Bamblett seems more flashy.
Russell though in attack is ok, in defence he is quality at Centre."
2 hours ago
LB replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Could there be a little bit of comfortability? He knows he is in Cup soon and more likely play NRL soon so no need to impress etc?
Or is he prone to being off in games.
Or is he the big 'O' word, overrated?
Koina looks the goods at least."
2 hours ago
LB replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Yes this is the game I referred to. He scored a double on debut. He was nowhere near as filled out as he is now."
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Great blog and really well laid out, especially the sequencing of events. I guess we will have to wait and see, it feels like we have a strong case, especially if we acted first, I'm just not confident justice will prevail as the Storm have a knack…"
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Ryan Matterson Concussion - Rumoured
"Headknocks can do that to you"
3 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2040

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 316

 

Eels' 2026 Backline?

To those with knowledge of the Eels' lower grades, do the Eels have players coming through in the outside backs who might be within 1-2 years of a) breaking into first grade, and/or b) have the potential to be star outside backs?I think the Eels'…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Yehez 4 hours ago
Views: 393

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>