Bathurst

Who is looking forward to the big race?

I followed the touring cars as a kid and was a Dick Johnson tragic, but I lost interest when he retired and all the cars started looking the same. Drivers were swapping teams between Holden and Ford and I didn’t follow it for decades.

When Dick Johnson joined with Penske, I found myself sucked right back in again and I am to the point now that I love it.

So, grab ya Winny Reds, a stezza with some Acca Dacca on it, ya favourite flanny and GO SCOTTY McLACHLAN!!!

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I still watch it. But don't really have the interest like I used to. As you say, all the cars are the same now and it used to be a lot more chaotic when it wasn't part of the championship as you had privateers in all sorts of cars lining up for that one race against the pro teams. 

    Plus, I was a Peter Brock fan for so long, followed him from the HDT days, then in his various Mobil 1 Racing cars (Commodore, BMW, Sierra then back to a Commodore, then I started follwing HRT when he joined them in 1993. When HRT folded and merged with Triple 8 Racing, I lost interest in that team and started following David Reynolds, mainly because of his stunner of a missus. 

    • Yes, Ms Reynolds is quite the catch for Dave.

      I am enjoying watching the Mustangs succeed and they are very different looking to the Holdens.

      Man they look awesome and I hope that we see a couple of Mustang drivers on the podium.

      Chaz Mostert is smashing it this year and may be a smokey.

      • Mostert Looks the goods at the moment

        • This reply was deleted.
          • The pussy wagon has driven like the stereotypical woman driver 

            • This reply was deleted.
              • Bathurst never fails to deliver. And no refereeing controversy. I was on Reynolds all day, and until that last safety car, he was right there. Always love watching Bathurst no matter who wins

  • Scott McLachlan's win is tarnished in my eye's, the tactics emplyoed by team Shell to blatantly hold back the field with their 2nd car during a safety car period robbed Van Gisbergen the opportunity to be in the lead for the final few laps.  He had a 10 secong fuel advantage which means he would have come out in the lead after the final pit stop.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Coryn, we assume you are a kiwi ( male or female ? ) Once your over your gloating dive in the surf at  Bondi and keep going, it's a short swim.

    • Coryn your just dirty your parents gave you a girls name, time to move on mate.

    • Fancy a kiwi calling Aussies battlers . 

      • This reply was deleted.
        • We know nz is good at rugby, we know there good at rugby, we know there zzzzzzzzzzz.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

The Captain replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"It definitely opens the doors for more counter attack for teams who have that attacking prowess. It'll be interesting to see who uses it to their advantage, I could see the Broncos or the Dolphins using this well.
Balanced teams probably don't get…"
36 minutes ago
Frank The Tank replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"The NRL are fast becoming the ALP of sport.
Introducing laws (rule changes) for the sake of it. The reason they change so often is because the stuffed it up in the first instance. Fuck.....leave the game as it was please, it's not broken."
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"1 i really like,  - Teams can sometimes keep the ball for 15 minutes and kill the opposition with fatigue  In the NFL scoring teams have always kicked off, it makes more sense 
 
2. I like.  I think it will suit Parramatta having more depth than…"
1 hour ago
MeelK replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"Captain this is an interesting one. Will teams forced to kick off after scoring start to kick short more often? From memory the short drop outs are close to 50/50 now."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"Also, not a big issue just awkward if you name a debutant on the bench but there is a chance they might not get on the field if there is an injury in a spot like backline.
Like imagine that hahah, here you go mate you might debut off the bench."
1 hour ago
MeelK replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"I agree Sloth, I think 2 and 3 are good changes. Not sold or fussed on the other two."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"That's the thing it will be hard in certain areas. Firstly as you mention do the 18th and 19th men need to sit out of NSW cup? If so that's not good for development if they aren't playing most weeks. Coaches wouldn't want to play someone like Joash…"
1 hour ago
The Captain replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"When you have a try scored against you, you get to decide whether you want to kick to the opposition or to receive from their kick on the restart after the try.
The intent is to stop endless momentum as you can choose whether you want to attack or…"
2 hours ago
The Badger replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"Do you think these extras will back up from reserve grade or be fresh? 
If fresh, will clubs now need more halves etc? Can't see many just in case halves playing much if they are just bench warmers. Still a few questions to be had I think."
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"They just cannot fucking help themselves
 "
2 hours ago
ParraEels replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"I don't understand the kick off rule. Can someone explain it"
3 hours ago
The Badger replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"Soon these boffins at NRL HQ will be setting lines of scrimmage and having conversions from in front for 1 pt ...just so TV in US pay a more for games screening at 3am."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"Yeah Kickoff one is not overly egregious, but is it necessary? Just creates an added thing where majority of the time the opposition will want the ball as each side always wants.
Rest i have no issues with. Rather just have a 19th man and leave…"
3 hours ago
Bob Smith replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"Meh, ok I s'pose. "
4 hours ago
sloth replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"1. Kick off rule seems unecessary, but not a biggie since it's only an option for the conceding team. Guess we'll see if any teams figure out a way to take advantage of receiving.
2. Bench changes are good. Makes it less punishing to have specialist…"
4 hours ago
Roy tannous replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"These rules are good except the kickoff"
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
13 Replies · Reply by Darren Munro on Sunday
Views: 1698

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 146

 

Let's Ask !!

I find myself sitting around watching the cricket after the Christmas Festivities, and I'm stewing on the perception that we are missing out on real talent that our coach wants, and missing out with way too much regularity and consistency. The…

Read more…
44 Replies · Reply by The Badger yesterday
Views: 1314

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>