Eels Blogs

Replies

• • • • • • • • • 

                  Randy Handlinger > Poppa January 30, 2026 at 12:40pm

                  I would hire a guy that is just as big...ummm.errr..The call to your mate may be cut short by the ashtray's arrival.

                  V'handys wants WWE. Lets give him a show. Drag him into the ring and hit him with a fucking chair till he goes tits-up.

                  Hoe commented on how NRL is at the intersection of BIG monied interests. I disagree. V'landys has made himself that intersection, personally. When traffic is not flowing as it should be what is to be done? Tear the fucking thing up and install a better one. No-one gives a shit about  the actual intersection, just that it works properly...(PS. it is not working properly)
                  • 

                    Bob Smith > Randy Handlinger January 31, 2026 at 2:03am

                    This contravenes code of conduct number 5.
                  • 

                    Randy Handlinger > Bob Smith January 31, 2026 at 9:14am

                    
          • 

            Clintorian > Randy Handlinger January 30, 2026 at 11:09am

            Same Randy, just taking action in itself is a win for me. I wish I shared your optimism in the Courts Poppa, but historical bias doesn't have me feeling too confident. We. Will. See.
            • 

              Poppa > Clintorian January 30, 2026 at 11:52am

              I don't want to prolong this as we have all said our peace but what "historical bias" exists in the courts? Jarryd Hayne took him 3 goes to get it right, we might take it to "appeal" if we lose and are not being satisfied for the reasons why....... For the same reasons the NRL maybe behind us, its a disaster for them if we lose!!! cannot emphasise that enough!
              • 

                Randy Handlinger > Poppa January 30, 2026 at 1:23pm

                So you can appeal a state Supreme court decision now? 

                To who?
                • 

                  Poppa > Randy Handlinger January 30, 2026 at 5:12pm

                  You can appeal a Supreme Court ruling, typically by taking the case to a higher court such as the Court of Appeal (a division of the Supreme Court) or the High Court of Australia. Appeals generally require demonstrating an error of law, new evidence, or a miscarriage of justice. Strict time limits apply, and some appeals require special permission  to proceed. 
        • mongolian trotting duck > Clintorian January 31, 2026 at 3:05pm

           pretty sure the nrl dont have any shares of melbourne anymore
          • 

            Poupou Escobar > mongolian trotting duck January 31, 2026 at 4:53pm

            The Storm is owned by a consortium of wealthy business owners:

            Executive Management | Storm
      • 

        Poppa > LB January 30, 2026 at 11:18am

        

        Notwithstanding all the rhetoric LB and assume you are right. Would Zac believe it is in his interests to continue to persue the case legally (without Storm's involvement) as it then gives him rights to negotiate with anyone......within the NRL, the only body he currently  cannot deal with. I assume his lawyer will decide if its in his interest's to persue.

        If ZAC has half a brain he would negotiate with Parra (assume they would listen to his plea) and discuss a contract to finish the year with Parra having a club option for another period. That at least would provide breathing room for all parties......I can see our fans going beserk over this but they left Simmonsson off the hook, stranger things happen?

        PS Lomax would start in Reserve Grade?