Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • That was the point of putting this up. If we went into the knit picking of this game you will find that around 9 times in the game the Warriors were were given the olive branch from the refs, while we were given it 3 times, if I remember correctly - it was something like this. The point is we won the game regardless of al the crap reffing going on. 

      • This reply was deleted.
        • This reply was deleted.
  • Who cares, he had to slow down to catch it, he caught it way in front from where the ball was passed, it was called a forward pass and you move on. It could have been the winning pass. We would be here saying, look how it travelled forward. Again, who cares we move on. Bring on the Dragons!!! 

  • It went a little forward from the point he threw it but maybe was not forward relative to where he would have been if he kept travelling at the same velocity. 50/50 decision by the same refs and linesmen that missed an obvious Warriors knockon that led to their second try and was a major turning point in the first half. The refs seemed to make a bad decision and then try to even it up and were constantly chasing their tails trying to even up

  • Ball came out of his hand backwards then floated forward. Play on, try, warriors win.

    • You can’t say Warriors win. There was still 4 minutes left and we play the last 4 minutes completely differently if we were behind. Parramatta has probably been on the wrong end of these sort of calls no less than 4 or 5 times this year. The referee ruled on this and he was in the best position anyone in the ground was to rule on it. They are in a no win situation here. The bunker can’t rule, they alone have to make a decision. If he lets it go on, plenty of Parramatta supporters would be unhappy if wasn’t ruled forward. 

      • Warriors win.

  • thought it was a try live

  • Forward to me.

  • It was forward. I have seen Foxtel footage illustrating exactly where the players were when the ball was passed and where it was caught. The player catching the ball is at least two metres in front of where the ball left RTShek’s hands.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"I wonder if the Abdo/vlandys blowtorch was still warm from when Gus got it applied to the Tigers re: Galvin"
2 minutes ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Is this a start of a revolution? Will the little man now feel empowered to dictate more fairness? 
I remember someone saying the NRL will punish us by having games fixed against us, though fans will click on. We are not dumb, though they believe we…"
22 minutes ago
Anguillidae replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"No, he won't be weazling his way out of this - he's in it up to his eyeballs. We've well and truly shone a torch light on the dodgy deals and preferential treatment that we knew was happening, but just couldn't prove it. It's fantastic."
23 minutes ago
macybrown replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Only reason I can possibly see nrl backed storm is possibly due to them having a contract signed in portal before discussions per our agreement with Lomax...again unjustified but to help the guilty and their seemingly pally party out. Coz storm…"
41 minutes ago
More…