Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • That was the point of putting this up. If we went into the knit picking of this game you will find that around 9 times in the game the Warriors were were given the olive branch from the refs, while we were given it 3 times, if I remember correctly - it was something like this. The point is we won the game regardless of al the crap reffing going on. 

      • This reply was deleted.
        • This reply was deleted.
  • Who cares, he had to slow down to catch it, he caught it way in front from where the ball was passed, it was called a forward pass and you move on. It could have been the winning pass. We would be here saying, look how it travelled forward. Again, who cares we move on. Bring on the Dragons!!! 

  • It went a little forward from the point he threw it but maybe was not forward relative to where he would have been if he kept travelling at the same velocity. 50/50 decision by the same refs and linesmen that missed an obvious Warriors knockon that led to their second try and was a major turning point in the first half. The refs seemed to make a bad decision and then try to even it up and were constantly chasing their tails trying to even up

  • Ball came out of his hand backwards then floated forward. Play on, try, warriors win.

    • You can’t say Warriors win. There was still 4 minutes left and we play the last 4 minutes completely differently if we were behind. Parramatta has probably been on the wrong end of these sort of calls no less than 4 or 5 times this year. The referee ruled on this and he was in the best position anyone in the ground was to rule on it. They are in a no win situation here. The bunker can’t rule, they alone have to make a decision. If he lets it go on, plenty of Parramatta supporters would be unhappy if wasn’t ruled forward. 

      • Warriors win.

  • thought it was a try live

  • Forward to me.

  • It was forward. I have seen Foxtel footage illustrating exactly where the players were when the ball was passed and where it was caught. The player catching the ball is at least two metres in front of where the ball left RTShek’s hands.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"I know it's a tough balancing act, but how long does he wait to be 'developed'? The rest of the year or the next as well? 
He'll be out of here if we continue to tell him he's not good enough and then we start our search all over again.
If he really…"
2 minutes ago
JC replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"I expect he will get a run at some point in the back 3rd of the season most likely off the bench at first. It all depends on how the team is playing , if they are getting flogged every week i suspect it's less likely he gets thrown to the wolves."
3 minutes ago
Bubba j replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"Can't see him wanting to play 6 at Parra he wants to be the 7 so no hope I would re sign Volkmann now myself showing genuine improvement and won't break the bank so we can sign a centre and front rower "
7 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"Cmon, it looking likely that we'll be out of the running by around round 18. Surely if he's the one, Ryles will get him into the systems on the feild with Moses.  It would be a great opportunity going into 27 to give him reps.
If he sticks with…"
11 minutes ago
More…