You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Pops, well said. This statement is brilliant.
It calmly and factually frames the narrative and reveals what the club has quietly tolerated and patiently endured with Team Lomax, exposing a dynamic that private negotiations never could.
It surgically…"
It calmly and factually frames the narrative and reveals what the club has quietly tolerated and patiently endured with Team Lomax, exposing a dynamic that private negotiations never could.
It surgically…"
"So glad this is going to court I like this.
Jim and the club from the very beginning have made there point of view on this matter very clear.
They haven't got sucked into the media circus and comment around it.
They have a legally binding agreement…"
Jim and the club from the very beginning have made there point of view on this matter very clear.
They haven't got sucked into the media circus and comment around it.
They have a legally binding agreement…"
"Kudos to the club, Jim Sarantinos, and Matthew Beach for taking the bull by the horns after Team Lomax gave the NRL-registered agreement the middle finger.
The pressure-cooker for Lomax starts today in the Supreme Court, symbolically, at high noon.…"
The pressure-cooker for Lomax starts today in the Supreme Court, symbolically, at high noon.…"
"One thing I do know is, sometimes the courts work in mysterious ways. You could have your T's crossed and i's dotted and still the courts find a way to punish you. Only winners here are the lawyers."
Replies
That was the point of putting this up. If we went into the knit picking of this game you will find that around 9 times in the game the Warriors were were given the olive branch from the refs, while we were given it 3 times, if I remember correctly - it was something like this. The point is we won the game regardless of al the crap reffing going on.
Hahaha nice
Who cares, he had to slow down to catch it, he caught it way in front from where the ball was passed, it was called a forward pass and you move on. It could have been the winning pass. We would be here saying, look how it travelled forward. Again, who cares we move on. Bring on the Dragons!!!
It went a little forward from the point he threw it but maybe was not forward relative to where he would have been if he kept travelling at the same velocity. 50/50 decision by the same refs and linesmen that missed an obvious Warriors knockon that led to their second try and was a major turning point in the first half. The refs seemed to make a bad decision and then try to even it up and were constantly chasing their tails trying to even up
Ball came out of his hand backwards then floated forward. Play on, try, warriors win.
You can’t say Warriors win. There was still 4 minutes left and we play the last 4 minutes completely differently if we were behind. Parramatta has probably been on the wrong end of these sort of calls no less than 4 or 5 times this year. The referee ruled on this and he was in the best position anyone in the ground was to rule on it. They are in a no win situation here. The bunker can’t rule, they alone have to make a decision. If he lets it go on, plenty of Parramatta supporters would be unhappy if wasn’t ruled forward.
Warriors win.
thought it was a try live
Forward to me.
It was forward. I have seen Foxtel footage illustrating exactly where the players were when the ball was passed and where it was caught. The player catching the ball is at least two metres in front of where the ball left RTShek’s hands.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next