I had to talk about this.
Our second rowers are complete and utter uselless
Kautoga:Is going backwards gives away to many penatlys terrible defence to many errors.
Tuilagi:same as kautoga
and matterson,lane and Cartwright are not any better
All the experiments our coach has tried with our second rowers has never worked cause there all terrible.
you look at every teams second rowers and there 100 times better then our terrible second rowers.
If im ryless im going straight on the market for second rowers.
Replies
Guymer and Kautoga didn't miss a tackle the other night, so there defence has improved, but they were pretty average in attack, i still think both of them would be better suited in the middle & coming off the bench.
Latu should debut soon, so should Matele.
Both are poor in attack. Also their miss tackle count does not tell the full story on their defence. Their tackles particularly Guymer last game were passive and as a result we had no ruck control. Real shame cause Guymer is meant to be all about aggression and intent. Seems to be struggling to keep up with the speed of NRL which would be further emphasised since he is a middle and not an edge.
Kautoga has zero discpline.
Sign David Fifita blog incoming from some muppet. Because it was mentioned on 360.
This might unpopular for some on here but Kelma has all the qualities to be a dynamic back rower for us. Yes he has some defensive deficiencies but I believe these can be coached much easier than the abilities he possesses with ball in hand. Ryles has already made some headway with his defence by dropping him after some awful displays earlier in the year. He had an average start against the tigers but then somehow miraculously lifted to have a very very good game. His intensity in defence when we went down to 11 men was top shelf. Anyways just don't think Kelma should be written off just yet. A work in progress
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 5 Next