You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I would take Lomax back as he is better than any other option at the club or on the market. The risk isn't that Lomax won't be committed or will ruin morale and what Ryles is working on, I think the risk is the circus towards the end of 2027 and…"
"I'm not fussed either way but if doesn't come back we need to sign another experienced outside back, we have zero depth with proven first grade experience. "
"The money would need to be a bit lower .you cant make a fool of your boss ."
"His manager definitely lead him a stray, but damage is done unlucky "
Replies
Sharks don't want him. He's a forward under 30.
I don't know that I'd be making comments like that one Super, given our history of signing over 30s forwards in recent years ....
How many forwards over 30 have we signed? Beau Scott, Vave and Watmough in the past 6 seasons?
T-Rex - 29
Mannah - 30
Vave - 33 (31 when we signed him)
Matagi - 30 (28 when we signed him and now overseas)
Evans - 26
Terepo - 26
Tepai - 22
Alvaro - 25
Ma'u - 29
Niukore - 22
Gower - 32 (28 when we signed him)
I've maintained that anyone claiming we have some kind of retirement home for ageing forwards is complete BS and someone looking for a lazy excuse as to why we've struggled this year.
Ive thought all along we are a good chance to get him, id not be suprised if you are right here Tone
I don't know if he will make our squad unless we lose Vave and possibly a couple of our backrowers.
Paulo, Mahoney, Tapau
Lane, Moreoa
Brown
Reserves
Nuikore, Mannah, Alvaro and a Utility is a handy pack indeed except it means no Vave,Mau and Evans.
I think you need a spot for Terepo as well
He specifically said "may yet come" poppa....context mate :)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next