Manu Vatuvei Jailed for 3 Year's 7months

Ex-NRL superstar Manu Vatuvei has been sentenced to three years and seven months in jail for importing drugs, marking a stunning fall from grace.

The former Kiwi international and Warriors winger was charged with importing methamphetamine into New Zealand as part of an “unsophisticated” drug ring.

Vatuvei’s brother Lopini Mafi has been sentenced to seven years and two months for his role in heading the operation.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
  • Poor bastard, Manu.

    Was he just a stooge who had a few bucks but "the communal money pot" was quickly finding more and more ways to be diminished? So they all put their  heads together to come up with this crazy scheme where they could all become rich. Net Result 3 years, 7months. The judge could clearly see who was the mastermind, hence big or small sibling gets 7 years, 2 months.

    Apparently, when mastermind hears young siblings whack is just 3 years, 7 months, he says in the judges hearing " that's nothin' Manu. I could do that on my head. The wise old judge having heard the bravado before says to Lopini, That's good to hear Lopini, I'll give you another 3 years, 7 months to get back on your feet. 7 years, 2 months. That should get your balance back "eh bro"?  

    • It freaks me out how many ex footballers are selling illegal substances. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Blue Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Hoe , another great summary and viewpoint, Love it.
Does anyone else think that V'Landys has shown his hand with Walters coaching the NRL owned inaugural Papa New Guinea Chiefs with Zachary Lomax as their first Marquee signing. mmmm cynical much."
4 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Why Academics Suck
"Poupou, now you just divert to other unsubstantiated claims, rather than address the counter-example of the  lawyer example I provided and which you claimed was invalid. 
This is shoddy argument on your part by being unable to warrant the specific…"
6 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"You're as lame as a no-legged dog"
8 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Why Academics Suck
"Poupou, you think academics "speaking outside the narrow remit" are the worst offenders for speaking outside their remit?"
16 minutes ago
More…