Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench

    • From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery 

      • Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him. 

        I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.

        • Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.

      • He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.

        • No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker. 

          • I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities. 

            • Yes well I gathered you'd like a hooker off the bench 

          • How do you know he can't defend at hooker?

            • Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!
"Shizumu  沈む ..... "to sink" or "to go down""
3 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R11 Game Day Blog, Magic Round v Storm: Trauma and Redemption (L34-8)
"Saying I “make it complicated” is a bit ironic when your argument keeps shifting between different explanations depending on the point you’re trying to make.
I’m not complicating it, I’m just separating roles and how things actually work in an NRL…"
5 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion Same
"I bet you're fun at parties"
5 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R11 Game Day Blog, Magic Round v Storm: Trauma and Redemption (L34-8)
"There are scapegoats and they can be a valid tool when used judiciously to ensure something more important is not lost in a popular Witch
Anyone at the Eels who is punted at the end of the year could cry "scapegoat" because our problems are bigger…"
6 minutes ago
More…