Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench

    • From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery 

      • Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him. 

        I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.

        • Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.

      • He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.

        • No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker. 

          • I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities. 

          • How do you know he can't defend at hooker?

            • Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion Real Reason Parramatta Coach cut Zac Lomax Loose
"Chiefy, is this the same Chiefy who has BA and Coryn living rent free in his very vacant head.....the same one that just said "he's gone and your still blabbering on" LOL. 
Want to add Lomax to that group, I suspect there is space left, given we are…"
2 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion Real Reason Parramatta Coach cut Zac Lomax Loose
"You don't actullay know that Adam...... you have view. thats fine. You didn't want JAC either if you remember or any player that may have a "stain" on them...... Horses for courses Adam.....I could bet you support the Greens as well."
6 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Blue Eel's discussion Real Reason Parramatta Coach cut Zac Lomax Loose
"Pops, we can talk about this for hours, lol. His carries, skill, and passion won’t be replaced like-for-like; he was our Haas-Coates lion-hybrid. Our Thor hammer as you say.
But he needs to figure out what he actually wants to do. Boxing? French…"
38 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Blue Eel's discussion Real Reason Parramatta Coach cut Zac Lomax Loose
"Yeah well he's gone and you're still blabbering on. 
You can't prove the contract amount that Lomax signed on for, and it was stated he was on 800 at the dragons.  Common sense says only a fool would think he'd sign here for 650. .  
If he was on…"
1 hour ago
More…