Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta

 31053260657?profile=RESIZE_710x


Zac Lomax has reportedly engaged a lawyer in an attempt to secure an unconditional release from the Parramatta Eels so he can join the Melbourne Storm.

It’s believed his legal team will argue that the situation is unfair and that their client now simply wants to play rugby league — despite the fact that only weeks ago he indicated he didn’t want to play at all. Chasing money often comes with consequences.

It’s unclear which lawyer he has approached, but you can expect plenty complaints and noise to follow. 

For mine Lomax fought against the Parramatta club in a bid to get out of the contract he chose to sign. This left the Eels in a no win situation, as  if we had forced Lomax to play against his will, that usually doesn't end well.  But Lomax left the club in a predicament, with more cap dollars with minimal recruitment opportunities available in his position.  We were banking on him to fulfil his 4 year deal.

 We made the commitment,  he broke the commitment.   Either we get a like for like player from the Storm or its no deal Eddie.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • non compete clauses are legal and relevant in this case

    • It's not a restriction of trade if he comes back to the NRL and plays with Parra as per his contract and release conditions.

      its only a restriction if we don't let him sign with other teams and refuse to sign him ourselves, then we're restricting his trade.

      • The only problem with that is, we have used his money to buy Pezet and Kelly, plus more than likely upgraded some players, possibly juniors.  We might be forced to re-sign him, or release him. We might only be able to offer him half of what he was on, then the NRL will block it.

        • We used about half of dylan browns money to sign pezet for 1 year.

          • We have that money available to sign players for 2027 and beyond, including Lomax if we wanted to.

  • Let's see what sort of stuff V'landys is really made of. I'm hoping he surprises me. I won't hold my breath though, with Melbourne involved...

  • It would be in the NRL's best interest for the NRL to be providing Parramatta with whatever support it needs to defend this. Otherwise, V'Landy's 10 year threat is doomed if R360 does indeed get up. 

  • He will be in the Melbourne colours 100%.

    It's the vibe, it's the constitution, it's just the vibe...

    • Too much legal stuff behind it, the release was made with restrictions. If storm offer up a origin level player I'm sure a swap can be done tho. Can't be that difficult to work out a deal if they are that interested in him 

      • Doesn't have to be an Origin player, I'd take any of the Storm's backline players on a multi-year contract to swap with Lomax. Coates, Warbrick, Howarth, Meaney... come on down!

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Really cause Kautoga has been paired with Pezet on the left, Williams rotating into the middle with Tuilagi. Ryles started Kautoga all year and Tuilagi and Williams filled in the gaps.
Could be wrong but I don't see it at this stage.
Also what…"
5 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Strangest part about the Lomax situation.
"very talented guy but obviously is unsettled and doesn't know what he wants to do. Ryles picked up on that pretty quickly and just shoved him out the door basically lol "
10 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Strangest part about the Lomax situation.
"That's exactly right that last comment I mean if you are going to comeback Melbourne or alike is where you go but like you mentioned he better have his head on straight there as they won't be putting up with his shit that's for sure.
First sign of…"
14 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Thx Nitram. Do you think it true that because the Eels only applied the non-compete to the NRL, and otherwise did not stand in the way of Lomax going to Rugby (etc), any restraint of trade argument might fail due to demonstrated intent?"
15 minutes ago
More…