Important site update

So I posted this last week in the Site News area but that gets little traffic. I'll post it here instead.

We now have the ability to @mention members in the comments like you can on all other social media sites. You just type the @ symbol and begin typing the name of the member you want to mention and you'll get a list of members to choose from.

Why is this important?

For one, it helps knowing exactly who a comment is directed at.

Secondly, I encourage you to use it to help with moderation. If you @mention me I will get a notification and I can go to view the issue. I'm still available on PM as per normal, but if you're concerned about something and you don't want to have to go through messaging me then you can use the @mention.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Impressive.

    Kudos Sir SuperEel 22 Hail King Arthur 

    • CarloEEL2 

      very intelligent and looks soooo young for 46

      like that ?

  • Chiefy ....just wanted to try it

  • Super, you need help with some other Mods.  Not a criticism, just a fact.  You cannot be on here 24/7 and you have a life and I am sure we all respect that.  Just food for thought.  This weeks activities on the site show it.

  • Tbh I thd GUI wax much better before.  Was on the site way more before It changed.

  • >Blogs takes you to "Eels Blogs".

    >Eels blogs takes you to "all discussions"

  • @Sir SuperEel 22@Hail King Arthur ,your moderation is  about as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike.

  • @Grunta hi

  • Poppa do you want a w(h)ine with your cheese and crackers?

  • The Captain makes me question my sexuality. Is it possible to be too good looking? If so, he is.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
2 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
4 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
5 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
6 hours ago
More…