Grounding the Ball - Try Interpretation

Just wondering what are others thoughts on the rule of 'Grounding the Ball interpretation for scoring a try' The reason I ask is that some of the tries I've witnessed lately over the past few seasons and in particular this year are somewhat dubious in comparison with years ago. It appears it's getting that way if a player even looks at the Ball it's grounded. There is no more real emphasis on firm downward pressure on the ball. Why, even a finger tip is acceptable.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Saw it too. It's deplorable. Some of the great older league players like Ray Price and Co must be laughing at some these tries. 

    • If you’re referring to CNK’s first try, his arm carrying the ball never touched the ground and there was always momentum in the tackle. Fair try IMO. 

  • Downward pressure is downward pressure. The rule book doesn’t specify how much, just that it needs some sort of downward pressure.

    The problem has been since the introduction of the video ref, it analyses it to the Nth degree.

     

  • Grounding of the ball imo is controlled grounding with the hands , hand forearm grounding is uncontrolled imo

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"One thing to remember out of this process and it is very apparent in Bronco supporters I know.....don't forget on face value they are sceptical that Parramatta are capable of actually developing anything...LOL
Ok, lets step back and say that Pezet…"
2 minutes ago
Parra2win replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"Where is Lomax going, no where atm - it's all talk and Garrick hasn't signed either - not sure what your talking about Coryn"
15 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"I don't want to face any of these consequences if we lose Lomax, once Lomax position is established I would then plan gthe next stage with what we have.
Without Lomax, what we have is not going to be good enough, why cannot we have the Lomax answer…"
16 minutes ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Papenhuyzen Quits Storm
"A few games a year for R360 is perfect for him.  He won't be getting smashed by defences 20 times a game and wt paid more.  Smart decision then he can retire few years earlier with same money "
22 minutes ago
More…