Grounding the Ball - Try Interpretation

Just wondering what are others thoughts on the rule of 'Grounding the Ball interpretation for scoring a try' The reason I ask is that some of the tries I've witnessed lately over the past few seasons and in particular this year are somewhat dubious in comparison with years ago. It appears it's getting that way if a player even looks at the Ball it's grounded. There is no more real emphasis on firm downward pressure on the ball. Why, even a finger tip is acceptable.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Saw it too. It's deplorable. Some of the great older league players like Ray Price and Co must be laughing at some these tries. 

    • If you’re referring to CNK’s first try, his arm carrying the ball never touched the ground and there was always momentum in the tackle. Fair try IMO. 

  • Downward pressure is downward pressure. The rule book doesn’t specify how much, just that it needs some sort of downward pressure.

    The problem has been since the introduction of the video ref, it analyses it to the Nth degree.

     

  • Grounding of the ball imo is controlled grounding with the hands , hand forearm grounding is uncontrolled imo

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"The issue what your finding here with the constant TOer is continually swapping out combinations.You can't compete that way we've got to keep these guys together for as long as possible.I mean right now if true not only are you losing Pezet in 27…"
9 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"Nailed it Chief. "
9 hours ago
The Captain commented on HKF’s status
"Unfortunately you can't fix stupid and bored - two attributes these destabilizing morons have in spades.
We only have to look at the Tigers if we want a reminder of what happens when you let power hungry, unintelligent and inexperienced people run…"
10 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"I can only guess that The bears offered somewhere around 550k, and we didn't want to get into a bidding war for a player who is replaceable.  Russell doesn't have good athletic ability for an outside back, and our for and against suffered for it in…"
13 hours ago
More…