Rumour on Sky Sports Radio this morning, there's a few senior players not happy Jan about super coach BA extending. I'm sure some can work out who they are.
Views: 2493
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
So you take the 2 names Simmoeel0891 posted as being the disgruntled payers and you assume that's correct; even though he didn't provide any proof or a source. Then you carry on with the rumour as if it's true by justifying it with your own rational. What's even worse, you and others discuss it as if it's fact.
Can't you see how you're just adding to the noise without saying anything?!?!?
Can confirm that this is absolutely not true. I know a lot of the fans are a bit indifferent towards BA(myself included), but I know a few players in the team and they've all told me that the players absolutely love BA. I guess there's a lot that we don't see behind the scenes, but the players love him.
Ah NRL journalism, where everything's made up and the points don't matter.
On the plus side it's nice that the articles about the Eels are all rumour-mill contract stuff and we haven't had any players involved in anything dodgy (touch wood).
The money that Penrith were contributing drops off which is why the option is in RCGs favour for '23. There is also an option in Parra's favour if RCG takes up the option for '23. This is why RCG is not taking up the option. RCG is happy at Parra but is likely to get more money if he renegotiates
I could make something up right now and Bang !!!!!!! @ A rumour is born. Some people seriously need to find a rewarding life instead of attacking our club and coaches non stop... Its tedious and getting damn boring.
"I think the club is more invested in trying to lock Burton and Spencer up before that can move to getting a centre could be young/star for whatever is I don't mind."
"Poppa, the players identified in our centres and backrow just appear on that worst of the worst list re: player contribution. The data is the data. On the RLET he does give a caveat that bottom performing contributors can be the victim of problems…"
"How can Kelly be when he was not bought to start. Originally it was a back 5 of Iongi, Simonsson, Penisini, Russell and Fox. Without injuries he ain't starting."
Replies
So you take the 2 names Simmoeel0891 posted as being the disgruntled payers and you assume that's correct; even though he didn't provide any proof or a source. Then you carry on with the rumour as if it's true by justifying it with your own rational. What's even worse, you and others discuss it as if it's fact.
Can't you see how you're just adding to the noise without saying anything?!?!?
Yawn.....
Scott
RCG had player option so no offer required. He didn't take it.
He wants a longer contract from 2023 - that is all.
RCG is not off contract, he had an option in his favour which he declined.
Can confirm that this is absolutely not true. I know a lot of the fans are a bit indifferent towards BA(myself included), but I know a few players in the team and they've all told me that the players absolutely love BA. I guess there's a lot that we don't see behind the scenes, but the players love him.
Ah NRL journalism, where everything's made up and the points don't matter.
On the plus side it's nice that the articles about the Eels are all rumour-mill contract stuff and we haven't had any players involved in anything dodgy (touch wood).
Classic Drew
Guthos isnt one.....
Moses either....
Or Jnr....
Thats leaves the rest.
The money that Penrith were contributing drops off which is why the option is in RCGs favour for '23. There is also an option in Parra's favour if RCG takes up the option for '23. This is why RCG is not taking up the option. RCG is happy at Parra but is likely to get more money if he renegotiates
What a load of crap...............
I could make something up right now and Bang !!!!!!! @ A rumour is born. Some people seriously need to find a rewarding life instead of attacking our club and coaches non stop... Its tedious and getting damn boring.
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
of 9 Next