Dunneman, Arthur and players' choice

I thought someone would have pointed this out before but here goes. Senior Canberra players had a falling out with Furner and they reacted by wanting his replacement Dunneman for the permanent coaching position. Senior Eels players had a falling out with Kearney and reacted by wanting his replacement Arthur for the full-time gig. Neither were cool rational decisions.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I don't really get your point

    • I am saying the players were so relieved to get rid of Furner/ Kearney, they could have easily over-estimated the ability and communication skills and rapport of their replacement. It is human nature. Over a full season, when the going gets tough, they might have second thoughts if Arthur is coach. That is called cognitive dissonance and it is real.

    • Can't afford to go through this again. Need to make the right decision now! I just hope they respect the coach and the coach expects respect back!
  • They could have 2nd thoughts about any coach mid way through the season. What's your point? It's at least a good idea to start the season with a coach players are positive about and are keen to play under.

  • JT is the one for us.
    But the board are a bunch of tossers
    • Mac, are you going to be ok if BA is coach? We all know how badly you wanted JT.
    • I'm ok with BA. He was my second choice.
      Some people are taking this situation way too lightly.
      The person who gets picked to coach us has to get us back where we belong. I personally think JT is the man to exactly that. He's the players choice and the fans choice.
      I never get my way with parra coaches. I never wanted Hagan, I never wanted Kearney and never wanted Ricky Stuart.
  • x2 Mac, JT would be great but i am really warming to Arthur.

  • In reality no one knows how a new coach will perform or how the team will perform with the new coach.

    Lets just patiently wait until after the GF and then back the team and the coach. Most likely BA.

    Then at the end of next year we will be in  a better place to judge how things are going.

    This is no different to signing a player, we've seen high profile players come and not perform, so lets just wait and see.

    Personally, every step is a step closer to a Premiership.

  • It's a simple case of good cop, bad cop, The head coach comes across as the bad cop laying down the law to the players, punishing them if they don't perform to expectation while the assistant coach is the good cop encouraging the players and being supportive of them in their hour of need. The assistant coach doesn't have the same level of  for the team to succeed as the head coach does so generally is more relaxed and easy going hence the players warming to him.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Blaize the only positive
"Agree NOS. It's beyond baffling we didn't even seem to raise a finger to get Bennett, though sadly not totally surprising. It was a nice dream, and ironically the board's best hope of on-field success & getting the best out of what we have.
The only…"
1 minute ago
The Badger replied to SEQld Eel (formely NZ Eel)'s discussion It's time to build a team that we can be proud of again!!!
"I think you answered your own point, the club won't do anything with negative financial implications.
We can certainly tell blokes like Sivo, Matterson, Lane etc now that the club will not be renewing their contract and hope their management seek a…"
5 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Matt Doorey
"If Gutho is good to go, Blaize prob NSW cup flb and let him learn I guess ?"
11 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Magic Round 11 v Melbourne: In the Eye of the Storm
"Though NOS, your insight and level headedness is much needed in this time as many here are very reactionary, including myself. Need someone to come in and be sane."
11 minutes ago
More…