In the first 18 minutes of the 1st half. 

1. Raiders forward shoulder charge in a tackle = no penalty to Rabbits

2. Raiders voluntary tackle = no penalty to Rabbits

3. Rabbits back forces an involuntary line drop out, ball and arm hits the ground behind the try line = Raiders knock the ball out and are awarded a try. 

WTF

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Na, let them play

  • Raiders forwards are doing nothing. Souths are matching them easily. 

    • Rabbits are getting on top but both sides look tired. Wonder if the week off will favour the rabbits during the 2nd half, probably 60 minute mark onwards? 

  • This reply was deleted.
  • Sorry Choccy, fantastic game, let the players sort it out, just let them play.

    And anybody who thinks the game should outlaw stripping, I present that last 40 minutes, every possession was a contest, nothing was a given. It was brilliant.

     

    • Agreed about the ball stripping and the 2nd half entertainment. It was a very good game. Still think a foul is a foul and the refs were not doing there job in the 1st half. Souths bombed a few try opportunities in the 1st half and could have been up 14 to 18 nil - raiders try was not a try. 

  • The Roosters and Melbourne were light years ahead of other sides this year. I know Raiders beat Melbourne but everything went there way including a dropped ball in the last minute to win. It was similar to 2017 eels performance except they won.  They won’t beat them again. Parra were not far off Raiders or Souths but were never going to beat Melbourne or Roosters in a finals game. 

    • 100%.

      Watching this game, I can’t help but think what might’ve been. We definitely have more weapons in our arsenal than both these sides put together, it’s just a shame the raiders beat the Storm first week.

       

      • Storm wanted Raiders to beat them. The Storm are better without a week off.

  • South's are doing well playing without a halfback,  Reynolds is ghosting his teammates 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

iamnot replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Strangest part about the Lomax situation.
"I'd be interested to know if Schifcofske has been breaking the NRL anti-tampering laws, both old and new. He manages both Lomax and Papenhuizen. 
It had been clear for some time that Papenhuizen was not likely to be playing NRL in 2026. Injuries had…"
6 minutes ago
HKF replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Brown at 7? Typo."
1 hour ago
EA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Good depth if Russel, Guymer and Doorey can't make the 19."
1 hour ago
EA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Iongi
JAC
Kelly
Penisini
Simmo
Pezet
Brown
Paulo
Smith
Hopgood
Williams
Kautoga
JDB
TDS
Walker
Moretti
Tuilagi
Papalii
Tuivita"
1 hour ago
More…