In the first 18 minutes of the 1st half. 

1. Raiders forward shoulder charge in a tackle = no penalty to Rabbits

2. Raiders voluntary tackle = no penalty to Rabbits

3. Rabbits back forces an involuntary line drop out, ball and arm hits the ground behind the try line = Raiders knock the ball out and are awarded a try. 

WTF

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Na, let them play

  • Raiders forwards are doing nothing. Souths are matching them easily. 

    • Rabbits are getting on top but both sides look tired. Wonder if the week off will favour the rabbits during the 2nd half, probably 60 minute mark onwards? 

  • This reply was deleted.
  • Sorry Choccy, fantastic game, let the players sort it out, just let them play.

    And anybody who thinks the game should outlaw stripping, I present that last 40 minutes, every possession was a contest, nothing was a given. It was brilliant.

     

    • Agreed about the ball stripping and the 2nd half entertainment. It was a very good game. Still think a foul is a foul and the refs were not doing there job in the 1st half. Souths bombed a few try opportunities in the 1st half and could have been up 14 to 18 nil - raiders try was not a try. 

  • The Roosters and Melbourne were light years ahead of other sides this year. I know Raiders beat Melbourne but everything went there way including a dropped ball in the last minute to win. It was similar to 2017 eels performance except they won.  They won’t beat them again. Parra were not far off Raiders or Souths but were never going to beat Melbourne or Roosters in a finals game. 

    • 100%.

      Watching this game, I can’t help but think what might’ve been. We definitely have more weapons in our arsenal than both these sides put together, it’s just a shame the raiders beat the Storm first week.

       

      • Storm wanted Raiders to beat them. The Storm are better without a week off.

  • South's are doing well playing without a halfback,  Reynolds is ghosting his teammates 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Gucci replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"No, Kelly wouldn't be on $650k or $700k. I would swap him with Matto, the difference in player salaries between the two would be greater towards us. We would have the difference on our cap but the swap would be player for player, we keep our top 30…"
8 minutes ago
Frank The Tank replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"That's also right. Why are we paying for a recruitment team that doesn't actually recruit? All they seem to be doing is re-signing players already at the club and promoting jnrs or others from within.
Save the $300k or $400k & fuck off MON and his…"
11 minutes ago
Frank The Tank replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"Precisely this.
If he hadn't signed elsewhere then he is the best since Hayne.
Roosters signing him says the kids got a lot of potential and I say this not actually having seen him play - just trust the roosters talent identification over ours."
14 minutes ago
EA replied to tyler's discussion ANY MORE SIGNINGS???
"I compare him to W Blake in the sense he has great athletic ability but just not footy ability."
25 minutes ago
More…