1Eyed Eels, NRL 3rd part Deal.

I know it’s a dream, but we have 3,939 members, each put in $ 50.0 per year.. Gives us $ 196,950.00.

Interesting?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Tipping comp? Haha
  • If we put in a 100, we could double it.
  • It's actually not far off a shorts sponsor...
  • Tipping comp sounds interesting..

  • No doubt id be in
  • Hey spanner I thought that first up but it's right. Don't make this a war of spanner vs snapper
  • And by the way Snapper I think this is an excellent idea, I'm in
  • I'll happily accept your sponsorship, cheers .... oh wait ..... 

  • Johnny buys an apple for 50cents. How any apples can he buy with $1?
  • Why do your dreams involve mathematics?
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
23 minutes ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
2 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
3 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
4 hours ago
More…