Replies

    • "They won't reveal the evidence until they reach court knowing the MSM & democrats would descend on witnesses like a cloud of locusts", probably straight from a source as reliable as Steve Bannon or someone from Qanon. 

      The only thing Powell and Giuliani will be dropping next week will be the unsupported by any evidence court case they are trying to push, as much chance as pushing shit uphill. Giuliana might drop his dacks if he thinks he's half a chance of getting some sweet young thing to respond positively to his undeniable sexual charms.

       

      • Oh I dunno.... I suspect Rudy might also drop some coin on getting new hair dye next week.

    • bigley. I think Rudy used the very same term in his arguments to the federal court.

      The Rudester: Your Honour, this election was stolen by the Democrats. The dead have risen and are voting Democrat.

      Judge: Do you have any evidence to present?

      Rudy: Yep. You're about to find out bigley all the evidence we have.

      Judge: Great. Where is it?

      Rudy: Oh, you want it now

      Judge: That would be useful.

      Rudy: Er..... Did you know married my second cousin? How cool's that?

      Judge: Good for you. Case dismissed.

  • 8202318667?profile=RESIZE_930x

    • That's right TAD.

      It's all bravado, confidence and puffery for the cameras, Twitter and YouTube: fraud, fraud, fraud, we have solid evidence. For the country. Then in court: No your honor, No fraud, no evidence; we just want to throw out some votes.

      There's appearances, then there's reality.

      They're running out of time to find some real evidence. They won't be able to stop the Election's certification without something solid.

    • If they can find some real evidence that is court worthy I'll listen, and say well done. But, atm, it's all inciteful jabber and toxic games that isn't heathy for a country already divided.

      • It is sad HOE.while this is all going on Rome burns. Lots of people with families are going to hurt with significant long-lasting Covid illnesses and death. For what??

        • Yes it is, mate. I've a friend in the US who was living alone & suddenly vanished from our lives earlier this year. I've since found out he's on a ventilator, on death's door. His father also died from COVID in Asia. Meanwhile, many conservatives think COVID is BS.

          • Yes HOE Just imagine one of your family dieing from something like this when Doctors are saying one thing around precautions and significant others are saying it's all B/S..You see a mass of people ignoring these warnings and you think if they can do it so can I. Totally irresponsible. Any sensible leadership would follow expert advice you would think..I can never get my head around why people will follow an amateur's advice over a life and death issue over a big body of professionals..Leadership is at an all-time low. in some countries. One of those what is more important money { immediate gratification} or life.{long term anguish}.

             

            • Yep true, TAD. IMO, COVID was a tipping point as to why Trump lost. The thing is, he knew how dangerous & complex Covid could be. He gambled & lost. You know I don't like Biden, but Trump has lost the plot with this toxic circus now. I expected more from him.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Adam Magrath replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Yeah not much, wouldn't hurt to approach the league if the bears actually want him and see what arrangements (if any) could be made that in some way benefit us. I had a giggle to myself over how you described the Pezet signing the other day."
25 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"The depth is the biggest issue Coryn. Simonsson goes down, which based on form of late and every year he has been at the club is bound to happen, we have nothing. Only Tago with 8 NRL games experience. That is it for Wingers."
32 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Well that's what i wonder about the transfer fee, what does it do for us?"
34 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Did you not read my blog? I mentioned it was brought up by me so others do not try to make a story out of it."
34 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Well he says now he is over rugby league, or is it he is over playing Wing? Many say he is a loss, he is but many act like our title chances are now gone completely without him. 
But Ryles being so comfortable and calm with him leaving says a bit…"
35 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Whatever you do BE boycott handing your hard earned Jesus I pity fans that hand over there hard earned to these jokers to have them pull the rug out from under you most years.Haven't bought a Parra jersey since 09.The blue pirtek job which I still…"
38 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"So my mum is involved with it being an Eels fan but knowing acquitance, like me, linked to Lomax. She keeps saying Lomax was led astray by his management. Though i always reply he is a grown man, he was able to decide whether the risk was worth…"
42 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"It's a key spot and regardless of what's being said and portrayed here.The coach and club are putting a brave face on here.They need something better than Simonsson whose not a bad player but we no what we have there.Lomax is a potential match…"
55 minutes ago
Gucci replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Played Origin and for Australia. Whats higher than that?"
1 hour ago
GM replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Thanks mate "
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Oh I wouldn't worry GM about Pops too much, if he is engaging with you that means you've had something to say, and something worth responding too. Thats just as valuable on this site as anyone else's opinion.
👍"
1 hour ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Reached the highest level ? He saw himself as a centre and reluctantly played wing . There is nothing surer than him getting sick of rugby sooner rather than later and going somewhere else from there . Who cares where players like him don't win…"
2 hours ago
iamnot replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"You're right. He looked done with rugby league before he got to us. He's not looking at coming back at all. "
2 hours ago
Gucci replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Sell his contract rights to a team with cap space and something to offer us. Raiders or Roosters. We dont want Toby Sexton or some Superleage Centre no other clubs wanted. Otherwise keep him out of the game until 2029.
Although, in all seriousness,…"
2 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Being the new club, do the bears get some sort of salary cap concessions? Given his release conditions I'm wondering if we could get some sort of cap relief in exchange for him going there?"
2 hours ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Im not worried about him at all.
Theres nothing going on upstairs with the bloke. His yardage game is elite but 9/10 decisions he makes on the field are the wrong one. He had more decisons to make at centre and was hopeless. His defence is ordinary.…"
3 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>