Pill testing

So what are everyone's thoughts on the whole pill testing debate?

The way I see it, pill testing is akin to being half pregnant. You can't have something be legal, but essentially make provisions to allow it.

However, I have a solution.

Ban rave music.

Clearly any music that is so shit, that you have to be completely off your face to enjoy it is worth is a menace to society. Get rid of it, and you not only stop driving people towards drugs, you solve the simultaneous problem of the noise pollutions that stems from duff duff music pumping out of cars at ridiculous volumes. There must be enormous public health benefits in that alone.

Problem solved.

I'm 1Eyed Eel, solving all the world's tough problems. You're welcome.

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Phil I could not agree more with you .the man that is promoting the idea of pill testing apparently lost his son to drugs and I feel very sorry that it happened to him and his family but his son had a choice and he took the wrong one the same as anybody that takes drugs .as you say drugs are illegal if you are stupid enough to take them then be prepared to pay the consequences.and before anybody’s says unless you have been affected in some way by drugs my family and I have but luckily our situation had a favourable outcome.but getting back to the actual pill testing how many do you think would go to the tent or what ever to get there stuff tested .and if they did the police wounld not be doing their job if arrests weren’t made as you said Phil drugs are illegal 

    • Agree, I honestly can't see the logisitics of it. If you're of a mind to take the risk of popping these pills, is anyone seriously going to line up to get their pills checked. 

      The main people I would see who would use it, would be the people who are on the fence of whether they should do it or not. And giving them the green light that is safe, is going to push those who might have otherwise been more cautious the ok to go and do it.

  • Why not get serious about catching the dealers & put them away for a very long time. It seems the penalties handed out are for too soft so the dealers just keep on dealing. They earn a fortune out of selling the crap then get a slap across the back of the hand. Now they want to test their product to make sure it's safe. IT"S NOT, that's why people are dying. Build a massive jail out in the sticks somewhere & send them all for a long stay far away from family & friends. Make their life HELL & see who wants to get into selling it knowing there is a good chance they will be locked up for a long time.

    • Agree totally their coach .plus if people would only wake up to them selfs and not take the crap .but we all know that won’t happen 

    • I think in all these cases where people do the wrong thing occasioning death, these crimes have to be treated as, at least manslaughter. I personally think they should be considered full-blown murder because there is no accident about it. They're very deliberately making the decision to sell something that they should know could kill someone.

  • The other thing I don't understand - it looks like you can buy quite inexpensive personal pill testing kits.

    https://testkitplus.com/

    So if these things are quite accessible, and you need these to get you through a rave, how is it so difficult to buy your bills before-hand, test them yourself and away you go. 

     

    Why trust dealers? It only makes sense to test your drugs before taking them. Test kits for MDMA (Molly), Cocaine, Speed, Ketamine, LSD and more.
  • I have no issue with pill testing. They tried it last year at Grooving the Moo in Canberra and it worked. It's clear that trying more and more punitive measures isn't working. People will take drugs regardless. 

    It's about trying to prevent people dying. 

    Now you can say, well just don't take drugs. But we've been saying that for decades and people are still taking them.

    Where are you in the injecting rooms Phil? There have been 1 million people through the Kings Cross room with no deaths. I don't see anyone campaigning to close it down.

    Now sure, target dealers and suppliers as much as you want. But pill testing is about more than just taking drugs. It's a way to prevent deaths as well as get front line contact with users. 

    Advocating for harsher penalties and the like is out of touch and isn't working. There's evidence from Europe that pill testing saves lives. Like I said, Grooving the Moo showed people would get their pills tested if those facilities were available. 

    No one goes to a festival trying to kill themselves. We have a way to try and prevent that, so why not try it? Because at the moment people are dying and the government is sitting on its hands.

    • Elliott, that is absolutely no proof to say that the Canberra trial "worked".

      Nobody died at the FIeld Day event, does that mean increased police presences worked. You can't say something work because something that could have happened, didn't happen.

      Injection Rooms are different. These people are addicts. Pill poppers aren't addicts, they're just doing it recreationally.

      Quite frankly, if you die willingly doing something dangerous, you deserve to die. I have zero sympathy for people who do something they know is dangerous, and surprise, surprise, they die.

      I'm not asking for people to can-test my energy drinks, am I? I know it's doing bad shit to my body, but I still do it, and I'm prepared to wear whatever consequences arise for that. I don't want to be protected.

      As I said, I can't see how pill testing doesn't do anything but help more people experiment with drugs. To be quite honest, if on the ocassions where I've had the opportunity to do these kinds of drugs, if I'd have had pill testing, I'd probably have done it. I haven't because I know one bad pill and you're fucked, so that danger factor is really a very valuable preventative measure to stop people doing something that has bad social consequences. That's why you don't try it, because it can cause more harm than good.

      • Pill testing isn't about greenlighting drug use necessarily. It's about providing a way to try and reduce the risks associated. 

        Now just telling people not to do something doesn't always work. People are going to take drugs. It's a fact. And at the moment we're not really doing anything about it other than threatening people with harsher punishments. Which aren't really working.

        Those home kits you suggested? They're often inaccurate, providing false positives and negatives. 

        Pill testing is more than just testing pills at festivals. It can be used to gather important information on drugs use, act as a way to better educate the community while also acting as a warning system if a bad batch of drugs are detected.

        How can we take an evidence based approach if we're unwilling to try pill testing? The arguments against seem one of three things. Black and white, idealistic or purely out of touch. But none of them can cite research saying pill testing does harm to the community. 

        The EMCDDA commissioned a report on pill testing in 2017. It's up to you guys to read it. But it provides a good amount of information on how and why the pill test in Europe.

        https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=ht...

        http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/attachments/6339/EuropeanResponsesGuide2017_BackgroundPape…
This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

iamnot replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Fitzy had no idea how to build ongoing success, or build sucess at all. He was politically strong and connected, that was it. He ensured the club constitution was setup in a way that made it very hard to boot him out of office.
He got extremely…"
1 hour ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"That's the entire purpose of our junior development now. The entire focus is on those juniors. We have now got the largest junior investment in the competition. And that's what is partially frustrating about these discussions saying "where's our big…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"They were when the club was a development first that's the difference what we were then is what we are trying to get back to I suspect.
Those 09 and 22 appearances tells you all you need to no about the club they aren't consistent and until we get…"
1 hour ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"2001? A squad built over a 5 year period culminating in one of the best NRL era teams of all time that fell at the final hurdle. The team that beat the defending premiers in the preliminary final.
2005. Again, a squad rebuilt following 2001 and a…"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"This is it if you want sustained success it's the club across every level that is strong not just a coach or a particular administrator that's the key for success here we have to be top of class in the key categories and have the people that are the…"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"101, take your meds or hand the phone to the other person who posts on your account.....I like them better"
3 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"How can you say we 'should have' made a grand final in a given year? When have we ever had the best or second best squad in the comp? Not since 1986. Any year we've made the grand final since then, we've overachieved."
3 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"BA had enough support, if not all were convinced. Not many clubs sack a coach immediately after a GF. But after it, there was a nuanced change in strategy up-top, which may have affected BA & seems to align with his emotional flatlining — when his…"
4 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"LB, do you get the feeling JR is ultimately aiming for a reasonably high footy IQ six? Not just your archetypical "running" six who can defend and has some ball skills.
Think his connection with Pezet. Walker. Iongi. He chose Junior over RCG. Foxxy…"
4 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Thats the bit that upsets me, we should have sacked BA after that GF for not taking it seriously. That 2020 squad should have also made the GF, same the 17 squad as well. "
4 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Well i can say we are going in the right direction, not rushing in to buy or sign anyone. Just annoyed over the 22 GF and that BA era. It really did upset me on how we handle the GF week and day and i just blame those at top that we should have been…"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"I do not know much on Fletcher either but i wonder if he is in the awkward spot of Moses still has another 4 years left and Fletcher could be looking at FG in 2 years. Does he wait? Or can he be a 5/8?
Overall of course you pick the best player out…"
4 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Defensively fragile and in free-fall post 2020, it's an illusory narrative, self-trickery, that we should have built on the 22' GF. It was an inevitable fall under the Jeckyl-Hyde defence and unadaptive coaching systems of the previous era."
4 hours ago
LB replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Right and the same board that brought Ryles in. I am not letting board off the hook as i have stated im holding my judgements til end of 2026 to see if it is working or not. I feel we would benefit from someone like Brian Smith at least with some…"
5 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Because this board was the same board that got us in the mess, we should have been on a roll after 22. Yet we signed duds and kept BA at the helm for too long. Ryles comes in and parra start to play better than they have in the past 20 years go…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"So we are going in the right direction but the f the board? How can that be the case? Like saying this VW golf is the best car i have ever driven, engineers did a great job but f*** VW. 
Doesn't work that way, if we somehow won a comp are you still…"
5 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>