Pill testing

So what are everyone's thoughts on the whole pill testing debate?

The way I see it, pill testing is akin to being half pregnant. You can't have something be legal, but essentially make provisions to allow it.

However, I have a solution.

Ban rave music.

Clearly any music that is so shit, that you have to be completely off your face to enjoy it is worth is a menace to society. Get rid of it, and you not only stop driving people towards drugs, you solve the simultaneous problem of the noise pollutions that stems from duff duff music pumping out of cars at ridiculous volumes. There must be enormous public health benefits in that alone.

Problem solved.

I'm 1Eyed Eel, solving all the world's tough problems. You're welcome.

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Phil I could not agree more with you .the man that is promoting the idea of pill testing apparently lost his son to drugs and I feel very sorry that it happened to him and his family but his son had a choice and he took the wrong one the same as anybody that takes drugs .as you say drugs are illegal if you are stupid enough to take them then be prepared to pay the consequences.and before anybody’s says unless you have been affected in some way by drugs my family and I have but luckily our situation had a favourable outcome.but getting back to the actual pill testing how many do you think would go to the tent or what ever to get there stuff tested .and if they did the police wounld not be doing their job if arrests weren’t made as you said Phil drugs are illegal 

    • Agree, I honestly can't see the logisitics of it. If you're of a mind to take the risk of popping these pills, is anyone seriously going to line up to get their pills checked. 

      The main people I would see who would use it, would be the people who are on the fence of whether they should do it or not. And giving them the green light that is safe, is going to push those who might have otherwise been more cautious the ok to go and do it.

  • Why not get serious about catching the dealers & put them away for a very long time. It seems the penalties handed out are for too soft so the dealers just keep on dealing. They earn a fortune out of selling the crap then get a slap across the back of the hand. Now they want to test their product to make sure it's safe. IT"S NOT, that's why people are dying. Build a massive jail out in the sticks somewhere & send them all for a long stay far away from family & friends. Make their life HELL & see who wants to get into selling it knowing there is a good chance they will be locked up for a long time.

    • Agree totally their coach .plus if people would only wake up to them selfs and not take the crap .but we all know that won’t happen 

    • I think in all these cases where people do the wrong thing occasioning death, these crimes have to be treated as, at least manslaughter. I personally think they should be considered full-blown murder because there is no accident about it. They're very deliberately making the decision to sell something that they should know could kill someone.

  • The other thing I don't understand - it looks like you can buy quite inexpensive personal pill testing kits.

    https://testkitplus.com/

    So if these things are quite accessible, and you need these to get you through a rave, how is it so difficult to buy your bills before-hand, test them yourself and away you go. 

     

    Why trust dealers? It only makes sense to test your drugs before taking them. Test kits for MDMA (Molly), Cocaine, Speed, Ketamine, LSD and more.
  • I have no issue with pill testing. They tried it last year at Grooving the Moo in Canberra and it worked. It's clear that trying more and more punitive measures isn't working. People will take drugs regardless. 

    It's about trying to prevent people dying. 

    Now you can say, well just don't take drugs. But we've been saying that for decades and people are still taking them.

    Where are you in the injecting rooms Phil? There have been 1 million people through the Kings Cross room with no deaths. I don't see anyone campaigning to close it down.

    Now sure, target dealers and suppliers as much as you want. But pill testing is about more than just taking drugs. It's a way to prevent deaths as well as get front line contact with users. 

    Advocating for harsher penalties and the like is out of touch and isn't working. There's evidence from Europe that pill testing saves lives. Like I said, Grooving the Moo showed people would get their pills tested if those facilities were available. 

    No one goes to a festival trying to kill themselves. We have a way to try and prevent that, so why not try it? Because at the moment people are dying and the government is sitting on its hands.

    • Elliott, that is absolutely no proof to say that the Canberra trial "worked".

      Nobody died at the FIeld Day event, does that mean increased police presences worked. You can't say something work because something that could have happened, didn't happen.

      Injection Rooms are different. These people are addicts. Pill poppers aren't addicts, they're just doing it recreationally.

      Quite frankly, if you die willingly doing something dangerous, you deserve to die. I have zero sympathy for people who do something they know is dangerous, and surprise, surprise, they die.

      I'm not asking for people to can-test my energy drinks, am I? I know it's doing bad shit to my body, but I still do it, and I'm prepared to wear whatever consequences arise for that. I don't want to be protected.

      As I said, I can't see how pill testing doesn't do anything but help more people experiment with drugs. To be quite honest, if on the ocassions where I've had the opportunity to do these kinds of drugs, if I'd have had pill testing, I'd probably have done it. I haven't because I know one bad pill and you're fucked, so that danger factor is really a very valuable preventative measure to stop people doing something that has bad social consequences. That's why you don't try it, because it can cause more harm than good.

      • Pill testing isn't about greenlighting drug use necessarily. It's about providing a way to try and reduce the risks associated. 

        Now just telling people not to do something doesn't always work. People are going to take drugs. It's a fact. And at the moment we're not really doing anything about it other than threatening people with harsher punishments. Which aren't really working.

        Those home kits you suggested? They're often inaccurate, providing false positives and negatives. 

        Pill testing is more than just testing pills at festivals. It can be used to gather important information on drugs use, act as a way to better educate the community while also acting as a warning system if a bad batch of drugs are detected.

        How can we take an evidence based approach if we're unwilling to try pill testing? The arguments against seem one of three things. Black and white, idealistic or purely out of touch. But none of them can cite research saying pill testing does harm to the community. 

        The EMCDDA commissioned a report on pill testing in 2017. It's up to you guys to read it. But it provides a good amount of information on how and why the pill test in Europe.

        https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=ht...

        http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/attachments/6339/EuropeanResponsesGuide2017_BackgroundPape…
This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Michael W. replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Lomax will line up against Fox, and Fox will burn him. Unless they play him in the centres."
19 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Don't need Blore, we have an abundance of edge players."
26 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"He will start with Williams and Tuilagi in the second row, then Williams will go to the middle and Kk will go to the left edge. He won't go with Williams and KK to start."
34 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"I was thinking JDB would start at 13 and either Walker would replace him, or he'd move to prop when Junior needed a rest. He can hold the defence in the middle without Junior which has been a weakness. Then he'd come back on wherever we'd need him…"
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"I know Junior's retiring soon, but I think Tuivaiti will be ready to take his place at the end of the year and we'll have him, Hopgod, and Moretti at prop"
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Doorey will be in the mix too. I have a feeling he's in for a big year."
1 hour ago
Alfred Mateo replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Buzz Rothfeild SMH - A Howarth Lomax Swap Deal?
"Spot on Mace!"
1 hour ago
KENDOZA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Agreed coryn. People don't realise the roosters went hard for him but chose parra"
3 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"1.longi 2.kelly 3.penisini 4.howarth 5. Fox 6.pezet 7.moses 8. Hopegood 9.smith 10.debelin 11.kit kat 12.williams 13.junior 14.desilva 15.walker 16.tuilagi 17.tuivati."
3 hours ago
Darren Munro replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Worse comes to worse parramatta takes him back and make him honour his contract. Screw Melbourne.  I would take coates or no one. They don't get to choose. Even if lomax wins in court. The nrl are within there rights to not registered his…"
3 hours ago
KingGutho replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"1: I Longi
2: B Simonson 
3: W Penisini
4: B Kelly
5: J Addo Carr
6: J Pezet
7: M Moses ( c ) ( gk )
8: Jr Paulo 
9: R Smith 
10: J Hopgood 
11: K Tuilugi
12: K Kautoga 
13: JDB
 
14: T Silva
15: J Williams ( edge, middle )
16: S Tuivita 
17: D…"
3 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"agree if our centres can defend ...we in for a reasonable year "
4 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"lomax against us be interesting..... tip Rylesy ...look for the Muster kick to the wing.......ffs what a team I support "
4 hours ago
GM replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Bailey is very good, he needs to stop bitching and get on quit, not sure he is much better than Kelly, Kelly more elusive and Bailey plus the collision game "
4 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"When he's healthy he's been one of our better players on the wing. 200+ metres and strong as. Just hope his body holds up cause he will be good "
5 hours ago
ScottX replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Agree Russell should go to the extended bench to be used in case of backline injury. But will Ryles follow last years example? He did use Brown as 18th man but only late in the season when semis were out of reach. I'd like to see it done earlier.…"
5 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Tin Tim Jan 1, 2026
Views: 1844

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 187

 

Rnd 1 team vs storm

1.Isaiah iongi 2.Bailey Simonsson 3.Will pensini4.Brian kelly5.Josh addocarr6.Jonah pezet7.Mitchell Moses 8.Jmaine hopgood9.Ryley smith10.Junior paulo11.Kitione kautoga12.Jack williams13.Jack debelin 14.Tayln da silva15.Dylan walker 16.Sam…

Read more…
31 Replies · Reply by Michael W. 19 minutes ago
Views: 606

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>