Off-season - Covid & Vaccination Discussion

Ladies and Gentlemen, 

With it being a significant part of current affairs, if there is a need to discuss Covid during in the off-season, it can be done here. Hence, there is no need for another Covid blog, unless it is related to the NRL or other current affairs issues.

Super wants to allow for some freedom of speech and sharing of ideas, not muting adult discussions - especially as it's the off-season. As long as it doesn't go too far and any sparring doesn't get below the belt.

For more info, please refer to the COC

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • The so called experts over reacted , prove me wrong. 

    • This reply was deleted.
      • Brissy stay away, just sit back and enjoy what Daz did to the  "jerk circle" I have never seen discussion's on here so methodically taken apart and to quote Daz, saying he see's it like "blood sport" was an understatement.

        It was like watching a professional in the ring taking on the "yocal" amateurs!

        • Poppa if you blow Daz any harder on a daily basis, your lips will fall off.

          • Gee! that might make me a "poofter" or is it "poof" can't remember!

          • Poppa , you do realise when Frank The Tank called Daz a poof he wasn't talking literally . 

            • Of course Wiz, doesn't look like Snake saw it that way but LOL

        • You mean he was dissected by Wiz 

          6/0, 6/0, 6/1 in an awesome display of tennis with sublime ground strokes and serving.

    • What’s the point in educating our people when those that remain uneducated become suspicious when the educated surpass their level of ability to understand.

  • MonsieurEel here is a copy of your post asking for Prof. Daz's opinion:

     

    "I added the WHO link to the conversation within the context of my previous post (in which I commented on the Dr Z video above).

    WHO is questioning the appropriateness of using the original vaccine composition (which was appropriate for the previous variant) as a booster to battle the latest variant.

    Equality and distribution aside, do you believe that they are questioning the effectiveness of the existing vaccines as a booster against Omicron?

    You would probably recall our previous discussions during the Delta outbreak and that I am generally pro-vaccine, to avoid severe disease and hospitilisation.

    However, at present, is there any significant benefit for vaccinated low-risk individuals in receiving a booster (obviously only currently available non-Omicron tailored vaccines, i.e. "the original vaccine composition"), given that:

    • They are already as protected against severe disease/hospitilisation as they are likely to be at present;
    • Omicron doesn't really give a shit about your temporary immunity boost;
    • The Omicron horse has already bolted (e.g. WHO estimates that 50% of Europe will soon be infected);
    • An Omicron-specific vaccine/booster is just around the corner (Pfizer estimates March 2022, and even they concede it may be DOA)."

    Source: WHO and Aljazeera

    https://www.who.int/news/item/11-01-2022-interim-statement-on-covid...

    https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2022/1/11/new-email-piles-more-p...

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

mongolian trotting duck replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"until albos money runs out sadly"
3 seconds ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Utokimanu 
Khafusi 
Dylan brown 
Russell 
Mahoney 
Stone 
Sanders
Blaze talagi 
Apa Twidle 
Alex Twal
What more do I have to.say. And you.are excusing the club for this unbelievable failure. 
We have 3 times the amount of developed juniors doing…"
16 minutes ago
Mitchy replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Agreed Anguillidae, but that is common sense and unfortunately will not win votes.....you only need to see how many people receive welfare and also how many govt jobs have been made in the last few years to see where $$$ go. And that is votes. NDIS…"
32 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"Agree, I'd go for them for sure."
48 minutes ago
Anguillidae replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Cut immigration and re-skill/upskill everyone on welfare - problem solved. We'll be rolling in revenue. But no, we can't expect everyone who is physically capable to actually contribute to society now, can we?"
51 minutes ago
Mitchy replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Thanks Daz, but again you have the wrong answer here but thats your view."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Well that's one person's view, but this is not the place to discuss it, is it DAZ!"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"I'd like to hear Chiefy's answer to Super's reality check. The irony of Chiefy's position is the myopic take on Stefano, if generalized, would see the club locking in very early on every green sprout and probably having zero recruitment room to move "
1 hour ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Exactly LB. People think you can force players to re-sign on favourable terms, as though they don't know they can get the best deal by having multiple clubs competing for them. That's why they wait until November. If you want them to sign early you…"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Mitchy, you've got to stop taking your economic plans DIRECTLY from the Libs. Most economists argue for boosting immigration to relieve labour shortage pressures and reduce inflation. Once that becomes 'cut migration but boost skilled migrant…"
1 hour ago
Darren Munro replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Do Parramatta sign him - Luai to become a free agent 27 , then Chiefs 2028
"How far off ea ,is Lokeni?"
3 hours ago
Darren Munro replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Do Parramatta sign him - Luai to become a free agent 27 , then Chiefs 2028
"Png are negotiating with joey manu. We should be at the table."
3 hours ago
JC replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"He is currently in career best form, stats so far this season, 
8 games
3 tries
7 try assists
6 line break assists
4 forced dropouts
90.7% tackle efficiency
87 average run mtrs per game
I wouldn't say no."
3 hours ago
Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Geeez Poppa that's rough having both shoulders redone, maybe leave your hotdog alone for a bit."
5 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Roy tannous's discussion You love to see it
"https://www.nine.com.au/sport/nrl/news-2026-craig-bellamy-neurodege...
Another reason why he should have pulled the pin."
7 hours ago
christeel replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Bahaha  !!!   poppy  since the  Bradman  era it's you  that's  been living  in denial  .... i see 3 pair's  of white  socks."
10 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2385

 

Jake Clifford?

Been a fan of this bloke for sometime.Strong kicking game,solid pass selection,good in the air and hard runner close to the line.With cows meeting with CHT and if they get him.Itll prob squeeze out cliffo.He'd actually go well with Moses I…

Read more…
27 Replies · Reply by Clintorian 48 minutes ago
Views: 1144

Parra 2027 2028 2029

Our ceiling is prtty limited for these yearsWhat can we really do next year?Not muchEven with a full squad sideEven with Seal Russell leaving (a big big up)Even with One signing8th would be over performing for 2027.Ryles will be either signed or…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Parra_Greg on Tuesday
Views: 909

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>