Jarryd Hayne wins his appeal

Its been reported today that Jarryd has finally been successful in appealing his rae conviction.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   This will not be widely accepted by those in the media but I for one remains very pleased with this overdue decision.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I'm with you Rich Haynes no angel but while there's a pub and bottle shop on every corner people will always get trouble. Years in jail doesn't fit the crime . Maybe I'm missing something 

    • My take was the media set out to paint him guilty and did so with relish. They won't be pleased with this Appeals outcome, for sure, lets see how they report on him now.

  • I'm stoked.

    But, where to now? Will be yet another trial? Does he still have a criminal record? Will the NRL have the kahunas to treat him like a human being now (if not publicly, discreetly)?

    Geez. Hayne's case is an encyclopaedia of lessons for young men - especially in what not to do.

    • Hi Hoe, I read where another trial is very unlikely. It seems like this will be the final word on the case. If it is its exoneration for Hayne at last. That being the case, the NRL would have to treat him as an innocent man and make him visible again. Hayne didnt help his case by appearing "aloof" in his trials and boy did the Media go after him for that. But Hayne has always looked like that and will never change his demeanour. In any case I'm glad for him.

      • Richard, thanks mate.

        Big wig, Justice SC, Deborah Sweeney concluded: "My own assessment of the quality and sufficiency of the evidence, I have a reasonable doubt that the applicant committed the offences charged."

        Seems she's on the same page as many of us.

        I've got no idea where this all puts him in the legal maze though. We need a lawyer here. I read a fourth trial is more likely than not. Would it not be an embarrassent for the DPP if they gave up, wouldn't it? 

        ‘Innocent’: Judge’s big call after Jarryd Hayne rape convictions overturned
        ‘Innocent’: Judge’s big call after Jarryd Hayne rape convictions overturned
  • Go Doctor

  • Sign him up I'd say. He'd still be miles quicker than the backline Brad Arthur left us with!! 🤣🤣🤣

  • Really hope this is the end of it for him.

    honestly enough is enough!

    • hi macy, its in the hands of the DPP now and making there deliberations for another trial. In their weighing they would note that one of the grounds on which the appeal was granted was the disallowed evidence concerning the 'victims" conversation with a woman (she had never met) on Snap-Chat. During the chat which occoured before and after h  er encounter with Hayne at no time did she say it was non-consensual. This bit of evidence, if allowed, would have been very beneficial to Haynes defence. In the remote case a 4th trial was considered the DPP would realise this bit of evidence would be allowed this time and weigh heavily in Haynes favour and could bring about a Not Guilty verdict. Best save embarasment now and end the vaudeville.

      • Hope so Richard! He must of spent millions so far another trial would be ridiculous.

        one thing I wonder, since two of the court cases were successfully appealed based on  judicial errors, can he sue for his legal costs on those? It doesn't seem fair he has had to fork out millions on top of everything else he has gone through.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"like many have mentioned the grit and ruck control were the highlight for me the compressed middle and discipline on the edge were definite standouts and a much deserved result for the grit on display.
The errors have been there since day 1 of this…"
29 minutes ago
Avon Barksdale replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion DISGRACEFUL REFEREEING AGAIN!!!
"It's a joke. It's obvious who the refs want to win. With no 6 agains, the ref is basically saying that the Raiders were always back 10 and markers were square every single ruck for 80 minutes "
35 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"I love Volkman's demeanour, he is so calm and level no matter what is going on in the game - at least that's how he appears on the outside. Moses doesn't do a good job of hiding his emotions and I believe it has an effect on those around him. I…"
1 hour ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"So happy for the win. They have played their guts out vs Knights, Dogs and Raiders so we deserved a win.
There is a lack of quality and playing their guts out won't save us when we can't complete sets because of park footy knock- ons.
We desperately…"
1 hour ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"He is a space cadet. Ryley gives us so much more."
6 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"All the arguments and negativity....apologies guys what a WIN GO PARRA ....one thing we may fight and disagree a great night"
6 hours ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"Sanders showed tonight he has a long way to go still. He was average at best."
6 hours ago
LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"Issue is, he is playing well lately, but also playing for a contract. If you can have him on a 1 year deal, sure why not. But on a long term deal could be a risk."
6 hours ago
JC replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion DISGRACEFUL REFEREEING AGAIN!!!
"The touchy called that one."
7 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"Totally get where you're coming from. I can't help but think how good he can be when he wants to. "
7 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"I understand where your coming from Angry but I still think we'd be better off using that roster spot for someone who will take that opportunity and prove they belong. He has a poor commitment level and professionalism."
7 hours ago
D_STOFFBERG replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1
"3 iongi, 2 Volkman, 1 kelma"
7 hours ago
Eels95 replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion DISGRACEFUL REFEREEING AGAIN!!!
"The forward pass one was a deadset disgrace.  I was in line with it. Went back 2m"
7 hours ago
Richard Jackson replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"Oh my beautiful boys....a win!  But getting punished by ziggy relentlessy with 6agains but alas none for us, our defence won us the game. and wthout a goal-kicker in the side. What about our 1st try. Samrani can do that, always surprising the…"
7 hours ago
Joel K replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1
"3 iongi
2 Williams
1 Volk and B Kelly"
7 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1
"3 Points - Canberra Angels, didn't give away one 6 again all game. Special mention to Ricky Stuart and his face after the loss. Priceless
2 Points -  Eels 63% Completions with 8 minutes to go , kept inviting the Raiders Back into the game. The…"
7 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>