Jarryd Hayne wins his appeal

Its been reported today that Jarryd has finally been successful in appealing his rae conviction.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   This will not be widely accepted by those in the media but I for one remains very pleased with this overdue decision.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I'm with you Rich Haynes no angel but while there's a pub and bottle shop on every corner people will always get trouble. Years in jail doesn't fit the crime . Maybe I'm missing something 

    • My take was the media set out to paint him guilty and did so with relish. They won't be pleased with this Appeals outcome, for sure, lets see how they report on him now.

  • I'm stoked.

    But, where to now? Will be yet another trial? Does he still have a criminal record? Will the NRL have the kahunas to treat him like a human being now (if not publicly, discreetly)?

    Geez. Hayne's case is an encyclopaedia of lessons for young men - especially in what not to do.

    • Hi Hoe, I read where another trial is very unlikely. It seems like this will be the final word on the case. If it is its exoneration for Hayne at last. That being the case, the NRL would have to treat him as an innocent man and make him visible again. Hayne didnt help his case by appearing "aloof" in his trials and boy did the Media go after him for that. But Hayne has always looked like that and will never change his demeanour. In any case I'm glad for him.

      • Richard, thanks mate.

        Big wig, Justice SC, Deborah Sweeney concluded: "My own assessment of the quality and sufficiency of the evidence, I have a reasonable doubt that the applicant committed the offences charged."

        Seems she's on the same page as many of us.

        I've got no idea where this all puts him in the legal maze though. We need a lawyer here. I read a fourth trial is more likely than not. Would it not be an embarrassent for the DPP if they gave up, wouldn't it? 

        ‘Innocent’: Judge’s big call after Jarryd Hayne rape convictions overturned
        ‘Innocent’: Judge’s big call after Jarryd Hayne rape convictions overturned
  • Go Doctor

  • Sign him up I'd say. He'd still be miles quicker than the backline Brad Arthur left us with!! 🤣🤣🤣

  • Really hope this is the end of it for him.

    honestly enough is enough!

    • hi macy, its in the hands of the DPP now and making there deliberations for another trial. In their weighing they would note that one of the grounds on which the appeal was granted was the disallowed evidence concerning the 'victims" conversation with a woman (she had never met) on Snap-Chat. During the chat which occoured before and after h  er encounter with Hayne at no time did she say it was non-consensual. This bit of evidence, if allowed, would have been very beneficial to Haynes defence. In the remote case a 4th trial was considered the DPP would realise this bit of evidence would be allowed this time and weigh heavily in Haynes favour and could bring about a Not Guilty verdict. Best save embarasment now and end the vaudeville.

      • Hope so Richard! He must of spent millions so far another trial would be ridiculous.

        one thing I wonder, since two of the court cases were successfully appealed based on  judicial errors, can he sue for his legal costs on those? It doesn't seem fair he has had to fork out millions on top of everything else he has gone through.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Hugh replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"thats a pretty fair point - Paul Stringer, Craig Stapleton are really good examples of that.
then just have to wait for a Glenn Morrison , David Solomona or Dean Widders like talent to pop up and look to come on board."
10 minutes ago
Wizardssleeves official receipts replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Brian Smith always recruited experienced players to complete the picture.  One old bloke who was without a contract isn't the Brian Smith blueprint. 
He'd also add 2 or 3 players in an offseason that could change the whole trans dynamics overnight.…"
48 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Fitzy had no idea how to build ongoing success, or build sucess at all. He was politically strong and connected, that was it. He ensured the club constitution was setup in a way that made it very hard to boot him out of office.
He got extremely…"
2 hours ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"That's the entire purpose of our junior development now. The entire focus is on those juniors. We have now got the largest junior investment in the competition. And that's what is partially frustrating about these discussions saying "where's our big…"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"They were when the club was a development first that's the difference what we were then is what we are trying to get back to I suspect.
Those 09 and 22 appearances tells you all you need to no about the club they aren't consistent and until we get…"
3 hours ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"2001? A squad built over a 5 year period culminating in one of the best NRL era teams of all time that fell at the final hurdle. The team that beat the defending premiers in the preliminary final.
2005. Again, a squad rebuilt following 2001 and a…"
3 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"This is it if you want sustained success it's the club across every level that is strong not just a coach or a particular administrator that's the key for success here we have to be top of class in the key categories and have the people that are the…"
4 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"101, take your meds or hand the phone to the other person who posts on your account.....I like them better"
4 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"How can you say we 'should have' made a grand final in a given year? When have we ever had the best or second best squad in the comp? Not since 1986. Any year we've made the grand final since then, we've overachieved."
5 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"BA had enough support, if not all were convinced. Not many clubs sack a coach immediately after a GF. But after it, there was a nuanced change in strategy up-top, which may have affected BA & seems to align with his emotional flatlining — when his…"
6 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"LB, do you get the feeling JR is ultimately aiming for a reasonably high footy IQ six? Not just your archetypical "running" six who can defend and has some ball skills.
Think his connection with Pezet. Walker. Iongi. He chose Junior over RCG. Foxxy…"
6 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Thats the bit that upsets me, we should have sacked BA after that GF for not taking it seriously. That 2020 squad should have also made the GF, same the 17 squad as well. "
6 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Well i can say we are going in the right direction, not rushing in to buy or sign anyone. Just annoyed over the 22 GF and that BA era. It really did upset me on how we handle the GF week and day and i just blame those at top that we should have been…"
6 hours ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"I do not know much on Fletcher either but i wonder if he is in the awkward spot of Moses still has another 4 years left and Fletcher could be looking at FG in 2 years. Does he wait? Or can he be a 5/8?
Overall of course you pick the best player out…"
6 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Defensively fragile and in free-fall post 2020, it's an illusory narrative, self-trickery, that we should have built on the 22' GF. It was an inevitable fall under the Jeckyl-Hyde defence and unadaptive coaching systems of the previous era."
6 hours ago
LB replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Right and the same board that brought Ryles in. I am not letting board off the hook as i have stated im holding my judgements til end of 2026 to see if it is working or not. I feel we would benefit from someone like Brian Smith at least with some…"
6 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>