Replies

  • Also available here in HD:

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qGFjrsfaatY

    • I challenge you to watch it Daz, I dare you

      • "Self-righteousness is a terrible thing in a believer". 
        See, challenge accepted, Brett. 
        Here is my challenge, in return. When will all the religious bigots hear that message and stop denigrating others?

        • Who is denigrating who ?

          • Brett, only religious bigots don't know the answer to that question. 

            • I'm assuming you are referring to me, I haven't denigrated anyone, certainly not based on whatever belief system they choose to believe in, but if you think so, then give me an example.

  • Just go and put your faith in the lord to keep you safe. Who needs Science, Medicine and Critical thought when you have power of the lord!

    • Science & Medicine are wonderful gifts from God, but my ultimate faith is in Him. And yes I have faith that He will, but even if He doesn't, I'll still stand in Him.

      • Serious question, in the ideological realm of Christian belief, where does this pandemic fit in? Sent by Lucifer? A punishment for our sins? All part of gods plan?

        • If it is in fact a serious question, the answer is that we live in a world corrupted by the sin of humanity. The Bible is clear that the wages of sin is death. The reason the world is in the collective chaos that it is in currently is through our collective disobedience to Him.

          It's not God's will that that it is the case, just the opposite, but He's not going to force us to live in obedience to Him. 

          God doesn't see the world in terms of good vs bad or right vs wrong the way mankind does, he sees it through the prism of life & death. If we live in obedience to Him, it brings us life, if we don't, it brings us death, and by death I mean it in the holistic sense, not just the narrow idea of physical death. It means spiritual death, which ultimately leads to physical death.

          Be assured God is not some cosmic wet blanket trying to stop us enjoying life or having fun, but he has put in place boundaries for us to live within, in the same way that as a father I do the same thing with my kids. I don't do it because I'm mean, but because I love them and I want the best for them. Sometimes they disobey me, and when that happens I have to discipline them.

          God is no different, except that His Love is pure.

           

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

HKF replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"Is taking him back a weak stance?, it's not as if he left on bad terms, people in the club are probably annoyed he made the decision to go but I doubt there is any animosity. 
I agree with what you are saying about the perception of being weak but I…"
4 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"I'm confident he'll come back, we stood right by him to walk and never left on bad terms. The people saying Ryles don't want him don't know shit. I bet Mitch Moses been in Ryles ear and ringing Lomax urging him to comeback. He's a top winger we need…"
23 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"Perceptions are changing, early days but the signs are good. Hop on board mate and enjoy the ride, it's better than whinging and whining about everything the club does."
25 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"I love that you think anyone respects us"
36 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"Same-Same with Matto, who I am pretty sure is only at training to get content for his gay Instagram posts"
40 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"The problem with taking a weak stance is respect is lost which is far more important (and harder to regain) than being appealing which is transient. It's a bit like finding out your missus fucked your best mate but you want to carry on the…"
43 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"Why they put the clause in was so he didn't leave for a year then want back in with say the Roosters or someone like that. In this case he sees out his deal and can't play elsewhere unless we say so. If he does come back for 2026 it's either here or…"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"I don't think he wants to play nrl anymore, seems interested in other things. "
1 hour ago
KENDOZA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"Lol"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
" R540?"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"I think I am going to call this version of you 101 and whatever the fuck the other guy is 102"
3 hours ago
Parra Dice replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"So R360 have done a 180?"
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"Yup HKF, and the agents would hate it even more, reinforcing that "bad light"
If he wants to return to the NRL I think the best we can hope for is a players swap
I am sure Margo Kneel will find a way to fuck it up though"
3 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"He'll come back too parra, why would they put the clause in. The put it in incase he wants to comeback hence why we haven't bought fuck all outside backs and haven't made a signings. He will be in eels gear in feb."
3 hours ago
HKF replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"I think the storm were happy to accommodate paps with his release as they had a younger player ready to take over."
3 hours ago
HKF replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 delayed 2 years
"The problem with taking such a strong stance is other players would look at the club in bad light and see the eels as an unfavourable destination. 
You can guarantee the players as a whole will support the return of lomax and paps."
3 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>