Moses , maybe a few others that have been mentioned , Fox and Lomax , the rest would be a stretch. if the found themselves short and in the market I'm sure Williams or Walker wouldn't find themselves in QLD cup very much either .
Poppa > Wizardssleeves official receiptsOctober 6, 2025 at 10:00pm
The interesting question here how good would we be if Reece was playing for us, I have a good mate (bestie) who is a out and out Broncos supporter and he reckons Walsh would be a sensational 5/8........I cannot disagree he has fantastic vision with the ball in his hands......don't worry I am not advocating we go after him ......there is more chance that Randolph will go fcuk himself before that would happen.
He did play some 5/8 at warriors and looked great there. Fullback gives him much more space however and he still gets his hands on the footy a bunch. Just smarter to leave him at the back like ponga
Yep well said. Ponga and Hayne are prime examples of the 6 experiment not working. Not saying it can't, Lockyer is case in point. Just do not see the need when I consider Fullback more important than a 6 when you have a 7 already.
Its not a 6 experiment in that sense, I never thought Hayne would work as a 5/8, he was always too lazy.
Different strokes for different blokes, no need to change Walsh but a lot of errors come from him being at the back. It all goes back to alternatives. Notwithstanding all that I am a great believer of, if it ain't broke dont fix it.
Walsh could be a great 6 but what is the fascination when there is a great Fullback they need to move to 6? I would rather a better Fullback than a 6 to be fair. Playing 1 allows more room to do what needs to be done, appearing both sides of the field.
Whenever there is a boom 1 "this kid can play, move him to 6"
Walsh can be a great 6, but he will always be a better Fullback.
I don't disagree but to rephrase a comment I always tell LB, they are not chess pieces.
The balance of the game is such that you make moves to suit the game and the position you are in. Chess is/has formula with constraints in movement, RL is much more spontaneous.
Lateral thinking is one of the great things you can do in life Randolph, don't restrict yourself with your locked in beliefs!!
"The race would be on to obtain one of Wanye Bennett's Femurs...it shouldn't be too hard to just tear it out of the middle of his leg.
If Ryles can get ahold of a Bennettt femur he will biblically smite them all"
Replies
Whoa. Wait up...... Are you saying that you are travellimg the country with 6 Rottweilers???
and Adelaide is full of churchy twats. Don't sweat it
Moses , maybe a few others that have been mentioned , Fox and Lomax , the rest would be a stretch. if the found themselves short and in the market I'm sure Williams or Walker wouldn't find themselves in QLD cup very much either .
The interesting question here how good would we be if Reece was playing for us, I have a good mate (bestie) who is a out and out Broncos supporter and he reckons Walsh would be a sensational 5/8........I cannot disagree he has fantastic vision with the ball in his hands......don't worry I am not advocating we go after him ......there is more chance that Randolph will go fcuk himself before that would happen.
0
He did play some 5/8 at warriors and looked great there. Fullback gives him much more space however and he still gets his hands on the footy a bunch. Just smarter to leave him at the back like ponga
Yep well said. Ponga and Hayne are prime examples of the 6 experiment not working. Not saying it can't, Lockyer is case in point. Just do not see the need when I consider Fullback more important than a 6 when you have a 7 already.
Its not a 6 experiment in that sense, I never thought Hayne would work as a 5/8, he was always too lazy.
Different strokes for different blokes, no need to change Walsh but a lot of errors come from him being at the back. It all goes back to alternatives. Notwithstanding all that I am a great believer of, if it ain't broke dont fix it.
Walsh could be a great 6 but what is the fascination when there is a great Fullback they need to move to 6? I would rather a better Fullback than a 6 to be fair. Playing 1 allows more room to do what needs to be done, appearing both sides of the field.
Whenever there is a boom 1 "this kid can play, move him to 6"
Walsh can be a great 6, but he will always be a better Fullback.
Yep..It's like this Ionghi to 5/8 garbage.
Don't mess with your strengths
I don't disagree but to rephrase a comment I always tell LB, they are not chess pieces.
The balance of the game is such that you make moves to suit the game and the position you are in. Chess is/has formula with constraints in movement, RL is much more spontaneous.
Lateral thinking is one of the great things you can do in life Randolph, don't restrict yourself with your locked in beliefs!!
Did you blank out on the keys midpost again? Stop drinking and press the Medalert buton...stat