Replies

  • Well then seems my source was correct

    • Yeah he'll need to sit down with Parra and work out his future, no way he's injured 😂😂

      • He already is doing that. The sticking point is transfer fee.

        • Should work that out and nab Pezet while he's still on the market. No point mucking around lol 

          • Then again why settle for less? He wants to break contract we should ask for compensation. And go to the NRL and do the same.

        • Transfer fee should be equivalent to his 2026 contract value. And there should be a clause that he is ineligible to sign for any other NRL club in the event he changes his mind or R360 folds, including the Perth Bears and PNG Cannibals, for the remaining duration of his contract term (i.e.: 2026-2028). Similar to what we did with Jamie Lyon in 2004. 

          • And what happened with Lyon? Haha

            More so a transfer fee, unless put back into the cap for extra is useless really. What would be more beneficial would be release him, we get his cap space and if he comes back we still hold a 3 year deal. If he wants to go to another NRL deal, player swaps are involved to our advantage or he can play for us.

            • I don't understand.....Lomax withdrew with a hip injury, Coates has his foot in plaster.

              No one else potentially involved in R360 is withdrawing from anything. 

              What am I missing here.....I feel I am in a school class of primary school kids?

              • Poppa he is not hurt. I posted here in the early afternoon yesterday he wanted out of Parra to go to Japan and he didn't want to go on Kangaroo tour. Not even a few hours after he withdraws.

                Conicidence? If so then it was a 1 in a million guess. But he is not hurt from i gathered.

                • Honestly LB how do you know for a  fact he is not carrying a hip injury. I guess we will all have to just wait see what is the actual truth 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Bob Smith replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"This contravenes code of conduct number 5."
3 hours ago
Bob Smith replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"This contravenes Guideline 4: sexist. "
3 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"No doubts about it. Hopefully this will make clubs second this before trying this with us again thinking we'll just rollover."
6 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to EA's discussion Eels Announce Junior Teams
"21-23 is the age I want to see if the club can retain the key to this crop of kids.
Thats for the most part where the bell toll's mentally and physically for these kids.
We just have to keep stacking the talent and identifying the next group…"
7 hours ago
More…