Replies

        • Okay, my take is that the Storm know this, and they can't have it drag out otherwise they lose out on him joining during Strom's pre-season, and a delayed court case will cost them more than he's actually worth, so they've tried to bring in the NRL to strong-arm Parra into a forced early decision hoping we won't fight.

          Well we are. I think they will see what the first early result is through the Supreme Courts, and make a decision based in what direction the wind is blowing. If it's going to be a difficult battle, watch Lomax get dropped quickly and V'landy's step in to try and go around the legal procedures. His priority is the NRL, and the team's the NRL owns, not Parra.

          Then you'll see bullshit PR assault on Parra celebrating Storm's approach to try and save Lomax and his career, and then shit-canning Parra the next couple of weeks to force them into a crappy deal so we can all just "move on" and not disrupt the 2026 season before it begins.

          • Your take is so wrong Clint, I am listing hereunder a direct quote from the clubs advice via Mathew Beach;s statement of Parra commencing legal action!

            “Our coaching staff, players, Members and fans would not expect us to consent to the release based on what has been offered, and therefore we have no alternative but to pursue legal action to enforce the terms of the release and protect the rights of our Club.”

            Now take note and I do not believe it has to be said, the NRL are powerless to do anything until after the court rules on Parra's right to enforce it. The NRL has no rights and its not in their interest's to see Lomax win those rights. 

            Why go on "crying poor me" you just make Parramatta seem useless and inconsequentual. There actions to date are nothing of that sort!

            Just let off the NRL bashing, it might make you and others  feel better, but it does nothing to enforce our case. Just be patient and let the courts do their job and Parramatta can hold on to its dignity. Public support across the spectrum is in our favour. Don't blow it by acting like losers.

            PS 

             The Melbourne Storm is 100% privately owned by a consortium of Melbourne-based businessmen, having transitioned away from News Ltd ownership in 2013. The ownership group is led by Chairman Matt Tripp, alongside Bart Campbell, Gerry Ryan OAM, and Brett Ralph. The club is held under Holding M.S. Australia Pty
            • "Just let off the NRL bashing..."

              HAHAHAHAHA, WHY? They have done nothing to support our cause and even attempted to mediate a rather insulting peace deal. They have shown absolutely ZERO leadership in this area. 

              • Can you show where that actually happened Freshie, I think you are believing the crap you read from the AI journos that write this shit...... mediation is what any governing body would do at this point and we have no idea what terms were discussed, if any.....simple thing is that the NRL have not made one! public comment!

                PS My statement about "let off the NRL bashing" is in context of the court procedure happening first. Patience and diplomacy is obviously not a strong point for the experienced judges we have on here!

                • I'm perfectly capable of analysing a situation and making up my own mind. I despise AI and have even managed to structure my own sentences in this response, without it. AMAZING! You can go on believing whatever you like I'll do exactly the same. From "10 year bans" to "no comment" says it all I think.

            • I think you've read my take a little wrong Poppa as the 'poor us' sentiment is not what i'm saying, neither is the ' NRL bashing'.

              The thought of V'landy's coming in and forcing a decision from us is wrong from most perspectives across the game and it's fans, and I have zero doubts that if we do win there will be a heavy PR battle we'll have to face.

              You are right, the NRL don't own the Storm anymore, but they are 100% one of the game's top prioritise to ensure their success and performance in the battleground state, and every action by the NRL has proved this year's... we all know this.

          • Hoping Beach and Sarantinos are made of sterner stuff than their forebears. They seem up for it

             

            • What they are made of now is irrelevant.....you could say the same about the Supreme Court.

              Once the court has their say you can wind up all the "players" (pun) from Parra, Storm and the NRL, even players assn...... but if the decision comes down in our favour (which it will)  and we have the sole descretionary take to decide, I would prefer to have the group of players mentioned on our side and not against us. The most obvious one being the NRL ( I would go out of the way to emphasise to them that "we us" and them won).....yes that's the royal "we" us and them!

              • It is cute that you think that, Bless!

                the NRL played dirty pool on us and they are the Really Big Guy in the room....so they need to be hit with a cue...or a ball...or an ashtray...you get my drift

            • Same Randy, just taking action in itself is a win for me. I wish I shared your optimism in the Courts Poppa, but historical bias doesn't have me feeling too confident. We. Will. See.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Anguillidae replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"I'm perfectly capable of analysing a situation and making up my own mind. I despise AI and have even managed to structure my own sentences in this response, without it. AMAZING! You can go on believing whatever you like I'll do exactly the same.…"
8 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Notwithstanding all the rhetoric LB and assume you are right. Would Zac believe it is in his interests to continue to persue the case legally (without Storm's involvement) as it then gives him rights to negotiate with anyone......within the NRL, the…"
8 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Same Randy, just taking action in itself is a win for me. I wish I shared your optimism in the Courts Poppa, but historical bias doesn't have me feeling too confident. We. Will. See."
17 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"I think you've read my take a little wrong Poppa as the 'poor us' sentiment is not what i'm saying, neither is the ' NRL bashing'.
The thought of V'landy's coming in and forcing a decision from us is wrong from most perspectives across the game and…"
20 minutes ago
More…