Replies

        • Notwithstanding all the rhetoric LB and assume you are right. Would Zac believe it is in his interests to continue to persue the case legally (without Storm's involvement) as it then gives him rights to negotiate with anyone......within the NRL, the only body he currently  cannot deal with. I assume his lawyer will decide if its in his interest's to persue.

          If ZAC has half a brain he would negotiate with Parra (assume they would listen to his plea) and discuss a contract to finish the year with Parra having a club option for another period. That at least would provide breathing room for all parties......I can see our fans going beserk over this but they left Simmonsson off the hook, stranger things happen?

          PS Lomax would start in Reserve Grade?

          • What if we do not have cap space for Lomax? We have 2 spots in our top 30, $120k minimum, to spend.

            So yeah we could have $600k left over but what if that all goes to Lomax and have no money to complete our top 30?

            • Well first things first, you don't know what cap issues are.....can be manipulated very easily.

              Lomax would be the 29th player, that would leave one more if someone became available. He realistically would not stay in Reserve Grade

              Now putting this in perspective, I would see it highly  unlikely probably about a 80/1 chance but cannot see the logic, when putting all the imponderables aside the last thing you would worry about is finding 600k for a player of Lomax's availability playing.

  • Lomax!  Sneaky, snake in the grass. Could nor trust him to not burn your toast. 

    • Lomax will burn your toast and NRL will smear the crud mess through our butter.

      I hate toast scrunge in my butter

  • Japan please give Zac a job

    • No-one wants to eat raw fish off a hairy smelly aussie who will stand up & walk out in the middle of your meal

  • All I know is Parra need to win this case the bigger picture needs it.You would like to think this is an open and shit case but I feel the devil is in the details and fine print.

    Hope the fine print goes in our favour there's big picture ramifications if we can't get this van over the line.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"It would NOT be subjudice for Vlandys to state that they consider a contract, which they registered, binding sans a court intervention...thats a furphy
 "
4 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"I would hire a guy that is just as big...ummm.errr..The call to your mate may be cut short by the ashtray's arrival.
V'handys wants WWE. Lets give him a show. Drag him into the ring and hit him with a fucking chair till he goes tits-up.
Hoe…"
16 minutes ago
Acme replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Do you mean 2027? Or are you just defiantly holding your ground 😁"
32 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Lomax will burn your toast and NRL will smear the crud mess through our butter.
I hate toast scrunge in my butter"
46 minutes ago
More…