Played over 50 first grade games, plenty of speed very talented and can play multiple positions ready to find his potential in the right team and I'd imagine at a bargain price.. Definately more upside then a few of the flops we have now! Do we try and sign him?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
More coaching, we are acting like Lomax has always been a Winger and moved to Centre for a year and failed. He played numerous seasons at Centre for Dragons. Turns out he is a better Winger. If he is moved back to Centre then fair i have no issues with it but many here were abusing Ryles to move Lomax back to the Wing, now they want him to move him back?
He still needs coaching. He made some poor reads and looked out of place . Nobody's saying he needs to go down the park with his dad and practise basic drills . But he certainly needs some video work on positional plays .
Mate lomax has had years as a centre.. His spot wing!
So if Lomax is a Winger to you, JAC is on the other, where does Sloan fit?
Certainly IS a good mover to get around the hammer. Lomax would need another offseason at centre.
His speed and attacking prowess would be great to have but I think we are well stocked in wingers and fullback for top 17.
centre is only where I can fit him and he is not a centre , plus I would like to see twiddle given a go at centre
we need forwards simple
Twiddle isn't in the convo right now for first grade, Sloan has experience.
So you would put Sloan at Centre?
Yeah I would actually doesn't seem to be much competition there if dumb and dumber keep getting named there, also back up for wing and fullback.
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
of 11 Next