The Wests Tigers will grant Lachlan Galvin permission to negotiate with rival clubs but will attach a transfer fee of around $165,000 to his early release.
Tigers officials reached an agreement with Galvin’s management on Thursday that will allow the playmaker to open discussions with clubs about joining them before the June 30 transfer deadline.
The Tigers have demanded that all negotiations are based on the prerequisite that of around a $165,000 fee will be payable to the club for his release.
The Wests Tigers board met on Monday and agreed on the need to put the Galvin saga to bed, but chief executive Shane Richardson wanted a positive outcome for the club.
Galvin last month informed the Tigers of his desire to depart at the end of his contract, which runs until the end of 2026, with his manager Isaac Moses knocking back Richardson’s attempts to offer him a lucrative upgrade and extension offer worth close to $6 million.
Galvin is on the radar of the Parramatta Eels, while whispers about a move to the Bulldogs have grown louder in recent weeks despite a public declaration by general manager Phil Gould that his club would not pursue Galvin’s services.
“We are not involved in the Lachlan Galvin discussion and we won’t be involved in the Lachlan Galvin discussion,” Gould said. “We wish him all the best.”
The Bulldogs are yet to offer incumbent halfback Toby Sexton an extension and don’t appear in a hurry to lock down their No.7, who became a free agent last November.
Parramatta haven’t hidden their desire to lure Galvin, a childhood Eels supporter. Parramatta coach Jason Ryles sees Galvin as the ideal replacement for the Newcastle-bound Dylan Brown, who will join the Knights next year on a record $13 million deal over 10 years.
“I made my [interest] clear a couple of weeks ago. That hasn’t changed, so we’ll wait and see what happens,” Ryles said.
“The rule is you can’t negotiate until they get permission to, so until that happens we’ll keep our position there. Lots of strange things happen in footy [though], but we’ll make sure we do the right thing with the NRL.”
It comes as Brisbane skipper Adam Reynolds confirmed Danny Weidler’s report on Nine’s 100% Footy a fortnight ago that he had received interest from the Tigers about playing on at the joint venture club next year if he was unable to strike a deal with the Broncos.
“Yes, there’s been interest from the Tigers, but no actual offer,” Reynolds said late on Thursday.
“I’ve always had a lot of time for Benji, and I spent a few years playing junior footy at Leichhardt. But I want to stress my main priority is getting a deal done in Brisbane. That’s where I want to be. And I’m confident we’ll get something sorted.
“If my future isn’t in Brisbane, then naturally I’d have to look elsewhere. It’s nice to know the Tigers have shown interest.”
The idea of Reynolds running the side and allowing Jarome Luai to revert to his old No. 6 role would be sure to excite Tigers fans.
Replies
hahahah Gus Gould. Dont you love how he was explaining to everyone a few years ago, that to have a winning club it must come from your juniors, whilst he promptly went out and bought other teams best players circumventing the cap with Laundy Hotel investment shares with guaranteed returns to boost their contracts.
Going to be funny when then juniors leave cause all the spots are filled with other clubs players, Gus is all air 😂
Yeah I'm hearing you Bluey. What he says and what he does are two very different things. The panthers took off as soon as Ivan convinced them to get rid of him. At Canterbury all he's done is buy players and somehow manage to move contracted players on, pay their wages and still buy a bunch of players. But you can't deny it's worked and he's somehow managed to keep the NRL from asking questions.
Im just saying , if he manages to fit this kid in for this season then he's a magician.
Parra Leagues can get that out of a single poker machine from Friday night.
I believe that 165k would be paying for part contract for 2026. It's a bargain to get a quality player. So it's not a transfer fee and would definitely be on the cap.
If they classify as a transfer fee, it doesn't go on cap. It goes on soft cap which is the footy dept which is about 5m. We are not spending anywhere near that on footy dept
titan its not on any cap
Longfin I heard Chammis last night say that the 'fee' was outside the cap. Anyway we will see who ends up with Galvin; from the media it seems as though things are moving quick as per Reynolds being on the Tigers radar.
Issue for Parra is Brown would need to leave unless Parra have room in the cap now and Ryles keeps Brown but I do not see how they all fit.
Surely we've got room in the cap after releasing both RCG and Gutherson early.
Not just them, Ofahengaue as well.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next