An AI version of of a current story
A senior journalist was reportedly removed from Channel 9’s 100% Footy program on Monday night at the request of Parramatta Eels star Mitchell Moses and his manager, Isaac Moses. This development underscores the significant influence Isaac Moses holds within the NRL landscape. Previously, he managed the “Big Four” at the Wests Tigers—James Tedesco, Luke Brooks, Aaron Woods, and Mitchell Moses—during a pivotal contract period, resulting in only Brooks re-signing with the club .
Isaac Moses’s influence has been a topic of discussion in rugby league circles. In 2020, the NRL deregistered him after finding he had breached his obligations as an accredited agent by assisting a client, Tim Mannah, in providing false evidence during an investigation . Despite this, he has since regained his accreditation and continues to be a prominent figure in player management.
The incident involving the journalist’s removal from 100% Footy raises questions about the extent of player and agent influence over media content in the NRL. It also highlights ongoing concerns about transparency and control within the sport’s media coverage.
Replies
thats how he plays, a real b***h instead of just playing the game
Clever Wiz, LOL
Sleep over tonight Wiz.....we could talk about all the positives in DB's game against Newcastle?
As someone who works in the media, this is a bs story. It happens every day, a guest is not going to come on if there is someone there they don't like. So the journalist sat out. lol, acting like Isaac Moses is Al Capone
I'd be keen to hear other examples of NRL players and their managers demanding panelists sit out ? Happens every day, you must be able to share quite an extensive list with us ?
Probably no examples you twat, just logic. People don't need to run things by the public or yourself.
He's not demanding anything, he just has terms to him coming on the show because this journo was probably a prick to him. I don't have to justify anything to you buddy
Just asking for some names of other players so we can use them as comparisons for the discussion , you seemed like this was common occurrence in the NRL. Touchy much.
Journo wrote an article about his manager rorting the salary cap. Being in the media and all, I thought you'd know this.
Great chat , Weidler .
"works in the media ........... "
Why do you keep pinning it on Mitch? It's clearly Isaac who has the issue with Chammas
Issac works for Mitch , not the other way around. Yes Issac has the grudge , but Mitch is ultimately the one who's making the descisions. Nobody wants to have Issac on their show.
But Isaac works for Mitch. Isaac's decisions should be for betterment of his client, not the other way around.
how does this decision help Mitchell our club captain in the PR stakes ??
tbh I find Chammas to be the best of a very bad bunch in his reporting. It was Richardson who technically blew this whole matter up and his fault he wanted the private discussion made public.