THE $1,200,000 PER SEASON QUESTION!

 

 Here is the question...... Do you believe spending $1,200,000 per season for Moses will increase the chances of the Eels winning a premiership, or, do you think if the Eels signed a proven premiership-winning coach with $1,200,000 plus available to him for signing a star or several players would be a better option?

 

 In my opinion, paying the best part of $3,000,000 per season for Gutho, Brown, and Moses is way too much. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • So Marty you get Tindall for a song say 300k for a season and he turns into a better player than Moses, are you going to pay him 1.2m next year as well, because that is what the market is all about.

      PS Don't get me to pay for an extra parachute, you still have a job to do in England. 

      • I'd sign him for 2 seasons on 450k year , and Mikaele so saves plenty

  • 10999801669?profile=RESIZE_930x

     

    He is choosing between two top teams - Not. It must be all about the money. 

    • It's a tight competition so far this year, looks like anything can happen and it's going to be around a legitimate 6/7 horse race.

  • But Slippery your not paid to make such decisions and you don't know what they are paid or how it is made up. You are also not in the market that they are in with a limited amount of merchadise.....

    I say regularly to you blokes a market is what you pay for, its not like a big window where you pick what you want or a chess board with set pieces,

    •  

       I totally understand what you are saying regarding market value, but, market value can make some big mistakes, so big it can cripple a club for 5 or more years. How about for this discussion we talk about "our own value estimation"?

       

       So working around a salary cap of $12,500,000 spread through 30 players. That gives an average per player of roughly $416,666 per player. I don't see the value in Moses taking anything near 3 players' share. In my opinion, if Moses is worth $1,200,000 per season the real top-line players (automatic origin selections, x-factor type players) must be worth close to $2,000,000 per season. 

       

       Many clubs are struggling in the halves yet from what I understand only 2 of 17 clubs are interested in Moses. Why? I bet if a more realistic price tag was attached to Moses, many more clubs would be interested. 

      • This reply was deleted.
        • So you reckon he played us less than two years ago when we were blessed with his loyalty and he apparently knocked back the Broncos offer? 

          Or has he only just built his business empire in the last year and a half?  He's certainly been busy in that time , apparently he didn't even have family here back then. 

  • IMO he is worth $1,026,597 per year and not a cent more.

  • I always smile when I see people say "he's only worth $800k". Fair enough everyone is entitled to an opinion but that's not how player prices are determined. It's a bidding war between clubs that determines price end of story. 
    That said, the Eels should also have a ceiling and be prepared not to budge from it. For many reasons Moses should have signed by now. If he wants to stay at Parra he has an excellent offer on the table. His refusal to sign it is poor form and an act of poor faith by him and his manager. We can't go much longer without a halfback for 2024. 

    • This is how I see it playing out

      • We can safely assume that he's not leaving to go to the Tigers. They are at best, a 5% chance of landing him, and those odds are lengthening by the day. But it's still a possibility the Eels can't take for granted. 
      • MM knows this is his last big contract and obviously wants to maximise it, at a guess he wants to earn $6m over the next 5 years.
      • The variable is his 2024 option, presumably for his current salary of 950k. 
      • The club is only prepared to pay him top dollars from 2025-2028, let's say that's $1.2m per season, that's $4.8m over 4 years, plus his 950k for 2024 if he takes up his option. That's a total of $5.75m over 5 years. It's 250k short of what he wants. 
        So, either he takes up his option and the Eels have to pay more from 25-28, or he doesn't take up his option and the Eels give him the 5th year at $1.2m.

      What it really comes down to is that MM wants a 250k pay rise for 2024. 
      He has the ace in the hole with his option, he knows it, and that's why he's playing hardball.

      Smart. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Foetal Position: To Be or Not To Be?
"NOS, excellent post, buddy. It did bring a chuckly.
I would agreeably disagree. The majority of posts, recently, lean towards "outrage" and "frustration". Poo-bombing perhaps, without running with your intelligent Capuchin Monkey fun fact.
There is…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Foetal Position: To Be or Not To Be?
"Tanky, you missed the point. Cameron's ability to be realistic & clear-headed facing difficult circumstances is a trained-habit or characteristic of good leaders: They can't lose their heads or pants when times are tough & uncomfortable. Punters can…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Foetal Position: To Be or Not To Be?
"Captain, that’s a well thought out and a balanced, measured response, as usual. Kudos.
I get why people are angry and outraged over the optics. I just don’t think anger and optics, blowing up the cap, is a brilliant recruitment strategy.
Why did we…"
1 hour ago
Frank The Tank replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Foetal Position: To Be or Not To Be?
"Hey Wiz.
Think Semi played for Australia at some point. Not sure how many times but I do remember him representing at least a few times before representing Fiji."
1 hour ago
More…